GDPR · Regulation (EU) 2016/679
Article 41a
Compare the available Commission, Council and Parliament texts and amendments affecting this article.
Article total: 16 parts · 4 Council drafts · 65 Parliament amendments
Removed wording is struck through; added or replacement wording is highlighted.
Institutional text
European Commission proposal
All Commission’s changes to GDPRThe wording proposed by the Commission at the start of this legislative file.
Full article with Commission changes
Article with proposed changes
Official consolidated text dated 4 May 2016, with the Commission proposal change affecting this article applied.
Article 41a
- 1.
The Commission may adopt implementing acts to specify means and criteria to determine whether data resulting from pseudonymisation no longer constitutes personal data for certain entities.
- 2.
For the purpose of paragraph 1 the Commission shall:
- (a)
assess the state of the art of available techniques;
- (b)
develop criteria and or categories for controllers and recipients to assess the risk of re-identification in relation to typical recipients of data.
- (a)
- 3.
The implementation of the means and criteria outlined in an implementing act may be used as an element to demonstrate that data cannot lead to reidentification of the data subjects.
- 4.
The Commission shall closely involve the EDPB in the preparations of the implementing acts. The EPDB shall issue an opinion on the draft implementing acts within a deadline of 8 weeks as of the receipt of the draft from the Commission.
- 5.
The Implementing Acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 93(3).
No standalone Commission wording is mapped to this tracked part. A newly proposed provision may have no earlier text of its own.
Commission source wording and instructions
Article 41a
Commission proposal
Article 41a (1) The Commission may adopt implementing acts to specify means and criteria to determine whether data resulting from pseudonymisation no longer constitutes personal data for certain entities. (2) For the purpose of paragraph 1 the Commission shall: (a) assess the state of the art of available techniques; (b) develop criteria and or categories for controllers and recipients to assess the risk of re-identification in relation to typical recipients of data. (3) The implementation of the means and criteria outlined in an implementing act may be used as an element to demonstrate that data cannot lead to reidentification of the data subjects. (4) The Commission shall closely involve the EDPB in the preparations of the implementing acts. The EPDB shall issue an opinion on the draft implementing acts within a deadline of 8 weeks as of the receipt of the draft from the Commission. (5) The Implementing Acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 93(3).
Institutional text
Council Presidency texts
Successive Presidency compromise texts. Their inclusion does not imply agreement or adoption.
No Council wording is mapped to this tracked part.
Article 29a
May Presidency compromise
Council wording reconstructed for this provision from the official operation
Article 29a - Application of pseudonymisation and identification of a natural person (1) Controllers and processors may apply pseudonymisation to personal data in order to reduce the risks to the data subjects concerned and to help meet their obligations under this Regulation.
To determine whether a natural person is identifiable, account shall be taken of all the means reasonably likely to be used, such as singling out, either by the controller or by another person to identify the natural person directly or indirectly. (2) The Board shall issue an opinion, in accordance with Article 64(2) of this Regulation, addressing the application of pseudonymisation and anonymisation, including related technical and organisational measures, and specifying means and criteria to determine whether and when the application of pseudonymisation to personal data may effectively prevent persons other than the controller from identifying a data subject, in such a way that, for them, the data subject is not or is no longer identifiable. (3) The Chair of the Board shall request the opinion referred to in paragraph 1 no later than 12 months after the entry into force of this Regulation. The opinion shall be reviewed and updated where necessary.
Article 29a
June Presidency compromise · 10 June
Council wording reconstructed for this provision from the official operation
Article 29a - Application of pseudonymisation and identification of a natural person (1) Controllers and processors may apply pseudonymisation in order to reduce the risks to the data subjects concerned and to comply with their obligations under this Regulation, in such a manner that the personal data can no longer be attributed to a specific data subject without the use of additional information. To determine whether a natural person is identifiable, including through personal data having undergone pseudonymisation , account shall be taken of all the means reasonably likely to be used, such as singling out or online identifiers, either by the controller or by another person to identify the natural person directly or indirectly.
The application of pseudonymisation to personal data may, depending on the circumstances of the case and provided that appropriate technical and organisational measures are put in place and are such as to prevent the data in question from being attributed to the data subject, effectively prevent persons other than the controller from identifying the data subject in such a way that, for them, the data subject is not or is no longer identifiable. (3)Paragraphs 1 and 2 are without prejudice to other provisions and obligations applicable to the controller and processor, including under Chapter IV and V of this Regulation.
The Board shall issue an opinion, in accordance with Article 64(2) of this Regulation, addressing the application of pseudonymisation and anonymisation, including the related circumstances and technical and organisational measures referred to paragraph 2. (5) The Chair of the Board shall request the opinion referred to in paragraph 4 no later than 6 months after the entry into force of this Regulation. The opinion shall be reviewed and updated where necessary.
Article 29a
June Presidency compromise · 18 June
Council wording reconstructed for this provision from the official operation
Article 29a - Application of pseudonymisation and identification of a natural person
Controllers and processors may apply pseudonymisation in order to reduce the risks to the data subjects concerned and to comply with their obligations under this Regulation, in such a manner that the personal data can no longer be attributed to a specific data subject without the use of additional information. To determine whether a natural person is identifiable, including through personal data having undergone pseudonymisation, account shall be taken of all the means reasonably likely to be used, such as singling out or online identifiers, either by the controller or by another person to identify the natural person directly or indirectly .
The application of pseudonymisation to personal data may, depending on the circumstances of the case and provided that appropriate technical and organisational measures are put in place and are such as to prevent the data in question from being attributed to the data subject, effectively prevent persons other than the controller from identifying the data subject in such a way that, for them, the data subject is not or is no longer identifiable. (3) Paragraphs 1 and 2 are without prejudice to other provisions and obligations applicable to the controller , including under Chapter IV and V of this Regulation. The provision set out in paragraph 2 shall not apply to processors.
The Board shall issue an opinion, in accordance with Article 64(2) of this Regulation, addressing the application of pseudonymisation and anonymisation, including related circumstances and technical and organisational measures referred to paragraph 2. (5) The Chair of the Board shall request the opinion referred to in paragraph 4 no later than 6 months after the entry into force of this Regulation. The opinion shall be reviewed and updated where necessary .
Article 25a
September Presidency compromise
Council wording reconstructed for this provision from the official operation
Article 25a - Application of pseudonymisation and identification of a natural person (1) Controllers and processors may apply pseudonymisation in order to reduce the risks to the data subjects concerned and to comply with their obligations under this Regulation, in such a manner that the personal data can no longer be attributed to a specific data subject without the use of additional information. (2) Pseudonymised data shall not be considered personal data for a person if that person is unable to identify the natural person to whom the data relates, unless paragraph 5 applies. (3) To determine whether a natural person is identifiable, including through personal data having undergone pseudonymisation, account shall be taken of all the means reasonably likely to be used, either by the controller or by another person to identify the natural person directly or indirectly. A natural person is not identifiable where the likelihood of identification is insignificant in practice. (4) Where a processor processes personal data on behalf of a controller, that information shall be considered personal data for the processor, and the processor continues to be subject to the obligations applicable under this Regulation. (5) Where a person other than the controller discloses, transmits or otherwise makes such data available to a third party and, in light of all relevant circumstances, the third party possesses or can obtain means reasonably likely to enable the data subject to be identified, both the transmission of the data to this third party and the subsequent processing of the data by this third party is processing of personal data. (6) The Board shall issue an opinion, in accordance with Article 64(2) of this Regulation, addressing the application of pseudonymisation and anonymisation, including related technical and organisational measures. (7) The Chair of the Board shall request the opinion referred to in paragraph 4 no later than 6 months after the entry into force of this Regulation. The opinion shall be reviewed and updated where necessary.
Official source passage and amending instruction
10. The following article is added: ‘Article 25a - Application of pseudonymisation and identification of a natural person (1) Controllers and processors may apply pseudonymisation in order to reduce the risks to the data subjects concerned and to comply with their obligations under this Regulation, in such a manner that the personal data can no longer be attributed to a specific data subject without the use of additional information. (2) Pseudonymised data shall not be considered personal data for a person if that person is unable to identify the natural person to whom the data relates, unless paragraph 5 applies. (3) To determine whether a natural person is identifiable, including through personal data having undergone pseudonymisation, account shall be taken of all the means reasonably likely to be used, either by the controller or by another person to identify the natural person directly or indirectly. A natural person is not identifiable where the likelihood of identification is insignificant in practice. (4) Where a processor processes personal data on behalf of a controller, that information shall be considered personal data for the processor, and the processor continues to be subject to the obligations applicable under this Regulation. (5) Where a person other than the controller discloses, transmits or otherwise makes such data available to a third party and, in light of all relevant circumstances, the third party possesses or can obtain means reasonably likely to enable the data subject to be identified, both the transmission of the data to this third party and the subsequent processing of the data by this third party is processing of personal data. (6) The Board shall issue an opinion, in accordance with Article 64(2) of this Regulation, addressing the application of pseudonymisation and anonymisation, including related technical and organisational measures. (7) The Chair of the Board shall request the opinion referred to in paragraph 4 no later than 6 months after the entry into force of this Regulation. The opinion shall be reviewed and updated where necessary.’
Article 41a 4 Council drafts
Article 29a
21 May 2026 · May Presidency compromise
Council wording reconstructed for this provision from the official operation
Article 29a - Application of pseudonymisation and identification of a natural person (1) Controllers and processors may apply pseudonymisation to personal data in order to reduce the risks to the data subjects concerned and to help meet their obligations under this Regulation.
To determine whether a natural person is identifiable, account shall be taken of all the means reasonably likely to be used, such as singling out, either by the controller or by another person to identify the natural person directly or indirectly. (2) The Board shall issue an opinion, in accordance with Article 64(2) of this Regulation, addressing the application of pseudonymisation and anonymisation, including related technical and organisational measures, and specifying means and criteria to determine whether and when the application of pseudonymisation to personal data may effectively prevent persons other than the controller from identifying a data subject, in such a way that, for them, the data subject is not or is no longer identifiable. (3) The Chair of the Board shall request the opinion referred to in paragraph 1 no later than 12 months after the entry into force of this Regulation. The opinion shall be reviewed and updated where necessary.
Article 29a
10 June 2026 · June Presidency compromise · 10 June
Council wording reconstructed for this provision from the official operation
Article 29a - Application of pseudonymisation and identification of a natural person (1) Controllers and processors may apply pseudonymisation in order to reduce the risks to the data subjects concerned and to comply with their obligations under this Regulation, in such a manner that the personal data can no longer be attributed to a specific data subject without the use of additional information. To determine whether a natural person is identifiable, including through personal data having undergone pseudonymisation , account shall be taken of all the means reasonably likely to be used, such as singling out or online identifiers, either by the controller or by another person to identify the natural person directly or indirectly.
The application of pseudonymisation to personal data may, depending on the circumstances of the case and provided that appropriate technical and organisational measures are put in place and are such as to prevent the data in question from being attributed to the data subject, effectively prevent persons other than the controller from identifying the data subject in such a way that, for them, the data subject is not or is no longer identifiable. (3)Paragraphs 1 and 2 are without prejudice to other provisions and obligations applicable to the controller and processor, including under Chapter IV and V of this Regulation.
The Board shall issue an opinion, in accordance with Article 64(2) of this Regulation, addressing the application of pseudonymisation and anonymisation, including the related circumstances and technical and organisational measures referred to paragraph 2. (5) The Chair of the Board shall request the opinion referred to in paragraph 4 no later than 6 months after the entry into force of this Regulation. The opinion shall be reviewed and updated where necessary.
Article 29a
18 June 2026 · June Presidency compromise · 18 June
Council wording reconstructed for this provision from the official operation
Article 29a - Application of pseudonymisation and identification of a natural person
Controllers and processors may apply pseudonymisation in order to reduce the risks to the data subjects concerned and to comply with their obligations under this Regulation, in such a manner that the personal data can no longer be attributed to a specific data subject without the use of additional information. To determine whether a natural person is identifiable, including through personal data having undergone pseudonymisation, account shall be taken of all the means reasonably likely to be used, such as singling out or online identifiers, either by the controller or by another person to identify the natural person directly or indirectly .
The application of pseudonymisation to personal data may, depending on the circumstances of the case and provided that appropriate technical and organisational measures are put in place and are such as to prevent the data in question from being attributed to the data subject, effectively prevent persons other than the controller from identifying the data subject in such a way that, for them, the data subject is not or is no longer identifiable. (3) Paragraphs 1 and 2 are without prejudice to other provisions and obligations applicable to the controller , including under Chapter IV and V of this Regulation. The provision set out in paragraph 2 shall not apply to processors.
The Board shall issue an opinion, in accordance with Article 64(2) of this Regulation, addressing the application of pseudonymisation and anonymisation, including related circumstances and technical and organisational measures referred to paragraph 2. (5) The Chair of the Board shall request the opinion referred to in paragraph 4 no later than 6 months after the entry into force of this Regulation. The opinion shall be reviewed and updated where necessary .
Article 25a
3 September 2026 · September Presidency compromise
Council wording reconstructed for this provision from the official operation
Article 25a - Application of pseudonymisation and identification of a natural person (1) Controllers and processors may apply pseudonymisation in order to reduce the risks to the data subjects concerned and to comply with their obligations under this Regulation, in such a manner that the personal data can no longer be attributed to a specific data subject without the use of additional information. (2) Pseudonymised data shall not be considered personal data for a person if that person is unable to identify the natural person to whom the data relates, unless paragraph 5 applies. (3) To determine whether a natural person is identifiable, including through personal data having undergone pseudonymisation, account shall be taken of all the means reasonably likely to be used, either by the controller or by another person to identify the natural person directly or indirectly. A natural person is not identifiable where the likelihood of identification is insignificant in practice. (4) Where a processor processes personal data on behalf of a controller, that information shall be considered personal data for the processor, and the processor continues to be subject to the obligations applicable under this Regulation. (5) Where a person other than the controller discloses, transmits or otherwise makes such data available to a third party and, in light of all relevant circumstances, the third party possesses or can obtain means reasonably likely to enable the data subject to be identified, both the transmission of the data to this third party and the subsequent processing of the data by this third party is processing of personal data. (6) The Board shall issue an opinion, in accordance with Article 64(2) of this Regulation, addressing the application of pseudonymisation and anonymisation, including related technical and organisational measures. (7) The Chair of the Board shall request the opinion referred to in paragraph 4 no later than 6 months after the entry into force of this Regulation. The opinion shall be reviewed and updated where necessary.
Official source passage and amending instruction
10. The following article is added: ‘Article 25a - Application of pseudonymisation and identification of a natural person (1) Controllers and processors may apply pseudonymisation in order to reduce the risks to the data subjects concerned and to comply with their obligations under this Regulation, in such a manner that the personal data can no longer be attributed to a specific data subject without the use of additional information. (2) Pseudonymised data shall not be considered personal data for a person if that person is unable to identify the natural person to whom the data relates, unless paragraph 5 applies. (3) To determine whether a natural person is identifiable, including through personal data having undergone pseudonymisation, account shall be taken of all the means reasonably likely to be used, either by the controller or by another person to identify the natural person directly or indirectly. A natural person is not identifiable where the likelihood of identification is insignificant in practice. (4) Where a processor processes personal data on behalf of a controller, that information shall be considered personal data for the processor, and the processor continues to be subject to the obligations applicable under this Regulation. (5) Where a person other than the controller discloses, transmits or otherwise makes such data available to a third party and, in light of all relevant circumstances, the third party possesses or can obtain means reasonably likely to enable the data subject to be identified, both the transmission of the data to this third party and the subsequent processing of the data by this third party is processing of personal data. (6) The Board shall issue an opinion, in accordance with Article 64(2) of this Regulation, addressing the application of pseudonymisation and anonymisation, including related technical and organisational measures. (7) The Chair of the Board shall request the opinion referred to in paragraph 4 no later than 6 months after the entry into force of this Regulation. The opinion shall be reviewed and updated where necessary.’
