Article 88b
Amendments as tabled
25 amendments, each tabled separately · IMCO amendments 329–532 to the draft opinion
438 −Deletion Piotr MüllerECR · IMCO Deletes the Commission’s wording
Article 88b- Tabled by
- Piotr Müller
- Group
- ECR
- Targets
- GDPR Article 88b
- Document
- IMCO amendments 329–532 to the draft opinion
- Source
- Official text, page 66
- Printed header
- Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 15 / Regulation (EU) 2016/679 / Article 88b
441 −Deletion Piotr MüllerECR · IMCO Deletes the Commission’s wording
(1) Controllers shall ensure that their online interfaces allow data subjects to: (a) Give consent through automated and machine-readable means, provided that the conditions for consent laid down in this Regulation are fulfilled; (b) decline a request for consent and exercise the right to object pursuant to Article 21(2) through automated and machine-readable means.- Tabled by
- Piotr Müller
- Group
- ECR
- Targets
- GDPR Article 88b(1)
- Document
- IMCO amendments 329–532 to the draft opinion
- Printed header
- Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 15 / Regulation (EU) 2016/679 / Article 88b
442 ~Alternative Virginie JoronPfE · IMCO “Providers of web browsers, websites, operating systems and applications shall provide technical means allowing data subjects to express, using…”
(1)
Controllers shall ensure that their online interfaces allow data subjects to:Providers of web browsers, websites, operating systems and applications shall provide technical means allowing data subjects to express, using automated and machine-readable indications, their choice to consent, refuse a consent request or exercise their right to object in accordance with Article 21(2). These means must be interoperable so as to ensure that an indication at any level, whether it be a terminal, an operating system, a browser, an application or a website, is recognised and taken into account at different levels; these means must not constitute a single mandatory mechanism. Controllers shall ensure that their online interfaces recognise and take into account these indications, provided that the conditions of consent under this Regulation are fulfilled.- Tabled by
- Virginie Joron
- Group
- PfE
- Document
- IMCO amendments 329–532 to the draft opinion
- Source
- Official text, page 68
- Printed header
- Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 15 / Regulation (EU) 2016/679 / Article 88 b – paragraph 1
444 +Addition David CormandGreens/EFA · IMCO “(-a) receive all information enabling the consumer to make an informed choice to consent or object to the processing and exercise his or her rights…”
(-a) receive all information enabling the consumer to make an informed choice to consent or object to the processing and exercise his or her rights under the regulation
Justification
This addition is to allow the consumer to get the necessary information ahead of making a decision and ensures coherence across the signal chain. This ensures that a simple comparison is possible and to quickly understand the relevant parts of the request.
- Tabled by
- David Cormand on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group
- Group
- Greens/EFA
- Targets
- GDPR Article 88b
- Document
- IMCO amendments 329–532 to the draft opinion
- Source
- Official text, page 69
- Printed header
- Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 15 / Regulation (EU) 2016/679 / Article 88b
445 ~Alternative David CormandGreens/EFA · IMCO “and therefore that consent is kept, among the others, free, based on the prior provision of clear and comprehensive information and allows consumer…”
(a)
Give consent through automated and machine-readable means, provided that the conditions for consent laid down in this Regulation are fulfilled;Allow the consumer to Give specific consent per controller and per purpose, provided that the conditions for consent laid down in Regulation 2016/679 are fulfilled and therefore that consent is kept, among the others, free, based on the prior provision of clear and comprehensive information and allows consumer choice for specific purposes and a specific identifiable controller;Justification
Consent for consumers needs to be informed and can therefore not be automated. This is to amend the wording accordingly and make it workable for consumers.
- Tabled by
- David Cormand on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group
- Group
- Greens/EFA
- Targets
- GDPR Article 88b(1)(a)
- Document
- IMCO amendments 329–532 to the draft opinion
- Source
- Official text, page 70
- Printed header
- Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 15 / Regulation (EU) 2016/679 / Article 88b
446 ~Alternative David CormandGreens/EFA · IMCO “to refuse consent or otherwise object to processing activities under Art. 21(2) of Regulation 2016/979;”
(b)
decline a request for consent and exercise the right to object pursuant to Article 21(2) through automated and machine-readable means.to refuse consent or otherwise object to processing activities under Art. 21(2) of Regulation 2016/979;- Tabled by
- David Cormand on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group
- Group
- Greens/EFA
- Targets
- GDPR Article 88b(1)(b)
- Document
- IMCO amendments 329–532 to the draft opinion
- Printed header
- Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 15 / Regulation (EU) 2016/679 / Article 88b
447 +Addition David CormandGreens/EFA · IMCO “withdraw consent through automated and machine-readable means previously given, in accordance with Article 7(3) of this Regulation. Where an active…”
(ba)withdraw consent through automated and machine-readable means previously given, in accordance with Article 7(3) of this Regulation. Where an active refusal signal is present, storing of, or gaining access to, personal data in terminal equipment shall not take place. A consumer’s withdrawal of consent through automated and machine-readable signals, as provided for under this article, shall have the legal automatic consequence of prohibiting the storing of information, or the gaining of access to information already stored, in the terminal equipment of that user related to that processing activity pursuant to Article 88a of this Regulation and in compliance with Article 5 of Directive 2002/58/EC.
