Texts to 22 Oct 2026

Data Act· Article 2

Text

Article 2 Data Act as printed in the Council text of 22 October 2026

Definitions

Source Council, 22 October 2026. Article 2: ST 14756/26, page 62 · Article 2 · pp. 62–68 · exact text page

Article 2(4a)

(4a)

‘consent’ means consent as defined in Article 4, point (11), of Regulation (EU) 2016/679;

Article 2(4b)

(4b)

‘permission’ in the context of Chapters VIIa and VIIc means giving data users the right to the processing of non-personal data;

Article 2(4c) Dropped

This Council draft drops the change the Commission proposed. It deletes nothing from the law in force.

Article 2(10)

(10)

‘data intermediation service’ means a service which aims to establish relationships of an economic character for the purposes of data sharing between an undetermined number of data subjects or data holders and data users, through technical, legal or other means, including for the purpose of exercising the rights of data subjects in relation to personal data, and which:

(a)

does not have as its main purpose the intermediation of copyright-protected content;

(b)

is not jointly procured by several legal persons for exclusive use among them;

Article 2(13)

(13)

‘data holder’ means a natural or legal person that has the right or obligation, in accordance with this Regulation, applicable Union law or national legislation adopted in accordance with Union law, to use or make available data, including, where contractually agreed, product data or related service data, which it has retrieved or generated during the provision of a related service;

Article 2(28)

(28)

‘public sector body’ means the State, national, regional or local authorities of the Member States and bodies governed by public law of the Member States, or associations formed by one or more such authorities or one or more such bodies.

Article 2(28a)

(28a)

‘bodies governed by public law’ means bodies that have all of the following characteristics:

Article 2(28a)(a)

(a)

they are established for the specific purpose of meeting needs in the general interest, not having an industrial or commercial character;

Article 2(28a)(b)

(b)

they have legal personality;

Article 2(28a)(c)

(c)

they are financed, for the most part by the State, national, regional or local authorities, or by other bodies governed by public law; or are subject to management supervision by those authorities or bodies; or have an administrative, managerial or supervisory board, more than half of whose members are appointed by the State, national, regional or local authorities, or by other bodies governed by public law;

Article 2(28b)

(28b)

‘public undertaking’ means any undertaking over which a public sector body may exercise directly or indirectly a dominant influence by virtue of their ownership of it, their financial participation therein, or the rules which govern it. A dominant influence on the part of the public sector bodies shall be presumed in any of the following cases in which those bodies, directly or indirectly:

Article 2(28b)(a)

(a)

hold the majority of the undertaking's subscribed capital;

Article 2(28b)(b)

(b)

control the majority of the votes attaching to shares issued by the undertaking;

Article 2(28b)(c)

(c)

can appoint more than half of the undertaking's administrative, management or supervisory body;;

Article 2(38a)

(38a)

‘data altruism’ means the voluntary sharing of data on the basis of the consent of data subjects to process personal data pertaining to them, or of permissions of data holders to allow the use of their non-personal data without seeking or receiving a reward that goes beyond compensation related to the costs that they incur where they make their data available for objectives of general interest as provided for in national law, where applicable, such as healthcare, combating climate change, improving mobility, facilitating the development, production and dissemination of official statistics, improving the provision of public services, public policy making or scientific research purposes in the general interest;

Article 2(38a) Dropped

This Council draft drops the change the Commission proposed. It deletes nothing from the law in force.

Article 2(39)

The Council draft deletes this provision and supplies no replacement wording. Open the official source to read the instruction in context.

The amending passage as printed

(ea) point (39) is deleted.

Article 2(42)

(42)

‘common specifications’ means a set of technical requirements, other than a standard, that provides means of complying with certain requirements and obligations established under this Regulation.

Article 2(44)

(44)

‘medium-sized enterprise’ means a medium-sized enterprise as defined in point 2 of Annex I to Recommendation 2003/361/EC;

Article 2(45)

(45)

‘small mid-cap’ or ‘SMC’ means a small mid-cap enterprise as defined in point 2 of the Annex to Commission Recommendation (EU) 2025/1099;

Article 2(46)

(46)

‘university’ means any public sector body that provides post-secondary-school higher education leading to academic degrees;

Article 2(47)

(47)

‘standard licence’ means a set of predefined re-use conditions in a digital format, preferably compatible with standardised public licences available online;

Article 2(48)

(48)

‘document’ means:

(a)

any content that is non-digital whatever its medium (paper or as a sound, visual or audiovisual recording); or

(b)

any part of such content;

Article 2(49)

(49)

‘dynamic data’ in the context of Chapter VIIc means data, subject to frequent or real-time updates, in particular because of their volatility or rapid obsolescence; data generated by sensors are typically considered to be dynamic data;

Article 2(50)

(50)

‘research data’ means data, other than scientific publications, which are collected or produced in the course of scientific research activities and are used as evidence in the research process, or are commonly accepted in the research community as necessary to validate research findings or results;

Article 2(51)

(51)

‘re-use’ means the use by natural or legal persons of data or documents held by:

(a)

public sector bodies, for commercial or non-commercial purposes other than the initial purpose within the public task for which the data or documents were produced, except for the exchange of data or documents between public sector bodies purely in pursuit of their public tasks; or

(b)

public undertakings, under Chapter VIIc Section 2 for commercial or non-commercial purposes other than for the initial purpose of providing services in the general interest for which the data or documents were produced, except for the exchange of data or documents between public undertakings and public sector bodies purely in pursuit of the public tasks of public sector bodies;

Article 2(52)

(52)

‘high-value datasets’ means data and documents the re-use of which is associated with important benefits for society, the environment and the economy, in particular because of their suitability for the creation of value-added services, applications and new, high-quality and decent jobs, and because of the number of potential beneficiaries of the value-added services and applications based on those data and documents;

Article 2(53)

(53)

‘certain categories of protected data’ means data held by public sector bodies which are protected on the grounds of

(a)

commercial confidentiality, including business, professional and company secrets;

(b)

statistical confidentiality;

(c)

the protection of intellectual property rights of third parties; or

(d)

the protection of personal data, insofar as such data fall outside the scope of Section 2 of Chapter VIIc;

Article 2(54)

(54)

‘secure processing environment’ means the physical or virtual environment and organisational means to ensure compliance with Union law in particular with regard to data subjects’ rights, intellectual property rights, and commercial and statistical confidentiality, integrity and accessibility, as well as with applicable national law, and to allow the entity providing the secure processing environment to determine and supervise all data processing actions, including the display, storage, download and export of data and the calculation of derivative data through computational algorithms;

Article 2(55)

(55)

‘re-user’ means a natural or legal person who was granted the right to re-use data or documents held by a public sector body or a public undertaking under Chapter VIIc or to research data or certain categories of protected data;

Article 2(56)

(56)

‘machine-readable format’ means a file format structured so that software applications can easily identify, recognise and extract specific data, including individual statements of fact, and their internal structure;

Article 2(57)

(57)

‘open format’ means a format that is platform-independent and made available to the public without any restriction that impedes the re-use of data;

Article 2(58)

(58)

‘formal open standard’ means a standard which has been laid down in written form, detailing specifications for the requirements on how to ensure software interoperability;

Article 2(59)

(59)

‘reasonable return on investment’ means a percentage of the overall charge, in addition to the amount needed to recover the eligible costs, not exceeding 5 percentage points above the fixed interest rate of the ECB;

Article 2(60)

(60)

‘data localisation requirement’ means any obligation, prohibition, condition, limit or other requirement provided for in the laws, regulations or administrative provisions of a Member State or resulting from general and consistent administrative practices in a Member State and in bodies governed by public law, including in the field of public procurement, without prejudice to Directive 2014/24/EU, which imposes the processing of data in the territory of a specific Member State or hinders the processing of data in any other Member State;

Article 2(61)

(61)

‘draft act’ means a text drafted for the purpose of being enacted as a law, regulation or administrative provision of a general nature, the text being at the stage of preparation at which substantive amendments can still be made;

Article 2(62)

(62)

‘pseudonymisation’ means pseudonymisation as referred to under Article 4(5) of Regulation (EU) 2016/679.

Article 2 in the whole Data Act

How each point has changed

Show the statuses
What each text would do to the law in force
Point Commission19 Nov 2025Council10 Jun 2026Council18 Jun 2026Council3 Sep 2026Council2 Oct 2026Council22 Oct 2026 Parliamentamendments
Compared withlaw in forcethe proposal10 Jun text18 Jun text3 Sep text2 Oct text
(4a)‘consent’ Adds Added Adds Unchanged Adds Unchanged Adds Unchanged Adds Unchanged Adds Unchanged 4
(4b)Point (4b) Adds Added Adds , changed since the proposal Changed Adds Unchanged Adds Unchanged Adds Unchanged Adds Unchanged 5
(4c)‘access’ Adds Added Not in the law in force or this text , dropped since the proposal Dropped Not in the law in force or this text In neither text Not in the law in force or this text In neither text Not in the law in force or this text In neither text Not in the law in force or this text In neither text 17
(10)‘data intermediation service’ No change Unchanged Amends , rewritten since the proposal Rewritten Amends Unchanged Amends , changed since 18 Jun Changed Amends Unchanged Amends Unchanged 3
(13)‘data holder’ Amends Changed Amends Unchanged Amends Unchanged Amends Unchanged Amends Unchanged Amends Unchanged 6
(28)‘public sector body’ No change Unchanged No change Unchanged Amends , changed since 10 Jun Changed Amends Unchanged Amends Unchanged Amends Unchanged 0
(28a)‘bodies governed by public law’ Adds Added Adds , rewritten since the proposal Rewritten Adds , changed since 10 Jun Changed Adds Unchanged Adds , changed since 3 Sep Changed Adds Unchanged 7
(28b)‘public undertaking’ Adds Added Adds , rewritten since the proposal Rewritten Adds , rewritten since 10 Jun Rewritten Adds Unchanged Adds , changed since 3 Sep Changed Adds Unchanged 7
(38a)‘data intermediation service’ Adds Added Not in the law in force or this text , dropped since the proposal Dropped Not in the law in force or this text In neither text Not in the law in force or this text In neither text Not in the law in force or this text In neither text Not in the law in force or this text In neither text 19
(38b)‘data altruism’ Adds Added Adds Unchanged printed (38a) Adds Unchanged printed (38a) Adds Unchanged printed (38a) Adds Unchanged printed (38a) Adds Unchanged printed (38a) 10
(39)‘smart contract’ No change Unchanged Deletes , deleted since the proposal Deleted Deletes Unchanged Deletes Unchanged Deletes Unchanged Deletes Unchanged 0
(42)‘common specifications’ No change Unchanged Amends , changed since the proposal Changed Amends Unchanged Amends Unchanged Amends Unchanged Amends Unchanged 0
(44)‘medium-sized enterprise’ Adds Added Adds , changed since the proposal Changed Adds Unchanged Adds Unchanged Adds Unchanged Adds Unchanged 4
(45)Point (45) Adds Added Adds , changed since the proposal Changed Adds Unchanged Adds Unchanged Adds Unchanged Adds Unchanged 5
(46)‘university’ Adds Added Adds , changed since the proposal Changed Adds Unchanged Adds Unchanged Adds Unchanged Adds Unchanged 4
(47)‘standard licence’ Adds Added Adds Unchanged Adds Unchanged Adds Unchanged Adds Unchanged Adds Unchanged 4
(48)‘document’ Adds Added Adds Unchanged Adds Unchanged Adds Unchanged Adds Unchanged Adds Unchanged 4
(50)Point (50) Adds Added Adds , changed since the proposal Changed printed (49) Adds Unchanged printed (49) Adds Unchanged printed (49) Adds Unchanged printed (49) Adds Unchanged printed (49) 10
(51)‘research data’ Adds Added Adds , changed since the proposal Changed printed (50) Adds Unchanged printed (50) Adds Unchanged printed (50) Adds Unchanged printed (50) Adds Unchanged printed (50) 8
(52)‘re-use’ Adds Added Adds , changed since the proposal Changed printed (51) Adds Unchanged printed (51) Adds Unchanged printed (51) Adds Unchanged printed (51) Adds Unchanged printed (51) 7
(53)‘high-value datasets’ Adds Added Adds Unchanged printed (52) Adds Unchanged printed (52) Adds Unchanged printed (52) Adds Unchanged printed (52) Adds Unchanged printed (52) 6
(54)‘certain categories of protected data’ Adds Added Adds Unchanged printed (53) Adds Unchanged printed (53) Adds , changed since 18 Jun Changed printed (53) Adds Unchanged printed (53) Adds Unchanged printed (53) 7
(56)‘secure processing environment’ Adds Added Adds Unchanged printed (54) Adds Unchanged printed (54) Adds Unchanged printed (54) Adds Unchanged printed (54) Adds Unchanged printed (54) 4
(57)‘re-user’ Adds Added Adds Unchanged printed (55) Adds Unchanged printed (55) Adds Unchanged printed (55) Adds Unchanged printed (55) Adds Unchanged printed (55) 4
(58)‘machine-readable format’ Adds Added Adds Unchanged printed (56) Adds Unchanged printed (56) Adds Unchanged printed (56) Adds Unchanged printed (56) Adds Unchanged printed (56) 6
(59)‘open format’ Adds Added Adds , changed since the proposal Changed printed (57) Adds Unchanged printed (57) Adds Unchanged printed (57) Adds Unchanged printed (57) Adds Unchanged printed (57) 5
(60)‘formal open standard’ Adds Added Adds Unchanged printed (58) Adds Unchanged printed (58) Adds Unchanged printed (58) Adds Unchanged printed (58) Adds Unchanged printed (58) 7
(61)‘reasonable return on investment’ Adds Added Adds Unchanged printed (59) Adds Unchanged printed (59) Adds Unchanged printed (59) Adds Unchanged printed (59) Adds Unchanged printed (59) 4
(61)‘draft act’new in ST 10426/26 Not in the law in force or this text In neither text Adds , added since the proposal Added Adds Unchanged Adds Unchanged Adds Unchanged Adds Unchanged 0
(62)‘data localisation requirement’ Adds Added Adds Unchanged printed (60) Adds Unchanged printed (60) Adds Unchanged printed (60) Adds Unchanged printed (60) Adds Unchanged printed (60) 4
(63)‘pseudonymisation’ Adds Added Adds Unchanged printed (62) Adds Unchanged printed (62) Adds Unchanged printed (62) Adds Unchanged printed (62) Adds Unchanged printed (62) 4
Definitions only Parliament would add or change21 terms, including ‘collective negotiation’ and ‘connected product’ Not in the law in force or this text In neither text Not in the law in force or this text In neither text Not in the law in force or this text In neither text Not in the law in force or this text In neither text Not in the law in force or this text In neither text Not in the law in force or this text In neither text 33

Each text against the law in force: +Adds adds a provision the law in force lacks~Amends amends the law in force−Deletes deletes a provision of the law in force=No change leaves the law in force as it is— neither the law in force nor the text has it changed from the text before

Each text against the text before it: +Added in this text, not in the text before~Changed wording changed~Rewritten under half the earlier wording survives−Deleted deletes a provision of the law in force−Dropped drops a provision the text before added=Unchanged same as the text before— in neither text

What each text does

  1. 19 Nov 2025 Commission proposalCOM(2025) 837 Amends Adds points (4a), (4b), (4c), (28a), (28b), (38a), (38b), (44) to (48), (50) to (54) and (56) to (63) and amends point (13), ‘data holder’.Article 2(41): The official text leaves out the opening quotation mark of the defined term; the tracker adds it back and changes no words. Article 2 in this text
  2. 5 Jun 2026 JURI draft opinion · Brando Benifei (rapporteur)JURI-PA-789142 11 amendments to this article. Amendments in this document
  3. 8 Jun 2026 IMCO draft opinion · Alex Agius Saliba (rapporteur)IMCO-PA-789877 9 amendments to this article. Amendments in this document
  4. 10 Jun 2026 Council textST 10426/26 Changed Adds point (61), ‘draft act’, changes points (4b), (42), (44) to (46), (50) to (52) and (59), rewrites points (10), (28a) and (28b), drops points (4c) and (38a) and deletes point (39), ‘smart contract’. Article 2 in this text
  5. 18 Jun 2026 Council textST 10677/26 Changed Changes points (28) and (28a) and rewrites point (28b), ‘public undertaking’. Article 2 in this text
  6. 22 Jun 2026 ITRE–LIBE draft report · Aura Salla and Marina Kaljurand (rapporteurs)CJ72-PR-786818 3 amendments to this article. Amendments in this document
  7. 29 Jun 2026 JURI amendments 69–296 to the draft opinionJURI-AM-790236 20 amendments to this article. Amendments in this document
  8. 16 Jul 2026 IMCO amendments 125–328 to the draft opinionIMCO-AM-790905 23 amendments to this article. Amendments in this document
  9. 27 Jul 2026 ITRE–LIBE amendments 527–776 to the draft reportCJ72-AM-791071 41 amendments to this article. Amendments in this document
  10. 3 Sep 2026 Council textST 12535/26 Changed Changes points (10) and (54). Article 2 in this text
  11. 2 Oct 2026 Council textST 13886/26 Changed Changes points (28a) and (28b). Article 2 in this text
  12. 22 Oct 2026 Council textST 14756/26 Unchanged Same as the text before. Article 2 in this text

Point (4a): ‘Consent’

New definition proposed by the Commission

Parliament amendments 4

3 would delete the definition and 1 proposes alternative wording. Deletion amendments come from Greens/EFA. 1 more, which add new definitions, is listed by term.

By political group; co-sponsored amendments count for each group
TypeS&DGreens/EFA
− Deletion·3
~ Alternative1·

By political group

  • − Deletion Greens/EFA 3
  • ~ Alternative S&D 1

Show

  1. 148 Deletion David CormandGreens/EFA · JURI Deletes the definition

    Tracker noteThe amendment names this article, but which paragraph or point it changes has not been automatically established, so it is not yet linked to a specific point.

