Article 32k
Amendments as tabled
One amendment · JURI amendments 69–296 to the draft opinion
218 ~Alternative Emil RadevEPP · JURI “By way of derogation of paragraph 1, where an exclusive right relates to the digitisation of cultural resources, the period of exclusivity shall not…”
(3) By way of derogation of paragraph 1, where an exclusive right relates to the digitisation of cultural resources, the period of exclusivity shall
in generalnot exceed 10 years. Where that period exceeds 10 years,itsanddurationforshall be in accordanceenterprises withapplicableaUniondesignationandasnationalalawgatekeepersubjectundertoRegulationreview(EU)during the 11th year and2022/1925,if applicable, every seven5 yearsthereafter.Justification
While the proposal improves transparency by requiring digitisation agreements to be made publicly available, the absence of a clear time limit risks perpetuating long-term exclusive control over digitised Public Domain materials. A temporal cap is necessary to ensure periodic review and preserve broad access to Europe’s cultural heritage.
- Tabled by
- Emil Radev
- Group
- EPP
- Targets
- Data Act Article 32k(3)
- Document
- JURI amendments 69–296 to the draft opinion
- Source
- Official text, page 123
- Printed header
- Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 18 / Regulation (EU) 2023/2854 / Article 32 k – paragraph 3