Competing proposals
European Parliament amendments
These are alternative tabled amendments. An amendment affecting several tracked parts appears once here, with each target identified.
More filters
Political group at the amendment date where available; otherwise the current Parliament affiliation.
Remove proposed wording Amendment 111 IMCO draft opinion · Alex Agius Saliba (rapporteur)
Justification
This is the competence of DPAs, not the Commission. Therefore it is not creating simplification, but rather bypassing MS authorities. The EDPB already adopted Guidelines 01/2025 on pseudonymisation. Imp: EDPB flags already that pseudonymisation is a risk-mitigation measure.
against:
Article 41a
- 1.
The Commission may adopt implementing acts to specify means and criteria to determine whether data resulting from pseudonymisation no longer constitutes personal data for certain entities. - 2.
For the purpose of paragraph 1 the Commission shall:- (a)
assess the state of the art of available techniques; - (b)
develop criteria and or categories for controllers and recipients to assess the risk of re-identification in relation to typical recipients of data.
- (a)
- 3.
The implementation of the means and criteria outlined in an implementing act may be used as an element to demonstrate that data cannot lead to reidentification of the data subjects. - 4.
The Commission shall closely involve the EDPB in the preparations of the implementing acts. The EPDB shall issue an opinion on the draft implementing acts within a deadline of 8 weeks as of the receipt of the draft from the Commission. - 5.
The Implementing Acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 93(3).
Remove proposed wording Amendment 256 · Daniel Buda JURI
Justification
Pseudonymisation is not, in and of itself, equivalent to anonymisation. A solution involving implementing acts would take a matter of principle – the scope of the GDPR’s application – out of the realm of the co-legislator and judicial interpretation and turn it into a technical procedure.
against:
Article 41a
- 1.
The Commission may adopt implementing acts to specify means and criteria to determine whether data resulting from pseudonymisation no longer constitutes personal data for certain entities. - 2.
For the purpose of paragraph 1 the Commission shall:- (a)
assess the state of the art of available techniques; - (b)
develop criteria and or categories for controllers and recipients to assess the risk of re-identification in relation to typical recipients of data.
- (a)
- 3.
The implementation of the means and criteria outlined in an implementing act may be used as an element to demonstrate that data cannot lead to reidentification of the data subjects. - 4.
The Commission shall closely involve the EDPB in the preparations of the implementing acts. The EPDB shall issue an opinion on the draft implementing acts within a deadline of 8 weeks as of the receipt of the draft from the Commission. - 5.
The Implementing Acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 93(3).
Remove proposed wording Amendment 257 · Arash Saeidi JURI
Remove proposed wording Amendment 394 · David Cormand on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group IMCO
against:
Article 41a
- 1.
The Commission may adopt implementing acts to specify means and criteria to determine whether data resulting from pseudonymisation no longer constitutes personal data for certain entities. - 2.
For the purpose of paragraph 1 the Commission shall:- (a)
assess the state of the art of available techniques; - (b)
develop criteria and or categories for controllers and recipients to assess the risk of re-identification in relation to typical recipients of data.
- (a)
- 3.
The implementation of the means and criteria outlined in an implementing act may be used as an element to demonstrate that data cannot lead to reidentification of the data subjects. - 4.
The Commission shall closely involve the EDPB in the preparations of the implementing acts. The EPDB shall issue an opinion on the draft implementing acts within a deadline of 8 weeks as of the receipt of the draft from the Commission. - 5.
The Implementing Acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 93(3).
Alternative wording Amendment 395 · Virginie Joron IMCO
against:
Article 41a
- 1.
The Commission
mayshall be authorised to adoptimplementingguidelinesactsspecifyingto specify meanstechnical andcriteriaorganisational measures, including consent management mechanisms, privacy-preserving technologies and privacy-strengthening methods, which may be taken into account to determine whether a processor, a subcontractor, a dataresultingholderfromorpseudonymisationanodatalongerrecipientconstituteshas means which are reasonably likely to be used to identify a natural person and to fulfil the obligations relating to a request for consent. These guidelines shall be adopted in close cooperation with the European Data Protection Board and shall be aimed at improving legal certainty, interoperability and the consistent application of this Regulation throughout the Union. The adoption of these guidelines shall be without prejudice to the interpretation of Union law by the Court of Justice of the European Union, including as regards the notions of personal data,foridentifiablecertainnaturalentitiesperson, pseudonymised data, anonymisation and means reasonably likely to be used. - 2.
For the purpose of paragraph 1 the Commission shall:
- (a)
assess the state of the art of available techniques;
- (b)
develop criteria and or categories for controllers and recipients to assess the risk of re-identification in relation to typical recipients of data.
- (a)
- 3.
The implementation of the means and criteria outlined in an implementing act may be used as an element to demonstrate that data cannot lead to reidentification of the data subjects.
- 4.
The Commission shall closely involve the EDPB in the preparations of the implementing acts. The EPDB shall issue an opinion on the draft implementing acts within a deadline of 8 weeks as of the receipt of the draft from the Commission.
- 5.
The Implementing Acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 93(3).
Alternative wording Amendment 396 · Piotr Müller IMCO
against:
Article 41a
- 1.
The Commission may adopt implementing acts to specify means and criteria to determine whether data resulting from pseudonymisation no longer constitutes personal data for certain entities.
- 2.
For the purpose of paragraph 1 the Commission shall:
- (a)
assess the state of the art of available techniques, such as privacy enhancing technologies;
- (b)
develop criteria and or categories for controllers and recipients to assess the risk of re-identification in relation to typical recipients of data.
- (a)
- 3.
The implementation of the means and criteria outlined in an implementing act may be used as an element to demonstrate that data cannot lead to reidentification of the data subjects.
- 4.
The Commission shall closely involve the EDPB in the preparations of the implementing acts. The EPDB shall issue an opinion on the draft implementing acts within a deadline of 8 weeks as of the receipt of the draft from the Commission.
- 5.
The Implementing Acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 93(3).
Alternative wording Amendment 397 · Virginie Joron IMCO
against:
Article 41a
- 1.
The Commission may adopt implementing acts to specify means and criteria to determine whether data resulting from pseudonymisation no longer constitutes personal data for certain entities.
- 2.
For the purpose of paragraph 1 the Commission shall:
- (a)
assess the state of the art of available techniques;
- (b)
develop criteria and or categories for controllers and recipients to assess the risk of re-identification in relation to typical recipients of data.
- (a)
- 3.
The implementation, by a processor, a subcontractor, a data holder or a data recipient, of
thetechnicalmeansand organisational measures and criteriaoutlinedset out inantheimplementingguidelinesactreferred to in paragraph [1] may beusedreferred to as an element which makes it possible to demonstrate that datacannotareleadnot, or are no longer, likely to allow the reidentification of the data subjects, and that the data subject has fulfilled his or her obligations, including those relating to the request for consent, under this Regulation. Consideration of these elements shall not affect the assessment of specific circumstances on a case-by-case basis by the competent supervisory authority or the interpretation of Union law by the Court of Justice of the European Union. - 4.
The Commission shall closely involve the EDPB in the preparations of the implementing acts. The EPDB shall issue an opinion on the draft implementing acts within a deadline of 8 weeks as of the receipt of the draft from the Commission.
- 5.
The Implementing Acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 93(3).
Alternative wording Amendment 398 · Piotr Müller IMCO
Justification
Turns advanced privacy-enhancing technologies into a rebuttable presumption of compliance, giving legal certainty and rewarding investment in privacy technology instead of paperwork.
against:
Article 41a
- 1.
The Commission may adopt implementing acts to specify means and criteria to determine whether data resulting from pseudonymisation no longer constitutes personal data for certain entities.
- 2.
For the purpose of paragraph 1 the Commission shall:
- (a)
assess the state of the art of available techniques;
- (b)
develop criteria and or categories for controllers and recipients to assess the risk of re-identification in relation to typical recipients of data.
- (a)
- 3.
The implementation ofWhere the means and criteria outlined in an implementing actmayare implemented, the data shall beusedpresumedas an elementnot todemonstrate that data cannotlead to the reidentification of the data subjects. - 4.
The Commission shall closely involve the EDPB in the preparations of the implementing acts. The EPDB shall issue an opinion on the draft implementing acts within a deadline of 8 weeks as of the receipt of the draft from the Commission.
- 5.
The Implementing Acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 93(3).
Remove proposed wording Amendment 399 · Virginie Joron IMCO
against:
Article 41a
- 1.
The Commission may adopt implementing acts to specify means and criteria to determine whether data resulting from pseudonymisation no longer constitutes personal data for certain entities.
- 2.
For the purpose of paragraph 1 the Commission shall:
- (a)
assess the state of the art of available techniques;
- (b)
develop criteria and or categories for controllers and recipients to assess the risk of re-identification in relation to typical recipients of data.
- (a)
- 3.
The implementation of the means and criteria outlined in an implementing act may be used as an element to demonstrate that data cannot lead to reidentification of the data subjects.
- 4.
The Commission shall closely involve the EDPB in the preparations of the implementing acts. The EPDB shall issue an opinion on the draft implementing acts within a deadline of 8 weeks as of the receipt of the draft from the Commission.
- 5.
The Implementing Acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 93(3).
Remove proposed wording Amendment 1243 · Sibylle Berg, Martin Sonneborn ITRE · LIBE
The source names this article, but its precise target scope has not been resolved. Related tracker provisions are not asserted as direct targets.
Article 41a
Remove proposed wording Amendment 1244 · Marina Kaljurand, Elena Sancho Murillo, Brando Benifei, Birgit Sippel, Alex Agius Saliba, Francisco Assis, Elisabeth Grossmann, Kristian Vigenin, Matjaž Nemec ITRE · LIBE
against:
Article 41a
- 1.
The Commission may adopt implementing acts to specify means and criteria to determine whether data resulting from pseudonymisation no longer constitutes personal data for certain entities. - 2.
For the purpose of paragraph 1 the Commission shall:- (a)
assess the state of the art of available techniques; - (b)
develop criteria and or categories for controllers and recipients to assess the risk of re-identification in relation to typical recipients of data.
- (a)
- 3.
The implementation of the means and criteria outlined in an implementing act may be used as an element to demonstrate that data cannot lead to reidentification of the data subjects. - 4.
The Commission shall closely involve the EDPB in the preparations of the implementing acts. The EPDB shall issue an opinion on the draft implementing acts within a deadline of 8 weeks as of the receipt of the draft from the Commission. - 5.
The Implementing Acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 93(3).
Remove proposed wording Amendment 1245 · Irena Joveva, Raquel García Hermida-Van Der Walle, Oihane Agirregoitia Martínez, Veronika Cifrová Ostrihoňová, Fabienne Keller ITRE · LIBE
against:
Article 41a
- 1.
The Commission may adopt implementing acts to specify means and criteria to determine whether data resulting from pseudonymisation no longer constitutes personal data for certain entities. - 2.
For the purpose of paragraph 1 the Commission shall:- (a)
assess the state of the art of available techniques; - (b)
develop criteria and or categories for controllers and recipients to assess the risk of re-identification in relation to typical recipients of data.
- (a)
- 3.
The implementation of the means and criteria outlined in an implementing act may be used as an element to demonstrate that data cannot lead to reidentification of the data subjects. - 4.
The Commission shall closely involve the EDPB in the preparations of the implementing acts. The EPDB shall issue an opinion on the draft implementing acts within a deadline of 8 weeks as of the receipt of the draft from the Commission. - 5.
The Implementing Acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 93(3).
Remove proposed wording Amendment 1246 · Pernando Barrena Arza ITRE · LIBE
against:
Article 41a
- 1.
The Commission may adopt implementing acts to specify means and criteria to determine whether data resulting from pseudonymisation no longer constitutes personal data for certain entities. - 2.
For the purpose of paragraph 1 the Commission shall:- (a)
assess the state of the art of available techniques; - (b)
develop criteria and or categories for controllers and recipients to assess the risk of re-identification in relation to typical recipients of data.
- (a)
- 3.
The implementation of the means and criteria outlined in an implementing act may be used as an element to demonstrate that data cannot lead to reidentification of the data subjects. - 4.
The Commission shall closely involve the EDPB in the preparations of the implementing acts. The EPDB shall issue an opinion on the draft implementing acts within a deadline of 8 weeks as of the receipt of the draft from the Commission. - 5.
The Implementing Acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 93(3).
Remove proposed wording Amendment 1247 · Markéta Gregorová on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group ITRE · LIBE
against:
Article 41a
- 1.
The Commission may adopt implementing acts to specify means and criteria to determine whether data resulting from pseudonymisation no longer constitutes personal data for certain entities. - 2.
For the purpose of paragraph 1 the Commission shall:- (a)
assess the state of the art of available techniques; - (b)
develop criteria and or categories for controllers and recipients to assess the risk of re-identification in relation to typical recipients of data.
- (a)
- 3.
The implementation of the means and criteria outlined in an implementing act may be used as an element to demonstrate that data cannot lead to reidentification of the data subjects. - 4.
The Commission shall closely involve the EDPB in the preparations of the implementing acts. The EPDB shall issue an opinion on the draft implementing acts within a deadline of 8 weeks as of the receipt of the draft from the Commission. - 5.
The Implementing Acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 93(3).
Remove proposed wording Amendment 1248 · João Oliveira ITRE · LIBE
against:
Article 41a
- 1.
The Commission may adopt implementing acts to specify means and criteria to determine whether data resulting from pseudonymisation no longer constitutes personal data for certain entities. - 2.
For the purpose of paragraph 1 the Commission shall:- (a)
assess the state of the art of available techniques; - (b)
develop criteria and or categories for controllers and recipients to assess the risk of re-identification in relation to typical recipients of data.
- (a)
- 3.
The implementation of the means and criteria outlined in an implementing act may be used as an element to demonstrate that data cannot lead to reidentification of the data subjects. - 4.
The Commission shall closely involve the EDPB in the preparations of the implementing acts. The EPDB shall issue an opinion on the draft implementing acts within a deadline of 8 weeks as of the receipt of the draft from the Commission. - 5.
The Implementing Acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 93(3).
Remove proposed wording Amendment 1250 · Mary Khan ITRE · LIBE
Justification
The Commission could, by means of technical implementing acts, define entire categories of pseudonymised data as being outside the scope of the GDPR. Although pseudonymisation reduces risks, it does not eliminate the link to a person. A legal effect as fundamental as this must not be delegated to the Commission.
against:
Article 41a
- 1.
The Commission may adopt implementing acts to specify means and criteria to determine whether data resulting from pseudonymisation no longer constitutes personal data for certain entities. - 2.
For the purpose of paragraph 1 the Commission shall:- (a)
assess the state of the art of available techniques; - (b)
develop criteria and or categories for controllers and recipients to assess the risk of re-identification in relation to typical recipients of data.
- (a)
- 3.
The implementation of the means and criteria outlined in an implementing act may be used as an element to demonstrate that data cannot lead to reidentification of the data subjects. - 4.