    (4c) ‘access’ means data use, in accordance with specific technical, legal or organisational requirements, without necessarily implying the transmission or downloading of data;

    Tabled by
    David Cormand
    Group
    Greens/EFA
    Targets
    Data Act Article 2
    Document
    JURI amendments 69–296 to the draft opinion
    Printed header
    Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a / Regulation (EU) 2023/2854 / Article 2
  2. 151 Deletion David CormandGreens/EFA · JURI Deletes the definition

    Tracker noteThe amendment names this article, but which paragraph or point it changes has not been automatically established, so it is not yet linked to a specific point.

    (c) the following points (28a) and (28b) are inserted: (28a) ‘bodies governed by public law’ means bodies that have all of the following characteristics: (a) they are established for the specific purpose of meeting needs in the general interest, not having an industrial or commercial character; (b) they have legal personality; (c) they are financed, for the most part by the State, regional or local authorities, or by other bodies governed by public law; or are subject to management supervision by those authorities or bodies; or have an administrative, managerial or supervisory board, more than half of whose members are appointed by the State, regional or local authorities, or by other bodies governed by public law; (28b) ‘public undertaking’ means any undertaking over which a public sector body may exercise directly or indirectly a dominant influence by virtue of their ownership of it, their financial participation therein, or the rules which govern it. A dominant influence on the part of the public sector bodies shall be presumed in any of the following cases in which those bodies, directly or indirectly: (a) hold the majority of the undertaking’s subscribed capital; (b) control the majority of the votes attaching to shares issued by the undertaking; (c) can appoint more than half of the undertaking’s administrative, management or supervisory body;;’

    Tabled by
    David Cormand
    Group
    Greens/EFA
    Targets
    Data Act Article 2
    Document
    JURI amendments 69–296 to the draft opinion
    Printed header
    Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point c / Regulation (EU) 2023/2854 / Article 2
  3. 157 Deletion David CormandGreens/EFA · JURI Deletes the definition

    Tracker noteThe amendment names this article, but which paragraph or point it changes has not been automatically established, so it is not yet linked to a specific point.

    (38a) ‘data intermediation service’ means a service which aims to establish relationships of an economic character for the purposes of data sharing between an undetermined number of data subjects or data holders and data users, through technical, legal or other means, including for the purpose of exercising the rights of data subjects in relation to personal data, and which: (1) do not have as their main purpose the intermediation of copyright-protected content; (2) are not jointly procured by several legal persons for exclusive use among them;

    Tabled by
    David Cormand
    Group
    Greens/EFA
    Targets
    Data Act Article 2
    Document
    JURI amendments 69–296 to the draft opinion
    Printed header
    Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point d / Regulation (EU) 2023/2854 / Article 2
  4. 165 Alternative Victor NegrescuS&D · JURI “such re-use should, where possible, take place under open, standardised and interoperable conditions that facilitate cross-border and cross-sector…”

    Tracker noteThe amendment names this article, but which paragraph or point it changes has not been automatically established, so it is not yet linked to a specific point.

    (b) public undertakings, under Chapter VIIc Section 2 for commercial or non-commercial purposes other than for the initial purpose of providing services in the general interest for which the documents were produced, except for the exchange of documents between public undertakings and public sector bodies purely in pursuit of the public tasks of public sector bodies; such re-use should, where possible, take place under open, standardised and interoperable conditions that facilitate cross-border and cross-sector use, in particular by SMEs and public-interest actors.

    Tabled by
    Victor Negrescu
    Group
    S&D
    Targets
    Data Act Article 2
    Document
    JURI amendments 69–296 to the draft opinion
    Printed header
    Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point e / Regulation (EU) 2023/2854 / Article 2

Point (4b)

Added by the Commission · changed by the Council on 10 June

Parliament amendments 5

4 would delete the wording and 1 proposes alternative wording. Deletion amendments come from Greens/EFA. 1 more, which add new definitions, is listed by term.

By political group; co-sponsored amendments count for each group
TypeS&DGreens/EFA
− Deletion·4
~ Alternative1·

By political group

  • − Deletion Greens/EFA 4
  • ~ Alternative S&D 1

Show

  1. 148 Deletion David CormandGreens/EFA · JURI Deletes the definition

    Text and details of Amendment 148 under point (4a), ‘consent’

  2. 151 Deletion David CormandGreens/EFA · JURI Deletes the definition

    Text and details of Amendment 151 under point (4a), ‘consent’

  3. 157 Deletion David CormandGreens/EFA · JURI Deletes the definition

    Text and details of Amendment 157 under point (4a), ‘consent’

  4. 165 Alternative Victor NegrescuS&D · JURI “such re-use should, where possible, take place under open, standardised and interoperable conditions that facilitate cross-border and cross-sector…”

    Text and details of Amendment 165 under point (4a), ‘consent’

  5. 548 Deletion Damian BoeselagerGreens/EFA · ITRE–LIBE Deletes the Commission’s wording

    (4b) ‘permission’ means giving data users the right to the processing of non-personal data;

    Tabled by
    Damian Boeselager on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group
    Group
    Greens/EFA
    Targets
    Data Act Article 2(4b)
    Document
    ITRE–LIBE amendments 527–776 to the draft report
    Printed header
    Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a / Regulation (EU) 2023/2854 / Article 2 – point 4b

Point (4c): ‘Access’

New definition proposed by the Commission · dropped by the Council on 10 June

Parliament amendments 17

14 would delete the definition and 3 propose alternative wording. Deletion amendments come from The Left, S&D, Greens/EFA, Renew, EPP and ECR, and from the ITRE–LIBE rapporteurs’ draft report, the JURI rapporteur’s draft opinion and the IMCO rapporteur’s draft opinion. 1 more, which add new definitions, is listed by term.

By political group; co-sponsored amendments count for each group
TypeThe LeftS&DGreens/EFARenewEPPECRNIRapporteur
− Deletion114131·3
~ Alternative·11···1·

By political group

  • − Deletion The Left 1 S&D 1 Greens/EFA 4 Renew 1 EPP 3 ECR 1 Rapporteur 3
  • ~ Alternative S&D 1 Greens/EFA 1 NI 1

Show

  1. 13 Deletion Aura Salla and Marina Kaljurand (rapporteurs)Rapporteurs · ITRE–LIBE Deletes the definition

    (4c) ‘access’ means data use, in accordance with specific technical, legal or organisational requirements, without necessarily implying the transmission or downloading of data;

    Rapporteurs
    Aura Salla and Marina Kaljurand
    Group
    Rapporteurs
    Targets
    Data Act Article 2(4c)
    Document
    ITRE–LIBE draft report
    Printed header
    Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a / Regulation (EU) 2023/2854 / Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 4c
  2. 15 Deletion Brando Benifei (rapporteur)Rapporteur · JURI Deletes the definition

    (4c) ‘access’ means data use, in accordance with specific technical, legal or organisational requirements, without necessarily implying the transmission or downloading of data;

    Justification

    The proposed definition risks reducing ‘access’ to mere in-situ or view-only consultation under conditions unilaterally determined by the data holder, without guaranteeing transmission, downloading, portability or effective re-use of data. This would undermine the practical effectiveness of Data Act access rights, contradict the Regulation’s logic of machine-readable and retrievable data access, weaken innovation and downstream services, and reinforce the market power of data holders at the expense of users, SMEs and third-party providers.

    Rapporteur
    Brando Benifei
    Group
    Rapporteur
    Targets
    Data Act Article 2(4c)
    Document
    JURI draft opinion
    Printed header
    Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a / Regulation (EU) 2023/2854 / Article 2 – point 4 c
  3. 28 Deletion Alex Agius Saliba (rapporteur)Rapporteur · IMCO Deletes the definition

    (4c) ‘access’ means data use, in accordance with specific technical, legal or organisational requirements, without necessarily implying the transmission or downloading of data;

    Justification

    This definition can create legal uncertainty and is therefore deleted.

    Rapporteur
    Alex Agius Saliba
    Group
    Rapporteur
    Targets
    Data Act Article 2(4c)
    Document
    IMCO draft opinion
    Printed header
    Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a / Regulation (EU) 2023/2854 / Article 2 – point 4c
  4. 146 Deletion Mario MantovaniECR · JURI Deletes the definition

    (4c) ‘access’ means data use, in accordance with specific technical, legal or organisational requirements, without necessarily implying the transmission or downloading of data;’

    Justification

    The proposed definition runs the risk of seriously undermining the right to access data under the Data Act, as it implies that data can be accessed but not transmitted or downloaded. Data holders could therefore limit access to read-only interfaces and thus prevent users and third parties from processing, storing or combining data, which would contravene a number of provisions and the objectives of the Data Act. In order to guard against this, there should be no definition of ‘access’.

    Tabled by
    Mario Mantovani
    Group
    ECR
    Targets
    Data Act Article 2(4c)
    Document
    JURI amendments 69–296 to the draft opinion
    Printed header
    Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a / Regulation (EU) 2023/2854 / Article 2 – point 4 c
  5. 147 Deletion Emil RadevEPP · JURI Deletes the definition

    (4c) ‘access’ means data use, in accordance with specific technical, legal or organisational requirements, without necessarily implying the transmission or downloading of data;

    Tabled by
    Emil Radev
    Group
    EPP
    Targets
    Data Act Article 2(4c)
    Document
    JURI amendments 69–296 to the draft opinion
    Printed header
    Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a / Regulation (EU) 2023/2854 / Article 2 – point 4 c
  6. 148 Deletion David CormandGreens/EFA · JURI Deletes the definition

    Text and details of Amendment 148 under point (4a), ‘consent’

  7. 151 Deletion David CormandGreens/EFA · JURI Deletes the definition

    Text and details of Amendment 151 under point (4a), ‘consent’

  8. 157 Deletion David CormandGreens/EFA · JURI Deletes the definition

    Text and details of Amendment 157 under point (4a), ‘consent’

  9. 165 Alternative Victor NegrescuS&D · JURI “such re-use should, where possible, take place under open, standardised and interoperable conditions that facilitate cross-border and cross-sector…”

    Text and details of Amendment 165 under point (4a), ‘consent’

  10. 200 Deletion Sophia KircherEPP · IMCO Deletes the definition

    (4c) ‘access’ means data use, in accordance with specific technical, legal or organisational requirements, without necessarily implying the transmission or downloading of data;

    Tabled by
    Sophia Kircher
    Group
    EPP
    Targets
    Data Act Article 2(4c)
    Document
    IMCO amendments 125–328 to the draft opinion
    Printed header
    Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a / Regulation (EU) 2023/2854 / Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 4c
Show 7 more amendments
  1. 201 Alternative David CormandGreens/EFA · IMCO “or collected by a connected product, including metadata”

    (4c) ‘access’ means data use, in accordance with specific technical, legal or organisational requirements, without necessarily implying the transmission or downloading of data;‘access’ means the act of viewing, retrieving and using data or collected by a connected product, including metadata, in accordance with specific technical, legal or organisational requirements

    Tabled by
    David Cormand on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group
    Group
    Greens/EFA
    Targets
    Data Act Article 2(4c)
    Document
    IMCO amendments 125–328 to the draft opinion
    Printed header
    Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a / Regulation (EU) 2023/2854 / Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 4c
  2. 549 Deletion João OliveiraThe Left · ITRE–LIBE Deletes the definition

    (4c) ‘access’ means data use, in accordance with specific technical, legal or organisational requirements, without necessarily implying the transmission or downloading of data;

    Tabled by
    João Oliveira
    Group
    The Left
    Targets
    Data Act Article 2(4c)
    Document
    ITRE–LIBE amendments 527–776 to the draft report
    Printed header
    Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a / Regulation (EU) 2023/2854 / Article 2 – point 4c
  3. 550 Deletion Pilar del Castillo VeraEPP · ITRE–LIBE Deletes the definition

    (4c) ‘access’ means data use, in accordance with specific technical, legal or organisational requirements, without necessarily implying the transmission or downloading of data;

    Justification

    This definition of ‘access’ risks undermining the effectiveness of the right of access under the Data Act. By providing that access does not necessarily imply the transmission or downloading of data, it could permit view-only or similarly restrictive solutions that prevent users from making effective use of the data, thereby depriving the right of its practical effect (effet utile). Moreover, Article 4 of the Data Act already comprehensively sets out the rights and obligations of users and data holders regarding access.

    Tabled by
    Pilar del Castillo Vera
    Group
    EPP
    Targets
    Data Act Article 2(4c)
    Document
    ITRE–LIBE amendments 527–776 to the draft report
    Printed header
    Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a / Regulation (EU) 2023/2854 / Article 2 – point 4c
  4. 551 Deletion Damian BoeselagerGreens/EFA · ITRE–LIBE Deletes the definition

    (4c) ‘access’ means data use, in accordance with specific technical, legal or organisational requirements, without necessarily implying the transmission or downloading of data;

    Tabled by
    Damian Boeselager on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group
    Group
    Greens/EFA
    Targets
    Data Act Article 2(4c)
    Document
    ITRE–LIBE amendments 527–776 to the draft report
    Printed header
    Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a / Regulation (EU) 2023/2854 / Article 2 – point 4c
  5. 552 Deletion Elena Sancho Murillo +6S&D · ITRE–LIBE Deletes the definition

    (4c) ‘access’ means data use, in accordance with specific technical, legal or organisational requirements, without necessarily implying the transmission or downloading of data;

    Justification

    As per draft report

    Tabled by
    Elena Sancho Murillo, Marina Kaljurand, Brando Benifei, José Cepeda, Lina Gálvez, Francisco Assis, Alex Agius Saliba
    Group
    S&D
    Targets
    Data Act Article 2(4c)
    Document
    ITRE–LIBE amendments 527–776 to the draft report
    Printed header
    Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a / Regulation (EU) 2022/868 / Article 2 – point 4c
  6. 553 Deletion Michael McNamara +4Renew · ITRE–LIBE Deletes the definition

    (4c) ‘access’ means data use, in accordance with specific technical, legal or organisational requirements, without necessarily implying the transmission or downloading of data;

    Tabled by
    Michael McNamara, Irena Joveva, Oihane Agirregoitia Martínez, Veronika Cifrová Ostrihoňová, Christophe Grudler
    Group
    Renew
    Targets
    Data Act Article 2(4c)
    Document
    ITRE–LIBE amendments 527–776 to the draft report
    Printed header
    Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a / Regulation (EU) 2023/2854 / Article 2 – point 4c
  7. 554 Alternative Diana Iovanovici ŞoşoacăNI · ITRE–LIBE “with the obligation to respect data protection in accordance with the legislation in force, determine who has access and the access period, and…”

    (4c) ‘access’ means data use, in accordance with specific technical, legal or organisational requirements, without necessarily implying the transmission or downloading of data, with the obligation to respect data protection in accordance with the legislation in force, determine who has access and the access period, and establish penalties in the event of uncontrolled data leaks or inadequate data protection;’

    Justification

    Access to data must be clearly established by identifying the persons who have access to it and the access period.

    Tabled by
    Diana Iovanovici Şoşoacă
    Group
    NI
    Targets
    Data Act Article 2(4c)
    Document
    ITRE–LIBE amendments 527–776 to the draft report
    Printed header
    Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a / Regulation (EU) 2023/2854 / Article 2 – point 4c

Point (10): ‘Data intermediation service’

Rewritten by the Council on 10 June · changed on 3 September

Parliament amendments 3

3 would add wording to point (10).

  1. 29 Addition Alex Agius Saliba (rapporteur)Rapporteur · IMCO “Point (10) is deleted.”

    Effectnew Parliament proposal instruction expressly deletes existing law

    (aa)Point (10) is deleted.

    Justification

    Concerning the definition of data intermediation services as the Omnibus introduces the definition in para. 38a.

    Rapporteur
    Alex Agius Saliba
    Group
    Rapporteur
    Targets
    Data Act Article 2(10)
    Document
    IMCO draft opinion
    Printed header
    Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a a (new) / Regulation (EU) 2023/2854 / Article 2 – point 10
  2. 556 Addition Elena Sancho Murillo +6S&D · ITRE–LIBE “point (10) is deleted.”

    Effectnew Parliament proposal instruction expressly deletes existing law

    (aa)point (10) is deleted.

    Justification

    Since the draft report introduces a new definition of intermediation services we need to delete point 10 of Article 2 of the Data Act (on top of deleting point 38a)

    Tabled by
    Elena Sancho Murillo, Marina Kaljurand, Brando Benifei, José Cepeda, Lina Gálvez, Francisco Assis, Alex Agius Saliba
    Group
    S&D
    Targets
    Data Act Article 2(10)
    Document
    ITRE–LIBE amendments 527–776 to the draft report
    Printed header
    Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a a (new) / Regulation (EU) 2023/2854 / Article 2 – point 10
  3. 557 Addition João OliveiraThe Left · ITRE–LIBE “point (10) is deleted;”

    Effectnew Parliament proposal instruction expressly deletes existing law

    (aa)point (10) is deleted;

    Tabled by
    João Oliveira
    Group
    The Left
    Targets
    Data Act Article 2(10)
    Document
    ITRE–LIBE amendments 527–776 to the draft report
    Printed header
    Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a a (new) / Regulation (EU) 2023/2854 / Article 2 – point 10

Point (13): ‘Data holder’

Changed by the Commission

Parliament amendments 6

3 would delete the definition and 3 propose alternative wording. Deletion amendments come from Greens/EFA. 1 more, which add new definitions, is listed by term.

