Texts to 22 Oct 2026

Amendments as tabled

Five amendments, each tabled separately · IMCO amendments 125–328 to the draft opinion

  1. 235 Alternative Piotr MüllerECR · IMCO “In circumstances, where the data holder who is a trade secret holder finds that, the data requested may result in disclosure of trade secrets to the…”

    11. In exceptional circumstances, where the data holder who is a trade secret holder is able to demonstratefinds that, despite the technicaldata andrequested organisationalmay measuresresult taken by the third party pursuant to paragraph 9 of this Article, it is highly likely to suffer serious economic damage from the disclosure of trade secrets or that thein disclosure of trade secrets to the third partyuser poses a high risk of unlawful acquisition, use, or disclosure to third country entities, or entities established in the Union under the direct or indirect control of such entities, which are subject to jurisdictions offering weaker or non-equivalent protection compared to that under Union law, that data holder may refuse on a case-by-case basis a request for access to the specific data in question. That demonstration shall be duly substantiated on the basis of objective elements, such as the enforceability of trade secrets protection in third countries, the nature and level of confidentiality of the data requested, and the uniqueness and novelty of the connected product. It shall be provided in writing to the third party without undue delay. Where the data holder refuses to share data pursuant to this paragraph, it shall notify the competentparty authorityrequesting designatedthe pursuant to Article 37data.;

    Tabled by
    Piotr Müller
    Group
    ECR
    Document
    IMCO amendments 125–328 to the draft opinion
    Printed header
    Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 / Regulation (EU) 2023/2854 / Article 5 – paragraph 11
  2. 236 Alternative Arba KokalariEPP · IMCO “Where the data holder who is a trade secret holder is able to demonstrate that, despite the technical and organisational measures taken by the third…”

    11. In exceptional circumstances, whereWhere the data holder who is a trade secret holder is able to demonstrate that, despite the technical and organisational measures taken by the third party pursuant to paragraph 9 of this Article, it is highly likely to suffer serious economic damage from the disclosure of trade secrets or that the disclosure of trade secrets to the third party poses a high risk of unlawful acquisition, use, or disclosure to third country entities, or entities established in the Union under the direct or indirect control of such entities, which are subject to jurisdictions offering weaker or non-equivalent protection compared to that under Union law, that data holder may refuse on a case-by-case basis a request for access to the specific data in question. That demonstration shall be duly substantiated on the basis of objective elements, such as the enforceability of trade secrets protection in third countries, the nature and level of confidentiality of the data requested, and the uniqueness and novelty of the connected product. It shall be provided in writing to the third party without undue delay.The refusal shall be provided in writing to the third party without undue delay. Where the data holder refuses to share data pursuant to this paragraph, it shall notify the competent authority designated pursuant to Article 37.;

    Tabled by
    Arba Kokalari
    Group
    EPP
    Document
    IMCO amendments 125–328 to the draft opinion
    Printed header
    Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 / Regulation (EU) 2023/2854 / Article 5 – paragraph 11
  3. 237 Alternative Virginie JoronPfE · IMCO “of industrial, strategic or sensitive data whose disclosure would be likely to cause damage to economic security, privacy or law and order, or”

    11. In exceptional circumstances, where the data holder who is a trade secret holder is ablein a position to demonstrateestablish on reasonable grounds that, despite the technical and organisational measures taken by the third party pursuant to paragraph 9 of this Article, it is highly likely to suffer serioussignificant economic damage from the disclosure of trade secrets or of industrial, strategic or sensitive data whose disclosure would be likely to cause damage to economic security, privacy or law and order, or that the disclosure of tradesuch secretsdata to the third party poses a high risk of unlawful acquisition, use, or disclosure to third country entities, or entities established in the Union under the direct or indirect control of such entities, which are subject to jurisdictions offering weaker or non-equivalent protection compared to that under Union law, including because of the likely onward transmission of data to those entities, that data holder may refuse on a case-by-case basis a request for access to the specific data in question. That demonstrationassessment shall be dulyreasonably substantiated on the basis of objective elements, such as the enforceability of trade secrets protection in third countries, the nature and level of confidentiality of the data requested, the chain of onward transmission of data that may reasonably be foreseen, and the uniqueness and novelty of the connected product. It shall be provided in writing to the third party without undue delay. Where the data holder refuses to share data pursuant to this paragraph, it shall notify the competent authority designated pursuant to Article 37.’;