The Commission shall closely involve the EDPB in the preparations of the implementing acts. The EPDB shall issue an opinion on the draft implementing acts within a deadline of 8 weeks as of the receipt of the draft from the Commission. - 5.
The Implementing Acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 93(3).
Alternative wording Amendment 1251 · Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pierre-Romain Thionnet, Alexandre Varaut, Fabrice Leggeri, Marion Maréchal, Christophe Bay ITRE · LIBE
against:
Article 41a
- 1.
The Commission
mayshall be empowered to adoptimplementingguidelines specifying technical and organisational measures, including consent-management mechanisms, privacy-preserving technologies and privacy-enhancing techniques, that may be taken into account when assessing whether a controller, processor, data holder or data recipient has means reasonably likely to be used to identify a natural person and comply with its consent requesting obligations. Those guidelines shall be adopted in close cooperation with the European Data Protection Board and shall aim to promote legal certainty, interoperability and the consistent application of this Regulation across the Union. The adoption of those guidelines actstoshallspecifybemeanswithoutand criteriaprejudice todeterminethewhetherinterpretationdataofresultingUnionfromlawpseudonymisationbynothelongerCourtconstitutesof Justice of the European Union, including as regards the concepts of personal data,foridentifiablecertainnaturalentitiesperson, pseudonymised data, anonymisation and means reasonably likely to be used. - 2.
For the purpose of paragraph 1 the Commission shall:
- (a)
assess the state of the art of available techniques;
- (b)
develop criteria and or categories for controllers and recipients to assess the risk of re-identification in relation to typical recipients of data.
- (a)
- 3.
The implementation of the means and criteria outlined in an implementing act may be used as an element to demonstrate that data cannot lead to reidentification of the data subjects.
- 4.
The Commission shall closely involve the EDPB in the preparations of the implementing acts. The EPDB shall issue an opinion on the draft implementing acts within a deadline of 8 weeks as of the receipt of the draft from the Commission.
- 5.
The Implementing Acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 93(3).
Alternative wording Amendment 1252 · Alice Teodorescu Måwe ITRE · LIBE
against:
Article 41a
- 1.
The Commission may adopt implementing acts to specify means and criteria to determine
whetherwhen dataresulting(a)fromispseudonymisationmerelynotransitorylongerinconstitutes personal data for certain entities.nature;- (b)
is unrelated to the data subject as an identified or identifiable natural person;
- (c)
has appropriate technical and/or organisational safeguards to prevent any use for a purpose related to the data subject as an identified or identifiable natural person.
- (b)
- 2.
For the purpose of paragraph 1 the Commission shall:
- (a)
assess the state of the art of available techniques;
- (b)
develop criteria and or categories for controllers and recipients to assess the risk of re-identification in relation to typical recipients of data.
- (a)
- 3.
The implementation of the means and criteria outlined in an implementing act may be used as an element to demonstrate that data cannot lead to reidentification of the data subjects.
- 4.
The Commission shall closely involve the EDPB in the preparations of the implementing acts. The EPDB shall issue an opinion on the draft implementing acts within a deadline of 8 weeks as of the receipt of the draft from the Commission.
- 5.
The Implementing Acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 93(3).
Alternative wording Amendment 1253 · Michael McNamara, Christophe Grudler ITRE · LIBE
Justification
Provides for an EDPB opinion addressing pseudonymisation and anonymisation, and determining whether their application to personal data prevents identification. Tasks the Commission with facilitating (rather than only encouraging) a code of conduct at Union level, taking the EDPB opinion into account. Then, according to existing GDPR provisions, the EDPB is empowered to provide another opinion on whether the draft code demonstrates compliance, and, if so, the Commission may give the code general validity via implementing act. This approach promotes a harmonised approach with proper oversight.
against:
Article 41a
- 1.
The
CommissionEuropeanmayDataadoptProtectionimplementingBoardacts(EDPB) shall issue an opinion in accordance with Article 64(2) addressing the application of pseudonymisation and anonymisation, including related technical and organisational measures, to specify the means and criteria to determine whether the application of pseudonymisation and anonymisation to personal dataresultingeffectivelyfrompreventspseudonymisationthe identification of a data subject and the data subject is not or is no longerconstitutes personal data for certain entitiesidentifiable. - 2.
For the purpose of paragraph 1 the Commission shall:
- (a)
assess the state of the art of available techniques;
- (b)
develop criteria and or categories for controllers and recipients to assess the risk of re-identification in relation to typical recipients of data.
- (a)
- 3.
The implementation of the means and criteria outlined in an implementing act may be used as an element to demonstrate that data cannot lead to reidentification of the data subjects.
- 4.
The Commission shall closely involve the EDPB in the preparations of the implementing acts. The EPDB shall issue an opinion on the draft implementing acts within a deadline of 8 weeks as of the receipt of the draft from the Commission.
- 5.
The Implementing Acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 93(3).
Alternative wording Amendment 1254 · Oliver Schenk, Angelika Niebler, Monika Hohlmeier, Dimitris Tsiodras, Christian Doleschal, Andrea Wechsler, Marie-Sophie Lanig, Ana Miguel Pedro, Marion Walsmann, Lena Düpont, Romana Tomc, Axel Voss, François-Xavier Bellamy ITRE · LIBE
against:
Article 41a
- 1.
The Commission may adopt implementing acts to specify
meanstechnical and organisational measures and criteriatosupportingdeterminecontrollers in assessing whether data resulting from anonymisation or pseudonymisation no longer constitutes personal data for certain entities and in preventing the risk of re-identification. - 2.
For the purpose of paragraph 1 the Commission shall:
- (a)
assess the state of the art of available techniques;
- (b)
develop criteria and or categories for controllers and recipients to assess the risk of re-identification in relation to typical recipients of data.
- (a)
- 3.
The implementation of the means and criteria outlined in an implementing act may be used as an element to demonstrate that data cannot lead to reidentification of the data subjects.
- 4.
The Commission shall closely involve the EDPB in the preparations of the implementing acts. The EPDB shall issue an opinion on the draft implementing acts within a deadline of 8 weeks as of the receipt of the draft from the Commission.
- 5.
The Implementing Acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 93(3).
Alternative wording Amendment 1255 · Ondřej Krutílek ITRE · LIBE
Justification
Generally, the comitology is strongly supported in relation to this issue. Rules of such significance should be adopted in a binding, formal and predictable way to ensure legal certainty for controllers. Soft law in form of EDPB opinion is not acceptable. This is primary concern as regards pseudonymisation; the other proposals just aim to improve on original text.
against:
Article 41a
- 1.
The Commission may adopt implementing acts to specify means and criteria to determine whether data resulting from pseudonymisation no longer constitutes personal data for certain entities because those entities are not reasonably likely to identify the natural person.
- 2.
For the purpose of paragraph 1 the Commission shall:
- (a)
assess the state of the art of available techniques;
- (b)
develop criteria and or categories for controllers and recipients to assess the risk of re-identification in relation to typical recipients of data.
- (a)
- 3.
The implementation of the means and criteria outlined in an implementing act may be used as an element to demonstrate that data cannot lead to reidentification of the data subjects.
- 4.
The Commission shall closely involve the EDPB in the preparations of the implementing acts. The EPDB shall issue an opinion on the draft implementing acts within a deadline of 8 weeks as of the receipt of the draft from the Commission.
- 5.
The Implementing Acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 93(3).
Alternative wording Amendment 1256 · François-Xavier Bellamy ITRE · LIBE
against:
Article 41a
- 1.
The Commission may adopt implementing acts to specify the technical means and any relevant criteria to determine whether data resulting from pseudonymisation constitutes anonymized data that no longer constitutes personal data for
certainaentitiesspecific entity. (Article 41 new of Regulation (EU) 2016/679) - 2.
For the purpose of paragraph 1 the Commission shall:
- (a)
assess the state of the art of available techniques;
- (b)
develop criteria and or categories for controllers and recipients to assess the risk of re-identification in relation to typical recipients of data.
- (a)
- 3.
The implementation of the means and criteria outlined in an implementing act may be used as an element to demonstrate that data cannot lead to reidentification of the data subjects.
- 4.
The Commission shall closely involve the EDPB in the preparations of the implementing acts. The EPDB shall issue an opinion on the draft implementing acts within a deadline of 8 weeks as of the receipt of the draft from the Commission.
- 5.
The Implementing Acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 93(3).
Alternative wording Amendment 1257 · Henrik Dahl ITRE · LIBE
against:
Article 41a
- 1.
The Commission may adopt implementing acts to specify means and criteria to determine
whetherwhen dataresulting from pseudonymisation no longer constitutes personal data for certain entities.: - 2.
For the purpose of paragraph 1 the Commission shall:
- (a)
assess the state of the art of available techniques;
- (b)
develop criteria and or categories for controllers and recipients to assess the risk of re-identification in relation to typical recipients of data.
- (a)
- 3.
The implementation of the means and criteria outlined in an implementing act may be used as an element to demonstrate that data cannot lead to reidentification of the data subjects.
- 4.
The Commission shall closely involve the EDPB in the preparations of the implementing acts. The EPDB shall issue an opinion on the draft implementing acts within a deadline of 8 weeks as of the receipt of the draft from the Commission.
- 5.
The Implementing Acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 93(3).
Alternative wording Amendment 1258 · Axel Voss ITRE · LIBE
Justification
The amendment strengthens harmonised GDPR application by allowing the Commission, with close EDPB involvement, to adopt practical criteria, methodologies and specifications where fragmentation creates uncertainty. This includes anonymisation, pseudonymisation, risk assessment, codes of conduct, certification, technical measures and sectoral use cases. Such acts do not create automatic exemptions, but give controllers and processors reliable tools to demonstrate compliance, reduce over-compliance and support data-driven innovation while preserving safeguards.
Alternative wording Amendment 1259 · Tomas Tobé, Arba Kokalari, Jörgen Warborn ITRE · LIBE
against:
Article 41a
- 1.
The Commission may adopt implementing acts to specify means and criteria to determine
whetherwhen dataresulting from pseudonymisationno longer constitutes personal data for certain entities. - 2.
For the purpose of paragraph 1 the Commission shall:
- (a)
assess the state of the art of available techniques;
- (b)
develop criteria and or categories for controllers and recipients to assess the risk of re-identification in relation to typical recipients of data.
- (a)
- 3.
The implementation of the means and criteria outlined in an implementing act may be used as an element to demonstrate that data cannot lead to reidentification of the data subjects.
- 4.
The Commission shall closely involve the EDPB in the preparations of the implementing acts. The EPDB shall issue an opinion on the draft implementing acts within a deadline of 8 weeks as of the receipt of the draft from the Commission.
- 5.
The Implementing Acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 93(3).
Additional proposed wording Amendment 1260 · Henrik Dahl ITRE · LIBE
(1a) In Article 41a, paragraph 1, the following subparagraphs a, b, c are added
is merely transitory in nature;
is unrelated to the data subject as an identified or identifiable natural person;
has appropriate technical and/or organisational safeguards to prevent any use for a purpose related to the data subject as an identified or identifiable natural person.'
against:
Article 41a
- 1.
The Commission may adopt implementing acts to specify means and criteria to determine whether data resulting from pseudonymisation no longer constitutes personal data for certain entities.
- (a)
is merely transitory in nature;
- (b)
is unrelated to the data subject as an identified or identifiable natural person;
- (c)
has appropriate technical and/or organisational safeguards to prevent any use for a purpose related to the data subject as an identified or identifiable natural person.'
- (b)
- (a)
- 2.
For the purpose of paragraph 1 the Commission shall:
- (a)
assess the state of the art of available techniques;
- (b)
develop criteria and or categories for controllers and recipients to assess the risk of re-identification in relation to typical recipients of data.
- (a)
- 3.
The implementation of the means and criteria outlined in an implementing act may be used as an element to demonstrate that data cannot lead to reidentification of the data subjects.
- 4.
The Commission shall closely involve the EDPB in the preparations of the implementing acts. The EPDB shall issue an opinion on the draft implementing acts within a deadline of 8 weeks as of the receipt of the draft from the Commission.
- 5.
The Implementing Acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 93(3).
Additional proposed wording Amendment 1261 · Michael McNamara, Christophe Grudler ITRE · LIBE
(1a) In Article 41a, the following paragraph 5a is inserted:
The Commission shall encourage and facilitate the drawing up of a code of conduct on the application of pseudonymisation and anonymisation, at Union level in accordance with the procedure planned in Article 40(7), in order to contribute to the proper application of this Regulation.'
Justification
Provides for an EDPB opinion addressing pseudonymisation and anonymisation, and determining whether their application to personal data prevents identification. Tasks the Commission with facilitating (rather than only encouraging) a code of conduct at Union level, taking the EDPB opinion into account. Then, according to existing GDPR provisions, the EDPB is empowered to provide another opinion on whether the draft code demonstrates compliance, and, if so, the Commission may give the code general validity via implementing act. This approach promotes a harmonised approach with proper oversight.
against:
Article 41a
- 1.
The Commission may adopt implementing acts to specify means and criteria to determine whether data resulting from pseudonymisation no longer constitutes personal data for certain entities.
- 2.
For the purpose of paragraph 1 the Commission shall:
- (a)
assess the state of the art of available techniques;
- (b)
develop criteria and or categories for controllers and recipients to assess the risk of re-identification in relation to typical recipients of data.
- (a)
- 3.
The implementation of the means and criteria outlined in an implementing act may be used as an element to demonstrate that data cannot lead to reidentification of the data subjects.
- 4.
The Commission shall closely involve the EDPB in the preparations of the implementing acts. The EPDB shall issue an opinion on the draft implementing acts within a deadline of 8 weeks as of the receipt of the draft from the Commission.
- 5.
The Implementing Acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 93(3).
- 5a.
The Commission shall encourage and facilitate the drawing up of a code of conduct on the application of pseudonymisation and anonymisation, at Union level in accordance with the procedure planned in Article 40(7), in order to contribute to the proper application of this Regulation.'
Additional proposed wording Amendment 1262 · Michael McNamara, Christophe Grudler ITRE · LIBE
(1b) In Article 41a, the following paragraph 5b is added:
When preparing a code of conduct on the application of pseudonymisation and anonymisation, in accordance with Article 40(2)(d), due account shall be taken of the European Data Protection Board (EDPB) opinion, as referred to in paragraph 1.'
Justification
Provides for an EDPB opinion addressing pseudonymisation and anonymisation, and determining whether their application to personal data prevents identification. Tasks the Commission with facilitating (rather than only encouraging) a code of conduct at Union level, taking the EDPB opinion into account. Then, according to existing GDPR provisions, the EDPB is empowered to provide another opinion on whether the draft code demonstrates compliance, and, if so, the Commission may give the code general validity via implementing act. This approach promotes a harmonised approach with proper oversight.
against:
Article 41a
- 1.
The Commission may adopt implementing acts to specify means and criteria to determine whether data resulting from pseudonymisation no longer constitutes personal data for certain entities.
- 2.
For the purpose of paragraph 1 the Commission shall:
- (a)
assess the state of the art of available techniques;
- (b)
develop criteria and or categories for controllers and recipients to assess the risk of re-identification in relation to typical recipients of data.
- (a)
- 3.
The implementation of the means and criteria outlined in an implementing act may be used as an element to demonstrate that data cannot lead to reidentification of the data subjects.
- 4.
The Commission shall closely involve the EDPB in the preparations of the implementing acts. The EPDB shall issue an opinion on the draft implementing acts within a deadline of 8 weeks as of the receipt of the draft from the Commission.