By political group; co-sponsored amendments count for each group
TypeS&DGreens/EFA
− Deletion·3
~ Alternative12

By political group

  • − Deletion Greens/EFA 3
  • ~ Alternative S&D 1 Greens/EFA 2

Show

  1. 148 Deletion David CormandGreens/EFA · JURI Deletes the definition

    Text and details of Amendment 148 under point (4a), ‘consent’

  2. 151 Deletion David CormandGreens/EFA · JURI Deletes the definition

    Text and details of Amendment 151 under point (4a), ‘consent’

  3. 157 Deletion David CormandGreens/EFA · JURI Deletes the definition

    Text and details of Amendment 157 under point (4a), ‘consent’

  4. 165 Alternative Victor NegrescuS&D · JURI “such re-use should, where possible, take place under open, standardised and interoperable conditions that facilitate cross-border and cross-sector…”

    Text and details of Amendment 165 under point (4a), ‘consent’

  5. 203 Alternative David CormandGreens/EFA · IMCO ‘data holder’ means a natural or legal person that has the right or obligation, in accordance with this Regulation, applicable Union law or national…

    (13) ‘data holder’ means a natural or legal person that has the right or obligation, in accordance with this Regulation, applicable Union law or national legislation adopted in accordance with Union law, to use orand make available data, including, where contractually agreed, product data or related service data, which it has retrieved or generated during the provision of a related service;

    Tabled by
    David Cormand on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group
    Group
    Greens/EFA
    Targets
    Data Act Article 2(13)
    Document
    IMCO amendments 125–328 to the draft opinion
    Printed header
    Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b / Regulation (EU) 2023/2854 / Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 13
  6. 558 Alternative Damian BoeselagerGreens/EFA · ITRE–LIBE ‘data holder’ means a natural or legal person that has the right or obligation, in accordance with this Regulation, applicable Union law or national…

    (13) ‘data holder’ means a natural or legal person that has the right or obligation, in accordance with this Regulation, applicable Union law or national legislation adopted in accordance with Union law, to use orand make available data, including, where contractually agreed, product data or related service data, which it has retrieved or generated during the provision of a related service;

    Tabled by
    Damian Boeselager on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group
    Group
    Greens/EFA
    Targets
    Data Act Article 2(13)
    Document
    ITRE–LIBE amendments 527–776 to the draft report
    Printed header
    Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b / Regulation (EU) 2023/2854 / Article 2 – point 13

Point (28): ‘Public sector body’

Changed by the Council on 18 June

Point (28a): ‘Bodies governed by public law’

New definition proposed by the Commission · rewritten by the Council on 10 June · changed on 18 June · changed on 2 October

Parliament amendments 7

6 would delete the definition and 1 proposes alternative wording. Deletion amendments come from S&D and Greens/EFA, and from the JURI rapporteur’s draft opinion. 1 more, which add new definitions, is listed by term.

By political group; co-sponsored amendments count for each group
TypeS&DGreens/EFARapporteur
− Deletion132
~ Alternative1··

By political group

  • − Deletion S&D 1 Greens/EFA 3 Rapporteur 2
  • ~ Alternative S&D 1

Show

  1. 16 Deletion Brando Benifei (rapporteur)Rapporteur · JURI Deletes the definition

    (c) the following points (28a) and (28b) are inserted: (28a) ‘bodies governed by public law’ means bodies that have all of the following characteristics: (a) they are established for the specific purpose of meeting needs in the general interest, not having an industrial or commercial character; (b) they have legal personality; (c) they are financed, for the most part by the State, regional or local authorities, or by other bodies governed by public law; or are subject to management supervision by those authorities or bodies; or have an administrative, managerial or supervisory board, more than half of whose members are appointed by the State, regional or local authorities, or by other bodies governed by public law; (28b) ‘public undertaking’ means any undertaking over which a public sector body may exercise directly or indirectly a dominant influence by virtue of their ownership of it, their financial participation therein, or the rules which govern it. A dominant influence on the part of the public sector bodies shall be presumed in any of the following cases in which those bodies, directly or indirectly: (a) hold the majority of the undertaking’s subscribed capital; (b) control the majority of the votes attaching to shares issued by the undertaking; (c) can appoint more than half of the undertaking’s administrative, management or supervisory body;’;

    Justification

    This amendment preserves the existing definition in order to maintain greater legal clarity and ensure that the notion of bodies governed by public law continues to be interpreted in a manner consistent with the public-interest objectives of the Regulation. Keeping the definition directly in the text also helps avoid unintended interpretative extensions that could broaden its scope beyond what is necessary in the context of the Data Act.

    Rapporteur
    Brando Benifei
    Group
    Rapporteur
    Targets
    Data Act Article 2
    Document
    JURI draft opinion
    Printed header
    Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point c / Regulation (EU) 2023/2854 / Article 2 – points 28a and 28b
  2. 17 Deletion Brando Benifei (rapporteur)Rapporteur · JURI Deletes the definition

    (28a) ‘bodies governed by public law’ means bodies that have all of the following characteristics: (a) they are established for the specific purpose of meeting needs in the general interest, not having an industrial or commercial character; (b) they have legal personality; (c) they are financed, for the most part by the State, regional or local authorities, or by other bodies governed by public law; or are subject to management supervision by those authorities or bodies; or have an administrative, managerial or supervisory board, more than half of whose members are appointed by the State, regional or local authorities, or by other bodies governed by public law;

    Justification

    This amendment preserves the existing definition in order to maintain greater legal clarity and ensure that the notion of bodies governed by public law continues to be interpreted in a manner consistent with the public-interest objectives of the Regulation. Keeping the definition directly in the text also helps avoid unintended interpretative extensions that could broaden its scope beyond what is necessary in the context of the Data Act.

    Rapporteur
    Brando Benifei
    Group
    Rapporteur
    Targets
    Data Act Article 2
    Document
    JURI draft opinion
    Printed header
    Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point c / Regulation (EU) 2023/2854 / Article 2 – point 28a
  3. 148 Deletion David CormandGreens/EFA · JURI Deletes the definition

    Text and details of Amendment 148 under point (4a), ‘consent’

  4. 151 Deletion David CormandGreens/EFA · JURI Deletes the definition

    Text and details of Amendment 151 under point (4a), ‘consent’

  5. 157 Deletion David CormandGreens/EFA · JURI Deletes the definition

    Text and details of Amendment 157 under point (4a), ‘consent’

  6. 165 Alternative Victor NegrescuS&D · JURI “such re-use should, where possible, take place under open, standardised and interoperable conditions that facilitate cross-border and cross-sector…”

    Text and details of Amendment 165 under point (4a), ‘consent’

  7. 560 Deletion Elena Sancho Murillo +6S&D · ITRE–LIBE Deletes the definition

    (28a) ‘bodies governed by public law’ means bodies that have all of the following characteristics: (a) they are established for the specific purpose of meeting needs in the general interest, not having an industrial or commercial character; (b) they have legal personality; (c) they are financed, for the most part by the State, regional or local authorities, or by other bodies governed by public law; or are subject to management supervision by those authorities or bodies; or have an administrative, managerial or supervisory board, more than half of whose members are appointed by the State, regional or local authorities, or by other bodies governed by public law;

    Justification

    This amendment preserves the existing definition in order to maintain greater legal clarity and ensure that the notion of bodies governed by public law continues to be interpreted in a manner consistent with the public-interest objectives of the Regulation.

    Tabled by
    Elena Sancho Murillo, Marina Kaljurand, Brando Benifei, José Cepeda, Lina Gálvez, Francisco Assis, Alex Agius Saliba
    Group
    S&D
    Targets
    Data Act Article 2
    Document
    ITRE–LIBE amendments 527–776 to the draft report
    Printed header
    Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point c / Regulation (EU) 2023/2854 / Article 2 – point 28a

Point (28b): ‘Public undertaking’

New definition proposed by the Commission · rewritten by the Council on 10 June · rewritten on 18 June · changed on 2 October

Parliament amendments 7

6 would delete the definition and 1 proposes alternative wording. Deletion amendments come from S&D and Greens/EFA, and from the JURI rapporteur’s draft opinion. 1 more, which add new definitions, is listed by term.

By political group; co-sponsored amendments count for each group
TypeS&DGreens/EFARapporteur
− Deletion132
~ Alternative1··

By political group

  • − Deletion S&D 1 Greens/EFA 3 Rapporteur 2
  • ~ Alternative S&D 1

Show

  1. 16 Deletion Brando Benifei (rapporteur)Rapporteur · JURI Deletes the definition

    Text and details of Amendment 16 under point (28a), ‘bodies governed by public law’

  2. 18 Deletion Brando Benifei (rapporteur)Rapporteur · JURI Deletes the definition

    (28b) ‘public undertaking’ means any undertaking over which a public sector body may exercise directly or indirectly a dominant influence by virtue of their ownership of it, their financial participation therein, or the rules which govern it. A dominant influence on the part of the public sector bodies shall be presumed in any of the following cases in which those bodies, directly or indirectly: (a) hold the majority of the undertaking’s subscribed capital; (b) control the majority of the votes attaching to shares issued by the undertaking; (c) can appoint more than half of the undertaking’s administrative, management or supervisory body;;

    Justification

    This amendment preserves the existing definition in order to maintain greater legal clarity and ensure that the notion of bodies governed by public law continues to be interpreted in a manner consistent with the public-interest objectives of the Regulation. Keeping the definition directly in the text also helps avoid unintended interpretative extensions that could broaden its scope beyond what is necessary in the context of the Data Act.

    Rapporteur
    Brando Benifei
    Group
    Rapporteur
    Targets
    Data Act Article 2
    Document
    JURI draft opinion
    Printed header
    Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point c / Regulation (EU) 2023/2854 / Article 2 – point 28b
  3. 148 Deletion David CormandGreens/EFA · JURI Deletes the definition

    Text and details of Amendment 148 under point (4a), ‘consent’

  4. 151 Deletion David CormandGreens/EFA · JURI Deletes the definition

    Text and details of Amendment 151 under point (4a), ‘consent’

  5. 157 Deletion David CormandGreens/EFA · JURI Deletes the definition

    Text and details of Amendment 157 under point (4a), ‘consent’

  6. 165 Alternative Victor NegrescuS&D · JURI “such re-use should, where possible, take place under open, standardised and interoperable conditions that facilitate cross-border and cross-sector…”

    Text and details of Amendment 165 under point (4a), ‘consent’

  7. 561 Deletion Elena Sancho Murillo +6S&D · ITRE–LIBE Deletes the definition

    (28b) ‘public undertaking’ means any undertaking over which a public sector body may exercise directly or indirectly a dominant influence by virtue of their ownership of it, their financial participation therein, or the rules which govern it. A dominant influence on the part of the public sector bodies shall be presumed in any of the following cases in which those bodies, directly or indirectly: (a) hold the majority of the undertaking’s subscribed capital; (b) control the majority of the votes attaching to shares issued by the undertaking; (c) can appoint more than half of the undertaking’s administrative, management or supervisory body;;

    Tabled by
    Elena Sancho Murillo, Marina Kaljurand, Brando Benifei, José Cepeda, Lina Gálvez, Francisco Assis, Alex Agius Saliba
    Group
    S&D
    Targets
    Data Act Article 2
    Document
    ITRE–LIBE amendments 527–776 to the draft report
    Printed header
    Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point c / Regulation (EU) 2023/2854 / Article 2 – point 28b

Point (38a): ‘Data intermediation service’

New definition proposed by the Commission · dropped by the Council on 10 June

Parliament amendments 19

9 would delete the definition, 7 propose alternative wording and 3 would add wording to point (38a). Deletion amendments come from S&D, Greens/EFA, Renew and EPP, and from the JURI rapporteur’s draft opinion. 1 more, which add new definitions, is listed by term.

By political group; co-sponsored amendments count for each group
TypeThe LeftS&DGreens/EFARenewEPPECRNIRapporteur
− Deletion·1322··1
~ Alternative11·21··2
+ Addition·····111

By political group

  • − Deletion S&D 1 Greens/EFA 3 Renew 2 EPP 2 Rapporteur 1
  • ~ Alternative The Left 1 S&D 1 Renew 2 EPP 1 Rapporteur 2
  • + Addition ECR 1 NI 1 Rapporteur 1

Show

  1. 14 Alternative Aura Salla and Marina Kaljurand (rapporteurs)Rapporteurs · ITRE–LIBE “including supplier or customer relationship or collaborations established by contract, in particular those that have as a main objective to ensure…”

    (38a) ‘data intermediation service’ means a service which aims to establish commercial relationships of an economic character for the purposes of data sharing between an undetermined number of data subjects orand data holders on the one hand and data users on the other, through technical, legal or other means, including for the purpose of exercising the rights of data subjects in relation to personal data, andexcluding whichthe following: (1) do not have as their main purpose the intermediation of copyright-protected content;(a) services that obtain data from data holders and aggregate, enrich or transform the data for the purpose of adding substantial value to it and license the use of the resulting data to data users, without establishing a commercial relationship between data holders and data users; (b) services that focus on the intermediation of copyright-protected content; (2) are not jointly procured by several legal persons for exclusive use among them;(c) services that are exclusively used by one data holder in order to enable the use of the data held by that data holder, or that are used by multiple legal persons in a closed group, including supplier or customer relationship or collaborations established by contract, in particular those that have as a main objective to ensure the functionalities of objects and devices connected to the Internet of Things; (d) data sharing services offered by public sector bodies that do not aim to establish commercial relationships;

    Rapporteurs
    Aura Salla and Marina Kaljurand
    Group
    Rapporteurs
    Targets
    Data Act Article 2(38a)
    Document
    ITRE–LIBE draft report
    Printed header
    Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point d / Regulation (EU) 2023/2854 / Article 2 – paragraph 1– point 38a
  2. 20 Alternative Brando Benifei (rapporteur)Rapporteur · JURI “the following point (38a) is inserted:”

    (d) the following pointspoint (38a) and (38b) areis inserted:

    Rapporteur
    Brando Benifei
    Group
    Rapporteur
    Targets
    Data Act Article 2(38a)
    Document
    JURI draft opinion
    Printed header
    Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point d – introductory part / Regulation (EU) 2023/2854 / Article 2 – point 38a
  3. 21 Deletion Brando Benifei (rapporteur)Rapporteur · JURI Deletes the definition

    (38a) ‘data intermediation service’ means a service which aims to establish relationships of an economic character for the purposes of data sharing between an undetermined number of data subjects or data holders and data users, through technical, legal or other means, including for the purpose of exercising the rights of data subjects in relation to personal data, and which: (1) do not have as their main purpose the intermediation of copyright-protected content; (2) are not jointly procured by several legal persons for exclusive use among them;

    Justification

    The original Data Governance Act definition ensured a clear distinction between neutral data intermediation and the economic exploitation of data. Its safeguards and exclusions, including for copyright-focused services, closed ecosystems and services monetising data for their own purposes, are essential for legal certainty. Many current concerns stem precisely from the weakening of these elements.

    Rapporteur
    Brando Benifei
    Group
    Rapporteur
    Targets
    Data Act Article 2(38a)
    Document
    JURI draft opinion
    Printed header
    Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point d / Regulation (EU) 2023/2854 / Article 2 – point 38a
  4. 30 Addition Alex Agius Saliba (rapporteur)Rapporteur · IMCO “are not a or are not connected to a very large enterprise, including by being a subsidiary in an undertaking that operates a Very Large Online…” numbered 2a

    (2a)are not a or are not connected to a very large enterprise, including by being a subsidiary in an undertaking that operates a Very Large Online Platform according to Regulation (EU) 2022/2065 or a Gatekeeper according to Regulation EU 2022/1925.

    Justification

    Limiting the possiblity for VLOPs and Gatekeepers to register a data intermediation service.

    Rapporteur
    Alex Agius Saliba
    Group
    Rapporteur
    Targets
    Data Act Article 2 – point 38a – introductory part – point 2 a (new)
    Document
    IMCO draft opinion
    Printed header
    Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point d / Regulation (EU) 2023/2854 / Article 2 – point 38a – introductory part – point 2 a (new)
  5. 148 Deletion David CormandGreens/EFA · JURI Deletes the definition

    Text and details of Amendment 148 under point (4a), ‘consent’

  6. 151 Deletion David CormandGreens/EFA · JURI Deletes the definition

    Text and details of Amendment 151 under point (4a), ‘consent’

  7. 155 Alternative Emil RadevEPP · JURI “the following point (38a) is inserted:”

    (d) the following pointspoint (38a) and (38b) areis inserted:

    Tabled by
    Emil Radev
    Group
    EPP
    Targets
    Data Act Article 2(38a)
    Document
    JURI amendments 69–296 to the draft opinion
    Printed header
    Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point d – introductory part / Regulation (EU) 2023/2854 / Article 2 – point 38 a
  8. 156 Deletion Emil RadevEPP · JURI Deletes the definition

    (38a) ‘data intermediation service’ means a service which aims to establish relationships of an economic character for the purposes of data sharing between an undetermined number of data subjects or data holders and data users, through technical, legal or other means, including for the purpose of exercising the rights of data subjects in relation to personal data, and which: (1) do not have as their main purpose the intermediation of copyright-protected content; (2) are not jointly procured by several legal persons for exclusive use among them;

    Tabled by
    Emil Radev
    Group
    EPP
    Targets
    Data Act Article 2(38a)
    Document
    JURI amendments 69–296 to the draft opinion
    Printed header
    Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point d / Regulation (EU) 2023/2854 / Article 2 – point 38 a
  9. 157 Deletion David CormandGreens/EFA · JURI Deletes the definition

    Text and details of Amendment 157 under point (4a), ‘consent’

  10. 158 Alternative Laurence FarrengRenew · JURI “aggregate, enrich or transform the data for the purpose of adding substantial value to it and license the use of the resulting data to data users…”

    (38a) ‘data intermediation service’ means a service which aims to establish relationships of an economic character for the purposes of data sharing between an undetermined number of data subjects or data holders and data users, through technical, legal or other means, including for the purpose of exercising the rights of data subjects in relation to personal data, and which:‘data intermediation service’ means a service which aims to establish commercial relationships for the purposes of data sharing between an undetermined number of data subjects and data holders on the one hand and data users on the other, through technical, legal or other means, including for the purpose of exercising the rights of data subjects in relation to personal data, excluding at least the following: (a) services that obtain data from data holders and aggregate, enrich or transform the data for the purpose of adding substantial value to it and license the use of the resulting data to data users, without establishing a commercial relationship between data holders and data users; (b) services that focus on the intermediation of copyright-protected content; (c) services that are exclusively used by one data holder in order to enable the use of the data held by that data holder, or that are used by multiple legal persons in a closed group, including supplier or customer relationships or collaborations established by contract, in particular those that have as a main objective to ensure the functionalities of objects and devices connected to the Internet of Things; (d) data sharing services offered by public sector bodies that do not aim to establish commercial relationships;

    Tabled by
    Laurence Farreng
    Group
    Renew
    Targets
    Data Act Article 2(38a)
    Document
    JURI amendments 69–296 to the draft opinion
    Printed header
    Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point d / Regulation (EU) 2023/2854 / Article 2 – point 38 a
Show 9 more amendments
  1. 159 Deletion Laurence FarrengRenew · JURI Deletes the definition

    (1) do not have as their main purpose the intermediation of copyright-protected content;

    Tabled by
    Laurence Farreng
    Group
    Renew
    Targets
    Data Act Article 2(38a)
    Document
    JURI amendments 69–296 to the draft opinion
    Printed header
    Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point d / Regulation (EU) 2023/2854 / Article 2 – point 38 a
  2. 160 Deletion Laurence FarrengRenew · JURI Deletes the definition

    (2) are not jointly procured by several legal persons for exclusive use among them;

    Tabled by
    Laurence Farreng
    Group
    Renew
    Targets
    Data Act Article 2(38a)
    Document
    JURI amendments 69–296 to the draft opinion
    Printed header
    Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point d / Regulation (EU) 2023/2854 / Article 2 – point 38 a
  3. 165 Alternative Victor NegrescuS&D · JURI “such re-use should, where possible, take place under open, standardised and interoperable conditions that facilitate cross-border and cross-sector…”

    Text and details of Amendment 165 under point (4a), ‘consent’

  4. 208 Deletion Sophia KircherEPP · IMCO Deletes the definition

    (38a) ‘data intermediation service’ means a service which aims to establish relationships of an economic character for the purposes of data sharing between an undetermined number of data subjects or data holders and data users, through technical, legal or other means, including for the purpose of exercising the rights of data subjects in relation to personal data, and which: (1) do not have as their main purpose the intermediation of copyright-protected content; (2) are not jointly procured by several legal persons for exclusive use among them;

    Tabled by
    Sophia Kircher
    Group
    EPP
    Targets
    Data Act Article 2(38a)
    Document
    IMCO amendments 125–328 to the draft opinion
    Printed header
    Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point d / Regulation (EU) 2023/2854 / Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 38a
  5. 562 Deletion Elena Sancho Murillo +6S&D · ITRE–LIBE Deletes the definition

    (38a) ‘data intermediation service’ means a service which aims to establish relationships of an economic character for the purposes of data sharing between an undetermined number of data subjects or data holders and data users, through technical, legal or other means, including for the purpose of exercising the rights of data subjects in relation to personal data, and which: (1) do not have as their main purpose the intermediation of copyright-protected content; (2) are not jointly procured by several legal persons for exclusive use among them;

    Justification

    Deleted definition of data intermediation service as in draft report since another definition is provided.