    Tabled by
    Virginie Joron
    Group
    PfE
    Document
    IMCO amendments 125–328 to the draft opinion
    Printed header
    Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 / Regulation (EU) 2023/2854 / Article 5 – Paragraph 11
  4. 238 Alternative Sophia KircherEPP · IMCO “secrets in particular where the disclosure of trade secrets to the third party poses a high risk of unlawful acquisition, use, or disclosure to third…”

    11. In exceptional circumstances, whereWhere the data holder who is a trade secret holder is able to demonstratefinds that, despite the technicaldata andrequested organisationalmay measuresresult taken by the third party pursuant to paragraph 9 of this Article, it is highly likely to suffer serious economic damage fromin the disclosure of trade secrets or that the disclosure of trade secrets to the third party poses a high risk of unlawful acquisition, use, or disclosure to third country entities, or entities established in the Union under the direct or indirect control of such entities, which are subject to jurisdictions offering weaker or non-equivalent protection compared to that under Union law, that data holder may refuse on a case-by-case basis a request for access to the specific data in question. That demonstration shall be duly substantiated on the basis of objective elements, such as the enforceability of trade secrets protection in third countries, the nature and level of confidentiality of the data requested, and the uniqueness and novelty of the connected product. It shall be provided in writing to the third party without undue delay. Where the data holder refuses to share data pursuant to this paragraph, it shall notify the competent authority designated pursuant to Article 37.;Where the data holder refuses to share data pursuant to this paragraph, it shall notify the user requesting the data.; The Commission shall consult stakeholders and adopt guidelines on the application of paragraph 5(11). These shall identify specific third-country jurisdictions and types of data or practices that inherently pose a high risk to trade secrets in particular where the disclosure of trade secrets to the third party poses a high risk of unlawful acquisition, use, or disclosure to third country entities, or entities established in the Union under the direct or indirect control of such entities, which are subject to jurisdictions offering weaker or non-equivalent protection compared to that under Union law. The Commission shall provide a simplified template based on the list of objective criteria to help data holders to substantiate 'serious economic damage,' and where access may be granted even if data is highly sensitive and under what conditions.

    Tabled by
    Sophia Kircher
    Group
    EPP
    Document
    IMCO amendments 125–328 to the draft opinion
    Printed header
    Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 / Regulation (EU) 2023/2854 / Article 5 – paragraph 11
  5. 239 Alternative David CormandGreens/EFA · IMCO “In exceptional circumstances, where the data holder who is a trade secret holder is able to demonstrate that, despite the technical and…”

    11. In exceptional circumstances, where the data holder who is a trade secret holder is able to demonstrate that, despite the technical and organisational measures taken by the third party pursuant to paragraph 9 of this Article, it is highly likely to suffer serious economic damage from the disclosure of trade secrets or that the disclosure of trade secrets to the third party poses a high risk of unlawful acquisition, use, or disclosure notably to third country entities, or entities established in the Union under the direct or indirect control of such entities, which are subject to jurisdictions offering weaker or non-equivalent protection compared to that under Union law, that data holder may refuse on a case-by-case basis a request for access to the specific data in question. That demonstration shall be duly substantiated on the basis of objective elements, such as the enforceability of trade secrets protection in third countries, the nature and level of confidentiality of the data requested, and the uniqueness and novelty of the connected product. It shall be provided in writing to the third party without undue delay. Where the data holder refuses to share data pursuant to this paragraph, it shall notify the competent authority designated pursuant to Article 37.;

    Tabled by
    David Cormand on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group
    Group
    Greens/EFA
    Document
    IMCO amendments 125–328 to the draft opinion
    Printed header
    Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 / Regulation (EU) 2023/2854 / Article 5 – paragraph 11