Amendments as tabled
Two amendments, each tabled separately · IMCO draft opinion
115 ~Alternative Alex Agius SalibaRapporteur · IMCO “In particular, gatekeepers under Regulation (EU) 2022/1925 should not be allowed to prompt data subjects more than once a year to give consent for…”
(b) if the data subject gives consent, the controller shall not make a new request for consent for the same purpose for the period during which the controller can lawfully rely on the consent of the data subject. In particular, gatekeepers under Regulation (EU) 2022/1925 should not be allowed to prompt data subjects more than once a year to give consent for the same processing purpose in respect of which they did not give consent or withdrew their consent;
Justification
This amendment is inspired on the wording of recital 37 of the DMA.
- Rapporteur
- Alex Agius Saliba
- Group
- Rapporteur
- Targets
- GDPR Article 88a(4)(b)
- Document
- IMCO draft opinion
- Printed header
- Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 15 / Regulation (EU) 2016/679 / Article 88a – paragraph 4 – point b
116 +Addition Alex Agius SalibaRapporteur · IMCO “In order to prevent unfair commercial practices pursuant to Directive 2005/29/EC, new requests for consent within these periods preclude consent from…”
In order to prevent unfair commercial practices pursuant to Directive 2005/29/EC, new requests for consent within these periods preclude consent from being validly granted.
Justification
With this amendment the rapporteur tries to prevent consent fatigue by reducing the possibility to use dark patterns under consumer law, in particular Directive 2005/29/EC.
- Rapporteur
- Alex Agius Saliba
- Group
- Rapporteur
- Targets
- GDPR Article 88a(4)
- Document
- IMCO draft opinion
- Source
- Official text, page 84
- Printed header
- Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 15 / Regulation (EU) 2016/679 / Article 88a – paragraph 4