Article 10
Amendments as tabled
18 amendments, each tabled separately · ITRE–LIBE amendments 1565–1740 to the draft report
1629 −Deletion Sibylle Berg +1NI · ITRE–LIBE Deletes the Commission’s wording
(a) in paragraph 2, the following points are added: (k) processing in the context of the development and operation of an AI system as defined in Article 3, point (1), of Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 or an AI model, subject to the conditions referred to in paragraph 4. (l) processing of biometric data is necessary for the purpose of confirming the identity of a data subject (verification), where the biometric data or the means needed for the verification is under the sole control of the data subject.’Justification
Adaptation in line with amendments to Regulation (EU) 2016/679
- Tabled by
- Sibylle Berg, Martin Sonneborn
- Group
- NI
- Document
- ITRE–LIBE amendments 1565–1740 to the draft report
- Printed header
- Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point a / Regulation (EU) 2018/1725 / Article 10 – paragraph 2 – point k l
1630 −Deletion Pernando Barrena Arza +1The Left · ITRE–LIBE Deletes the Commission’s wording
(a) in paragraph 2, the following points are added: (k) processing in the context of the development and operation of an AI system as defined in Article 3, point (1), of Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 or an AI model, subject to the conditions referred to in paragraph 4. . (l) processing of biometric data is necessary for the purpose of confirming the identity of a data subject (verification), where the biometric data or the means needed for the verification is under the sole control of the data subject.’- Tabled by
- Pernando Barrena Arza, João Oliveira
- Group
- The Left
- Document
- ITRE–LIBE amendments 1565–1740 to the draft report
- Printed header
- Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point a / Regulation (EU) 2018/1725 / Article 10 – paragraph 2 – point k, l
1631 −Deletion Mary KhanESN · ITRE–LIBE Deletes the Commission’s wording
(k) processing in the context of the development and operation of an AI system as defined in Article 3, point (1), of Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 or an AI model, subject to the conditions referred to in paragraph 4.Justification
By analogy with GDPR.
- Tabled by
- Mary Khan
- Group
- ESN
- Targets
- EUDPR Article 10(2)(k)
- Document
- ITRE–LIBE amendments 1565–1740 to the draft report
- Source
- Official text, page 76
- Printed header
- Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point a / Regulation (EU) 2018/1725 / Article 10 – paragraph 2 – point k
1632 −Deletion Marina Kaljurand +8S&D · ITRE–LIBE Deletes the Commission’s wording
(k) processing in the context of the development and operation of an AI system as defined in Article 3, point (1), of Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 or an AI model, subject to the conditions referred to in paragraph 4. .- Tabled by
- Marina Kaljurand, Elena Sancho Murillo, Brando Benifei, Birgit Sippel, Alex Agius Saliba, Francisco Assis, Elisabeth Grossmann, Kristian Vigenin, Matjaž Nemec
- Group
- S&D
- Targets
- EUDPR Article 10(2)(k)
- Document
- ITRE–LIBE amendments 1565–1740 to the draft report
- Source
- Official text, page 76
- Printed header
- Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point a / Regulation (EU) 2018/1725 / Article 10 – paragraph 2 – point k
1633 ~Alternative Julie Rechagneux +7ECR, PfE · ITRE–LIBE “and without prejudice to the prohibited practices laid down in Article 5, the classification rules for high-risk AI systems laid down in Article 6…”
(k) processing in the context of the development and operation of an AI system as defined in Article 3, point (1), of Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 or an AI model, subject to the conditions referred to in paragraph 4, and without prejudice to the prohibited practices laid down in Article 5, the classification rules for high-risk AI systems laid down in Article 6, the obligations of deployers of high-risk AI systems laid down in Article 26, and the transparency obligations laid down in Article 50 of that Regulation.
.- Tabled by
- Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pierre-Romain Thionnet, Alexandre Varaut, Fabrice Leggeri, Marion Maréchal, Christophe Bay
- Group
- ECR, PfE
- Targets
- EUDPR Article 10(2)(k)
- Document
- ITRE–LIBE amendments 1565–1740 to the draft report
- Source
- Official text, page 77
- Printed header
- Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point a / Regulation (EU) 2018/1725 / Article 10 – paragraph 2 – point k
1634 ~Alternative Irena Joveva +5Renew · ITRE–LIBE “strictly incidental and residual”
(k) strictly incidental and residual processing in the context of the development and operation of an AI system as defined in Article 3, point (1), of Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 or an AI model, subject to the conditions referred to in paragraph 4.
.- Tabled by
- Irena Joveva, Michael McNamara, Raquel García Hermida-Van Der Walle, Oihane Agirregoitia Martínez, Veronika Cifrová Ostrihoňová, Fabienne Keller
- Group
- Renew
- Targets
- EUDPR Article 10(2)(k)
- Document
- ITRE–LIBE amendments 1565–1740 to the draft report
- Source
- Official text, page 77
- Printed header
- Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point a / Regulation (EU) 2018/1725 / Article 10 – paragraph 2 – point k
1635 ~Alternative Julie Rechagneux +8ECR, PfE · ITRE–LIBE “This point applies solely to verification and does not cover the identification of a natural person by comparing their biometric data to biometric…”
(l) processing of biometric data is necessary for the purpose of confirming the identity of a data subject (verification), by means of a one-to-one comparison performed locally on the data subject’s own device, where the biometric data or the means needed for the verification is under the sole control of the data subject. This point applies solely to verification and does not cover the identification of a natural person by comparing their biometric data to biometric data stored in a database within the meaning of Regulation (EU) 2024/1689; it is without prejudice to the prohibition laid down in Article 5(1), point (e), of that Regulation.