- Tabled by
- David Cormand on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group
- Group
- Greens/EFA
- Targets
- GDPR Article 88b
- Document
- IMCO amendments 329–532 to the draft opinion
- Source
- Official text, page 71
- Printed header
- Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 15 / Regulation (EU) 2016/679 / Article 88b
448 +Addition David CormandGreens/EFA · IMCO “object to subsequent processing transmitted through browser, operating system, application-level or user agent”
(bb)object to subsequent processing transmitted through browser, operating system, application-level or user agent
- Tabled by
- David Cormand on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group
- Group
- Greens/EFA
- Targets
- GDPR Article 88b
- Document
- IMCO amendments 329–532 to the draft opinion
- Printed header
- Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 15 / Regulation (EU) 2016/679 / Article 88b
449 −Deletion Piotr MüllerECR · IMCO Deletes the Commission’s wording
(2) Controllers shall respect the choices made by data subjects in accordance with paragraph 1.- Tabled by
- Piotr Müller
- Group
- ECR
- Targets
- GDPR Article 88b(2)
- Document
- IMCO amendments 329–532 to the draft opinion
- Source
- Official text, page 72
- Printed header
- Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 15 / Regulation (EU) 2016/679 / Article 88b
450 ~Alternative David CormandGreens/EFA · IMCO “and any other party involved in the generation, management, transmission and application of automated and machine readable signals”
(2) Controllers and any other party involved in the generation, management, transmission and application of automated and machine readable signals, shall respect and give effect to the choices made by data subjects in accordance with paragraph 1.
- Tabled by
- David Cormand on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group
- Group
- Greens/EFA
- Targets
- GDPR Article 88b(2)
- Document
- IMCO amendments 329–532 to the draft opinion
- Source
- Official text, page 72
- Printed header
- Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 15 / Regulation (EU) 2016/679 / Article 88b
451 −Deletion David CormandGreens/EFA · IMCO Deletes the Commission’s wording
(3) Paragraphs 1 and 2 shall not apply to controllers that are media service providers when providing a media service.- Tabled by
- David Cormand on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group
- Group
- Greens/EFA
- Targets
- GDPR Article 88b(3)
- Document
- IMCO amendments 329–532 to the draft opinion
- Source
- Official text, page 73
- Printed header
- Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 15 / Regulation (EU) 2016/679 / Article 88b
452 −Deletion Piotr MüllerECR · IMCO Deletes the Commission’s wording
(3) Paragraphs 1 and 2 shall not apply to controllers that are media service providers when providing a media service.- Tabled by
- Piotr Müller
- Group
- ECR
- Targets
- GDPR Article 88b(3)
- Document
- IMCO amendments 329–532 to the draft opinion
- Source
- Official text, page 73
- Printed header
- Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 15 / Regulation (EU) 2016/679 / Article 88b
453 −Deletion Christian DoleschalEPP · IMCO Deletes the Commission’s wording
(4) The Commission shall, in accordance with Article 10(1) of Regulation (EU) 1025/2012, request one or more European standardisation organisations to draft standards for the interpretation of machine-readable indications of data subjects’ choices. Online interfaces of controllers which are in conformity with harmonised standards or parts thereof the references of which have been published in the Official Journal of the European Union shall be presumed to be in conformity with the requirements covered by those standards or parts thereof, set out in paragraph 1.- Tabled by
- Christian Doleschal
- Group
- EPP
- Targets
- GDPR Article 88b(4)
- Document
- IMCO amendments 329–532 to the draft opinion
- Printed header
- Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 15 / Regulation (EU) 2016/679 / Article 88b paragraph 4