    Tabled by
    Elena Sancho Murillo, Marina Kaljurand, Brando Benifei, José Cepeda, Lina Gálvez, Francisco Assis, Alex Agius Saliba
    Group
    S&D
    Targets
    Data Act Article 2(38a)
    Document
    ITRE–LIBE amendments 527–776 to the draft report
    Printed header
    Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point d / Regulation (EU) 2023/2854 / Article 2 – point 38a
  6. 563 Alternative Michael McNamara +4Renew · ITRE–LIBE ‘data intermediation service’ means a service which aims to establish relationships of an economic character for the purposes of data sharing between…

    (38a) ‘data intermediation service’ means a service which aims to establish relationships of an economic character for the purposes of data sharing between an undetermined number of data subjects orand data holders on the one hand, and data users on the other hand, through technical, legal or other means, including for the purpose of exercising the rights of data subjects in relation to personal data, and which:

    Tabled by
    Michael McNamara, Irena Joveva, Oihane Agirregoitia Martínez, Veronika Cifrová Ostrihoňová, Christophe Grudler
    Group
    Renew
    Targets
    Data Act Article 2(38a)
    Document
    ITRE–LIBE amendments 527–776 to the draft report
    Printed header
    Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point d / Regulation (EU) 2023/2854 / Article 2 – point 38a
  7. 564 Alternative João OliveiraThe Left · ITRE–LIBE ‘data intermediation service’ means a service which aims to establish relationships for the purposes of data sharing between an undetermined number…

    (38a) ‘data intermediation service’ means a service which aims to establish relationships of an economic character for the purposes of data sharing between an undetermined number of data subjects or data holders and data users, through technical, legal or other means, including for the purpose of exercising the rights of data subjects in relation to personal data, and which :

    Tabled by
    João Oliveira
    Group
    The Left
    Targets
    Data Act Article 2(38a)
    Document
    ITRE–LIBE amendments 527–776 to the draft report
    Printed header
    Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point d / Regulation (EU) 2023/2854 / Article 2 – point 38a
  8. 565 Addition Diego Solier +2ECR · ITRE–LIBE “provide analytical, benchmarking, financial, research or other value-added information products and shall be regarded as data intermediation services…” numbered 2a

    (2a) In Article 2, point 38a, the following point is inserted

    (2a)provide analytical, benchmarking, financial, research or other value-added information products and shall be regarded as data intermediation services even if they process third-party data;'

    Tabled by
    Diego Solier, Sebastian Tynkkynen, Elena Donazzan
    Group
    ECR
    Targets
    Data Act Article 2 – point 38a – point 2a (new)
    Document
    ITRE–LIBE amendments 527–776 to the draft report
    Printed header
    Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point d / Regulation (EU) 2023/2854 / Article 2 – point 38a – point 2a (new)
  9. 566 Addition Diana Iovanovici ŞoşoacăNI · ITRE–LIBE “without prejudice to the privacy of individuals, the protection of such data shall be ensured in accordance with the legislation in force and access…” numbered 2a

    (38aa) In Article 2, point 38a, the following point is inserted

    (2a)without prejudice to the privacy of individuals, the protection of such data shall be ensured in accordance with the legislation in force and access to this data shall be for a clearly defined period of time;’

    Justification

    No data intermediation service must exist without personal data protection, for clearly defined time periods.

    Tabled by
    Diana Iovanovici Şoşoacă
    Group
    NI
    Targets
    Data Act Article 2 – point 38a – point 2a (new)
    Document
    ITRE–LIBE amendments 527–776 to the draft report
    Printed header
    Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point d / Regulation (EU) 2023/2854 / Article 2 – point 38a – point 2a (new)

Point (38b): ‘Data altruism’

New definition proposed by the Commission

Parliament amendments 10

3 would delete the definition and 7 propose alternative wording. Deletion amendments come from Greens/EFA. 1 more, which add new definitions, is listed by term.

By political group; co-sponsored amendments count for each group
TypeS&DGreens/EFARapporteur
− Deletion·3·
~ Alternative232

By political group

  • − Deletion Greens/EFA 3
  • ~ Alternative S&D 2 Greens/EFA 3 Rapporteur 2

Show

  1. 22 Alternative Brando Benifei (rapporteur)Rapporteur · JURI ‘data altruism’ means the voluntary sharing of data on the basis of the consent of data subjects to process personal data pertaining to them, or of…

    (38b) ‘data altruism’ means the voluntary sharing of data on the basis of the consent of data subjects to process personal data pertaining to them, or of permissions of data holders to allow the use of their non-personal data without seeking or receiving a reward that goes beyond fair compensation related to the actual costs that they incur where they make their data available for objectives of general interest as provided for in nationalaccordance with Union law and, where applicable, national law, such as healthcare, combating climate change, improving mobility, facilitating the development, production and dissemination of official statistics, improving the provision of public services, public policy making or scientific research purposes in the general interest;

    Justification

    This amendment helps strengthen legal certainty and ensures that objectives of general interest are interpreted consistently within the existing EU legal framework, including applicable data protection rules.

    Rapporteur
    Brando Benifei
    Group
    Rapporteur
    Targets
    Data Act Article 2(38b)
    Document
    JURI draft opinion
    Printed header
    Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point d / Regulation (EU) 2023/2854 / Article 2 – point 38b
  2. 31 Alternative Alex Agius Saliba (rapporteur)Rapporteur · IMCO ‘data altruism’ means the voluntary sharing of data on the basis of the consent of data subjects to process personal data pertaining to them, or of…

    (38b) ‘data altruism’ means the voluntary sharing of data on the basis of the consent of data subjects to process personal data pertaining to them, or of permissions of data holders to allow the use of their non-personal data without seeking or receiving a reward that goes beyond fair compensation related to the actual costs that they incur where they make their data available for objectives of general interest as provided for in national law, where applicable, such as healthcare, combating climate change, improving mobility, facilitating the development, production and dissemination of official statistics, improving the provision of public services, public policy making or scientific research purposes in the general interest;

    Rapporteur
    Alex Agius Saliba
    Group
    Rapporteur
    Targets
    Data Act Article 2(38b)
    Document
    IMCO draft opinion
    Printed header
    Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point d / Regulation (EU) 2023/2854 / Article 2 – point 38b
  3. 148 Deletion David CormandGreens/EFA · JURI Deletes the definition

    Text and details of Amendment 148 under point (4a), ‘consent’

  4. 151 Deletion David CormandGreens/EFA · JURI Deletes the definition

    Text and details of Amendment 151 under point (4a), ‘consent’

  5. 157 Deletion David CormandGreens/EFA · JURI Deletes the definition

    Text and details of Amendment 157 under point (4a), ‘consent’

  6. 161 Alternative David CormandGreens/EFA · JURI ‘data altruism’ means the voluntary sharing of data on the basis of the consent of data subjects to process personal data pertaining to them, or of…

    (38b) ‘data altruism’ means the voluntary sharing of data on the basis of the consent of data subjects to process personal data pertaining to them, or of permissions of data holders to allow the use of their non-personal data without seeking or receiving a reward that goes beyond fair compensation related to the actual costs that they incur where they make their data available for objectives of general interest as provided for in national law, where applicable, such as healthcare, combating climate change, improving mobility, facilitating the development, production and dissemination of official statistics, improving the provision of public services, public policy making or scientific research purposes in the general interest;

    Tabled by
    David Cormand
    Group
    Greens/EFA
    Targets
    Data Act Article 2(38b)
    Document
    JURI amendments 69–296 to the draft opinion
    Printed header
    Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point d / Regulation (EU) 2023/2854 / Article 2 – point 38 b
  7. 165 Alternative Victor NegrescuS&D · JURI “such re-use should, where possible, take place under open, standardised and interoperable conditions that facilitate cross-border and cross-sector…”

    Text and details of Amendment 165 under point (4a), ‘consent’

  8. 209 Alternative David CormandGreens/EFA · IMCO ‘data altruism’ means the voluntary sharing of data on the basis of the consent of data subjects to process personal data pertaining to them, or of…

    (38b) ‘data altruism’ means the voluntary sharing of data on the basis of the consent of data subjects to process personal data pertaining to them, or of permissions of data holders to allow the use of their non-personal data without seeking or receiving a reward that goes beyond fair compensation related to the costs that they incur where they make their data available for objectives of general interest as provided for in national and Union law, where applicable, such as healthcare, combating climate change, improving mobility, facilitating the development, production and dissemination of official statistics, improving the provision of public services, public policy making or scientific research purposes in the general interest;

    Tabled by
    David Cormand on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group
    Group
    Greens/EFA
    Targets
    Data Act Article 2(38b)
    Document
    IMCO amendments 125–328 to the draft opinion
    Printed header
    Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point d / Regulation (EU) 2023/2854 / Article 2 – paragraph 1– point 38b
  9. 567 Alternative Elena Sancho Murillo +6S&D · ITRE–LIBE “Union law, and where applicable”

    (38b) ‘data altruism’ means the voluntary sharing of data on the basis of the consent of data subjects to process personal data pertaining to them, or of permissions of data holders to allow the use of their non-personal data without seeking or receiving a reward that goes beyond fair compensation related to the actual costs that they incur where they make their data available for objectives of general interest asin providedaccordance forwith inUnion law, and where applicable national law, where applicable, such as healthcare, combating climate change, improving mobility, facilitating the development, production and dissemination of official statistics, improving the provision of public services, public policy making or scientific research purposes in the general interest;

    Tabled by
    Elena Sancho Murillo, Marina Kaljurand, Brando Benifei, José Cepeda, Lina Gálvez, Francisco Assis, Alex Agius Saliba
    Group
    S&D
    Targets
    Data Act Article 2(38b)
    Document
    ITRE–LIBE amendments 527–776 to the draft report
    Printed header
    Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point d / Regulation (EU) 2023/2854 / Article 2 – point 38b
  10. 568 Alternative Damian BoeselagerGreens/EFA · ITRE–LIBE ‘data altruism’ means the voluntary sharing of data on the basis of the consent of data subjects to process personal data pertaining to them, or of…

    (38b) ‘data altruism’ means the voluntary sharing of data on the basis of the consent of data subjects to process personal data pertaining to them, or of permissions of data holders to allow the use of their non-personal data without seeking or receiving a reward that goes beyond fair compensation related to the actual costs that they incur where they make their data available for objectives of general interest as provided for in national and Union law, where applicable, such as healthcare, combating climate change, improving mobility, facilitating the development, production and dissemination of official statistics, improving the provision of public services, public policy making or scientific research purposes in the general interest;

    Tabled by
    Damian Boeselager on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group
    Group
    Greens/EFA
    Targets
    Data Act Article 2(38b)
    Document
    ITRE–LIBE amendments 527–776 to the draft report
    Printed header
    Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point d / Regulation (EU) 2023/2854 / Article 2 – point 38b

Point (39): ‘Smart contract’

Deleted by the Council on 10 June

Point (42): ‘Common specifications’

Changed by the Council on 10 June

Point (44): ‘Medium-sized enterprise’

New definition proposed by the Commission · changed by the Council on 10 June

Parliament amendments 4

3 would delete the definition and 1 proposes alternative wording. Deletion amendments come from Greens/EFA. 1 more, which add new definitions, is listed by term.

By political group; co-sponsored amendments count for each group
TypeS&DGreens/EFA
− Deletion·3
~ Alternative1·

By political group

  • − Deletion Greens/EFA 3
  • ~ Alternative S&D 1

Show

  1. 148 Deletion David CormandGreens/EFA · JURI Deletes the definition

    Text and details of Amendment 148 under point (4a), ‘consent’

  2. 151 Deletion David CormandGreens/EFA · JURI Deletes the definition

    Text and details of Amendment 151 under point (4a), ‘consent’

  3. 157 Deletion David CormandGreens/EFA · JURI Deletes the definition

    Text and details of Amendment 157 under point (4a), ‘consent’

  4. 165 Alternative Victor NegrescuS&D · JURI “such re-use should, where possible, take place under open, standardised and interoperable conditions that facilitate cross-border and cross-sector…”

    Text and details of Amendment 165 under point (4a), ‘consent’

Point (45)

Added by the Commission · changed by the Council on 10 June

Parliament amendments 5

4 would delete the wording and 1 proposes alternative wording. Deletion amendments come from The Left and Greens/EFA. 1 more, which add new definitions, is listed by term.

By political group; co-sponsored amendments count for each group
TypeThe LeftS&DGreens/EFA
− Deletion1·3
~ Alternative·1·

By political group

  • − Deletion The Left 1 Greens/EFA 3
  • ~ Alternative S&D 1

Show

  1. 148 Deletion David CormandGreens/EFA · JURI Deletes the definition

    Text and details of Amendment 148 under point (4a), ‘consent’

  2. 151 Deletion David CormandGreens/EFA · JURI Deletes the definition

    Text and details of Amendment 151 under point (4a), ‘consent’

  3. 157 Deletion David CormandGreens/EFA · JURI Deletes the definition

    Text and details of Amendment 157 under point (4a), ‘consent’

  4. 165 Alternative Victor NegrescuS&D · JURI “such re-use should, where possible, take place under open, standardised and interoperable conditions that facilitate cross-border and cross-sector…”

    Text and details of Amendment 165 under point (4a), ‘consent’

  5. 569 Deletion João OliveiraThe Left · ITRE–LIBE Deletes the Commission’s wording

    (45) ‘small mid-cap’ or ‘SMC’ means a small mid-cap enterprise as defined in Article 2 of the Annex to Commission Recommendation (EU) 2025/1099;

    Tabled by
    João Oliveira
    Group
    The Left
    Targets
    Data Act Article 2(45)
    Document
    ITRE–LIBE amendments 527–776 to the draft report
    Printed header
    Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point e / Regulation (EU) 2023/2854 / Article 2 – point 45

Point (46): ‘University’

New definition proposed by the Commission · changed by the Council on 10 June

Parliament amendments 4

3 would delete the definition and 1 proposes alternative wording. Deletion amendments come from Greens/EFA. 1 more, which add new definitions, is listed by term.

By political group; co-sponsored amendments count for each group
TypeS&DGreens/EFA
− Deletion·3
~ Alternative1·

By political group

  • − Deletion Greens/EFA 3
  • ~ Alternative S&D 1

Show

  1. 148 Deletion David CormandGreens/EFA · JURI Deletes the definition

    Text and details of Amendment 148 under point (4a), ‘consent’

  2. 151 Deletion David CormandGreens/EFA · JURI Deletes the definition

    Text and details of Amendment 151 under point (4a), ‘consent’

  3. 157 Deletion David CormandGreens/EFA · JURI Deletes the definition

    Text and details of Amendment 157 under point (4a), ‘consent’

  4. 165 Alternative Victor NegrescuS&D · JURI “such re-use should, where possible, take place under open, standardised and interoperable conditions that facilitate cross-border and cross-sector…”

    Text and details of Amendment 165 under point (4a), ‘consent’

Point (47): ‘Standard licence’

New definition proposed by the Commission

Parliament amendments 4

3 would delete the definition and 1 proposes alternative wording. Deletion amendments come from Greens/EFA. 2 more, which add new definitions, are listed by term.

By political group; co-sponsored amendments count for each group
TypeS&DGreens/EFA
− Deletion·3
~ Alternative1·

By political group

  • − Deletion Greens/EFA 3
  • ~ Alternative S&D 1

Show

  1. 148 Deletion David CormandGreens/EFA · JURI Deletes the definition

    Text and details of Amendment 148 under point (4a), ‘consent’

  2. 151 Deletion David CormandGreens/EFA · JURI Deletes the definition

    Text and details of Amendment 151 under point (4a), ‘consent’

  3. 157 Deletion David CormandGreens/EFA · JURI Deletes the definition

    Text and details of Amendment 157 under point (4a), ‘consent’

  4. 165 Alternative Victor NegrescuS&D · JURI “such re-use should, where possible, take place under open, standardised and interoperable conditions that facilitate cross-border and cross-sector…”

    Text and details of Amendment 165 under point (4a), ‘consent’

Point (48): ‘Document’

New definition proposed by the Commission

Parliament amendments 4

3 would delete the definition and 1 proposes alternative wording. Deletion amendments come from Greens/EFA. 1 more, which add new definitions, is listed by term.

