Article 5
Amendments as tabled
Five amendments, each tabled separately · IMCO amendments 125–328 to the draft opinion
235 ~Alternative Piotr MüllerECR · IMCO “In circumstances, where the data holder who is a trade secret holder finds that, the data requested may result in disclosure of trade secrets to the…”
11. In
exceptionalcircumstances, where the data holder who is a trade secret holderis able to demonstratefinds that,despitethetechnicaldataandrequestedorganisationalmaymeasuresresulttaken by the third party pursuant to paragraph 9 of this Article, it is highly likely to suffer serious economic damage from the disclosure of trade secrets or that thein disclosure of trade secrets to thethird partyuser poses a high risk of unlawful acquisition, use, or disclosure to third country entities, or entities established in the Union under the direct or indirect control of such entities, which are subject to jurisdictions offering weaker or non-equivalent protection compared to that under Union law, that data holder may refuseon a case-by-case basisa request for access to the specific data in question. That demonstration shall be duly substantiated on the basis of objective elements, such as the enforceability of trade secrets protection in third countries, the nature and level of confidentiality of the data requested, and the uniqueness and novelty of the connected product. It shall be provided in writing to the third party without undue delay. Where the data holder refuses to share data pursuant to this paragraph, it shall notify thecompetentpartyauthorityrequestingdesignatedthepursuant to Article 37data.;- Tabled by
- Piotr Müller
- Group
- ECR
- Targets
- Data Act Article 5(11)
- Document
- IMCO amendments 125–328 to the draft opinion
- Printed header
- Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 / Regulation (EU) 2023/2854 / Article 5 – paragraph 11
236 ~Alternative Arba KokalariEPP · IMCO “Where the data holder who is a trade secret holder is able to demonstrate that, despite the technical and organisational measures taken by the third…”
11.
In exceptional circumstances, whereWhere the data holder who is a trade secret holder is able to demonstrate that, despite the technical and organisational measures taken by the third party pursuant to paragraph 9 of this Article, it ishighlylikely to sufferseriouseconomic damage from the disclosure of trade secrets or that the disclosure of trade secrets to the third party poses a high risk of unlawful acquisition, use, or disclosure to third country entities, or entities established in the Union under the direct or indirect control of such entities, which are subject to jurisdictions offering weaker or non-equivalent protection compared to that under Union law, that data holder may refuseon a case-by-case basisa request for access to the specific data in question.That demonstration shall be duly substantiated on the basis of objective elements, such as the enforceability of trade secrets protection in third countries, the nature and level of confidentiality of the data requested, and the uniqueness and novelty of the connected product. It shall be provided in writing to the third party without undue delay.The refusal shall be provided in writing to the third party without undue delay.Where the data holder refuses to share data pursuant to this paragraph, it shall notify the competent authority designated pursuant to Article 37.;- Tabled by
- Arba Kokalari
- Group
- EPP
- Targets
- Data Act Article 5(11)
- Document
- IMCO amendments 125–328 to the draft opinion
- Printed header
- Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 / Regulation (EU) 2023/2854 / Article 5 – paragraph 11
237 ~Alternative Virginie JoronPfE · IMCO “of industrial, strategic or sensitive data whose disclosure would be likely to cause damage to economic security, privacy or law and order, or”
11. In exceptional circumstances, where the data holder who is a trade secret holder is
ablein a position todemonstrateestablish on reasonable grounds that, despite the technical and organisational measures taken by the third party pursuant to paragraph 9 of this Article, it is highly likely to sufferserioussignificant economic damage from the disclosure of trade secrets or of industrial, strategic or sensitive data whose disclosure would be likely to cause damage to economic security, privacy or law and order, or that the disclosure oftradesuchsecretsdata to the third party poses a high risk of unlawful acquisition, use, or disclosure to third country entities, or entities established in the Union under the direct or indirect control of such entities, which are subject to jurisdictions offering weaker or non-equivalent protection compared to that under Union law, including because of the likely onward transmission of data to those entities, that data holder may refuse on a case-by-case basis a request for access to the specific data in question. Thatdemonstrationassessment shall bedulyreasonably substantiated on the basis of objective elements, such as the enforceability of trade secrets protection in third countries, the nature and level of confidentiality of the data requested, the chain of onward transmission of data that may reasonably be foreseen, and the uniqueness and novelty of the connected product. It shall be provided in writing to the third party without undue delay. Where the data holder refuses to share data pursuant to this paragraph, it shall notify the competent authority designated pursuant to Article 37.’;- Tabled by
- Virginie Joron
- Group
- PfE
- Targets
- Data Act Article 5(11)
- Document
- IMCO amendments 125–328 to the draft opinion
- Printed header
- Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 / Regulation (EU) 2023/2854 / Article 5 – Paragraph 11
238 ~Alternative Sophia KircherEPP · IMCO “secrets in particular where the disclosure of trade secrets to the third party poses a high risk of unlawful acquisition, use, or disclosure to third…”
11.