- 5.
The Implementing Acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 93(3).
- 5b.
When preparing a code of conduct on the application of pseudonymisation and anonymisation, in accordance with Article 40(2)(d), due account shall be taken of the European Data Protection Board (EDPB) opinion, as referred to in paragraph 1.'
Additional proposed wording Amendment 1263 · Michael McNamara ITRE · LIBE
(1c)
When preparing a code of conduct on the application of pseudonymisation and anonymisation, in accordance with Article 40(2)(d), due account shall be taken of the European Data Protection Board (EDPB) opinion, as referred to in paragraph 1.
against:
Article 41a
- 1.
The Commission may adopt implementing acts to specify means and criteria to determine whether data resulting from pseudonymisation no longer constitutes personal data for certain entities.
- 1c.
(1c)
- 3.
When preparing a code of conduct on the application of pseudonymisation and anonymisation, in accordance with Article 40(2)(d), due account shall be taken of the European Data Protection Board (EDPB) opinion, as referred to in paragraph 1.
- 3.
- 2.
For the purpose of paragraph 1 the Commission shall:
- (a)
assess the state of the art of available techniques;
- (b)
develop criteria and or categories for controllers and recipients to assess the risk of re-identification in relation to typical recipients of data.
- (a)
- 3.
The implementation of the means and criteria outlined in an implementing act may be used as an element to demonstrate that data cannot lead to reidentification of the data subjects.
- 4.
The Commission shall closely involve the EDPB in the preparations of the implementing acts. The EPDB shall issue an opinion on the draft implementing acts within a deadline of 8 weeks as of the receipt of the draft from the Commission.
- 5.
The Implementing Acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 93(3).
Remove proposed wording Amendment 1264 · Michael McNamara, Irena Joveva, Oihane Agirregoitia Martínez, Veronika Cifrová Ostrihoňová, Christophe Grudler ITRE · LIBE
against:
Article 41a
- 1.
The Commission may adopt implementing acts to specify means and criteria to determine whether data resulting from pseudonymisation no longer constitutes personal data for certain entities.
- 2.
For the purpose of paragraph 1 the Commission shall:- (a)
assess the state of the art of available techniques; - (b)
develop criteria and or categories for controllers and recipients to assess the risk of re-identification in relation to typical recipients of data.
- (a)
- 3.
The implementation of the means and criteria outlined in an implementing act may be used as an element to demonstrate that data cannot lead to reidentification of the data subjects.
- 4.
The Commission shall closely involve the EDPB in the preparations of the implementing acts. The EPDB shall issue an opinion on the draft implementing acts within a deadline of 8 weeks as of the receipt of the draft from the Commission.
- 5.
The Implementing Acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 93(3).
Alternative wording Amendment 1265 · Axel Voss ITRE · LIBE
Justification
The amendment strengthens harmonised GDPR application by allowing the Commission, with close EDPB involvement, to adopt practical criteria, methodologies and specifications where fragmentation creates uncertainty. This includes anonymisation, pseudonymisation, risk assessment, codes of conduct, certification, technical measures and sectoral use cases. Such acts do not create automatic exemptions, but give controllers and processors reliable tools to demonstrate compliance, reduce over-compliance and support data-driven innovation while preserving safeguards.
Remove proposed wording Amendment 1266 · Michael McNamara, Irena Joveva, Oihane Agirregoitia Martínez, Veronika Cifrová Ostrihoňová, Christophe Grudler ITRE · LIBE
against:
Article 41a
- 1.
The Commission may adopt implementing acts to specify means and criteria to determine whether data resulting from pseudonymisation no longer constitutes personal data for certain entities.
- 2.
For the purpose of paragraph 1 the Commission shall:
- (a)
assess the state of the art of available techniques; - (b)
develop criteria and or categories for controllers and recipients to assess the risk of re-identification in relation to typical recipients of data.
- (a)
- 3.
The implementation of the means and criteria outlined in an implementing act may be used as an element to demonstrate that data cannot lead to reidentification of the data subjects.
- 4.
The Commission shall closely involve the EDPB in the preparations of the implementing acts. The EPDB shall issue an opinion on the draft implementing acts within a deadline of 8 weeks as of the receipt of the draft from the Commission.
- 5.
The Implementing Acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 93(3).
Alternative wording Amendment 1267 · Axel Voss ITRE · LIBE
Justification
The amendment strengthens harmonised GDPR application by allowing the Commission, with close EDPB involvement, to adopt practical criteria, methodologies and specifications where fragmentation creates uncertainty. This includes anonymisation, pseudonymisation, risk assessment, codes of conduct, certification, technical measures and sectoral use cases. Such acts do not create automatic exemptions, but give controllers and processors reliable tools to demonstrate compliance, reduce over-compliance and support data-driven innovation while preserving safeguards.
against:
Article 41a
- 1.
The Commission may adopt implementing acts to specify means and criteria to determine whether data resulting from pseudonymisation no longer constitutes personal data for certain entities.
- 2.
For the purpose of paragraph 1 the Commission shall:
- (a)
assessspecifythecriteriastateandofmethodologiestheforartassessingofwhetheravailabledatatechniquesresulting from anonymisation or pseudonymisation can reasonably be used to identify or re-identify a natural person; - (b)
develop criteria and or categories for controllers and recipients to assess the risk of re-identification in relation to typical recipients of data.
- (a)
- 3.
The implementation of the means and criteria outlined in an implementing act may be used as an element to demonstrate that data cannot lead to reidentification of the data subjects.
- 4.
The Commission shall closely involve the EDPB in the preparations of the implementing acts. The EPDB shall issue an opinion on the draft implementing acts within a deadline of 8 weeks as of the receipt of the draft from the Commission.
- 5.
The Implementing Acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 93(3).
Alternative wording Amendment 1268 · Tomas Tobé, Arba Kokalari, Jörgen Warborn ITRE · LIBE
against:
Article 41a
- 1.
The Commission may adopt implementing acts to specify means and criteria to determine whether data resulting from pseudonymisation no longer constitutes personal data for certain entities.
- 2.
For the purpose of paragraph 1 the Commission shall:
- (a)
assess the state of the art of available techniques , including Privacy Enhancing Technologies (PET);
- (b)
develop criteria and or categories for controllers and recipients to assess the risk of re-identification in relation to typical recipients of data.
- (a)
- 3.
The implementation of the means and criteria outlined in an implementing act may be used as an element to demonstrate that data cannot lead to reidentification of the data subjects.
- 4.
The Commission shall closely involve the EDPB in the preparations of the implementing acts. The EPDB shall issue an opinion on the draft implementing acts within a deadline of 8 weeks as of the receipt of the draft from the Commission.
- 5.
The Implementing Acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 93(3).
Alternative wording Amendment 1269 · Oliver Schenk, Eva Maydell, Andrea Wechsler, Monika Hohlmeier, Dimitris Tsiodras, Christian Doleschal, Angelika Niebler, Axel Voss, Marie-Sophie Lanig, Ana Miguel Pedro, Romana Tomc, Marion Walsmann, Lena Düpont, François-Xavier Bellamy ITRE · LIBE
against:
Article 41a
- 1.
The Commission may adopt implementing acts to specify means and criteria to determine whether data resulting from pseudonymisation no longer constitutes personal data for certain entities.
- 2.
For the purpose of paragraph 1 the Commission shall:
- (a)
assess the state of the art of available techniques, such as privacy-enhancing technologies;
- (b)
develop criteria and or categories for controllers and recipients to assess the risk of re-identification in relation to typical recipients of data.
- (a)
- 3.
The implementation of the means and criteria outlined in an implementing act may be used as an element to demonstrate that data cannot lead to reidentification of the data subjects.
- 4.
The Commission shall closely involve the EDPB in the preparations of the implementing acts. The EPDB shall issue an opinion on the draft implementing acts within a deadline of 8 weeks as of the receipt of the draft from the Commission.
- 5.
The Implementing Acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 93(3).
Alternative wording Amendment 1270 · Krzysztof Hetman, Adam Jarubas ITRE · LIBE
against:
Article 41a
- 1.
The Commission may adopt implementing acts to specify means and criteria to determine whether data resulting from pseudonymisation no longer constitutes personal data for certain entities.
- 2.
For the purpose of paragraph 1 the Commission shall:
- (a)
assess the state of the art of available techniques such as privacy enhancing technologies;;
- (b)
develop criteria and or categories for controllers and recipients to assess the risk of re-identification in relation to typical recipients of data.
- (a)
- 3.
The implementation of the means and criteria outlined in an implementing act may be used as an element to demonstrate that data cannot lead to reidentification of the data subjects.
- 4.
The Commission shall closely involve the EDPB in the preparations of the implementing acts. The EPDB shall issue an opinion on the draft implementing acts within a deadline of 8 weeks as of the receipt of the draft from the Commission.
- 5.
The Implementing Acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 93(3).
Alternative wording Amendment 1271 · François-Xavier Bellamy ITRE · LIBE
against:
Article 41a
- 1.
The Commission may adopt implementing acts to specify means and criteria to determine whether data resulting from pseudonymisation no longer constitutes personal data for certain entities.
- 2.
For the purpose of paragraph 1 the Commission shall:
- (a)
assess the state of the art of available
techniquestechnical means; - (b)
develop criteria and or categories for controllers and recipients to assess the risk of re-identification in relation to typical recipients of data.
- (a)
- 3.
The implementation of the means and criteria outlined in an implementing act may be used as an element to demonstrate that data cannot lead to reidentification of the data subjects.
- 4.
The Commission shall closely involve the EDPB in the preparations of the implementing acts. The EPDB shall issue an opinion on the draft implementing acts within a deadline of 8 weeks as of the receipt of the draft from the Commission.
- 5.
The Implementing Acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 93(3).
Remove proposed wording Amendment 1272 · Michael McNamara, Irena Joveva, Oihane Agirregoitia Martínez, Veronika Cifrová Ostrihoňová, Christophe Grudler ITRE · LIBE
against:
Article 41a
- 1.
The Commission may adopt implementing acts to specify means and criteria to determine whether data resulting from pseudonymisation no longer constitutes personal data for certain entities.
- 2.
For the purpose of paragraph 1 the Commission shall:
- (a)
assess the state of the art of available techniques;
- (b)
develop criteria and or categories for controllers and recipients to assess the risk of re-identification in relation to typical recipients of data.
- (a)
- 3.
The implementation of the means and criteria outlined in an implementing act may be used as an element to demonstrate that data cannot lead to reidentification of the data subjects.
- 4.
The Commission shall closely involve the EDPB in the preparations of the implementing acts. The EPDB shall issue an opinion on the draft implementing acts within a deadline of 8 weeks as of the receipt of the draft from the Commission.
- 5.
The Implementing Acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 93(3).
Alternative wording Amendment 1273 · François-Xavier Bellamy ITRE · LIBE
against:
Article 41a
- 1.
The Commission may adopt implementing acts to specify means and criteria to determine whether data resulting from pseudonymisation no longer constitutes personal data for certain entities.
- 2.
For the purpose of paragraph 1 the Commission shall:
- (a)
assess the state of the art of available techniques;
- (b)
develop criteria
and or categories for controllers and recipientsto assess the risk of re-identification in practice in relation to typical recipients of data. The criteria should take into account, inter alia, the likelihood of identifying a natural person, the possibility of linking records relating to a natural person, and the potential of inferring information concerning a natural person.
- (a)
- 3.
The implementation of the means and criteria outlined in an implementing act may be used as an element to demonstrate that data cannot lead to reidentification of the data subjects.
- 4.
The Commission shall closely involve the EDPB in the preparations of the implementing acts. The EPDB shall issue an opinion on the draft implementing acts within a deadline of 8 weeks as of the receipt of the draft from the Commission.
- 5.
The Implementing Acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 93(3).
Alternative wording Amendment 1274 · Ondřej Krutílek ITRE · LIBE
Justification
The implementing acts should not directly determine the notion of personal data, they should include the core requirements on the means and criteria. It should be done by introducing the reason for why the data lose the status of personal data in relation to specific entities in para (1) and by adapting point 2(b) to cover the basic factors contributing to risk of re-identification (according to recital 26 GDPR). “or reasonably foreseeable” is added to address risk-based determination of other than typical or intended recipients.
against:
Article 41a
- 1.
The Commission may adopt implementing acts to specify means and criteria to determine whether data resulting from pseudonymisation no longer constitutes personal data for certain entities.
- 2.
For the purpose of paragraph 1 the Commission shall:
- (a)
assess the state of the art of available techniques;
- (b)
develop criteria and or categories for controllers and recipients to assess the risk of re-identification in relation to typical or reasonably foreseeable recipients of data, based on costs, amount of time required, available technology, legal powers and restrictions and all other relevant objective factors.
- (a)
- 3.
The implementation of the means and criteria outlined in an implementing act may be used as an element to demonstrate that data cannot lead to reidentification of the data subjects.
- 4.
The Commission shall closely involve the EDPB in the preparations of the implementing acts. The EPDB shall issue an opinion on the draft implementing acts within a deadline of 8 weeks as of the receipt of the draft from the Commission.
- 5.
The Implementing Acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 93(3).
Alternative wording Amendment 1275 · Oliver Schenk, Eva Maydell, Angelika Niebler, Monika Hohlmeier, Dimitris Tsiodras, Christian Doleschal, Andrea Wechsler, Axel Voss, Ana Miguel Pedro, Marion Walsmann, Lena Düpont, Romana Tomc, Marie-Sophie Lanig, François-Xavier Bellamy ITRE · LIBE
against:
Article 41a
- 1.
The Commission may adopt implementing acts to specify means and criteria to determine whether data resulting from pseudonymisation no longer constitutes personal data for certain entities.
- 2.
For the purpose of paragraph 1 the Commission shall:
- (a)
assess the state of the art of available techniques;
- (b)
develop criteria and or categories for controllers and recipients to assess the risk of re-identification in relation to typical recipients of data, taking into account objective factors such as cost, amount of time required, available technology, legal obligations.
- (a)
- 3.
The implementation of the means and criteria outlined in an implementing act may be used as an element to demonstrate that data cannot lead to reidentification of the data subjects.
- 4.
The Commission shall closely involve the EDPB in the preparations of the implementing acts. The EPDB shall issue an opinion on the draft implementing acts within a deadline of 8 weeks as of the receipt of the draft from the Commission.
- 5.
The Implementing Acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 93(3).
Alternative wording Amendment 1276 · Alice Teodorescu Måwe ITRE · LIBE
against:
Article 41a
- 1.
The Commission may adopt implementing acts to specify means and criteria to determine whether data resulting from pseudonymisation no longer constitutes personal data for certain entities.
- 2.
For the purpose of paragraph 1 the Commission shall:
- (a)
assess the state of the art of available techniques;
- (b)
develop criteria and or categories for controllers and recipients to assess the risk of
re-identificationdatainbeingrelationused for a purpose related totypical recipients ofthe data.subject as an identified or identifiable natural person
- (a)
- 3.
The implementation of the means and criteria outlined in an implementing act may be used as an element to demonstrate that data cannot lead to reidentification of the data subjects.
- 4.
The Commission shall closely involve the EDPB in the preparations of the implementing acts. The EPDB shall issue an opinion on the draft implementing acts within a deadline of 8 weeks as of the receipt of the draft from the Commission.
- 5.
The Implementing Acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 93(3).
Alternative wording Amendment 1277 · Katri Kulmuni ITRE · LIBE
against:
Article 41a
- 1.