By political group; co-sponsored amendments count for each group
TypeS&DGreens/EFA
− Deletion·3
~ Alternative1·

By political group

  • − Deletion Greens/EFA 3
  • ~ Alternative S&D 1

Show

  1. 148 Deletion David CormandGreens/EFA · JURI Deletes the definition

    Text and details of Amendment 148 under point (4a), ‘consent’

  2. 151 Deletion David CormandGreens/EFA · JURI Deletes the definition

    Text and details of Amendment 151 under point (4a), ‘consent’

  3. 157 Deletion David CormandGreens/EFA · JURI Deletes the definition

    Text and details of Amendment 157 under point (4a), ‘consent’

  4. 165 Alternative Victor NegrescuS&D · JURI “such re-use should, where possible, take place under open, standardised and interoperable conditions that facilitate cross-border and cross-sector…”

    Text and details of Amendment 165 under point (4a), ‘consent’

Point (50)

Added by the Commission · changed by the Council on 10 June

Parliament amendments 10

3 would delete the wording and 7 propose alternative wording. Deletion amendments come from Greens/EFA. 1 more, which add new definitions, is listed by term.

By political group; co-sponsored amendments count for each group
TypeS&DGreens/EFAECRPfERapporteur
− Deletion·3···
~ Alternative13121

By political group

  • − Deletion Greens/EFA 3
  • ~ Alternative S&D 1 Greens/EFA 3 ECR 1 PfE 2 Rapporteur 1

Show

  1. 24 Alternative Brando Benifei (rapporteur)Rapporteur · JURI ‘research data’ means data or documents, other than scientific publications, which are collected or produced in the course of scientific research…

    (50) ‘research data’ means data or documents, other than scientific publications, which are collected or produced in the course of scientific research activities and are used as evidence in the research process, or are commonly accepted in the research community as necessary to validate research findings andor results;

    Rapporteur
    Brando Benifei
    Group
    Rapporteur
    Targets
    Data Act Article 2(50)
    Document
    JURI draft opinion
    Printed header
    Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point e / Regulation (EU) 2023/2854 / Article 2 – point 50
  2. 148 Deletion David CormandGreens/EFA · JURI Deletes the definition

    Text and details of Amendment 148 under point (4a), ‘consent’

  3. 151 Deletion David CormandGreens/EFA · JURI Deletes the definition

    Text and details of Amendment 151 under point (4a), ‘consent’

  4. 157 Deletion David CormandGreens/EFA · JURI Deletes the definition

    Text and details of Amendment 157 under point (4a), ‘consent’

  5. 163 Alternative David CormandGreens/EFA · JURI “It also includes research information, such as abstracts, citations, metadata and other information used to understand and assess research”

    (50) ‘research data’ means data , other than scientific publications, which are collected or produced in the course of scientific research activities and are used as evidence in the research process, or are commonly accepted in the research community as necessary to validate research findings and results. It also includes research information, such as abstracts, citations, metadata and other information used to understand and assess research;

    Tabled by
    David Cormand
    Group
    Greens/EFA
    Targets
    Data Act Article 2(50)
    Document
    JURI amendments 69–296 to the draft opinion
    Printed header
    Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point e / Regulation (EU) 2023/2854 / Article 2 – point 50
  6. 165 Alternative Victor NegrescuS&D · JURI “such re-use should, where possible, take place under open, standardised and interoperable conditions that facilitate cross-border and cross-sector…”

    Text and details of Amendment 165 under point (4a), ‘consent’

  7. 213 Alternative Virginie JoronPfE · IMCO “Research data do not include data collected or produced in the context of processing with the principal aim of observing, establishing the profile or…”

    (50) ‘research data’ means data , other than scientific publications, which are collected or produced in the course of scientific research activities, in accordance with Article 4(38) of Regulation (EU) 2026/679, and are used as evidence in the research process, or are commonly accepted in the research community as necessary to validate research findings and results. Research data do not include data collected or produced in the context of processing with the principal aim of observing, establishing the profile or influencing the behaviour of natural persons for commercial purposes, in particular for behavioural advertising or the commercial targeting of individuals even where scientific methods are used;

    Tabled by
    Virginie Joron
    Group
    PfE
    Targets
    Data Act Article 2 – paragraph 1– point 50
    Document
    IMCO amendments 125–328 to the draft opinion
    Printed header
    Article 1– paragraph 1 – point 2 – point e / Regulation (EU) 2023/2854 / Article 2 – paragraph 1– point 50
  8. 214 Alternative David CormandGreens/EFA · IMCO “it also includes research information, such as abstracts, citations, metadata and other information used to understand and assess research”

    (50) ‘research data’ means data , other than scientific publications, which are collected or produced in the course of scientific research activities and are used as evidence in the research process, or are commonly accepted in the research community as necessary to validate research findings and results; it also includes research information, such as abstracts, citations, metadata and other information used to understand and assess research;

    Tabled by
    David Cormand on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group
    Group
    Greens/EFA
    Targets
    Data Act Article 2 – paragraph 1– point 50
    Document
    IMCO amendments 125–328 to the draft opinion
    Printed header
    Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point e / Regulation (EU) 2023/2854 / Article 2 – paragraph 1– point 50
  9. 571 Alternative Julie Rechagneux +7ECR, PfE · ITRE–LIBE “research data does not include data collected or produced in the course of processing whose principal object is to observe, profile or influence the…”

    (50) ‘research data’ means data , other than scientific publications, which are collected or produced in the course of scientific research activities, within the meaning of Article 4, point (38), of Regulation (EU) 2016/679, and are used as evidence in the research process, or are commonly accepted in the research community as necessary to validate research findings and results; research data does not include data collected or produced in the course of processing whose principal object is to observe, profile or influence the behaviour of natural persons for commercial purposes, in particular for behavioural advertising or the commercial targeting of individuals, even where scientific methods are used;

    Justification

    The definition of research data conditions the scope of the safeguards attaching to them. Its clarification ensures that data collected or produced in the course of scientific research are covered irrespective of the sector in which the research is carried out, while excluding processing whose principal object is the observation or influencing of behaviour.

    Tabled by
    Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pierre-Romain Thionnet, Alexandre Varaut, Fabrice Leggeri, Marion Maréchal, Christophe Bay
    Group
    ECR, PfE
    Targets
    Data Act Article 2(50)
    Document
    ITRE–LIBE amendments 527–776 to the draft report
    Printed header
    Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point e / Regulation (EU) 2023/2854 / Article 2 – point 50
  10. 572 Alternative Damian BoeselagerGreens/EFA · ITRE–LIBE “including research information, such as abstracts, citations, metadata and other information used to understand and assess research, as well as…”

    (50) ‘research data’ means data, other than scientific publications, which are collected or produced in the course of scientific research activities and are used as evidence in the research process, or are commonly accepted in the research community as necessary to validate research findings and results, including research information, such as abstracts, citations, metadata and other information used to understand and assess research, as well as scientific publications;

    Tabled by
    Damian Boeselager on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group
    Group
    Greens/EFA
    Targets
    Data Act Article 2(50)
    Document
    ITRE–LIBE amendments 527–776 to the draft report
    Printed header
    Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point e / Regulation (EU) 2023/2854 / Article 2 – point 50

Point (51): ‘Research data’

New definition proposed by the Commission · changed by the Council on 10 June

Parliament amendments 8

3 would delete the definition and 5 propose alternative wording. Deletion amendments come from Greens/EFA. 1 more, which add new definitions, is listed by term.

By political group; co-sponsored amendments count for each group
TypeS&DGreens/EFAEPPRapporteur
− Deletion·3··
~ Alternative1·31

By political group

  • − Deletion Greens/EFA 3
  • ~ Alternative S&D 1 EPP 3 Rapporteur 1

Show

  1. 25 Alternative Brando Benifei (rapporteur)Rapporteur · JURI ‘re-use’ means the use by natural or legal persons of data or documents held by:

    (51) ‘re-use’ means the use by natural persons or legal entitiespersons of data or documents held by:

    Rapporteur
    Brando Benifei
    Group
    Rapporteur
    Targets
    Data Act Article 2(51)
    Document
    JURI draft opinion
    Printed header
    Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point e / Regulation (EU) 2023/2854 / Article 2 – point 51 – introductory part
  2. 148 Deletion David CormandGreens/EFA · JURI Deletes the definition

    Text and details of Amendment 148 under point (4a), ‘consent’

  3. 151 Deletion David CormandGreens/EFA · JURI Deletes the definition

    Text and details of Amendment 151 under point (4a), ‘consent’

  4. 157 Deletion David CormandGreens/EFA · JURI Deletes the definition

    Text and details of Amendment 157 under point (4a), ‘consent’

  5. 164 Alternative Emil RadevEPP · JURI ‘re-use’ means the use by natural or legal persons of data or documents held by:

    (51) ‘re-use’ means the use by natural persons or legal entitiespersons of data or documents held by:

    Tabled by
    Emil Radev
    Group
    EPP
    Targets
    Data Act Article 2(51)
    Document
    JURI amendments 69–296 to the draft opinion
    Printed header
    Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point e / Regulation (EU) 2023/2854 / Article 2 – point 51
  6. 165 Alternative Victor NegrescuS&D · JURI “such re-use should, where possible, take place under open, standardised and interoperable conditions that facilitate cross-border and cross-sector…”

    Text and details of Amendment 165 under point (4a), ‘consent’

  7. 215 Alternative Sophia KircherEPP · IMCO ‘re-use’ means the use by natural or legal persons of data or documents held by:

    (51) ‘re-use’ means the use by natural persons or legal entitiespersons of data or documents held by:

    Tabled by
    Sophia Kircher
    Group
    EPP
    Targets
    Data Act Article 2 – paragraph 1– point 51
    Document
    IMCO amendments 125–328 to the draft opinion
    Printed header
    Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point e / Regulation (EU) 2023/2854 / Article 2 – paragraph 1– point 51
  8. 573 Alternative Aura SallaEPP · ITRE–LIBE ‘re-use’ means the use by natural or legal persons of data or documents held by:

    (51) ‘re-use’ means the use by natural persons or legal entitiespersons of data or documents held by:

    Tabled by
    Aura Salla
    Group
    EPP
    Targets
    Data Act Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 51 – introductory part
    Document
    ITRE–LIBE amendments 527–776 to the draft report
    Printed header
    Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point e / Regulation (EU) 2023/2854 / Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 51 – introductory part

Point (52): ‘Re-use’

New definition proposed by the Commission · changed by the Council on 10 June

Parliament amendments 7

3 would delete the definition and 4 propose alternative wording. Deletion amendments come from Greens/EFA. 1 more, which add new definitions, is listed by term.

By political group; co-sponsored amendments count for each group
TypeThe LeftS&DGreens/EFAECRPfE
− Deletion··3··
~ Alternative11·12

By political group

  • − Deletion Greens/EFA 3
  • ~ Alternative The Left 1 S&D 1 ECR 1 PfE 2

Show

  1. 148 Deletion David CormandGreens/EFA · JURI Deletes the definition

    Text and details of Amendment 148 under point (4a), ‘consent’

  2. 151 Deletion David CormandGreens/EFA · JURI Deletes the definition

    Text and details of Amendment 151 under point (4a), ‘consent’

  3. 157 Deletion David CormandGreens/EFA · JURI Deletes the definition

    Text and details of Amendment 157 under point (4a), ‘consent’

  4. 165 Alternative Victor NegrescuS&D · JURI “such re-use should, where possible, take place under open, standardised and interoperable conditions that facilitate cross-border and cross-sector…”

    Text and details of Amendment 165 under point (4a), ‘consent’

  5. 216 Alternative Virginie JoronPfE · IMCO “non-personal data, as well as 50”

    (52) ‘high-value datasets’ means datapersonal and non-personal data, as well as 50 documents the re-use of which is associated with important benefits for society, the environment and the economy, in particular because of their suitability for the creation of value-added services, applications and new, high-quality and decent jobs, and because of the number of potential beneficiaries of the value-added services and applications based on those data and documents;

    Tabled by
    Virginie Joron
    Group
    PfE
    Targets
    Data Act Article 2 – paragraph 1– point 52
    Document
    IMCO amendments 125–328 to the draft opinion
    Printed header
    Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point e / Regulation (EU) 2023/2854 / Article 2 – paragraph 1– point 52
  6. 574 Alternative João OliveiraThe Left · ITRE–LIBE ‘high-value datasets’ means data and documents the re-use of which is associated with important benefits for society, the environment and the public…

    (52) ‘high-value datasets’ means data and documents the re-use of which is associated with important benefits for society, the environment and the economy,public in particular because of their suitability for the creation of value-added services, applications and new, high-quality and decent jobs, and because of the number of potential beneficiaries of the value-added services and applications based on those data and documentsinterest;

    Tabled by
    João Oliveira
    Group
    The Left
    Targets
    Data Act Article 2(52)
    Document
    ITRE–LIBE amendments 527–776 to the draft report
    Printed header
    Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point e / Regulation (EU) 2023/2854 / Article 2 – point 52
  7. 575 Alternative Julie Rechagneux +7ECR, PfE · ITRE–LIBE “non-personal data, as well as”

    (52) ‘high-value datasets’ means datapersonal and non-personal data, as well as documents thewhose re-use of which is associated with important benefits for society, the environment and the economy, in particular because of their suitability for the creation of value-added services, applications and new, high-quality and decent jobs, and because of the number of potential beneficiaries of the value-added services and applications based on those data and documents;

    Tabled by
    Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pierre-Romain Thionnet, Alexandre Varaut, Fabrice Leggeri, Marion Maréchal, Christophe Bay
    Group
    ECR, PfE
    Targets
    Data Act Article 2(52)
    Document
    ITRE–LIBE amendments 527–776 to the draft report
    Printed header
    Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point e / Regulation (EU) 2023/2854 / Article 2 – point 52

Point (53): ‘High-value datasets’

New definition proposed by the Commission

Parliament amendments 6

3 would delete the definition, 1 proposes alternative wording and 2 would add wording to point (53). Deletion amendments come from Greens/EFA. 1 more, which add new definitions, is listed by term.

By political group; co-sponsored amendments count for each group
TypeS&DGreens/EFAECRPfE
− Deletion·3··
~ Alternative1···
+ Addition··12

By political group

  • − Deletion Greens/EFA 3
  • ~ Alternative S&D 1
  • + Addition ECR 1 PfE 2

Show

  1. 148 Deletion David CormandGreens/EFA · JURI Deletes the definition

    Text and details of Amendment 148 under point (4a), ‘consent’

  2. 151 Deletion David CormandGreens/EFA · JURI Deletes the definition

    Text and details of Amendment 151 under point (4a), ‘consent’

  3. 157 Deletion David CormandGreens/EFA · JURI Deletes the definition

    Text and details of Amendment 157 under point (4a), ‘consent’

  4. 165 Alternative Victor NegrescuS&D · JURI “such re-use should, where possible, take place under open, standardised and interoperable conditions that facilitate cross-border and cross-sector…”

    Text and details of Amendment 165 under point (4a), ‘consent’

  5. 217 Addition Virginie JoronPfE · IMCO “national security, public security defence or law and order, in accordance with Article 4(2) of the Treaty on European Union.”

    (da)national security, public security defence or law and order, in accordance with Article 4(2) of the Treaty on European Union.

    Tabled by
    Virginie Joron
    Group
    PfE
    Targets
    Data Act Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 53 – point d a (new)
    Document
    IMCO amendments 125–328 to the draft opinion
    Printed header
    Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point e / Regulation (EU) 2023/2854 / Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 53 – point d a (new)
  6. 576 Addition Julie Rechagneux +7ECR, PfE · ITRE–LIBE “national security, public security, defence or public order, in accordance with Article 4(2) of the Treaty on European Union.”

    (da)national security, public security, defence or public order, in accordance with Article 4(2) of the Treaty on European Union.

    Justification

    Article 4(2) of the Treaty on European Union reserves national security to the exclusive responsibility of each Member State. The addition ensures that the categories of protected data expressly include those relating to national security, public security, defence and public order, so that the re-use regime cannot be invoked to obtain access to data falling within the sole competence of the Member States.

    Tabled by
    Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pierre-Romain Thionnet, Alexandre Varaut, Fabrice Leggeri, Marion Maréchal, Christophe Bay
    Group
    ECR, PfE
    Targets
    Data Act Article 2 – point 53 – point da (new)
    Document
    ITRE–LIBE amendments 527–776 to the draft report
    Printed header
    Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point e / Regulation (EU) 2023/2854 / Article 2 – point 53 – point da (new)

Point (54): ‘Certain categories of protected data’

New definition proposed by the Commission · changed by the Council on 3 September

Parliament amendments 7

3 would delete the definition and 4 propose alternative wording. Deletion amendments come from Greens/EFA. 1 more, which add new definitions, is listed by term.