In exceptional circumstances, whereWhere the data holder who is a trade secret holderis able to demonstratefinds that, despitethetechnicaldataandrequestedorganisationalmaymeasuresresulttaken by the third party pursuant to paragraph 9 of this Article, it is highly likely to suffer serious economic damage fromin the disclosure of trade secretsor that the disclosure of trade secrets to the third party poses a high risk of unlawful acquisition, use, or disclosure to third country entities, or entities established in the Union under the direct or indirect control of such entities, which are subject to jurisdictions offering weaker or non-equivalent protection compared to that under Union law, that data holder may refuse on a case-by-case basis a request for access to the specific data in question.That demonstration shall be duly substantiated on the basis of objective elements, such as the enforceability of trade secrets protection in third countries, the nature and level of confidentiality of the data requested, and the uniqueness and novelty of the connected product. It shall be provided in writing to the third party without undue delay. Where the data holder refuses to share data pursuant to this paragraph, it shall notify the competent authority designated pursuant to Article 37.;Where the data holder refuses to share data pursuant to this paragraph, it shall notify the user requesting the data.; The Commission shall consult stakeholders and adopt guidelines on the application of paragraph 5(11). These shall identify specific third-country jurisdictions and types of data or practices that inherently pose a high risk to trade secrets in particular where the disclosure of trade secrets to the third party poses a high risk of unlawful acquisition, use, or disclosure to third country entities, or entities established in the Union under the direct or indirect control of such entities, which are subject to jurisdictions offering weaker or non-equivalent protection compared to that under Union law. The Commission shall provide a simplified template based on the list of objective criteria to help data holders to substantiate 'serious economic damage,' and where access may be granted even if data is highly sensitive and under what conditions.- Tabled by
- Sophia Kircher
- Group
- EPP
- Targets
- Data Act Article 5(11)
- Document
- IMCO amendments 125–328 to the draft opinion
- Printed header
- Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 / Regulation (EU) 2023/2854 / Article 5 – paragraph 11
239 ~Alternative David CormandGreens/EFA · IMCO “In exceptional circumstances, where the data holder who is a trade secret holder is able to demonstrate that, despite the technical and…”
11. In exceptional circumstances, where the data holder who is a trade secret holder is able to demonstrate that, despite the technical and organisational measures taken by the third party pursuant to paragraph 9 of this Article, it is highly likely to suffer serious economic damage from the disclosure of trade secrets or that the disclosure of trade secrets to the third party poses a high risk of unlawful acquisition, use, or disclosure notably to third country entities, or entities established in the Union under the direct or indirect control of such entities, which are subject to jurisdictions offering weaker or non-equivalent protection compared to that under Union law, that data holder may refuse on a case-by-case basis a request for access to the specific data in question. That demonstration shall be duly substantiated on the basis of objective elements, such as the enforceability of trade secrets protection in third countries, the nature and level of confidentiality of the data requested, and the uniqueness and novelty of the connected product. It shall be provided in writing to the third party without undue delay. Where the data holder refuses to share data pursuant to this paragraph, it shall notify the competent authority designated pursuant to Article 37.;
- Tabled by
- David Cormand on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group
- Group
- Greens/EFA
- Targets
- Data Act Article 5(11)
- Document
- IMCO amendments 125–328 to the draft opinion
- Printed header
- Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 / Regulation (EU) 2023/2854 / Article 5 – paragraph 11