The Commission may adopt implementing acts to specify means and criteria to determine whether data resulting from pseudonymisation no longer constitutes personal data for certain entities.
- 2.
For the purpose of paragraph 1 the Commission shall:
- (a)
assess the state of the art of available techniques;
- (b)
develop criteria and or categories for controllers and recipients to assess the risk of
re-identificationdatainbeingrelationused for a purpose related totypical recipients ofthe data subject as an identified or identifiable natural person.
- (a)
- 3.
The implementation of the means and criteria outlined in an implementing act may be used as an element to demonstrate that data cannot lead to reidentification of the data subjects.
- 4.
The Commission shall closely involve the EDPB in the preparations of the implementing acts. The EPDB shall issue an opinion on the draft implementing acts within a deadline of 8 weeks as of the receipt of the draft from the Commission.
- 5.
The Implementing Acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 93(3).
Alternative wording Amendment 1278 · Henrik Dahl ITRE · LIBE
against:
Article 41a
- 1.
The Commission may adopt implementing acts to specify means and criteria to determine whether data resulting from pseudonymisation no longer constitutes personal data for certain entities.
- 2.
For the purpose of paragraph 1 the Commission shall:
- (a)
assess the state of the art of available techniques;
- (b)
develop criteria and or categories for controllers and recipients to assess the risk of
re-identificationdatainbeingrelationused for a purpose related totypical recipients ofthe data subject as an identified or identifiable natural person.
- (a)
- 3.
The implementation of the means and criteria outlined in an implementing act may be used as an element to demonstrate that data cannot lead to reidentification of the data subjects.
- 4.
The Commission shall closely involve the EDPB in the preparations of the implementing acts. The EPDB shall issue an opinion on the draft implementing acts within a deadline of 8 weeks as of the receipt of the draft from the Commission.
- 5.
The Implementing Acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 93(3).
Alternative wording Amendment 1279 · Tomas Tobé, Arba Kokalari, Jörgen Warborn ITRE · LIBE
against:
Article 41a
- 1.
The Commission may adopt implementing acts to specify means and criteria to determine whether data resulting from pseudonymisation no longer constitutes personal data for certain entities.
- 2.
For the purpose of paragraph 1 the Commission shall:
- (a)
assess the state of the art of available techniques;
- (b)
develop criteria and or categories for controllers and recipients to assess the risk of
re-identificationdatainbeingrelationused for a purpose related totypical recipients ofthe data.subject as an identifiable natural person
- (a)
- 3.
The implementation of the means and criteria outlined in an implementing act may be used as an element to demonstrate that data cannot lead to reidentification of the data subjects.
- 4.
The Commission shall closely involve the EDPB in the preparations of the implementing acts. The EPDB shall issue an opinion on the draft implementing acts within a deadline of 8 weeks as of the receipt of the draft from the Commission.
- 5.
The Implementing Acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 93(3).
Alternative wording Amendment 1280 · Axel Voss ITRE · LIBE
Justification
The amendment strengthens harmonised GDPR application by allowing the Commission, with close EDPB involvement, to adopt practical criteria, methodologies and specifications where fragmentation creates uncertainty. This includes anonymisation, pseudonymisation, risk assessment, codes of conduct, certification, technical measures and sectoral use cases. Such acts do not create automatic exemptions, but give controllers and processors reliable tools to demonstrate compliance, reduce over-compliance and support data-driven innovation while preserving safeguards.
against:
Article 41a
- 1.
The Commission may adopt implementing acts to specify means and criteria to determine whether data resulting from pseudonymisation no longer constitutes personal data for certain entities.
- 2.
For the purpose of paragraph 1 the Commission shall:
- (a)
assess the state of the art of available techniques;
- (b)
developspecifycriteriamethodologies for assessing risks to the rights andor categories for controllers and recipients to assess the riskfreedoms ofre-identificationnaturalin relation to typical recipients of data.persons;
- (a)
- 3.
The implementation of the means and criteria outlined in an implementing act may be used as an element to demonstrate that data cannot lead to reidentification of the data subjects.
- 4.
The Commission shall closely involve the EDPB in the preparations of the implementing acts. The EPDB shall issue an opinion on the draft implementing acts within a deadline of 8 weeks as of the receipt of the draft from the Commission.
- 5.
The Implementing Acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 93(3).
Additional proposed wording Amendment 1281 · Oliver Schenk, Eva Maydell, Andrea Wechsler, Angelika Niebler, Monika Hohlmeier, Dimitris Tsiodras, Christian Doleschal, Axel Voss, Marie-Sophie Lanig, Ana Miguel Pedro, Marion Walsmann, Lena Düpont, Romana Tomc, François-Xavier Bellamy ITRE · LIBE
(ba) In Article 41a, paragraph 2, the following point ba is added
assess technical, administrative, organisational and contractual measures that can prevent the risk of re-identification.'
against:
Article 41a
- 1.
The Commission may adopt implementing acts to specify means and criteria to determine whether data resulting from pseudonymisation no longer constitutes personal data for certain entities.
- 2.
For the purpose of paragraph 1 the Commission shall:
- (a)
assess the state of the art of available techniques;
- (b)
develop criteria and or categories for controllers and recipients to assess the risk of re-identification in relation to typical recipients of data.
- (ba)
assess technical, administrative, organisational and contractual measures that can prevent the risk of re-identification.'
- (a)
- 3.
The implementation of the means and criteria outlined in an implementing act may be used as an element to demonstrate that data cannot lead to reidentification of the data subjects.
- 4.
The Commission shall closely involve the EDPB in the preparations of the implementing acts. The EPDB shall issue an opinion on the draft implementing acts within a deadline of 8 weeks as of the receipt of the draft from the Commission.
- 5.
The Implementing Acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 93(3).
Additional proposed wording Amendment 1282 · Axel Voss ITRE · LIBE
(ba) In Article 41a, paragraph 2, the following point ba is added
establish or approve Union-wide Codes of Conduct pursuant to Article 40 where harmonised application is necessary;'
Justification
The amendment strengthens harmonised GDPR application by allowing the Commission, with close EDPB involvement, to adopt practical criteria, methodologies and specifications where fragmentation creates uncertainty. This includes anonymisation, pseudonymisation, risk assessment, codes of conduct, certification, technical measures and sectoral use cases. Such acts do not create automatic exemptions, but give controllers and processors reliable tools to demonstrate compliance, reduce over-compliance and support data-driven innovation while preserving safeguards.
against:
Article 41a
- 1.
The Commission may adopt implementing acts to specify means and criteria to determine whether data resulting from pseudonymisation no longer constitutes personal data for certain entities.
- 2.
For the purpose of paragraph 1 the Commission shall:
- (a)
assess the state of the art of available techniques;
- (b)
develop criteria and or categories for controllers and recipients to assess the risk of re-identification in relation to typical recipients of data.
- (ba)
establish or approve Union-wide Codes of Conduct pursuant to Article 40 where harmonised application is necessary;'
- (a)
- 3.
The implementation of the means and criteria outlined in an implementing act may be used as an element to demonstrate that data cannot lead to reidentification of the data subjects.
- 4.
The Commission shall closely involve the EDPB in the preparations of the implementing acts. The EPDB shall issue an opinion on the draft implementing acts within a deadline of 8 weeks as of the receipt of the draft from the Commission.
- 5.
The Implementing Acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 93(3).
Additional proposed wording Amendment 1283 · Axel Voss ITRE · LIBE
(bb) In Article 41a, paragraph 2, the following point ba is added
establish or approve Certification mechanisms, seals and marks pursuant to Article 42, including certification criteria and conditions for accreditation of certification bodies;'
Justification
The amendment strengthens harmonised GDPR application by allowing the Commission, with close EDPB involvement, to adopt practical criteria, methodologies and specifications where fragmentation creates uncertainty. This includes anonymisation, pseudonymisation, risk assessment, codes of conduct, certification, technical measures and sectoral use cases. Such acts do not create automatic exemptions, but give controllers and processors reliable tools to demonstrate compliance, reduce over-compliance and support data-driven innovation while preserving safeguards.
against:
Article 41a
- 1.
The Commission may adopt implementing acts to specify means and criteria to determine whether data resulting from pseudonymisation no longer constitutes personal data for certain entities.
- 2.
For the purpose of paragraph 1 the Commission shall:
- (a)
assess the state of the art of available techniques;
- (b)
develop criteria and or categories for controllers and recipients to assess the risk of re-identification in relation to typical recipients of data.
- (bb)
establish or approve Certification mechanisms, seals and marks pursuant to Article 42, including certification criteria and conditions for accreditation of certification bodies;'
- (a)
- 3.
The implementation of the means and criteria outlined in an implementing act may be used as an element to demonstrate that data cannot lead to reidentification of the data subjects.
- 4.
The Commission shall closely involve the EDPB in the preparations of the implementing acts. The EPDB shall issue an opinion on the draft implementing acts within a deadline of 8 weeks as of the receipt of the draft from the Commission.
- 5.
The Implementing Acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 93(3).
Additional proposed wording Amendment 1284 · Axel Voss ITRE · LIBE
(bc) In Article 41a, paragraph 2, the following point ba is added
specify common technical and organisational measures that may be used to demonstrate compliance with this Regulation;'
Justification
The amendment strengthens harmonised GDPR application by allowing the Commission, with close EDPB involvement, to adopt practical criteria, methodologies and specifications where fragmentation creates uncertainty. This includes anonymisation, pseudonymisation, risk assessment, codes of conduct, certification, technical measures and sectoral use cases. Such acts do not create automatic exemptions, but give controllers and processors reliable tools to demonstrate compliance, reduce over-compliance and support data-driven innovation while preserving safeguards.
against:
Article 41a
- 1.
The Commission may adopt implementing acts to specify means and criteria to determine whether data resulting from pseudonymisation no longer constitutes personal data for certain entities.
- 2.
For the purpose of paragraph 1 the Commission shall:
- (a)
assess the state of the art of available techniques;
- (b)
develop criteria and or categories for controllers and recipients to assess the risk of re-identification in relation to typical recipients of data.
- (bc)
specify common technical and organisational measures that may be used to demonstrate compliance with this Regulation;'
- (a)
- 3.
The implementation of the means and criteria outlined in an implementing act may be used as an element to demonstrate that data cannot lead to reidentification of the data subjects.
- 4.
The Commission shall closely involve the EDPB in the preparations of the implementing acts. The EPDB shall issue an opinion on the draft implementing acts within a deadline of 8 weeks as of the receipt of the draft from the Commission.
- 5.
The Implementing Acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 93(3).
Additional proposed wording Amendment 1285 · Axel Voss ITRE · LIBE
(bd) In Article 41a, paragraph 2, the following point ba is added
identify sector-specific circumstances, processing operations or use cases where harmonised interpretation is necessary to avoid fragmentation of the internal market.'
Justification
The amendment strengthens harmonised GDPR application by allowing the Commission, with close EDPB involvement, to adopt practical criteria, methodologies and specifications where fragmentation creates uncertainty. This includes anonymisation, pseudonymisation, risk assessment, codes of conduct, certification, technical measures and sectoral use cases. Such acts do not create automatic exemptions, but give controllers and processors reliable tools to demonstrate compliance, reduce over-compliance and support data-driven innovation while preserving safeguards.
against:
Article 41a
- 1.
The Commission may adopt implementing acts to specify means and criteria to determine whether data resulting from pseudonymisation no longer constitutes personal data for certain entities.
- 2.
For the purpose of paragraph 1 the Commission shall:
- (a)
assess the state of the art of available techniques;
- (b)
develop criteria and or categories for controllers and recipients to assess the risk of re-identification in relation to typical recipients of data.
- (bd)
identify sector-specific circumstances, processing operations or use cases where harmonised interpretation is necessary to avoid fragmentation of the internal market.'
- (a)
- 3.
The implementation of the means and criteria outlined in an implementing act may be used as an element to demonstrate that data cannot lead to reidentification of the data subjects.
- 4.
The Commission shall closely involve the EDPB in the preparations of the implementing acts. The EPDB shall issue an opinion on the draft implementing acts within a deadline of 8 weeks as of the receipt of the draft from the Commission.
- 5.
The Implementing Acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 93(3).
Remove proposed wording Amendment 1286 · Michael McNamara, Irena Joveva, Oihane Agirregoitia Martínez, Veronika Cifrová Ostrihoňová, Christophe Grudler ITRE · LIBE
against:
Article 41a
- 1.
The Commission may adopt implementing acts to specify means and criteria to determine whether data resulting from pseudonymisation no longer constitutes personal data for certain entities.
- 2.
For the purpose of paragraph 1 the Commission shall:
- (a)
assess the state of the art of available techniques;
- (b)
develop criteria and or categories for controllers and recipients to assess the risk of re-identification in relation to typical recipients of data.
- (a)
- 3.
The implementation of the means and criteria outlined in an implementing act may be used as an element to demonstrate that data cannot lead to reidentification of the data subjects. - 4.
The Commission shall closely involve the EDPB in the preparations of the implementing acts. The EPDB shall issue an opinion on the draft implementing acts within a deadline of 8 weeks as of the receipt of the draft from the Commission.
- 5.
The Implementing Acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 93(3).
Alternative wording Amendment 1287 · Francesco Torselli ITRE · LIBE
against:
Article 41a
- 1.
The Commission may adopt implementing acts to specify means and criteria to determine whether data resulting from pseudonymisation no longer constitutes personal data for certain entities.
- 2.
For the purpose of paragraph 1 the Commission shall:
- (a)
assess the state of the art of available techniques;
- (b)
develop criteria and or categories for controllers and recipients to assess the risk of re-identification in relation to typical recipients of data.
- (a)
- 3.
TheInimplementationthe context oftheameansgroupandofcriteriaundertakings,outlineddatainresulting from pseudonymisation shall no longer constitute personal data for animplementingundertakingact may be used as an element to demonstrate that data cannot lead to reidentification of the data subjects.where:- (a)
binding intra-group arrangements and appropriate technical and organisational measures, such as logical segregation and access controls, ensure that the undertaking does not have access, and is not reasonably likely to obtain access, to identification keys or additional identifying information held by another group undertaking prohibit any attempt at re-identification, and ensure that the undertaking does not possess other means reasonably likely to enable the re-identification of data subjects; and (b) the undertaking is able to demonstrate the effectiveness of such arrangements and measures.
- (a)
- 4.
The Commission shall closely involve the EDPB in the preparations of the implementing acts. The EPDB shall issue an opinion on the draft implementing acts within a deadline of 8 weeks as of the receipt of the draft from the Commission.
- 5.
The Implementing Acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 93(3).
Alternative wording Amendment 1288 · Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pierre-Romain Thionnet, Alexandre Varaut, Fabrice Leggeri, Marion Maréchal, Christophe Bay ITRE · LIBE
against:
Article 41a
- 1.
The Commission may adopt implementing acts to specify means and criteria to determine whether data resulting from pseudonymisation no longer constitutes personal data for certain entities.
- 2.
For the purpose of paragraph 1 the Commission shall:
- (a)
assess the state of the art of available techniques;
- (b)
develop criteria and or categories for controllers and recipients to assess the risk of re-identification in relation to typical recipients of data.
- (a)
- 3.