By political group; co-sponsored amendments count for each group
TypeS&DGreens/EFAECRPfENI
− Deletion·3···
~ Alternative1·121

By political group

  • − Deletion Greens/EFA 3
  • ~ Alternative S&D 1 ECR 1 PfE 2 NI 1

Show

  1. 148 Deletion David CormandGreens/EFA · JURI Deletes the definition

    Text and details of Amendment 148 under point (4a), ‘consent’

  2. 151 Deletion David CormandGreens/EFA · JURI Deletes the definition

    Text and details of Amendment 151 under point (4a), ‘consent’

  3. 157 Deletion David CormandGreens/EFA · JURI Deletes the definition

    Text and details of Amendment 157 under point (4a), ‘consent’

  4. 165 Alternative Victor NegrescuS&D · JURI “such re-use should, where possible, take place under open, standardised and interoperable conditions that facilitate cross-border and cross-sector…”

    Text and details of Amendment 165 under point (4a), ‘consent’

  5. 218 Alternative Virginie JoronPfE · IMCO “in order to protect personal data and data relating to identifiable natural persons from re-identification, personal data breaches and any unlawful…”

    (54) ‘secure processing environment’ means the physical or virtual environment and organisational means to ensure compliance with Union law in particular with regard to data subjects’ rights, intellectual property rights, and commercial and statistical confidentiality, integrity and accessibility, as well as with applicable national law, in order to protect personal data and data relating to identifiable natural persons from re-identification, personal data breaches and any unlawful use or trading, and to allow the entity providing the secure processing environment to determine and supervise all data processing actions, including the display, storage, download and export of data and the calculation of derivative data through computational algorithms;

    Tabled by
    Virginie Joron
    Group
    PfE
    Targets
    Data Act Article 2 – paragraph 1– point 54
    Document
    IMCO amendments 125–328 to the draft opinion
    Printed header
    Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point e / Regulation (EU) 2023/2854 / Article 2 – paragraph 1– point 54
  6. 578 Alternative Diana Iovanovici ŞoşoacăNI · ITRE–LIBE “ensuring governance, access control, traceability, anonymisation, data minimisation, data protection impact assessments and compliance with security…”

    54. ‘secure processing environment’ means the physical or virtual environment and organisational means to ensure compliance with Union law in particular with regard to data subjects’ rights, intellectual property rights, and commercial and statistical confidentiality, integrity and accessibility, as well as with applicable national law, and to allow the entity providing the secure processing environment to determine and supervise all data processing actions, including the display, storage, download and export of data and the calculation of derivative data through computational algorithms, ensuring governance, access control, traceability, anonymisation, data minimisation, data protection impact assessments and compliance with security requirements, business confidentiality and protection of data subject rights, as well as interoperability with other secure processing environments, within an EU-wide framework;

    Justification

    Proper supervision of all data processing actions is necessary, while ensuring data protection in accordance with the legislation in force and without prejudice to data subjects.

    Tabled by
    Diana Iovanovici Şoşoacă
    Group
    NI
    Targets
    Data Act Article 2(54)
    Document
    ITRE–LIBE amendments 527–776 to the draft report
    Printed header
    Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point e / Regulation (EU) 2023/2854 / Article 2 – point 54
  7. 579 Alternative Julie Rechagneux +8ECR, PfE · ITRE–LIBE “to protect personal data and data relating to identifiable natural persons against re-identification, against personal data breaches, and against…”

    (54) ‘secure processing environment’ means the physical or virtual environment and organisational means to ensure compliance with Union law in particular with regard to data subjects’ rights, intellectual property rights, and commercial and statistical confidentiality, integrity and accessibility, as well as with applicable national law, to protect personal data and data relating to identifiable natural persons against re-identification, against personal data breaches, and against unlawful use and trade, and to allow the entity providing the secure processing environment to determine and supervise all data processing actions, including the display, storage, download and export of data and the calculation of derivative data through computational algorithms;

    Tabled by
    Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pierre-Romain Thionnet, Alexandre Varaut, Fabrice Leggeri, Marion Maréchal, António Tânger Corrêa, Christophe Bay
    Group
    ECR, PfE
    Targets
    Data Act Article 2(54)
    Document
    ITRE–LIBE amendments 527–776 to the draft report
    Printed header
    Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point e / Regulation (EU) 2023/2854 / Article 2 – point 54

Point (56): ‘Secure processing environment’

New definition proposed by the Commission

Parliament amendments 4

3 would delete the definition and 1 proposes alternative wording. Deletion amendments come from Greens/EFA. 1 more, which add new definitions, is listed by term.

By political group; co-sponsored amendments count for each group
TypeS&DGreens/EFA
− Deletion·3
~ Alternative1·

By political group

  • − Deletion Greens/EFA 3
  • ~ Alternative S&D 1

Show

  1. 148 Deletion David CormandGreens/EFA · JURI Deletes the definition

    Text and details of Amendment 148 under point (4a), ‘consent’

  2. 151 Deletion David CormandGreens/EFA · JURI Deletes the definition

    Text and details of Amendment 151 under point (4a), ‘consent’

  3. 157 Deletion David CormandGreens/EFA · JURI Deletes the definition

    Text and details of Amendment 157 under point (4a), ‘consent’

  4. 165 Alternative Victor NegrescuS&D · JURI “such re-use should, where possible, take place under open, standardised and interoperable conditions that facilitate cross-border and cross-sector…”

    Text and details of Amendment 165 under point (4a), ‘consent’

Point (57): ‘Re-user’

New definition proposed by the Commission

Parliament amendments 4

3 would delete the definition and 1 proposes alternative wording. Deletion amendments come from Greens/EFA. 1 more, which add new definitions, is listed by term.

By political group; co-sponsored amendments count for each group
TypeS&DGreens/EFA
− Deletion·3
~ Alternative1·

By political group

  • − Deletion Greens/EFA 3
  • ~ Alternative S&D 1

Show

  1. 148 Deletion David CormandGreens/EFA · JURI Deletes the definition

    Text and details of Amendment 148 under point (4a), ‘consent’

  2. 151 Deletion David CormandGreens/EFA · JURI Deletes the definition

    Text and details of Amendment 151 under point (4a), ‘consent’

  3. 157 Deletion David CormandGreens/EFA · JURI Deletes the definition

    Text and details of Amendment 157 under point (4a), ‘consent’

  4. 165 Alternative Victor NegrescuS&D · JURI “such re-use should, where possible, take place under open, standardised and interoperable conditions that facilitate cross-border and cross-sector…”

    Text and details of Amendment 165 under point (4a), ‘consent’

Point (58): ‘Machine-readable format’

New definition proposed by the Commission

Parliament amendments 6

3 would delete the definition and 3 propose alternative wording. Deletion amendments come from Greens/EFA. 1 more, which add new definitions, is listed by term.

By political group; co-sponsored amendments count for each group
TypeS&DGreens/EFA
− Deletion·3
~ Alternative12

By political group

  • − Deletion Greens/EFA 3
  • ~ Alternative S&D 1 Greens/EFA 2

Show

  1. 148 Deletion David CormandGreens/EFA · JURI Deletes the definition

    Text and details of Amendment 148 under point (4a), ‘consent’

  2. 151 Deletion David CormandGreens/EFA · JURI Deletes the definition

    Text and details of Amendment 151 under point (4a), ‘consent’

  3. 157 Deletion David CormandGreens/EFA · JURI Deletes the definition

    Text and details of Amendment 157 under point (4a), ‘consent’

  4. 165 Alternative Victor NegrescuS&D · JURI “such re-use should, where possible, take place under open, standardised and interoperable conditions that facilitate cross-border and cross-sector…”

    Text and details of Amendment 165 under point (4a), ‘consent’

  5. 219 Alternative David CormandGreens/EFA · IMCO ‘formal open standard’ means a freely accessible standard which has been laid down in written form, detailing specifications for the requirements on…

    (58) ‘formal open standard’ means a freely accessible standard which has been laid down in written form, detailing specifications for the requirements on how to ensure software interoperability;

    Tabled by
    David Cormand on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group
    Group
    Greens/EFA
    Targets
    Data Act Article 2 – paragraph 1– point 58
    Document
    IMCO amendments 125–328 to the draft opinion
    Printed header
    Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point e / Regulation (EU) 2023/2854 / Article 2 – paragraph 1– point 58
  6. 581 Alternative Damian BoeselagerGreens/EFA · ITRE–LIBE ‘formal open standard’ means a freely accessible standard which has been laid down in written form, detailing specifications for the requirements on…

    (58) ‘formal open standard’ means a freely accessible standard which has been laid down in written form, detailing specifications for the requirements on how to ensure software interoperability;

    Tabled by
    Damian Boeselager on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group
    Group
    Greens/EFA
    Targets
    Data Act Article 2(58)
    Document
    ITRE–LIBE amendments 527–776 to the draft report
    Printed header
    Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point e / Regulation (EU) 2023/2854 / Article 2 – point 58

Point (59): ‘Open format’

New definition proposed by the Commission · changed by the Council on 10 June

Parliament amendments 5

4 would delete the definition and 1 proposes alternative wording. Deletion amendments come from Greens/EFA, and from the IMCO rapporteur’s draft opinion. 1 more, which add new definitions, is listed by term.

By political group; co-sponsored amendments count for each group
TypeS&DGreens/EFARapporteur
− Deletion·31
~ Alternative1··

By political group

  • − Deletion Greens/EFA 3 Rapporteur 1
  • ~ Alternative S&D 1

Show

  1. 36 Deletion Alex Agius Saliba (rapporteur)Rapporteur · IMCO Deletes the definition

    (59) ‘reasonable return on investment’ means a percentage of the overall charge, in addition to the amount needed to recover the eligible costs, not exceeding 5 percentage points above the fixed interest rate of the ECB;

    Rapporteur
    Alex Agius Saliba
    Group
    Rapporteur
    Targets
    Data Act Article 2(59)
    Document
    IMCO draft opinion
    Printed header
    Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point e / Regulation (EU) 2023/2854 / Article 2 – point 59
  2. 148 Deletion David CormandGreens/EFA · JURI Deletes the definition

    Text and details of Amendment 148 under point (4a), ‘consent’

  3. 151 Deletion David CormandGreens/EFA · JURI Deletes the definition

    Text and details of Amendment 151 under point (4a), ‘consent’

  4. 157 Deletion David CormandGreens/EFA · JURI Deletes the definition

    Text and details of Amendment 157 under point (4a), ‘consent’

  5. 165 Alternative Victor NegrescuS&D · JURI “such re-use should, where possible, take place under open, standardised and interoperable conditions that facilitate cross-border and cross-sector…”

    Text and details of Amendment 165 under point (4a), ‘consent’

Point (60): ‘Formal open standard’

New definition proposed by the Commission

Parliament amendments 7

3 would delete the definition and 4 propose alternative wording. Deletion amendments come from Greens/EFA. 1 more, which add new definitions, is listed by term.

By political group; co-sponsored amendments count for each group
TypeS&DGreens/EFAECRPfE
− Deletion·3··
~ Alternative1112

By political group

  • − Deletion Greens/EFA 3
  • ~ Alternative S&D 1 Greens/EFA 1 ECR 1 PfE 2

Show

  1. 148 Deletion David CormandGreens/EFA · JURI Deletes the definition

    Text and details of Amendment 148 under point (4a), ‘consent’

  2. 151 Deletion David CormandGreens/EFA · JURI Deletes the definition

    Text and details of Amendment 151 under point (4a), ‘consent’

  3. 157 Deletion David CormandGreens/EFA · JURI Deletes the definition

    Text and details of Amendment 157 under point (4a), ‘consent’

  4. 165 Alternative Victor NegrescuS&D · JURI “such re-use should, where possible, take place under open, standardised and interoperable conditions that facilitate cross-border and cross-sector…”

    Text and details of Amendment 165 under point (4a), ‘consent’

  5. 220 Alternative Virginie JoronPfE · IMCO “A requirement shall not constitute a data localisation requirement within the meaning of this point where it is justified by reasons or public…”

    (60) ‘data localisation requirement’ means any obligation, prohibition, condition, limit or other requirement provided for in the laws, regulations or administrative provisions of a Member State or resulting from general and consistent administrative practices in a Member State and in bodies governed by public law, including in the field of public procurement, without prejudice to Directive 2014/24/EU, which imposes the processing of data in the territory of a specific Member State or hinders the processing of data in any other Member State. A requirement shall not constitute a data localisation requirement within the meaning of this point where it is justified by reasons or public security or where it is necessary and proportionate in order to protect personal data, sensitive data or high-value datasets from any access, transfer or use resulting from the extra-territorial application of a law of a third country that may be cause harm to the Union or its Member States;

    Tabled by
    Virginie Joron
    Group
    PfE
    Targets
    Data Act Article 2 – paragraph 1– point 60
    Document
    IMCO amendments 125–328 to the draft opinion
    Printed header
    Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point e / Regulation (EU) 2023/2854 / Article 2 – paragraph 1– point 60
  6. 582 Alternative Julie Rechagneux +8ECR, PfE · ITRE–LIBE “a requirement shall not constitute a data localisation requirement within the meaning of this point where it is justified on grounds of public…”

    (60) ‘data localisation requirement’ means any obligation, prohibition, condition, limit or other requirement provided for in the laws, regulations or administrative provisions of a Member State or resulting from general and consistent administrative practices in a Member State and in bodies governed by public law, including in the field of public procurement, without prejudice to Directive 2014/24/EU, which imposes the processing of data in the territory of a specific Member State or hinders the processing of data in any other Member State; a requirement shall not constitute a data localisation requirement within the meaning of this point where it is justified on grounds of public security, service continuity in the face of unilateral extraterritorial suspension risks, or where it is necessary and proportionate to protect personal data, sensitive data or high-value datasets against access, transfer or use resulting from the extraterritorial application of a third-country law likely to cause harm to the Union or its Member States;

    Justification

    The growing extraterritorial reach of certain third-country laws exposes personal data, sensitive data and high-value datasets held in the Union to access, transfer or use that may run counter to the Union’s economic security and to the protection of natural persons. This exception, framed around the established grounds of public security and the principles of necessity and proportionality, ensures that the prohibition on data localisation requirements does not prevent Member States from protecting data whose exposure to extraterritorial reach would be liable to cause harm to the Union or its Member States.

    Tabled by
    Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pierre-Romain Thionnet, Alexandre Varaut, Fabrice Leggeri, Marion Maréchal, António Tânger Corrêa, Christophe Bay
    Group
    ECR, PfE
    Targets
    Data Act Article 2(60)
    Document
    ITRE–LIBE amendments 527–776 to the draft report
    Printed header
    Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point e / Regulation (EU) 2023/2854 / Article 2 – point 60
  7. 583 Alternative Damian BoeselagerGreens/EFA · ITRE–LIBE ‘data localisation requirement’ means any obligation, prohibition, condition, limit or other requirement provided for in the laws, regulations or…

    (60) ‘data localisation requirement’ means any obligation, prohibition, condition, limit or other requirement provided for in the laws, regulations or administrative provisions of a Member State or resulting from general and consistent administrative practices in a Member State and in bodies governed by public law, including in the field of public procurement, without prejudice to Directive 2014/24/EU, which imposes the processing of data in the territory of a specific Member State or hinders the processing of data in any other Member State;

    Tabled by
    Damian Boeselager on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group
    Group
    Greens/EFA
    Targets
    Data Act Article 2(60)
    Document
    ITRE–LIBE amendments 527–776 to the draft report
    Printed header
    Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point e / Regulation (EU) 2023/2854 / Article 2 – point 60

Point (61): ‘Reasonable return on investment’

New definition proposed by the Commission

Parliament amendments 4

3 would delete the definition and 1 proposes alternative wording. Deletion amendments come from Greens/EFA. 1 more, which add new definitions, is listed by term.

By political group; co-sponsored amendments count for each group
TypeS&DGreens/EFA
− Deletion·3
~ Alternative1·

By political group

  • − Deletion Greens/EFA 3
  • ~ Alternative S&D 1

Show

  1. 148 Deletion David CormandGreens/EFA · JURI Deletes the definition

    Text and details of Amendment 148 under point (4a), ‘consent’

  2. 151 Deletion David CormandGreens/EFA · JURI Deletes the definition

    Text and details of Amendment 151 under point (4a), ‘consent’

  3. 157 Deletion David CormandGreens/EFA · JURI Deletes the definition

    Text and details of Amendment 157 under point (4a), ‘consent’

  4. 165 Alternative Victor NegrescuS&D · JURI “such re-use should, where possible, take place under open, standardised and interoperable conditions that facilitate cross-border and cross-sector…”

    Text and details of Amendment 165 under point (4a), ‘consent’

Point (61): ‘Draft act’

Added by the Council on 10 June

Point (62): ‘Data localisation requirement’

New definition proposed by the Commission

Parliament amendments 4

3 would delete the definition and 1 proposes alternative wording. Deletion amendments come from Greens/EFA. 1 more, which add new definitions, is listed by term.

By political group; co-sponsored amendments count for each group
TypeS&DGreens/EFA
− Deletion·3
~ Alternative1·

By political group

  • − Deletion Greens/EFA 3
  • ~ Alternative S&D 1

Show

  1. 148 Deletion David CormandGreens/EFA · JURI Deletes the definition

    Text and details of Amendment 148 under point (4a), ‘consent’

  2. 151 Deletion David CormandGreens/EFA · JURI Deletes the definition

    Text and details of Amendment 151 under point (4a), ‘consent’

  3. 157 Deletion David CormandGreens/EFA · JURI Deletes the definition

    Text and details of Amendment 157 under point (4a), ‘consent’

  4. 165 Alternative Victor NegrescuS&D · JURI “such re-use should, where possible, take place under open, standardised and interoperable conditions that facilitate cross-border and cross-sector…”

    Text and details of Amendment 165 under point (4a), ‘consent’

Point (63): ‘Pseudonymisation’

New definition proposed by the Commission

Parliament amendments 4

3 would delete the definition and 1 proposes alternative wording. Deletion amendments come from Greens/EFA. 1 more, which add new definitions, is listed by term.