454 −Deletion Arba KokalariEPP · IMCO Deletes the Commission’s wording
(4) The Commission shall, in accordance with Article 10(1) of Regulation (EU) 1025/2012, request one or more European standardisation organisations to draft standards for the interpretation of machine-readable indications of data subjects’ choices. Online interfaces of controllers which are in conformity with harmonised standards or parts thereof the references of which have been published in the Official Journal of the European Union shall be presumed to be in conformity with the requirements covered by those standards or parts thereof, set out in paragraph 1.- Tabled by
- Arba Kokalari
- Group
- EPP
- Targets
- GDPR Article 88b(4)
- Document
- IMCO amendments 329–532 to the draft opinion
- Source
- Official text, page 74
- Printed header
- Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 15 / Regulation (EU) 2016/679 / Article 88b (new)
455 −Deletion Piotr MüllerECR · IMCO Deletes the Commission’s wording
(4) The Commission shall, in accordance with Article 10(1) of Regulation (EU) 1025/2012, request one or more European standardisation organisations to draft standards for the interpretation of machine-readable indications of data subjects’ choices. Online interfaces of controllers which are in conformity with harmonised standards or parts thereof the references of which have been published in the Official Journal of the European Union shall be presumed to be in conformity with the requirements covered by those standards or parts thereof, set out in paragraph 1.- Tabled by
- Piotr Müller
- Group
- ECR
- Targets
- GDPR Article 88b(4)
- Document
- IMCO amendments 329–532 to the draft opinion
- Source
- Official text, page 75
- Printed header
- Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 15 / Regulation (EU) 2016/679 / Article 88b
456 −Deletion Arba KokalariEPP · IMCO Deletes the Commission’s wording
The Commission shall, in accordance with Article 10(1) of Regulation (EU) 1025/2012, request one or more European standardisation organisations to draft standards for the interpretation of machine-readable indications of data subjects’ choices.- Tabled by
- Arba Kokalari
- Group
- EPP
- Document
- IMCO amendments 329–532 to the draft opinion
- Printed header
- Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 15 / Regulation (EU) 2016/679 / Article 88b (new)
457 ~Alternative David CormandGreens/EFA · IMCO “In particular, such a request shall set out essential safeguards to the interpretation of automated signals and at minimum lay down detailed rules…”
The Commission shall, in accordance with Article 10(1) of Regulation (EU) 1025/2012, request one or more European standardisation organisations to draft standards for the interpretation of machine-readable indications of data subjects’ choices as it regards their design and their technical standards and covering the requirements of paragraph 1. In particular, such a request shall set out essential safeguards to the interpretation of automated signals and at minimum lay down detailed rules and standards to: (a) guarantee privacy by default and design in accordance with Article 25 of this Regulation; (b) present minimum technical requirements for ensuring that an active refusal signal prevents the storing of, or gaining access to, personal data in terminal. equipment without requiring further interaction with the data subject; (c) guarantee that such mechanisms are neutral and do not favour specific services, software or interfaces (d) provide detailed guidance on how to ensure neutral interfaces, with specific attention to avoid any type of dark patterns, deceptive and non-neutral elements in the design of the interface with data subjects, and in full respect of the principle of fairness; (e) define interoperability requirements for the transmission and recognition of signals. At least for the interaction between web browsers and websites, as well as mobile operating systems and mobile applications, such a request shall be made by [insert the date: 3 months following the date of entry into force of this Regulation].