The implementation by a controller, processor, data holder or data recipient of the
meanstechnical and organisational measures and criteriaoutlinedset out inantheimplementingguidelinesactreferred to in paragraph [1] may beusedrelied upon as an element to demonstrate that the datacannotare not, or are no longer, likely to lead toreidentificationthe re-identification of the data subjects, and that the person concerned has complied with its obligations, including its consent-requesting obligations, under this Regulation. Such reliance shall be without prejudice to the assessment of the specific circumstances of each case by the competent supervisory authority and to the interpretation of Union law by the Court of Justice of the European Union. - 4.
The Commission shall closely involve the EDPB in the preparations of the implementing acts. The EPDB shall issue an opinion on the draft implementing acts within a deadline of 8 weeks as of the receipt of the draft from the Commission.
- 5.
The Implementing Acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 93(3).
Alternative wording Amendment 1289 · Oliver Schenk, Andrea Wechsler, Angelika Niebler, Monika Hohlmeier, Dimitris Tsiodras, Christian Doleschal, Axel Voss, Marie-Sophie Lanig, Ana Miguel Pedro, Marion Walsmann, Romana Tomc, Lena Düpont, Aura Salla, François-Xavier Bellamy ITRE · LIBE
against:
Article 41a
- 1.
The Commission may adopt implementing acts to specify means and criteria to determine whether data resulting from pseudonymisation no longer constitutes personal data for certain entities.
- 2.
For the purpose of paragraph 1 the Commission shall:
- (a)
assess the state of the art of available techniques;
- (b)
develop criteria and or categories for controllers and recipients to assess the risk of re-identification in relation to typical recipients of data.
- (a)
- 3.
The implementation of the
meanstechnical and organisational measures and criteria outlined in an implementing act may be used as an element to demonstrate that pseudonymised datacannotdo not lead to reidentification of the data subjects in a specific case. - 4.
The Commission shall closely involve the EDPB in the preparations of the implementing acts. The EPDB shall issue an opinion on the draft implementing acts within a deadline of 8 weeks as of the receipt of the draft from the Commission.
- 5.
The Implementing Acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 93(3).
Alternative wording Amendment 1290 · Henrik Dahl ITRE · LIBE
against:
Article 41a
- 1.
The Commission may adopt implementing acts to specify means and criteria to determine whether data resulting from pseudonymisation no longer constitutes personal data for certain entities.
- 2.
For the purpose of paragraph 1 the Commission shall:
- (a)
assess the state of the art of available techniques;
- (b)
develop criteria and or categories for controllers and recipients to assess the risk of re-identification in relation to typical recipients of data.
- (a)
- 3.
The implementation of the means and criteria outlined in an implementing act may be used as an element to demonstrate that data cannot
leadbe used for any purpose related toreidentification ofthe data subjects as an identified or identifiable natural person. - 4.
The Commission shall closely involve the EDPB in the preparations of the implementing acts. The EPDB shall issue an opinion on the draft implementing acts within a deadline of 8 weeks as of the receipt of the draft from the Commission.
- 5.
The Implementing Acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 93(3).
Alternative wording Amendment 1291 · Alice Teodorescu Måwe ITRE · LIBE
against:
Article 41a
- 1.
The Commission may adopt implementing acts to specify means and criteria to determine whether data resulting from pseudonymisation no longer constitutes personal data for certain entities.
- 2.
For the purpose of paragraph 1 the Commission shall:
- (a)
assess the state of the art of available techniques;
- (b)
develop criteria and or categories for controllers and recipients to assess the risk of re-identification in relation to typical recipients of data.
- (a)
- 3.
The implementation of the means and criteria outlined in an implementing act may be used as an element to demonstrate that data cannot
leadbe used for any purpose related toreidentification ofthe data subjects as an identified or identifiable natural person. - 4.
The Commission shall closely involve the EDPB in the preparations of the implementing acts. The EPDB shall issue an opinion on the draft implementing acts within a deadline of 8 weeks as of the receipt of the draft from the Commission.
- 5.
The Implementing Acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 93(3).
Alternative wording Amendment 1292 · Tomas Tobé, Arba Kokalari, Jörgen Warborn ITRE · LIBE
against:
Article 41a
- 1.
The Commission may adopt implementing acts to specify means and criteria to determine whether data resulting from pseudonymisation no longer constitutes personal data for certain entities.
- 2.
For the purpose of paragraph 1 the Commission shall:
- (a)
assess the state of the art of available techniques;
- (b)
develop criteria and or categories for controllers and recipients to assess the risk of re-identification in relation to typical recipients of data.
- (a)
- 3.
The implementation of the means and criteria outlined in an implementing act may be used as an element to demonstrate that data cannot
leadbe used for any purpose related toreidentification ofthe data subjects as an identifiable natural person. - 4.
The Commission shall closely involve the EDPB in the preparations of the implementing acts. The EPDB shall issue an opinion on the draft implementing acts within a deadline of 8 weeks as of the receipt of the draft from the Commission.
- 5.
The Implementing Acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 93(3).
Alternative wording Amendment 1293 · Axel Voss ITRE · LIBE
Justification
The amendment strengthens harmonised GDPR application by allowing the Commission, with close EDPB involvement, to adopt practical criteria, methodologies and specifications where fragmentation creates uncertainty. This includes anonymisation, pseudonymisation, risk assessment, codes of conduct, certification, technical measures and sectoral use cases. Such acts do not create automatic exemptions, but give controllers and processors reliable tools to demonstrate compliance, reduce over-compliance and support data-driven innovation while preserving safeguards.
against:
Article 41a
- 1.
The Commission may adopt implementing acts to specify means and criteria to determine whether data resulting from pseudonymisation no longer constitutes personal data for certain entities.
- 2.
For the purpose of paragraph 1 the Commission shall:
- (a)
assess the state of the art of available techniques;
- (b)
develop criteria and or categories for controllers and recipients to assess the risk of re-identification in relation to typical recipients of data.
- (a)
- 3.
TheComplianceimplementationwithof the means andspecifications, criteriaoutlinedor methodologies set out inanimplementingactacts adopted under this Article may be used by controllers and processors as an element to demonstratethatcompliancedatawithcannotthislead to reidentification of the data subjectsRegulation. - 4.
The Commission shall closely involve the EDPB in the preparations of the implementing acts. The EPDB shall issue an opinion on the draft implementing acts within a deadline of 8 weeks as of the receipt of the draft from the Commission.
- 5.
The Implementing Acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 93(3).
Remove proposed wording Amendment 1295 · Michael McNamara, Irena Joveva, Oihane Agirregoitia Martínez, Veronika Cifrová Ostrihoňová, Christophe Grudler ITRE · LIBE
against:
Article 41a
- 1.
The Commission may adopt implementing acts to specify means and criteria to determine whether data resulting from pseudonymisation no longer constitutes personal data for certain entities.
- 2.
For the purpose of paragraph 1 the Commission shall:
- (a)
assess the state of the art of available techniques;
- (b)
develop criteria and or categories for controllers and recipients to assess the risk of re-identification in relation to typical recipients of data.
- (a)
- 3.
The implementation of the means and criteria outlined in an implementing act may be used as an element to demonstrate that data cannot lead to reidentification of the data subjects.
- 4.
The Commission shall closely involve the EDPB in the preparations of the implementing acts. The EPDB shall issue an opinion on the draft implementing acts within a deadline of 8 weeks as of the receipt of the draft from the Commission. - 5.
The Implementing Acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 93(3).
Alternative wording Amendment 1296 · Tomas Tobé, Arba Kokalari, Jörgen Warborn ITRE · LIBE
against:
Article 41a
- 1.
The Commission may adopt implementing acts to specify means and criteria to determine whether data resulting from pseudonymisation no longer constitutes personal data for certain entities.
- 2.
For the purpose of paragraph 1 the Commission shall:
- (a)
assess the state of the art of available techniques;
- (b)
develop criteria and or categories for controllers and recipients to assess the risk of re-identification in relation to typical recipients of data.
- (a)
- 3.
The implementation of the means and criteria outlined in an implementing act may be used as an element to demonstrate that data cannot lead to reidentification of the data subjects.
- 4.
The Commission shall closely involve the EDPB in the preparations of the implementing acts. The EPDB shall issue an opinion, which shall be made public, on the draft implementing acts within a deadline of 8 weeks as of the receipt of the draft from the Commission.
- 5.
The Implementing Acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 93(3).
Alternative wording Amendment 1297 · Axel Voss ITRE · LIBE
Justification
The amendment strengthens harmonised GDPR application by allowing the Commission, with close EDPB involvement, to adopt practical criteria, methodologies and specifications where fragmentation creates uncertainty. This includes anonymisation, pseudonymisation, risk assessment, codes of conduct, certification, technical measures and sectoral use cases. Such acts do not create automatic exemptions, but give controllers and processors reliable tools to demonstrate compliance, reduce over-compliance and support data-driven innovation while preserving safeguards.
Remove proposed wording Amendment 1298 · Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pierre-Romain Thionnet, Alexandre Varaut, Fabrice Leggeri, Marion Maréchal, Christophe Bay ITRE · LIBE
against:
Article 41a
- 1.
The Commission may adopt implementing acts to specify means and criteria to determine whether data resulting from pseudonymisation no longer constitutes personal data for certain entities.
- 2.
For the purpose of paragraph 1 the Commission shall:
- (a)
assess the state of the art of available techniques;
- (b)
develop criteria and or categories for controllers and recipients to assess the risk of re-identification in relation to typical recipients of data.
- (a)
- 3.
The implementation of the means and criteria outlined in an implementing act may be used as an element to demonstrate that data cannot lead to reidentification of the data subjects.
- 4.
The Commission shall closely involve the EDPB in the preparations of the implementing acts. The EPDB shall issue an opinion on the draft implementing acts within a deadline of 8 weeks as of the receipt of the draft from the Commission.
- 5.
The Implementing Acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 93(3).
Remove proposed wording Amendment 1299 · Michael McNamara, Irena Joveva, Oihane Agirregoitia Martínez, Veronika Cifrová Ostrihoňová, Christophe Grudler ITRE · LIBE
against:
Article 41a
- 1.
The Commission may adopt implementing acts to specify means and criteria to determine whether data resulting from pseudonymisation no longer constitutes personal data for certain entities.
- 2.
For the purpose of paragraph 1 the Commission shall:
- (a)
assess the state of the art of available techniques;
- (b)
develop criteria and or categories for controllers and recipients to assess the risk of re-identification in relation to typical recipients of data.
- (a)
- 3.
The implementation of the means and criteria outlined in an implementing act may be used as an element to demonstrate that data cannot lead to reidentification of the data subjects.
- 4.
The Commission shall closely involve the EDPB in the preparations of the implementing acts. The EPDB shall issue an opinion on the draft implementing acts within a deadline of 8 weeks as of the receipt of the draft from the Commission.
- 5.
The Implementing Acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 93(3).
Alternative wording Amendment 1300 · Axel Voss ITRE · LIBE
Justification
The amendment strengthens harmonised GDPR application by allowing the Commission, with close EDPB involvement, to adopt practical criteria, methodologies and specifications where fragmentation creates uncertainty. This includes anonymisation, pseudonymisation, risk assessment, codes of conduct, certification, technical measures and sectoral use cases. Such acts do not create automatic exemptions, but give controllers and processors reliable tools to demonstrate compliance, reduce over-compliance and support data-driven innovation while preserving safeguards.
against:
Article 41a
- 1.
The Commission may adopt implementing acts to specify means and criteria to determine whether data resulting from pseudonymisation no longer constitutes personal data for certain entities.
- 2.
For the purpose of paragraph 1 the Commission shall:
- (a)
assess the state of the art of available techniques;
- (b)
develop criteria and or categories for controllers and recipients to assess the risk of re-identification in relation to typical recipients of data.
- (a)
- 3.
The implementation of the means and criteria outlined in an implementing act may be used as an element to demonstrate that data cannot lead to reidentification of the data subjects.
- 4.
The Commission shall closely involve the EDPB in the preparations of the implementing acts. The EPDB shall issue an opinion on the draft implementing acts within a deadline of 8 weeks as of the receipt of the draft from the Commission.
- 5.
The
ImplementingimplementingActsacts referred to in this Article shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 93(3).
No amendments match these filters.
Selected texts
Compare wording
Choose a tracked part and a named pair of texts. Comparisons are offered only where both sides cover the same legal unit.
Select a specific tracked part above to compare wording.
No same-scope comparison is available for this tracked part. Its source wording remains available in the article text sections.
Article 41a
European Commission proposal → Council Presidency text · ST 9547/26
Changes in context
RemovedAdded
Both texts in full
European Commission proposal
Council Presidency text · ST 9547/26
Article 41a
Council Presidency text · ST 9547/26 → Council Presidency text · ST 10426/26
Changes in context
RemovedAdded
Both texts in full
Council Presidency text · ST 9547/26
Council Presidency text · ST 10426/26
Article 41a
Council Presidency text · ST 10426/26 → Council Presidency text · ST 10677/26
Changes in context
RemovedAdded
Both texts in full
Council Presidency text · ST 10426/26
Council Presidency text · ST 10677/26
Article 41a
Council Presidency text · ST 10677/26 → Council Presidency text · ST 12535/26
Changes in context
RemovedAdded
Both texts in full
Council Presidency text · ST 10677/26
Council Presidency text · ST 12535/26
Article 41a
Wording reproduced in the amendment → Amendment 1244 · ITRE–LIBE amendments 1053–1260 to the draft report: removal
Changes in context
RemovedAdded
Both texts in full
Wording reproduced in the amendment
Amendment 1244 · ITRE–LIBE amendments 1053–1260 to the draft report: removal
This wording is removed.
Article 41a
Wording reproduced in the amendment → Amendment 1245 · ITRE–LIBE amendments 1053–1260 to the draft report: removal
Changes in context
RemovedAdded
Both texts in full
Wording reproduced in the amendment
Amendment 1245 · ITRE–LIBE amendments 1053–1260 to the draft report: removal
This wording is removed.
Article 41a
Wording reproduced in the amendment → Amendment 1246 · ITRE–LIBE amendments 1053–1260 to the draft report: removal
Changes in context
RemovedAdded
Both texts in full
Wording reproduced in the amendment
Amendment 1246 · ITRE–LIBE amendments 1053–1260 to the draft report: removal
This wording is removed.
Article 41a
Wording reproduced in the amendment → Amendment 1247 · ITRE–LIBE amendments 1053–1260 to the draft report: removal
Changes in context
RemovedAdded
Both texts in full
Wording reproduced in the amendment
Amendment 1247 · ITRE–LIBE amendments 1053–1260 to the draft report: removal
This wording is removed.
Article 41a
Wording reproduced in the amendment → Amendment 1248 · ITRE–LIBE amendments 1053–1260 to the draft report: removal
Changes in context
RemovedAdded
Both texts in full
Wording reproduced in the amendment
Amendment 1248 · ITRE–LIBE amendments 1053–1260 to the draft report: removal
This wording is removed.
Article 41a
Wording reproduced in the amendment → Amendment 394 · IMCO amendments 329–532 to the draft opinion: removal
Changes in context
RemovedAdded
Both texts in full
Wording reproduced in the amendment
Amendment 394 · IMCO amendments 329–532 to the draft opinion: removal
This wording is removed.
Article 41a
Wording reproduced in the amendment → Amendment 111 · IMCO draft opinion · Alex Agius Saliba (rapporteur): removal
Changes in context
RemovedAdded
Both texts in full
Wording reproduced in the amendment
Amendment 111 · IMCO draft opinion · Alex Agius Saliba (rapporteur): removal
This wording is removed.