By political group; co-sponsored amendments count for each group
TypeS&DGreens/EFA
− Deletion·3
~ Alternative1·

By political group

  • − Deletion Greens/EFA 3
  • ~ Alternative S&D 1

Show

  1. 148 Deletion David CormandGreens/EFA · JURI Deletes the definition

    Text and details of Amendment 148 under point (4a), ‘consent’

  2. 151 Deletion David CormandGreens/EFA · JURI Deletes the definition

    Text and details of Amendment 151 under point (4a), ‘consent’

  3. 157 Deletion David CormandGreens/EFA · JURI Deletes the definition

    Text and details of Amendment 157 under point (4a), ‘consent’

  4. 165 Alternative Victor NegrescuS&D · JURI “such re-use should, where possible, take place under open, standardised and interoperable conditions that facilitate cross-border and cross-sector…”

    Text and details of Amendment 165 under point (4a), ‘consent’

Definitions only Parliament amendments would add or change

33 amendments: 17 propose new definitions, 16 amend definitions the Commission leaves unchanged

‘collective negotiation’New definition

  1. 33 Addition Alex Agius Saliba (rapporteur)Rapporteur · IMCO ‘collective negotiation’ means the negotiation by a data expert representative, acting on the basis of an aggregated mandate from a defined or… numbered (38bb)

    (38bb) ‘collective negotiation’ means the negotiation by a data expert representative, acting on the basis of an aggregated mandate from a defined or ascertainable group of individuals in their best interest, with one or more data controllers, of the standard terms governing the processing of those individuals' personal data, with a view to those terms being applied uniformly to all individuals covered by that mandate;

    Rapporteur
    Alex Agius Saliba
    Group
    Rapporteur
    Targets
    Data Act Article 2 – point 38b b (new)
    Document
    IMCO draft opinion
    Printed header
    Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point d / Regulation (EU) 2023/2854 / Article 2 – point 38b b (new)

‘connected product’Amends existing point (4aa)5 proposals

  1. 150 Addition Emil RadevEPP · JURI ‘connected product’ means an item that whose primary function is obtaining, generating, or collecting obtains, generates or collects data concerning…

    (4cb) (5) ‘connected product’ means an item that whose primary function is obtaining, generating, or collecting obtains, generates or collects data concerning its use or environment and that is able to communicate product data via an electronic communications service, physical connection or on-device access, and excluding any item whose primary function is not the storing, processing or transmission of data other than data concerning its use or environment on behalf of any party other than the user;

    Justification

    This amendment aims to ensure legal clarity and regulatory consistency by explicitly excluding hardware whose primary function is the processing of regulated financial transactions from the scope of the Regulation. Such hardware is already subject to comprehensive sector-specific requirements under the Union’s financial services framework. Bringing these products simultaneously within the scope of this Regulation would create overlapping and potentially conflicting compliance requirements, resulting in unnecessary administrative burdens and legal uncertainty. The exclusion is therefore necessary to avoid double regulation, maintain a coherent regulatory framework, and preserve the security, stability and resilience of Europe’s payment infrastructure.

    Tabled by
    Emil Radev
    Group
    EPP
    Targets
    Data Act Article 2(5)
    Document
    JURI amendments 69–296 to the draft opinion
    Printed header
    Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a / Regulation (EU) 2023/2854 / Article 2 – point 5
  2. 205 Alternative Arba KokalariEPP · IMCO “primary function is to obtain”

    (ba) Point (5) is replaced by the following:

    (5) ‘connected product’ means an item thatwhose obtainsprimary function is to obtain, generatesgenerate or collectscollect data concerning its use or environment and that is able to communicate product data via an electronic communications service, physical connection or on-device access, and whose primary function is not the storing, processing or transmission of data on behalf of any party other than the user;"

    Tabled by
    Arba Kokalari
    Group
    EPP
    Targets
    Data Act Article 2(5)
    Document
    IMCO amendments 125–328 to the draft opinion
    Printed header
    Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b a (new) / Regulation (EU) 2023/2854 / Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 5
  3. 206 Alternative Sophia KircherEPP · IMCO “concerning its use or environment”

    "‘connected product’ means an item thatwhose obtainsprimary function is obtaining, generatesgenerating, or collectscollecting data concerning its use or environment and that is able to communicate product data via an electronic communications service, physical connection or on-device access, andexcluding any item whose primary function is not the storing, processing or transmission of data on behalf of any party other than thedata userconcerning its use or environment;"

    Tabled by
    Sophia Kircher
    Group
    EPP
    Targets
    Data Act Article 2(5)
    Document
    IMCO amendments 125–328 to the draft opinion
    Printed header
    Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b b (new) / Regulation (EU) 2023/2854 / Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 5
  4. 547 Addition Aura Salla +4EPP · ITRE–LIBE ‘connected product’ means an item whose primary function is obtaining, generating, or collecting data concerning its use or environment and that is…

    (4aa) 'connected product’ means an item whose primary function is obtaining, generating, or collecting data concerning its use or environment and that is able to communicate product data via an electronic communications service, physical connection or on-device access, excluding any item whose primary function is not the storing, processing or transmission of data other than data concerning its use or environment;

    Tabled by
    Aura Salla, Niels Flemming Hansen, Ana Miguel Pedro, Andrea Wechsler, Christian Ehler
    Group
    EPP
    Targets
    Data Act Article 2 – point 4a a (new)
    Document
    ITRE–LIBE amendments 527–776 to the draft report
    Printed header
    Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a / Regulation (EU) 2023/2854 / Article 2 – point 4a a (new)
  5. 555 Addition Tomas Tobé +2EPP · ITRE–LIBE ‘connected product’ means an item whose primary function is to obtain, generate or collect data concerning its use or environment and that is able to…

    (aa) (ba) Point (5) is replaced by the following:

    (5) ‘connected product’ means an item thatwhose obtainsprimary function is to obtain, generatesgenerate or collectscollect data concerning its use or environment and that is able to communicate product data via an electronic communications service, physical connection or on-device access, and whose primary function is not the storing, processing or transmission of data on behalf of any party other than the user;"

    Tabled by
    Tomas Tobé, Arba Kokalari, Jörgen Warborn
    Group
    EPP
    Targets
    Data Act Article 2(5)
    Document
    ITRE–LIBE amendments 527–776 to the draft report
    Printed header
    Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a a (new) / Regulation (EU) 2023/2854 / Article 2 – point 5

‘Data altruism organisation’New definition2 proposals

  1. 162 Addition Emil RadevEPP · JURI ‘Data altruism organisation’ means a legal person operating on a not-for-profit basis and independently from any for-profit entity, which carries out… numbered (38)

    (38ba) The following point (38c) is inserted

    ‘Data altruism organisation’ means a legal person operating on a not-for-profit basis and independently from any for-profit entity, which carries out activities enabling the voluntary sharing and use of personal or non-personal data for objectives of general interest.

    Justification

    Justification: Due to the loss of certain provisions on data altruism organisations an explicit definition of data altruism organisations is suggested.

    Tabled by
    Emil Radev
    Group
    EPP
    Targets
    Data Act Article 2 – point 38c (new)
    Document
    JURI amendments 69–296 to the draft opinion
    Printed header
    Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point d / Regulation (EU) 2023/2854 / Article 2 – point 38
  2. 210 Addition Sophia KircherEPP · IMCO ‘Data altruism organisation’ means a legal person operating on a not-for-profit basis and independently from any for-profit entity, which carries out… numbered (38ba)

    (38ba) ‘Data altruism organisation’ means a legal person operating on a not-for-profit basis and independently from any for-profit entity, which carries out activities enabling the voluntary sharing and use of personal or non-personal data for objectives of general interest.

    Justification

    Due to the loss of certain provisions on data altruism organisations an explicit definition of data altruism organisations is suggested.

    Tabled by
    Sophia Kircher
    Group
    EPP
    Targets
    Data Act Article 2 – paragraph 1– point 38b a (new)
    Document
    IMCO amendments 125–328 to the draft opinion
    Printed header
    Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point d / Regulation (EU) 2023/2854 / Article 2 – paragraph 1– point 38b a (new)

‘data expert representative’New definition

  1. 32 Addition Alex Agius Saliba (rapporteur)Rapporteur · IMCO ‘data expert representative’ means a data intermediation services provider, recognised under this Regulation, which acts in a fiduciary capacity… numbered (38ba)

    (38ba) ‘data expert representative’ means a data intermediation services provider, recognised under this Regulation, which acts in a fiduciary capacity representing the interests of individuals, who undertakes to act with all due care and transparency in the best interests of one or more such identified individuals, advising those individuals on the processing of their personal data by data controllers within the meaning of Article 4 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679, including the negotiation of such terms when mandated to do so by the individuals in question;

    Rapporteur
    Alex Agius Saliba
    Group
    Rapporteur
    Targets
    Data Act Article 2 – paragraph 1– point 38b a (new)
    Document
    IMCO draft opinion
    Printed header
    Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point d / Regulation (EU) 2023/2854 / Article 2 – point 38b a (new)

‘data intermediation service’Amends an existing definition2 proposals

  1. 149 Addition Emil RadevEPP · JURI ‘data intermediation service’ means a service which aims to establish commercial relationships for the purposes of data sharing between an…

    (4ca) ‘data intermediation service’ means a service which aims to establish commercial relationships for the purposes of data sharing between an undetermined number of data subjects and data holders on the one hand and data users on the other, through technical, legal or other means, including for the purpose of exercising the rights of data subjects in relation to personal data, excluding at least the following:

    (a)services that obtain data from data holders and aggregate, enrich or transform the data for the purpose of adding substantial value to it and license the use of the resulting data to data users, without establishing a commercial relationship between data holders and data users;

    (b)services that focus on the intermediation of copyright-protected content;

    (c)services that are exclusively used by one data holder in order to enable the use of the data held by that data holder, or that are used by multiple legal persons in a closed group, including supplier or customer relationships or collaborations established by contract, in particular those that have as a main objective to ensure the functionalities of objects and devices connected to the Internet of Things;

    (d)data sharing services offered by public sector bodies that do not aim to establish commercial relationships;

    Justification

    The proposed definition implies that access does not necessarily include transmission or downloading, which would undermine effectiveness of the Data Act. There is a contradiction in saying that access does not necessarily implies transmission or download of data. This would allow data holders to limit access to view-only solutions, preventing users from effectively using the data. If this definition of access is not removed, the right of access would remain purely theoretical and ineffective

    Tabled by
    Emil Radev
    Group
    EPP
    Targets
    Data Act Article 2 – point 4 c a (new)
    Document
    JURI amendments 69–296 to the draft opinion
    Printed header
    Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a / Regulation (EU) 2023/2854 / Article 2 – point 4 c a (new)
  2. 202 Addition Sophia KircherEPP · IMCO ‘data intermediation service’ means a service which aims to establish commercial relationships for the purposes of data sharing between an…

    (aa)‘data intermediation service’ means a service which aims to establish commercial relationships for the purposes of data sharing between an undetermined number of data subjects and data holders on the one hand and data users on the other, through technical, legal or other means, including for the purpose of exercising the rights of data subjects in relation to personal data, excluding at least the following:

    (a)services that obtain data from data holders and aggregate, enrich or transform the data for the purpose of adding substantial value to it and license the use of the resulting data to data users, without establishing a commercial relationship between data holders and data users;

    (b)services that focus on the intermediation of copyright-protected content;

    (c)services that are exclusively used by one data holder in order to enable the use of the data held by that data holder, or that are used by multiple legal persons in a closed group, including supplier or customer relationships or collaborations established by contract, in particular those that have as a main objective to ensure the functionalities of objects and devices connected to the Internet of Things;

    (d)data sharing services offered by public sector bodies that do not aim to establish commercial relationships;

    Tabled by
    Sophia Kircher
    Group
    EPP
    Targets
    Data Act Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point a (new)
    Document
    IMCO amendments 125–328 to the draft opinion
    Printed header
    Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a a (new) / Regulation (EU) 2023/2854 / Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point a (new)

‘derived data’New definition

  1. 577 Addition Julie Rechagneux +7ECR, PfE · ITRE–LIBE ‘derived data’ should mean data resulting from processing beyond the minimum adaptations strictly necessary to ensure readability and usability… numbered (53a)

    (53a)'Industrial or business data should not be regarded as ‘high-value datasets’ within the meaning of this Regulation solely because they have significant economic, commercial or strategic value. Where such data are protected on grounds of commercial confidentiality, including as trade secrets, they should remain subject to the applicable rules governing access, re-use, data sharing and confidentiality. For the purposes of mandatory data-sharing obligations:

    (a)‘raw data’ should mean data automatically captured or generated by an individual sensor, software event or source component in their native form, subject only to operations technically inherent in their capture, recording, transmission or storage;

    (b)‘derived data’ should mean data resulting from processing beyond the minimum adaptations strictly necessary to ensure readability and usability, including transformation, combination, aggregation, enrichment, inference or analysis, as well as data generated through sensor fusion, algorithms, analytics or domain-specific expertise;

    (c)mandatory data sharing should be limited to raw data and to the minimum technical adaptations strictly necessary to ensure their usability and readability. Processed, inferred, derived or other value-added data should be excluded from such obligations, unless otherwise expressly required by Union law or agreed by the parties, in order to protect trade secrets, intellectual property rights and investments in data processing and analytics.'

    Tabled by
    Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pierre-Romain Thionnet, Alexandre Varaut, Fabrice Leggeri, Marion Maréchal, Christophe Bay
    Group
    ECR, PfE
    Targets
    Data Act Article 2 – point 53a (new)
    Document
    ITRE–LIBE amendments 527–776 to the draft report
    Printed header
    Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point e / Regulation (EU) 2023/2854 / Article 2 – point 53a (new)

‘local network access’New definition

  1. 221 Addition David CormandGreens/EFA · IMCO ‘local network access’ means access to product data or related service data through an interface operating on the electronic communications network… numbered (61a)

    (61a)‘local network access’ means access to product data or related service data through an interface operating on the electronic communications network under the user’s own control, that does not require the data to be transmitted to, processed by, or routed through a server or cloud infrastructure operated by the manufacturer, the data holder, or a third party.

    Justification

    This amendment is connected to the following addition on access to connected products which aims to ensure that data access is made possible and operational without the data first being transmitted to, or made contingent upon the availability of, a server or cloud infrastructure operated by the manufacturer.

    Tabled by
    David Cormand on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group
    Group
    Greens/EFA
    Targets
    Data Act Article 2 – paragraph 1– point 61 a (new)
    Document
    IMCO amendments 125–328 to the draft opinion
    Printed header
    Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point e / Regulation (EU) 2023/2854 / Article 2 – paragraph 1– point 61 a (new)

‘machine-readable negotiated terms’New definition

  1. 34 Addition Alex Agius Saliba (rapporteur)Rapporteur · IMCO ‘machine-readable negotiated terms’ means a set of terms governing the processing of personal data, agreed between a data expert representative and a… numbered (38bc)

    (38bc) ‘machine-readable negotiated terms’ means a set of terms governing the processing of personal data, agreed between a data expert representative and a data controller in the course of collective negotiation, expressed in a format that allows automated communication, verification and enforcement between the data controller’s systems and the data expert representative’s systems.'

    Rapporteur
    Alex Agius Saliba
    Group
    Rapporteur
    Targets
    Data Act Article 2 – point 38b c (new)
    Document
    IMCO draft opinion
    Printed header
    Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point d / Regulation (EU) 2023/2854 / Article 2 – point 38b c (new)

‘mitigating or supporting the recovery from a public emergency’New definition2 proposals

  1. 15 Addition Aura Salla and Marina Kaljurand (rapporteurs)Rapporteurs · ITRE–LIBE ‘mitigating or supporting the recovery from a public emergency’ means actions taken after or once the immediate phase of the emergency has passed and… numbered (63a)

    (ea) the following point is added

    (63a)‘responding to a public emergency’ means the immediate actions necessary to address and manage the emergency while it is ongoing, whereas ‘mitigating or supporting the recovery from a public emergency’ means actions taken after or once the immediate phase of the emergency has passed and is aimed at limiting its consequences and restoring normal conditions;

    Rapporteurs
    Aura Salla and Marina Kaljurand
    Group
    Rapporteurs
    Targets
    Data Act Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 63a(new)
    Document
    ITRE–LIBE draft report
    Printed header
    Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point e a (new) / Regulation (EU) 2023/2854 / Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 63a(new)
  2. 587 Addition Michael McNamara +4Renew · ITRE–LIBE ‘mitigating or supporting the recovery from a public emergency’ means time-limited actions taken after or once the immediate phase of the emergency… numbered (63a)

    (ea) In Article 2, the following point is added:

    (63a)‘responding to a public emergency’ means the immediate, time-limited actions strictly necessary and proportionate to directly and solely address and manage the emergency until its immediate phase has passed, whereas ‘mitigating or supporting the recovery from a public emergency’ means time-limited actions taken after or once the immediate phase of the emergency has passed and is aimed at limiting its direct consequences and restoring stable conditions;'

    Tabled by
    Michael McNamara, Irena Joveva, Oihane Agirregoitia Martínez, Veronika Cifrová Ostrihoňová, Christophe Grudler
    Group
    Renew
    Targets
    Data Act Article 2 – point 63a (new)
    Document
    ITRE–LIBE amendments 527–776 to the draft report
    Printed header
    Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point e a (new) / Regulation (EU) 2023/2854 / Article 2 – point 63a (new)

‘placing on the market’Amends existing point (22)2 proposals

  1. 204 Alternative Sophia KircherEPP · IMCO “meaning that if at least one individual unit has been lawfully placed on the market or put into service before the date specified in Article 50…”

    "(22)‘placing on the market’ means the first making available of a connected product on the Union market;, meaning that if at least one individual unit has been lawfully placed on the market or put into service before the date specified in Article 50, other individual units of the same type and model of connected products are subject to the grace period provided in Article 50 and thus may continue to be placed on the market, made available or put into service on the Union market without any additional obligations, requirements or the need for additional certification."

