Texts to 22 Oct 2026

Amendments as tabled

Two amendments, each tabled separately · JURI amendments 69–296 to the draft opinion

  1. 256 Deletion Daniel BudaEPP · JURI Deletes the Commission’s wording

    10. The following article is added: ‘Article 41a (1) The Commission may adopt implementing acts to specify means and criteria to determine whether data resulting from pseudonymisation no longer constitutes personal data for certain entities. (2) For the purposes of paragraph 1 the Commission shall: (a) assess the state of the art of available techniques; (b) develop criteria and or categories for controllers and recipients to assess the risk of re-identification in relation to typical recipients of data. (3) The implementation of the means and criteria outlined in an implementing act may be used as an element to demonstrate that data cannot lead to reidentification of the data subjects. (4) The Commission shall closely involve the EDPB in the preparations of the implementing acts. The EPDB shall issue an opinion on the draft implementing acts within a deadline of 8 weeks as of the receipt of the draft from the Commission. (5) The Implementing Acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 93(3).’

    Justification

    Pseudonymisation is not, in and of itself, equivalent to anonymisation. A solution involving implementing acts would take a matter of principle – the scope of the GDPR’s application – out of the realm of the co-legislator and judicial interpretation and turn it into a technical procedure.

    Tabled by
    Daniel Buda
    Group
    EPP
    Document
    JURI amendments 69–296 to the draft opinion
    Printed header
    Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 10 / Regulation (EU) 2016/679 (GDPR) / Article 41 a
  2. 257 Deletion Arash SaeidiThe Left · JURI Deletes the Commission’s wording

    10. The following article is added: ‘Article 41a (1) The Commission may adopt implementing acts to specify means and criteria to determine whether data resulting from pseudonymisation no longer constitutes personal data for certain entities. (2) For the purpose of paragraph 1 the Commission shall: (a) assess the state of the art of available techniques; (b) develop criteria and or categories for controllers and recipients to assess the risk of re-identification in relation to typical recipients of data. (3) The implementation of the means and criteria outlined in an implementing act may be used as an element to demonstrate that data cannot lead to reidentification of the data subjects. (4) The Commission shall closely involve the EDPB in the preparations of the implementing acts. The EPDB shall issue an opinion on the draft implementing acts within a deadline of 8 weeks as of the receipt of the draft from the Commission. (5) The Implementing Acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 93(3).’

    Tabled by
    Arash Saeidi
    Group
    The Left
    Document
    JURI amendments 69–296 to the draft opinion
    Printed header
    Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 10 / Regulation (EU) 2016/679 / Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 10 – introductory part