Article 41a
Wording reproduced in the amendment → Amendment 256 · JURI amendments 69–296 to the draft opinion: removal
Changes in context
RemovedAdded
Both texts in full
Wording reproduced in the amendment
Amendment 256 · JURI amendments 69–296 to the draft opinion: removal
This wording is removed.
Article 41a
Wording reproduced in the amendment → Amendment 257 · JURI amendments 69–296 to the draft opinion: removal
Changes in context
RemovedAdded
Both texts in full
Wording reproduced in the amendment
Amendment 257 · JURI amendments 69–296 to the draft opinion: removal
This wording is removed.
Article 41a, heading
Wording reproduced in the amendment → Amendment 1250 · ITRE–LIBE amendments 1053–1260 to the draft report: removal
Changes in context
RemovedAdded
Both texts in full
Wording reproduced in the amendment
Amendment 1250 · ITRE–LIBE amendments 1053–1260 to the draft report: removal
This wording is removed.
Article 41a(1)
Wording reproduced in the amendment → Amendment 1244 · ITRE–LIBE amendments 1053–1260 to the draft report: removal
Changes in context
RemovedAdded
Both texts in full
Wording reproduced in the amendment
Amendment 1244 · ITRE–LIBE amendments 1053–1260 to the draft report: removal
This wording is removed.
Article 41a(1)
Wording reproduced in the amendment → Amendment 1245 · ITRE–LIBE amendments 1053–1260 to the draft report: removal
Changes in context
RemovedAdded
Both texts in full
Wording reproduced in the amendment
Amendment 1245 · ITRE–LIBE amendments 1053–1260 to the draft report: removal
This wording is removed.
Article 41a(1)
Wording reproduced in the amendment → Amendment 1246 · ITRE–LIBE amendments 1053–1260 to the draft report: removal
Changes in context
RemovedAdded
Both texts in full
Wording reproduced in the amendment
Amendment 1246 · ITRE–LIBE amendments 1053–1260 to the draft report: removal
This wording is removed.
Article 41a(1)
Wording reproduced in the amendment → Amendment 1247 · ITRE–LIBE amendments 1053–1260 to the draft report: removal
Changes in context
RemovedAdded
Both texts in full
Wording reproduced in the amendment
Amendment 1247 · ITRE–LIBE amendments 1053–1260 to the draft report: removal
This wording is removed.
Article 41a(1)
Wording reproduced in the amendment → Amendment 1248 · ITRE–LIBE amendments 1053–1260 to the draft report: removal
Changes in context
RemovedAdded
Both texts in full
Wording reproduced in the amendment
Amendment 1248 · ITRE–LIBE amendments 1053–1260 to the draft report: removal
This wording is removed.
Article 41a(1)
Wording reproduced in the amendment → Amendment 1251 · ITRE–LIBE amendments 1053–1260 to the draft report
Changes in context
RemovedAdded
Both texts in full
Wording reproduced in the amendment
Amendment 1251 · ITRE–LIBE amendments 1053–1260 to the draft report
Article 41a(1)
Wording reproduced in the amendment → Amendment 1252 · ITRE–LIBE amendments 1053–1260 to the draft report
Changes in context
RemovedAdded
Both texts in full
Wording reproduced in the amendment
Amendment 1252 · ITRE–LIBE amendments 1053–1260 to the draft report
Article 41a(1)
Wording reproduced in the amendment → Amendment 1253 · ITRE–LIBE amendments 1053–1260 to the draft report
Changes in context
RemovedAdded
Both texts in full
Wording reproduced in the amendment
Amendment 1253 · ITRE–LIBE amendments 1053–1260 to the draft report
Article 41a(1)
Wording reproduced in the amendment → Amendment 1254 · ITRE–LIBE amendments 1053–1260 to the draft report
Changes in context
RemovedAdded
Both texts in full
Wording reproduced in the amendment
Amendment 1254 · ITRE–LIBE amendments 1053–1260 to the draft report
Article 41a(1)
Wording reproduced in the amendment → Amendment 1255 · ITRE–LIBE amendments 1053–1260 to the draft report
Changes in context
RemovedAdded
Both texts in full
Wording reproduced in the amendment
Amendment 1255 · ITRE–LIBE amendments 1053–1260 to the draft report
Article 41a(1)
Wording reproduced in the amendment → Amendment 1256 · ITRE–LIBE amendments 1053–1260 to the draft report
Changes in context
RemovedAdded
Both texts in full
Wording reproduced in the amendment
Amendment 1256 · ITRE–LIBE amendments 1053–1260 to the draft report
Article 41a(1)
Wording reproduced in the amendment → Amendment 1257 · ITRE–LIBE amendments 1053–1260 to the draft report
Changes in context
RemovedAdded
Both texts in full
Wording reproduced in the amendment
Amendment 1257 · ITRE–LIBE amendments 1053–1260 to the draft report
Article 41a(1)
Wording reproduced in the amendment → Amendment 1258 · ITRE–LIBE amendments 1053–1260 to the draft report
Changes in context
RemovedAdded
Both texts in full
Wording reproduced in the amendment
Amendment 1258 · ITRE–LIBE amendments 1053–1260 to the draft report
Article 41a(1)
Wording reproduced in the amendment → Amendment 1259 · ITRE–LIBE amendments 1053–1260 to the draft report
Changes in context
RemovedAdded
Both texts in full
Wording reproduced in the amendment
Amendment 1259 · ITRE–LIBE amendments 1053–1260 to the draft report
Article 41a(1)
Wording reproduced in the amendment → Amendment 395 · IMCO amendments 329–532 to the draft opinion
Changes in context
RemovedAdded
Both texts in full
Wording reproduced in the amendment
Amendment 395 · IMCO amendments 329–532 to the draft opinion
Article 41a(1)
Wording reproduced in the amendment → Amendment 111 · IMCO draft opinion · Alex Agius Saliba (rapporteur): removal
Changes in context
RemovedAdded
Both texts in full
Wording reproduced in the amendment
Amendment 111 · IMCO draft opinion · Alex Agius Saliba (rapporteur): removal
This wording is removed.
Article 41a(1)
Wording reproduced in the amendment → Amendment 256 · JURI amendments 69–296 to the draft opinion: removal
Changes in context
RemovedAdded
Both texts in full
Wording reproduced in the amendment
Amendment 256 · JURI amendments 69–296 to the draft opinion: removal
This wording is removed.
Article 41a(2)
Wording reproduced in the amendment → Amendment 1244 · ITRE–LIBE amendments 1053–1260 to the draft report: removal
Changes in context
RemovedAdded
Both texts in full
Wording reproduced in the amendment
Amendment 1244 · ITRE–LIBE amendments 1053–1260 to the draft report: removal
This wording is removed.
Article 41a(2)
Wording reproduced in the amendment → Amendment 1245 · ITRE–LIBE amendments 1053–1260 to the draft report: removal
Changes in context
RemovedAdded
Both texts in full
Wording reproduced in the amendment
Amendment 1245 · ITRE–LIBE amendments 1053–1260 to the draft report: removal
This wording is removed.
Article 41a(2)
Wording reproduced in the amendment → Amendment 1246 · ITRE–LIBE amendments 1053–1260 to the draft report: removal
Changes in context
RemovedAdded
Both texts in full
Wording reproduced in the amendment
Amendment 1246 · ITRE–LIBE amendments 1053–1260 to the draft report: removal
This wording is removed.
Article 41a(2)
Wording reproduced in the amendment → Amendment 1247 · ITRE–LIBE amendments 1053–1260 to the draft report: removal
Changes in context
RemovedAdded
Both texts in full
Wording reproduced in the amendment
Amendment 1247 · ITRE–LIBE amendments 1053–1260 to the draft report: removal
This wording is removed.
Article 41a(2)
Wording reproduced in the amendment → Amendment 1248 · ITRE–LIBE amendments 1053–1260 to the draft report: removal
Changes in context
RemovedAdded
Both texts in full
Wording reproduced in the amendment
Amendment 1248 · ITRE–LIBE amendments 1053–1260 to the draft report: removal
This wording is removed.
Article 41a(2)
Wording reproduced in the amendment → Amendment 1264 · ITRE–LIBE amendments 1261–1564 to the draft report: removal
Changes in context
RemovedAdded
Both texts in full
Wording reproduced in the amendment
Amendment 1264 · ITRE–LIBE amendments 1261–1564 to the draft report: removal
This wording is removed.
Article 41a(2)
Wording reproduced in the amendment → Amendment 1265 · ITRE–LIBE amendments 1261–1564 to the draft report
Changes in context
RemovedAdded
Both texts in full
Wording reproduced in the amendment
Amendment 1265 · ITRE–LIBE amendments 1261–1564 to the draft report
Article 41a(2)
Wording reproduced in the amendment → Amendment 111 · IMCO draft opinion · Alex Agius Saliba (rapporteur): removal
Changes in context
RemovedAdded
Both texts in full
Wording reproduced in the amendment
Amendment 111 · IMCO draft opinion · Alex Agius Saliba (rapporteur): removal
This wording is removed.
Article 41a(2)(a)
Wording reproduced in the amendment → Amendment 1244 · ITRE–LIBE amendments 1053–1260 to the draft report: removal
Changes in context
RemovedAdded
Both texts in full
Wording reproduced in the amendment
Amendment 1244 · ITRE–LIBE amendments 1053–1260 to the draft report: removal
This wording is removed.
Article 41a(2)(a)
Wording reproduced in the amendment → Amendment 1245 · ITRE–LIBE amendments 1053–1260 to the draft report: removal
Changes in context
RemovedAdded
Both texts in full
Wording reproduced in the amendment
Amendment 1245 · ITRE–LIBE amendments 1053–1260 to the draft report: removal
This wording is removed.
Article 41a(2)(a)
Wording reproduced in the amendment → Amendment 1246 · ITRE–LIBE amendments 1053–1260 to the draft report: removal
Changes in context
RemovedAdded
Both texts in full
Wording reproduced in the amendment
Amendment 1246 · ITRE–LIBE amendments 1053–1260 to the draft report: removal
This wording is removed.
Article 41a(2)(a)
Wording reproduced in the amendment → Amendment 1247 · ITRE–LIBE amendments 1053–1260 to the draft report: removal
Changes in context
RemovedAdded
Both texts in full
Wording reproduced in the amendment
Amendment 1247 · ITRE–LIBE amendments 1053–1260 to the draft report: removal
This wording is removed.
Article 41a(2)(a)
Wording reproduced in the amendment → Amendment 1248 · ITRE–LIBE amendments 1053–1260 to the draft report: removal
Changes in context
RemovedAdded
Both texts in full
Wording reproduced in the amendment
Amendment 1248 · ITRE–LIBE amendments 1053–1260 to the draft report: removal
This wording is removed.
Article 41a(2)(a)
Wording reproduced in the amendment → Amendment 1266 · ITRE–LIBE amendments 1261–1564 to the draft report: removal
Changes in context
RemovedAdded
Both texts in full
Wording reproduced in the amendment
Amendment 1266 · ITRE–LIBE amendments 1261–1564 to the draft report: removal
This wording is removed.
Article 41a(2)(a)
Wording reproduced in the amendment → Amendment 1267 · ITRE–LIBE amendments 1261–1564 to the draft report
Changes in context
RemovedAdded
Both texts in full
Wording reproduced in the amendment
Amendment 1267 · ITRE–LIBE amendments 1261–1564 to the draft report
Article 41a(2)(a)
Wording reproduced in the amendment → Amendment 1268 · ITRE–LIBE amendments 1261–1564 to the draft report
Changes in context
RemovedAdded
Both texts in full
Wording reproduced in the amendment
Amendment 1268 · ITRE–LIBE amendments 1261–1564 to the draft report
Article 41a(2)(a)
Wording reproduced in the amendment → Amendment 1269 · ITRE–LIBE amendments 1261–1564 to the draft report
Changes in context
RemovedAdded
Both texts in full
Wording reproduced in the amendment
Amendment 1269 · ITRE–LIBE amendments 1261–1564 to the draft report
Article 41a(2)(a)
Wording reproduced in the amendment → Amendment 1270 · ITRE–LIBE amendments 1261–1564 to the draft report
Changes in context
RemovedAdded
Both texts in full
Wording reproduced in the amendment
Amendment 1270 · ITRE–LIBE amendments 1261–1564 to the draft report
Article 41a(2)(a)
Wording reproduced in the amendment → Amendment 1271 · ITRE–LIBE amendments 1261–1564 to the draft report
Changes in context
RemovedAdded
Both texts in full
Wording reproduced in the amendment
Amendment 1271 · ITRE–LIBE amendments 1261–1564 to the draft report
Article 41a(2)(a)
Wording reproduced in the amendment → Amendment 396 · IMCO amendments 329–532 to the draft opinion
Changes in context
RemovedAdded
Both texts in full
Wording reproduced in the amendment
Amendment 396 · IMCO amendments 329–532 to the draft opinion
Article 41a(2)(a)
Wording reproduced in the amendment → Amendment 111 · IMCO draft opinion · Alex Agius Saliba (rapporteur): removal
Changes in context
RemovedAdded
Both texts in full
Wording reproduced in the amendment
Amendment 111 · IMCO draft opinion · Alex Agius Saliba (rapporteur): removal
This wording is removed.
Article 41a(2)(a)
Wording reproduced in the amendment → Amendment 256 · JURI amendments 69–296 to the draft opinion: removal
Changes in context
RemovedAdded
Both texts in full
Wording reproduced in the amendment
Amendment 256 · JURI amendments 69–296 to the draft opinion: removal
This wording is removed.
Article 41a(2)(b)
Wording reproduced in the amendment → Amendment 1244 · ITRE–LIBE amendments 1053–1260 to the draft report: removal
Changes in context
RemovedAdded
Both texts in full
Wording reproduced in the amendment
Amendment 1244 · ITRE–LIBE amendments 1053–1260 to the draft report: removal
This wording is removed.
Article 41a(2)(b)
Wording reproduced in the amendment → Amendment 1245 · ITRE–LIBE amendments 1053–1260 to the draft report: removal
Changes in context
RemovedAdded
Both texts in full
Wording reproduced in the amendment
Amendment 1245 · ITRE–LIBE amendments 1053–1260 to the draft report: removal
This wording is removed.
Article 41a(2)(b)
Wording reproduced in the amendment → Amendment 1246 · ITRE–LIBE amendments 1053–1260 to the draft report: removal
Changes in context
RemovedAdded
Both texts in full
Wording reproduced in the amendment
Amendment 1246 · ITRE–LIBE amendments 1053–1260 to the draft report: removal
This wording is removed.
Article 41a(2)(b)
Wording reproduced in the amendment → Amendment 1247 · ITRE–LIBE amendments 1053–1260 to the draft report: removal
Changes in context
RemovedAdded
Both texts in full
Wording reproduced in the amendment
Amendment 1247 · ITRE–LIBE amendments 1053–1260 to the draft report: removal
This wording is removed.
Article 41a(2)(b)
Wording reproduced in the amendment → Amendment 1248 · ITRE–LIBE amendments 1053–1260 to the draft report: removal
Changes in context
RemovedAdded
Both texts in full
Wording reproduced in the amendment
Amendment 1248 · ITRE–LIBE amendments 1053–1260 to the draft report: removal
This wording is removed.
Article 41a(2)(b)
Wording reproduced in the amendment → Amendment 1272 · ITRE–LIBE amendments 1261–1564 to the draft report: removal
Changes in context
RemovedAdded
Both texts in full
Wording reproduced in the amendment
Amendment 1272 · ITRE–LIBE amendments 1261–1564 to the draft report: removal
This wording is removed.