    Tabled by
    Sophia Kircher
    Group
    EPP
    Targets
    Data Act Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 22
    Document
    IMCO amendments 125–328 to the draft opinion
    Printed header
    Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b a (new) / Regulation (EU) 2023/2854 / Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 22
  2. 559 Addition Aura Salla +5EPP · ITRE–LIBE “placing on the market’ means the first making available of a connected product on the Union market, meaning that if at least one individual unit has…”

    (13a) Article 2, paragraph 1, point 22 is replaced by the following

    (22)placing on the market’ means the first making available of a connected product on the Union market, meaning that if at least one individual unit has been lawfully placed on the market or put into service before the date specified in Article 50, other individual units of the same type and model of connected products are subject to the grace period provided in Article 50 and thus may continue to be placed on the market, made available or put into service on the Union market without any additional obligations, requirements or the need for additional certification;'

    Tabled by
    Aura Salla, Niels Flemming Hansen, Ana Miguel Pedro, Andrea Wechsler, Pekka Toveri, Christian Ehler
    Group
    EPP
    Targets
    Data Act Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 22
    Document
    ITRE–LIBE amendments 527–776 to the draft report
    Printed header
    Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b / Regulation (EU) 2023/2854 / Article 2 – point 22

Point (49)

  1. 23 Alternative Brando Benifei (rapporteur)Rapporteur · JURI “in the context of Chapter VIIc”

    (49) ‘dynamic data’ in the context of Chapter VIIc means data and documents in a digital form, subject to frequent or real-time updates, in particular because of their volatility or rapid obsolescence; data generated by sensors are typically considered to be dynamic data;

    Rapporteur
    Brando Benifei
    Group
    Rapporteur
    Targets
    Data Act Article 2(49)
    Document
    JURI draft opinion
    Printed header
    Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point e / Regulation (EU) 2023/2854 / Article 2 – point 49

Point (55)

  1. 580 Alternative Diana Iovanovici ŞoşoacăNI · ITRE–LIBE “on condition that said person ensures proper data protection, does not transmit the data for material gain, especially without seeking the consent of…”

    55. ‘re-user’ means a natural or legal person who was granted the right to re-use data or documents held by a public sector body or a public undertaking under Chapter VIIc or to research data or certain categories of protected data, on condition that said person ensures proper data protection, does not transmit the data for material gain, especially without seeking the consent of the holder and without communicating their intention to the persons concerned;

    Justification

    The transmission of data by a re-user for material gain is not acceptable.

    Tabled by
    Diana Iovanovici Şoşoacă
    Group
    NI
    Targets
    Data Act Article 2(55)
    Document
    ITRE–LIBE amendments 527–776 to the draft report
    Printed header
    Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point e / Regulation (EU) 2023/2854 / Article 2 – point 55

‘pseudonymised data’New definition2 proposals

  1. 222 Addition Virginie JoronPfE · IMCO ‘pseudonymised data’ and ‘ pseudonymous data’ mean, respectively pseudonymised data and pseudonymous data as defined in Article 4 of Regulation (EU)… numbered (61a)

    (61a)‘pseudonymised data’ and ‘ pseudonymous data’ mean, respectively pseudonymised data and pseudonymous data as defined in Article 4 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679;

    Tabled by
    Virginie Joron
    Group
    PfE
    Targets
    Data Act Article 2 – paragraph 1– point 61 a (new)
    Document
    IMCO amendments 125–328 to the draft opinion
    Printed header
    Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point e / Regulation (EU) 2023/2854 / Article 2 – paragraph 1– point 61 a (new)
  2. 585 Addition Julie Rechagneux +7ECR, PfE · ITRE–LIBE ‘pseudonymised data’ mean pseudonymous data and pseudonymised data as defined in Article 4 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679;' numbered (61a)

    (61a)‘pseudonymous data’ and ‘pseudonymised data’ mean pseudonymous data and pseudonymised data as defined in Article 4 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679;'

    Tabled by
    Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pierre-Romain Thionnet, Alexandre Varaut, Fabrice Leggeri, Marion Maréchal, Christophe Bay
    Group
    ECR, PfE
    Targets
    Data Act Article 2 – point 61a (new)
    Document
    ITRE–LIBE amendments 527–776 to the draft report
    Printed header
    Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point e / Regulation (EU) 2023/2854 / Article 2 – point 61a (new)

‘pseudonymous data’New definition2 proposals

  1. 222 Addition Virginie JoronPfE · IMCO ‘pseudonymised data’ and ‘ pseudonymous data’ mean, respectively pseudonymised data and pseudonymous data as defined in Article 4 of Regulation (EU)… numbered (61a)

    Text and details of Amendment 222 under ‘pseudonymised data’

  2. 585 Addition Julie Rechagneux +7ECR, PfE · ITRE–LIBE ‘pseudonymous data’ and ‘pseudonymised data’ mean pseudonymous data and pseudonymised data as defined in Article 4 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679;' numbered (61a)

    Text and details of Amendment 585 under ‘pseudonymised data’

‘public emergency’Amends existing point (29)5 proposals

  1. 19 Alternative Brando Benifei (rapporteur)Rapporteur · JURI “for the purposes of this Regulation, ‘responding to a public emergency’ refers to the immediate actions necessary to address and manage the emergency…”

    (ca) point (29) is replaced by the following:

    (29) ‘public emergency’ means an exceptional situation, limited in time, such as a public health emergency, an emergency resulting from natural disasters, a human-induced major disaster, including a major cybersecurity incident, negatively affecting the population of the Union or the whole or part of a Member State, with a risk of serious and lasting repercussions for living conditions or economic stability, financial stability, or the substantial and immediate degradation of economic assets in the Union or the relevant Member State and which is determined or officially declared in accordance with the relevant procedures under Union or national law; for the purposes of this Regulation, “responding to a public emergency” refers to the immediate actions necessary to address and manage the emergency while it is ongoing, whereas “mitigating or supporting the recovery from a public emergency” refers to actions taken after or once the immediate phase of the emergency has passed, aimed at limiting its consequences and restoring normal conditions;

    Justification

    This amendment introduces a clearer and harmonised definition of ‘public emergency’ in order to improve legal certainty and avoid divergent interpretations across Member States. It also helps ensure that emergency-related data access mechanisms remain limited to genuinely exceptional and time-bound situations. It also clarifies the distinction between the immediate response phase of a public emergency and broader mitigation or recovery activities.

    Rapporteur
    Brando Benifei
    Group
    Rapporteur
    Targets
    Data Act Article 2 – point 29
    Document
    JURI draft opinion
    Printed header
    Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point c a (new) / Regulation (EU) 2023/2854 / Article 2 – point 29
  2. 152 Addition David CormandGreens/EFA · JURI ‘public emergency’ means an exceptional situation, limited in time, such as a public health emergency, an emergency resulting from natural disasters…

    Tracker noteThe amendment names this article, but which paragraph or point it changes has not been automatically established, so it is not yet linked to a specific point.

    (ca) point (29) is replaced by the following

    (29)‘public emergency’ means an exceptional situation, limited in time, such as a public health emergency, an emergency resulting from natural disasters, a human-induced major disaster, including a major cybersecurity incident, negatively affecting the population of the Union or the whole or part of a Member State, with a risk of serious and lasting repercussions for living conditions or economic stability, financial stability, or the substantial and immediate degradation of economic assets in the Union or the relevant Member State and which is determined or officially declared in accordance with the relevant procedures under Union or national law; for the purposes of this Regulation, ‘responding to a public emergency’ refers to the immediate actions necessary to address and manage the emergency while it is ongoing, whereas ‘mitigating or supporting the recovery from a public emergency’ refers to actions taken after or once the immediate phase of the emergency has passed, aimed at limiting its consequences and restoring normal conditions;

    Tabled by
    David Cormand
    Group
    Greens/EFA
    Targets
    Data Act Article 2
    Document
    JURI amendments 69–296 to the draft opinion
    Printed header
    Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point c a (new) / Regulation (EU) 2023/2854 / Article 2
  3. 153 Addition Emil RadevEPP · JURI ‘public emergency’ means an exceptional situation, limited in time, such as a public health emergency, an emergency resulting from natural disasters…

    (29)‘public emergency’ means an exceptional situation, limited in time, such as a public health emergency, an emergency resulting from natural disasters, a human-induced major disaster, including a major cybersecurity incident, negatively affecting the population of the Union or the whole or part of a Member State, with a risk of serious and lasting repercussions for living conditions or economic stability, financial stability, or the substantial and immediate degradation of economic assets in the Union or the relevant Member State and which is determined or officially declared in accordance with the relevant procedures under Union or national law; for the purposes of this Regulation, ‘responding to a public emergency’ refers to immediate actions necessary to address and manage the emergency while it is ongoing, whereas ‘mitigating or supporting the recovery from a public emergency’ refers to immediate actions taken after or once the immediate phase of the emergency has passed, aimed at limiting its consequences and restoring normal conditions within a timely manner;

    Tabled by
    Emil Radev
    Group
    EPP
    Targets
    Data Act Article 2 – point 29
    Document
    JURI amendments 69–296 to the draft opinion
    Printed header
    Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point c a (new) / Regulation (EU) 2023/2854 / Article 2 – point 29
  4. 154 Addition Brando BenifeiS&D · JURI ‘public emergency’ means an exceptional situation, limited in time, such as a public health emergency, an emergency resulting from natural disasters…

    (29)‘public emergency’ means an exceptional situation, limited in time, such as a public health emergency, an emergency resulting from natural disasters, a human-induced major disaster, including a major cybersecurity incident, negatively affecting the population of the Union or the whole or part of a Member State, with a risk of serious and lasting repercussions for living conditions or economic stability, financial stability, or the substantial and immediate degradation of economic assets in the Union or the relevant Member State and which is determined or officially declared in accordance with the relevant procedures under Union or national law; for the purposes of this Regulation, ‘responding to a public emergency’ refers to the immediate actions necessary to address and manage the emergency while it is ongoing, whereas ‘supporting the recovery from a public emergency’ refers to actions taken after or once the immediate phase of the emergency has passed, aimed at limiting its consequences and restoring normal conditions;

    Justification

    This amendment introduces a clearer and harmonised definition of ‘public emergency’ in order to improve legal certainty and avoid divergent interpretations across Member States. It also helps ensure that emergency-related data access mechanisms remain limited to genuinely exceptional and time-bound situations. It also clarifies the distinction between the immediate response phase of a public emergency and broader mitigation or recovery activities.

    Tabled by
    Brando Benifei
    Group
    S&D
    Targets
    Data Act Article 2 – point 29
    Document
    JURI amendments 69–296 to the draft opinion
    Printed header
    Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point c a (new) / Regulation (EU) 2023/2854 / Article 2 – point 29
  5. 211 Alternative Sophia KircherEPP · IMCO “for the purposes of this Regulation, ‘responding to a public emergency’ refers to immediate actions necessary to address and manage the emergency…”

    "‘public emergency’ means an exceptional situation, limited in time, such as a public health emergency, an emergency resulting from natural disasters, a human-induced major disaster, including a major cybersecurity incident, negatively affecting the population of the Union or the whole or part of a Member State, with a risk of serious and lasting repercussions for living conditions or economic stability, financial stability, or the substantial and immediate degradation of economic assets in the Union or the relevant Member State and which is determined or officially declared in accordance with the relevant procedures under Union or national law, for the purposes of this Regulation, “responding to a public emergency” refers to immediate actions necessary to address and manage the emergency while it is ongoing, whereas “mitigating or supporting the recovery from a public emergency” refers to immediate actions taken after or once the immediate phase of the emergency has passed, aimed at limiting its consequences and restoring normal conditions within a timely manner;"

    Tabled by
    Sophia Kircher
    Group
    EPP
    Targets
    Data Act Article 2 – point 29
    Document
    IMCO amendments 125–328 to the draft opinion
    Printed header
    Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point d a (new) / Regulation (EU) 2023/2854 / Article 2 – paragraph 1– point 29

‘raw data’New definition

  1. 577 Addition Julie Rechagneux +7ECR, PfE · ITRE–LIBE ‘raw data’ should mean data automatically captured or generated by an individual sensor, software event or source component in their native form… numbered (53a)

    Text and details of Amendment 577 under ‘derived data’

‘responding to a public emergency’New definition2 proposals

  1. 15 Addition Aura Salla and Marina Kaljurand (rapporteurs)Rapporteurs · ITRE–LIBE ‘responding to a public emergency’ means the immediate actions necessary to address and manage the emergency while it is ongoing, whereas ‘mitigating… numbered (63a)

    Text and details of Amendment 15 under ‘mitigating or supporting the recovery from a public emergency’

  2. 587 Addition Michael McNamara +4Renew · ITRE–LIBE ‘responding to a public emergency’ means the immediate, time-limited actions strictly necessary and proportionate to directly and solely address and… numbered (63a)

    Text and details of Amendment 587 under ‘mitigating or supporting the recovery from a public emergency’

‘standard digital licence’New definition

  1. 35 Alternative Alex Agius Saliba (rapporteur)Rapporteur · IMCO ‘standard digital licence’ means a set of predefined re-use conditions in a digital format, preferably compatible with standardised public licences… numbered (47)

    (47) ‘standard digital licence’ means a set of predefined re-use conditions in a digital format, preferably compatible with standardised public licences available online;

    Rapporteur
    Alex Agius Saliba
    Group
    Rapporteur
    Targets
    Data Act Article 2(47)
    Document
    IMCO draft opinion
    Printed header
    Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point e / Regulation (EU) 2023/2854 / Article 2 – point 47

‘state-of-the-art methods to preserve and reinforce privacy’New definition

  1. 223 Addition Virginie JoronPfE · IMCO ‘state-of-the-art methods to preserve and reinforce privacy’ means: techniques such as those referred to in Article 4 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679; numbered (61b)

    (61b)‘state-of-the-art methods to preserve and reinforce privacy’ means: techniques such as those referred to in Article 4 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679;

    Tabled by
    Virginie Joron
    Group
    PfE
    Targets
    Data Act Article 2 – paragraph 1– point 61 b (new)
    Document
    IMCO amendments 125–328 to the draft opinion
    Printed header
    Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point e / Regulation (EU) 2023/2854 / Article 2 – paragraph 1– point 61 b (new)

‘state-of-the-art privacy-preserving and privacy-enhancing methods’New definition

  1. 586 Addition Julie Rechagneux +7ECR, PfE · ITRE–LIBE ‘state-of-the-art privacy-preserving and privacy-enhancing methods’ means such techniques as defined in Article 4 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679;’ numbered (61b)

    (61b)‘state-of-the-art privacy-preserving and privacy-enhancing methods’ means such techniques as defined in Article 4 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679;’

    Tabled by
    Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pierre-Romain Thionnet, Alexandre Varaut, Fabrice Leggeri, Marion Maréchal, Christophe Bay
    Group
    ECR, PfE
    Targets
    Data Act Article 2 – point 61b (new)
    Document
    ITRE–LIBE amendments 527–776 to the draft report
    Printed header
    Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point e / Regulation (EU) 2023/2854 / Article 2 – point 61b (new)

‘very large enterprise’New definition3 proposals

  1. 212 Addition Virginie JoronPfE · IMCO ‘very large enterprise’ means an enterprise that is neither a start-up nor a small or medium-sized enterprise nor a small mid-cap enterprise within… numbered (45a)

    (45a)‘very large enterprise’ means an enterprise that is neither a start-up nor a small or medium-sized enterprise nor a small mid-cap enterprise within the meaning of the present Regulation, and which has significant economic power on one or more digital economy markets in view of its designation as a ‘gatekeeper’ under Article 3 of Regulation (EU) 2022/1925, or in view of the fact that it provides one or more core platform services within the meaning of that regulation; its annual global turnover and its market capitalisation or its equivalent fair market value; its capacity to access large volumes of data, to accumulate or aggregate them across different services or jurisdictions and to monetise them; the extent to which users established in the Union depend on its services and the existence of obstacles preventing them from switching to other providers;

    Tabled by
    Virginie Joron
    Group
    PfE
    Targets
    Data Act Article 2 – point 45a (new)
    Document
    IMCO amendments 125–328 to the draft opinion
    Printed header
    Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point e / Regulation (EU) 2023/2854 / Article 2 – paragraph 1– point 45 a (new)
  2. 570 Addition Julie Rechagneux +7ECR, PfE · ITRE–LIBE ‘very large enterprise’ means an enterprise which is not a start-up, a small or medium-sized enterprise or a small mid-cap within the meaning of this… numbered (45a)

    (45a)‘very large enterprise’ means an enterprise which is not a start-up, a small or medium-sized enterprise or a small mid-cap within the meaning of this Regulation, and which holds significant economic power on one or more markets in the digital economy, taking into account its designation as a gatekeeper pursuant to Article 3 of Regulation (EU) 2022/1925, or the fact that it provides one or more core platform services within the meaning of that Regulation; its annual worldwide turnover and its market capitalisation or equivalent fair market value; its ability to access, accumulate or aggregate large volumes of data across services or jurisdictions, and to monetise them; the extent to which users established in the Union depend on its services and the existence of barriers preventing them from switching to alternative providers;

    Justification

    The Regulation applies differentiated conditions to very large enterprises without defining them, leaving the notion to be construed case by case. The definition retained is effect-based: significant economic power on one or more markets in the digital economy, designation as a gatekeeper or provision of core platform services, worldwide turnover and market capitalisation, and the ability to access, accumulate or aggregate large volumes of data across services or jurisdictions.

    Tabled by
    Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pierre-Romain Thionnet, Alexandre Varaut, Fabrice Leggeri, Marion Maréchal, Christophe Bay
    Group
    ECR, PfE
    Targets
    Data Act Article 2 – point 45a (new)
    Document
    ITRE–LIBE amendments 527–776 to the draft report
    Printed header
    Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point e / Regulation (EU) 2023/2854 / Article 2 – point 45a (new)
  3. 584 Addition Elena Sancho Murillo +7S&D · ITRE–LIBE ‘very large enterprise’ means a large undertaking which, by reason of the scale of data generated, collected, aggregated or controlled through… numbered (61a)

    (61a)‘very large enterprise’ means a large undertaking which, by reason of the scale of data generated, collected, aggregated or controlled through connected products, related services or online platform services within the meaning of Regulation (EU) 2022/2065, and by reason of its capacity to derive significant and sustained economic value from the large-scale reuse of such data across services, markets and digital ecosystems, possesses significant bargaining power in data-sharing relationships, including where such control over data results in structural dependencies or material asymmetries in access to or use of data;

    Justification

    The amendment provides legal clarity on the concept of ‘very large enterprise’ by reflecting the realities of data-driven markets, where economic significance is increasingly linked to the ability to generate value from large-scale data processing and reuse. A clear definition ensures consistent, proportionate and predictable application across the Union’s digital acquis.

    Tabled by
    Elena Sancho Murillo, Marina Kaljurand, Brando Benifei, José Cepeda, Matthias Ecke, Lina Gálvez, Francisco Assis, Alex Agius Saliba
    Group
    S&D
    Targets
    Data Act Article 2 – point 61a (new)
    Document
    ITRE–LIBE amendments 527–776 to the draft report
    Printed header
    Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point e / Regulation (EU) 2023/2854 / Article 2 – point 61a (new)