Article 33
Amendments as tabled
Six amendments, each tabled separately · IMCO amendments 329–532 to the draft opinion
384 ~Alternative Virginie JoronPfE · IMCO “Controllers shall continue to document breaches which are not notified, including the facts relating to the personal data breach, its effects and the…”
1. In the case of a personal data breach that is likely to result in a high risk to the rights and freedoms of natural persons, the controller shall without undue delay and, where feasible, not later than 96 hours after having become aware of it, notify the personal data breach via
theitssingle-entrynational point of entry established pursuant to Article 23a of Directive (EU) 2022/2555 to the supervisory authority competent in accordance with Article 55 and Article 56. Where the notification to the supervisory authority is not made within 96 hours, it shall be accompanied by reasons for the delay.;Controllers shall continue to document breaches which are not notified, including the facts relating to the personal data breach, its effects and the remedial action taken.- Tabled by
- Virginie Joron
- Group
- PfE
- Targets
- GDPR Article 33(1)
- Document
- IMCO amendments 329–532 to the draft opinion
- Printed header
- Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 8 – point a / Regulation (EU) 2016/679 / Article 33 – paragraph 1
385 −Deletion Virginie JoronPfE · IMCO Deletes the Commission’s wording
(b) the following paragraph is added: 1a. Until the establishment of the single-entry point pursuant to Article 23a of Directive (EU) 2022/2555, controllers shall continue to notify personal data breaches directly to the competent supervisory authority in accordance with Article 55 and Article 56.’- Tabled by
- Virginie Joron
- Group
- PfE
- Targets
- GDPR Article 33(1a)
- Document
- IMCO amendments 329–532 to the draft opinion
- Source
- Official text, page 37
- Printed header
- Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 8 – point b / Regulation (EU) 2016/679 / Article 33 – paragraphe 1 a
386 ~Alternative Virginie JoronPfE · IMCO “If the Commission departs from the proposal submitted by the Board, it shall set out the reasons for doing so. These reasons shall be made public at…”
6. The Board shall prepare and transmit to the Commission a proposal for a common template for notifying a personal data breach to the competent supervisory authority referred to in paragraph 1 as well as for a list of the circumstances in which a personal data breach is likely to result in a high risk to the rights and freedoms of a natural person. The proposals shall be submitted to the Commission within [OP date = nine months of the entry into application of this Regulation]. The Commission after due consideration
reviewsrefersitthem to the Board so that the latter can review them, as necessary, and is empowered to adoptitthem by way of an implementing act in accordance with the examination procedure set out in Article 93(2). If the Commission departs from the proposal submitted by the Board, it shall set out the reasons for doing so. These reasons shall be made public at the same time as the implementing act.- Tabled by
- Virginie Joron
- Group
- PfE
- Targets
- GDPR Article 33(6)
- Document
- IMCO amendments 329–532 to the draft opinion
- Printed header
- Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 8 – point c / Regulation (EU) 2016/679 / Article 33 – paragraph 6
387 ~Alternative Arba KokalariEPP · IMCO “This shall not go beyond existing obligations under this Regulation or mandate any retroactive obligations.”
6. The Board shall prepare and transmit to the Commission a proposal for a common template for notifying a personal data breach to the competent supervisory authority referred to in paragraph 1 as well as for a list of the circumstances in which a personal data breach is likely to result in a high risk to the rights and freedoms of a natural person. The proposals shall be submitted to the Commission within [OP date = nine months of the entry into application of this Regulation]. The Commission after due consideration reviews it, as necessary, and is empowered to adopt it by way of an implementing act in accordance with the examination procedure set out in Article 93(2). This shall not go beyond existing obligations under this Regulation or mandate any retroactive obligations.
- Tabled by
- Arba Kokalari
- Group
- EPP
- Targets
- GDPR Article 33(6)
- Document
- IMCO amendments 329–532 to the draft opinion
- Printed header
- Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 8 – point c / Regulation (EU) 2016/679 / Article 35 – paragraph 6a
388 ~Alternative Virginie JoronPfE · IMCO “If the Commission departs from the Board’s proposed updates, it shall set out the reasons for doing so, and these reasons shall be made public at the…”
7. The template and the list referred to in paragraph 6 shall be reviewed at least every three years and updated where necessary. The Board shall submit its assessment and possible proposals for updates to the Commission in due time. The Commission after due consideration of the proposals reviews them and is empowered to adopt any updates following the procedure in paragraph 6. If the Commission departs from the Board’s proposed updates, it shall set out the reasons for doing so, and these reasons shall be made public at the same time as the adopted updates.
- Tabled by
- Virginie Joron
- Group
- PfE
- Targets
- GDPR Article 33(7)
- Document
- IMCO amendments 329–532 to the draft opinion
- Source
- Official text, page 39
- Printed header
- Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 8 – point c / Regulation (EU) 2016/679 / Article 33 – paragraph 7
389 +Addition David CormandGreens/EFA · IMCO “The submission of notifications, reports or other information provided for in this provision shall not reduce the scope, frequency or level of detail…” numbered 7a
7a.The submission of notifications, reports or other information provided for in this provision shall not reduce the scope, frequency or level of detail of the reporting obligations laid down in this Regulation or other applicable Union Law. The establishment of a single point of entry under this Article shall serve solely to simplify procedural aspects and ensure better coordination between competent authorities. It shall not result in lowering the level of data protection nor limit the power of supervisory authorities to request additional information, conduct investigations or require further reporting where necessary to guarantee compliance with this Regulation.
- Tabled by
- David Cormand on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group
- Group
- Greens/EFA
- Document
- IMCO amendments 329–532 to the draft opinion
- Printed header
- Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 8 – point c / Regulation (EU) 2016/679 / Article 33