- Tabled by
- David Cormand on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group
- Group
- Greens/EFA
- Targets
- GDPR Article 88b
- Document
- IMCO amendments 329–532 to the draft opinion
- Printed header
- Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 15 / Regulation (EU) 2016/679 / Article 88b
458 −Deletion Arba KokalariEPP · IMCO Deletes the Commission’s wording
Online interfaces of controllers which are in conformity with harmonised standards or parts thereof the references of which have been published in the Official Journal of the European Union shall be presumed to be in conformity with the requirements covered by those standards or parts thereof, set out in paragraph 1.- Tabled by
- Arba Kokalari
- Group
- EPP
- Document
- IMCO amendments 329–532 to the draft opinion
- Source
- Official text, page 77
- Printed header
- Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 15 / Regulation (EU) 2016/679 / Article 88b (new)
460 −Deletion Piotr MüllerECR · IMCO Deletes the Commission’s wording
(5) Paragraphs 1 and 2 shall apply from [OP: please insert the date = 24 months following the date of entry into force of this Regulation].- Tabled by
- Piotr Müller
- Group
- ECR
- Targets
- GDPR Article 88b(5)
- Document
- IMCO amendments 329–532 to the draft opinion
- Printed header
- Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 15 / Regulation (EU) 2016/679 / Article 88b
461 −Deletion Piotr MüllerECR · IMCO Deletes the Commission’s wording
(6) Providers of web browsers, which are not SMEs, shall provide the technical means to allow data subjects to give their consent and to refuse a request for consent and exercise the right to object pursuant to Article 21(2) through the automated and machine-readable means referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article, as applied pursuant to paragraphs 2 to 5 of this Article.- Tabled by
- Piotr Müller
- Group
- ECR
- Targets
- GDPR Article 88b(6)
- Document
- IMCO amendments 329–532 to the draft opinion
- Source
- Official text, page 79
- Printed header
- Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 15 / Regulation (EU) 2016/679 / Article 88b
462 ~Alternative Virginie JoronPfE · IMCO “This paragraph shall not affect the possibility of processors obtaining explicit consent by other means, and shall apply in accordance with the…”
(6) Providers of web browsers, which are not SMEs, shall provide, but not impose by default, the technical means to allow data subjects to give their consent and to refuse a request for consent and exercise the right to object pursuant to Article 21(2) through the automated and machine-readable means referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article, as applied pursuant to paragraphs 2 to 5 of this Article. This paragraph shall not affect the possibility of processors obtaining explicit consent by other means, and shall apply in accordance with the principle of technological neutrality.
- Tabled by
- Virginie Joron
- Group
- PfE
- Targets
- GDPR Article 88b(6)
- Document
- IMCO amendments 329–532 to the draft opinion
- Printed header
- Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 15 / Regulation (EU) 2016/679 / Article 88 b
463 ~Alternative David CormandGreens/EFA · IMCO “software to access interfaces such as mobile operating systems or”
(6)
Providers of web browsers, which are not SMEs, shall provide the technical means to allow data subjects to give their consent and to refuse a request for consent and exercise the right to object pursuant to Article 21(2) through the automated and machine-readable means referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article, as applied pursuant to paragraphs 2 to 5 of this Article.Providers of software to access interfaces such as mobile operating systems or web browsers, operating systems applications and any other actor operating in the signal chain shall provide the technical means to exercise the choices in paragraph 1 of this Article through the automated and machine-readable means therein.- Tabled by
- David Cormand on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group
- Group
- Greens/EFA
- Targets
- GDPR Article 88b(6)
- Document
- IMCO amendments 329–532 to the draft opinion
- Source
- Official text, page 80
- Printed header
- Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 15 / Regulation (EU) 2016/679 / Article 88b
464 −Deletion Piotr MüllerECR · IMCO Deletes the Commission’s wording
(7) Paragraph 6 shall apply from [OP: please insert the date = 48 months following the date of entry into force of this Regulation].- Tabled by
- Piotr Müller
- Group
- ECR
- Targets
- GDPR Article 88b(7)
- Document
- IMCO amendments 329–532 to the draft opinion
- Printed header
- Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 15 / Regulation (EU) 2016/679 / Article 88b
465 ~Alternative David CormandGreens/EFA · IMCO “Paragraph 6 shall apply from [OP: please insert the date = 18 months following the date of entry into force of this Regulation].”
(7) Paragraph 6 shall apply from [OP: please insert the date =
4818 months following the date of entry into force of this Regulation].- Tabled by
- David Cormand on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group
- Group
- Greens/EFA
- Targets
- GDPR Article 88b(7)
- Document
- IMCO amendments 329–532 to the draft opinion
- Source
- Official text, page 81
- Printed header
- Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 15 / Regulation (EU) 2016/679 / Article 88b
466 +Addition David CormandGreens/EFA · IMCO “Providers of web browsers, operating systems and applications and any other actor operating in the automated machine-readable signals chain, shall…” numbered 7a
(7a)Providers of web browsers, operating systems and applications and any other actor operating in the automated machine-readable signals chain, shall not process choices expressed by the consumer referred to in paragraph 1 for any other purpose than transmitting, generating, managing and applying the signal to providers of online interfaces. Usage of signal data is prohibited for advertising, profiling, analytics, measurement, service optimisation, self-preferencing, cross-service linking, retention or any secondary purpose.
- Tabled by
- David Cormand on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group
- Group
- Greens/EFA
- Targets
- GDPR Article 88b – 7 a new
- Document
- IMCO amendments 329–532 to the draft opinion
- Printed header
- Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 15 / Regulation (EU) 2016/679 / Article 88b – 7 a new