Article 41a(2)(b)
Wording reproduced in the amendment → Amendment 1273 · ITRE–LIBE amendments 1261–1564 to the draft report
Changes in context
RemovedAdded
Both texts in full
Wording reproduced in the amendment
Amendment 1273 · ITRE–LIBE amendments 1261–1564 to the draft report
Article 41a(2)(b)
Wording reproduced in the amendment → Amendment 1274 · ITRE–LIBE amendments 1261–1564 to the draft report
Changes in context
RemovedAdded
Both texts in full
Wording reproduced in the amendment
Amendment 1274 · ITRE–LIBE amendments 1261–1564 to the draft report
Article 41a(2)(b)
Wording reproduced in the amendment → Amendment 1275 · ITRE–LIBE amendments 1261–1564 to the draft report
Changes in context
RemovedAdded
Both texts in full
Wording reproduced in the amendment
Amendment 1275 · ITRE–LIBE amendments 1261–1564 to the draft report
Article 41a(2)(b)
Wording reproduced in the amendment → Amendment 1276 · ITRE–LIBE amendments 1261–1564 to the draft report
Changes in context
RemovedAdded
Both texts in full
Wording reproduced in the amendment
Amendment 1276 · ITRE–LIBE amendments 1261–1564 to the draft report
Article 41a(2)(b)
Wording reproduced in the amendment → Amendment 1277 · ITRE–LIBE amendments 1261–1564 to the draft report
Changes in context
RemovedAdded
Both texts in full
Wording reproduced in the amendment
Amendment 1277 · ITRE–LIBE amendments 1261–1564 to the draft report
Article 41a(2)(b)
Wording reproduced in the amendment → Amendment 1278 · ITRE–LIBE amendments 1261–1564 to the draft report
Changes in context
RemovedAdded
Both texts in full
Wording reproduced in the amendment
Amendment 1278 · ITRE–LIBE amendments 1261–1564 to the draft report
Article 41a(2)(b)
Wording reproduced in the amendment → Amendment 1279 · ITRE–LIBE amendments 1261–1564 to the draft report
Changes in context
RemovedAdded
Both texts in full
Wording reproduced in the amendment
Amendment 1279 · ITRE–LIBE amendments 1261–1564 to the draft report
Article 41a(2)(b)
Wording reproduced in the amendment → Amendment 1280 · ITRE–LIBE amendments 1261–1564 to the draft report
Changes in context
RemovedAdded
Both texts in full
Wording reproduced in the amendment
Amendment 1280 · ITRE–LIBE amendments 1261–1564 to the draft report
Article 41a(2)(b)
Wording reproduced in the amendment → Amendment 111 · IMCO draft opinion · Alex Agius Saliba (rapporteur): removal
Changes in context
RemovedAdded
Both texts in full
Wording reproduced in the amendment
Amendment 111 · IMCO draft opinion · Alex Agius Saliba (rapporteur): removal
This wording is removed.
Article 41a(2)(b)
Wording reproduced in the amendment → Amendment 256 · JURI amendments 69–296 to the draft opinion: removal
Changes in context
RemovedAdded
Both texts in full
Wording reproduced in the amendment
Amendment 256 · JURI amendments 69–296 to the draft opinion: removal
This wording is removed.
Article 41a(3)
Wording reproduced in the amendment → Amendment 1244 · ITRE–LIBE amendments 1053–1260 to the draft report: removal
Changes in context
RemovedAdded
Both texts in full
Wording reproduced in the amendment
Amendment 1244 · ITRE–LIBE amendments 1053–1260 to the draft report: removal
This wording is removed.
Article 41a(3)
Wording reproduced in the amendment → Amendment 1245 · ITRE–LIBE amendments 1053–1260 to the draft report: removal
Changes in context
RemovedAdded
Both texts in full
Wording reproduced in the amendment
Amendment 1245 · ITRE–LIBE amendments 1053–1260 to the draft report: removal
This wording is removed.
Article 41a(3)
Wording reproduced in the amendment → Amendment 1246 · ITRE–LIBE amendments 1053–1260 to the draft report: removal
Changes in context
RemovedAdded
Both texts in full
Wording reproduced in the amendment
Amendment 1246 · ITRE–LIBE amendments 1053–1260 to the draft report: removal
This wording is removed.
Article 41a(3)
Wording reproduced in the amendment → Amendment 1247 · ITRE–LIBE amendments 1053–1260 to the draft report: removal
Changes in context
RemovedAdded
Both texts in full
Wording reproduced in the amendment
Amendment 1247 · ITRE–LIBE amendments 1053–1260 to the draft report: removal
This wording is removed.
Article 41a(3)
Wording reproduced in the amendment → Amendment 1248 · ITRE–LIBE amendments 1053–1260 to the draft report: removal
Changes in context
RemovedAdded
Both texts in full
Wording reproduced in the amendment
Amendment 1248 · ITRE–LIBE amendments 1053–1260 to the draft report: removal
This wording is removed.
Article 41a(3)
Wording reproduced in the amendment → Amendment 1286 · ITRE–LIBE amendments 1261–1564 to the draft report: removal
Changes in context
RemovedAdded
Both texts in full
Wording reproduced in the amendment
Amendment 1286 · ITRE–LIBE amendments 1261–1564 to the draft report: removal
This wording is removed.
Article 41a(3)
Wording reproduced in the amendment → Amendment 1287 · ITRE–LIBE amendments 1261–1564 to the draft report
Changes in context
RemovedAdded
Both texts in full
Wording reproduced in the amendment
Amendment 1287 · ITRE–LIBE amendments 1261–1564 to the draft report
Article 41a(3)
Wording reproduced in the amendment → Amendment 1288 · ITRE–LIBE amendments 1261–1564 to the draft report
Changes in context
RemovedAdded
Both texts in full
Wording reproduced in the amendment
Amendment 1288 · ITRE–LIBE amendments 1261–1564 to the draft report
Article 41a(3)
Wording reproduced in the amendment → Amendment 1289 · ITRE–LIBE amendments 1261–1564 to the draft report
Changes in context
RemovedAdded
Both texts in full
Wording reproduced in the amendment
Amendment 1289 · ITRE–LIBE amendments 1261–1564 to the draft report
Article 41a(3)
Wording reproduced in the amendment → Amendment 1290 · ITRE–LIBE amendments 1261–1564 to the draft report
Changes in context
RemovedAdded
Both texts in full
Wording reproduced in the amendment
Amendment 1290 · ITRE–LIBE amendments 1261–1564 to the draft report
Article 41a(3)
Wording reproduced in the amendment → Amendment 1291 · ITRE–LIBE amendments 1261–1564 to the draft report
Changes in context
RemovedAdded
Both texts in full
Wording reproduced in the amendment
Amendment 1291 · ITRE–LIBE amendments 1261–1564 to the draft report
Article 41a(3)
Wording reproduced in the amendment → Amendment 1292 · ITRE–LIBE amendments 1261–1564 to the draft report
Changes in context
RemovedAdded
Both texts in full
Wording reproduced in the amendment
Amendment 1292 · ITRE–LIBE amendments 1261–1564 to the draft report
Article 41a(3)
Wording reproduced in the amendment → Amendment 1293 · ITRE–LIBE amendments 1261–1564 to the draft report
Changes in context
RemovedAdded
Both texts in full
Wording reproduced in the amendment
Amendment 1293 · ITRE–LIBE amendments 1261–1564 to the draft report
Article 41a(3)
Wording reproduced in the amendment → Amendment 397 · IMCO amendments 329–532 to the draft opinion
Changes in context
RemovedAdded
Both texts in full
Wording reproduced in the amendment
Amendment 397 · IMCO amendments 329–532 to the draft opinion
Article 41a(3)
Wording reproduced in the amendment → Amendment 398 · IMCO amendments 329–532 to the draft opinion
Changes in context
RemovedAdded
Both texts in full
Wording reproduced in the amendment
Amendment 398 · IMCO amendments 329–532 to the draft opinion
Article 41a(3)
Wording reproduced in the amendment → Amendment 111 · IMCO draft opinion · Alex Agius Saliba (rapporteur): removal
Changes in context
RemovedAdded
Both texts in full
Wording reproduced in the amendment
Amendment 111 · IMCO draft opinion · Alex Agius Saliba (rapporteur): removal
This wording is removed.
Article 41a(3)
Wording reproduced in the amendment → Amendment 256 · JURI amendments 69–296 to the draft opinion: removal
Changes in context
RemovedAdded
Both texts in full
Wording reproduced in the amendment
Amendment 256 · JURI amendments 69–296 to the draft opinion: removal
This wording is removed.
Article 41a(4)
Wording reproduced in the amendment → Amendment 1244 · ITRE–LIBE amendments 1053–1260 to the draft report: removal
Changes in context
RemovedAdded
Both texts in full
Wording reproduced in the amendment
Amendment 1244 · ITRE–LIBE amendments 1053–1260 to the draft report: removal
This wording is removed.
Article 41a(4)
Wording reproduced in the amendment → Amendment 1245 · ITRE–LIBE amendments 1053–1260 to the draft report: removal
Changes in context
RemovedAdded
Both texts in full
Wording reproduced in the amendment
Amendment 1245 · ITRE–LIBE amendments 1053–1260 to the draft report: removal
This wording is removed.
Article 41a(4)
Wording reproduced in the amendment → Amendment 1246 · ITRE–LIBE amendments 1053–1260 to the draft report: removal
Changes in context
RemovedAdded
Both texts in full
Wording reproduced in the amendment
Amendment 1246 · ITRE–LIBE amendments 1053–1260 to the draft report: removal
This wording is removed.
Article 41a(4)
Wording reproduced in the amendment → Amendment 1247 · ITRE–LIBE amendments 1053–1260 to the draft report: removal
Changes in context
RemovedAdded
Both texts in full
Wording reproduced in the amendment
Amendment 1247 · ITRE–LIBE amendments 1053–1260 to the draft report: removal
This wording is removed.
Article 41a(4)
Wording reproduced in the amendment → Amendment 1248 · ITRE–LIBE amendments 1053–1260 to the draft report: removal
Changes in context
RemovedAdded
Both texts in full
Wording reproduced in the amendment
Amendment 1248 · ITRE–LIBE amendments 1053–1260 to the draft report: removal
This wording is removed.
Article 41a(4)
Wording reproduced in the amendment → Amendment 1295 · ITRE–LIBE amendments 1261–1564 to the draft report: removal
Changes in context
RemovedAdded
Both texts in full
Wording reproduced in the amendment
Amendment 1295 · ITRE–LIBE amendments 1261–1564 to the draft report: removal
This wording is removed.
Article 41a(4)
Wording reproduced in the amendment → Amendment 1296 · ITRE–LIBE amendments 1261–1564 to the draft report
Changes in context
RemovedAdded
Both texts in full
Wording reproduced in the amendment
Amendment 1296 · ITRE–LIBE amendments 1261–1564 to the draft report
Article 41a(4)
Wording reproduced in the amendment → Amendment 1297 · ITRE–LIBE amendments 1261–1564 to the draft report
Changes in context
RemovedAdded
Both texts in full
Wording reproduced in the amendment
Amendment 1297 · ITRE–LIBE amendments 1261–1564 to the draft report
Article 41a(4)
Wording reproduced in the amendment → Amendment 111 · IMCO draft opinion · Alex Agius Saliba (rapporteur): removal
Changes in context
RemovedAdded
Both texts in full
Wording reproduced in the amendment
Amendment 111 · IMCO draft opinion · Alex Agius Saliba (rapporteur): removal
This wording is removed.
Article 41a(4)
Wording reproduced in the amendment → Amendment 256 · JURI amendments 69–296 to the draft opinion: removal
Changes in context
RemovedAdded
Both texts in full
Wording reproduced in the amendment
Amendment 256 · JURI amendments 69–296 to the draft opinion: removal
This wording is removed.
Article 41a(5)
Wording reproduced in the amendment → Amendment 1244 · ITRE–LIBE amendments 1053–1260 to the draft report: removal
Changes in context
RemovedAdded
Both texts in full
Wording reproduced in the amendment
Amendment 1244 · ITRE–LIBE amendments 1053–1260 to the draft report: removal
This wording is removed.
Article 41a(5)
Wording reproduced in the amendment → Amendment 1245 · ITRE–LIBE amendments 1053–1260 to the draft report: removal
Changes in context
RemovedAdded
Both texts in full
Wording reproduced in the amendment
Amendment 1245 · ITRE–LIBE amendments 1053–1260 to the draft report: removal
This wording is removed.
Article 41a(5)
Wording reproduced in the amendment → Amendment 1246 · ITRE–LIBE amendments 1053–1260 to the draft report: removal
Changes in context
RemovedAdded
Both texts in full
Wording reproduced in the amendment
Amendment 1246 · ITRE–LIBE amendments 1053–1260 to the draft report: removal
This wording is removed.
Article 41a(5)
Wording reproduced in the amendment → Amendment 1247 · ITRE–LIBE amendments 1053–1260 to the draft report: removal
Changes in context
RemovedAdded
Both texts in full
Wording reproduced in the amendment
Amendment 1247 · ITRE–LIBE amendments 1053–1260 to the draft report: removal
This wording is removed.
Article 41a(5)
Wording reproduced in the amendment → Amendment 1248 · ITRE–LIBE amendments 1053–1260 to the draft report: removal
Changes in context
RemovedAdded
Both texts in full
Wording reproduced in the amendment
Amendment 1248 · ITRE–LIBE amendments 1053–1260 to the draft report: removal
This wording is removed.
Article 41a(5)
Wording reproduced in the amendment → Amendment 1298 · ITRE–LIBE amendments 1261–1564 to the draft report: removal
Changes in context
RemovedAdded
Both texts in full
Wording reproduced in the amendment
Amendment 1298 · ITRE–LIBE amendments 1261–1564 to the draft report: removal
This wording is removed.
Article 41a(5)
Wording reproduced in the amendment → Amendment 1299 · ITRE–LIBE amendments 1261–1564 to the draft report: removal
Changes in context
RemovedAdded
Both texts in full
Wording reproduced in the amendment
Amendment 1299 · ITRE–LIBE amendments 1261–1564 to the draft report: removal
This wording is removed.
Article 41a(5)
Wording reproduced in the amendment → Amendment 1300 · ITRE–LIBE amendments 1261–1564 to the draft report
Changes in context
RemovedAdded
Both texts in full
Wording reproduced in the amendment
Amendment 1300 · ITRE–LIBE amendments 1261–1564 to the draft report
Article 41a(5)
Wording reproduced in the amendment → Amendment 399 · IMCO amendments 329–532 to the draft opinion: removal
Changes in context
RemovedAdded
Both texts in full
Wording reproduced in the amendment
Amendment 399 · IMCO amendments 329–532 to the draft opinion: removal
This wording is removed.
Article 41a(5)
Wording reproduced in the amendment → Amendment 111 · IMCO draft opinion · Alex Agius Saliba (rapporteur): removal
Changes in context
RemovedAdded
Both texts in full
Wording reproduced in the amendment
Amendment 111 · IMCO draft opinion · Alex Agius Saliba (rapporteur): removal
This wording is removed.
Article 41a(5)
Wording reproduced in the amendment → Amendment 256 · JURI amendments 69–296 to the draft opinion: removal
Changes in context
RemovedAdded
Both texts in full
Wording reproduced in the amendment
Amendment 256 · JURI amendments 69–296 to the draft opinion: removal
This wording is removed.