- Tabled by
- Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pierre-Romain Thionnet, Alexandre Varaut, Fabrice Leggeri, Marion Maréchal, António Tânger Corrêa, Christophe Bay
- Group
- ECR, PfE
- Targets
- EUDPR Article 10(2)(l)
- Document
- ITRE–LIBE amendments 1565–1740 to the draft report
- Source
- Official text, page 78
- Printed header
- Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point a / Regulation (EU) 2018/1725 / Article 10 – paragraph 2 – point l
1636 ~Alternative Irena Joveva +5Renew · ITRE–LIBE “and subject to apropriate safeguards to protect the fundamental rights and the interest of the data subject, as laid down in Unio law or Member State…”
(l) processing of biometric data is strictly necessary and proportionate for the purpose of confirming the identity of a data subject (verification), where the biometric data or the means needed for the verification is under the sole control of the data subject., and subject to apropriate safeguards to protect the fundamental rights and the interest of the data subject, as laid down in Unio law or Member State law, in accordance with paragraph 4 of this Article.
- Tabled by
- Irena Joveva, Michael McNamara, Raquel García Hermida-Van Der Walle, Oihane Agirregoitia Martínez, Veronika Cifrová Ostrihoňová, Fabienne Keller
- Group
- Renew
- Targets
- EUDPR Article 10(2)(l)
- Document
- ITRE–LIBE amendments 1565–1740 to the draft report
- Printed header
- Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point a / Regulation (EU) 2018/1725 / Article 10 – paragraph 2 – point l
1637 ~Alternative Sebastian Tynkkynen +1ECR · ITRE–LIBE “and occurs on the data subject’s device, except in highly exceptional cases where this is strictly necessary, proportional and uses state of the art…”
(l) processing of biometric data is strictly necessary for the purpose of confirming the identity of a data subject
(using one-to-one verification), where the biometric data or the means needed for theverificationrecognition is under the sole control of the data subject and occurs on the data subject’s device, except in highly exceptional cases where this is strictly necessary, proportional and uses state of the art privacy preserving technology, such as encryption and zero knowledge proofs.- Tabled by
- Sebastian Tynkkynen, Diego Solier
- Group
- ECR
- Targets
- EUDPR Article 10(2)(l)
- Document
- ITRE–LIBE amendments 1565–1740 to the draft report
- Source
- Official text, page 79
- Printed header
- Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point a / Regulation (EU) 2018/1725 / Article 10 – paragraph 2 – point l
1638 ~Alternative Mary KhanESN · ITRE–LIBE “are not stored centrally and are not processed for other purposes”
(l) processing of biometric data is necessary for the purpose of confirming the identity of a data subject
(verification), where the biometric dataorand the means needed for the verificationisare under the sole control of the data subject, are not stored centrally and are not processed for other purposes.’Justification
By analogy with GDPR.
- Tabled by
- Mary Khan
- Group
- ESN
- Targets
- EUDPR Article 10(2)(l)
- Document
- ITRE–LIBE amendments 1565–1740 to the draft report
- Printed header
- Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point a / Regulation (EU) 2018/1725 / Article 10 – paragraph 2 – point l
1639 −Deletion Sibylle Berg +1NI · ITRE–LIBE Deletes the Commission’s wording
(b) the following paragraph 4 is added: 4. For processing referred to in point (k) of paragraph 2, appropriate organisational and technical measures shall be implemented to avoid the collection and otherwise processing of special categories of personal data. Where, despite the implementation of such measures, the controller identifies special categories of personal data in the datasets used for training, testing or validation or in the AI system or AI model, the controller shall remove such data. If removal of those data requires disproportionate effort, the controller shall in any event effectively protect without undue delay such data from being used to produce outputs, from being disclosed or otherwise made available to third parties.’Justification
Subsequent adaptation in line with amendments to Regulation (EU) 2016/679
- Tabled by
- Sibylle Berg, Martin Sonneborn
- Group
- NI
- Targets
- EUDPR Article 10(4)
- Document
- ITRE–LIBE amendments 1565–1740 to the draft report
- Printed header
- Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point b / Regulation (EU) 2018/1725 / Article 10 – paragraph 4
1640 −Deletion Mary KhanESN · ITRE–LIBE Deletes the Commission’s wording
(b) the following paragraph 4 is added: 4. For processing referred to in point (k) of paragraph 2, appropriate organisational and technical measures shall be implemented to avoid the collection and otherwise processing of special categories of personal data. Where, despite the implementation of such measures, the controller identifies special categories of personal data in the datasets used for training, testing or validation or in the AI system or AI model, the controller shall remove such data. If removal of those data requires disproportionate effort, the controller shall in any event effectively protect without undue delay such data from being used to produce outputs, from being disclosed or otherwise made available to third parties.’- Tabled by
- Mary Khan
- Group
- ESN
- Targets
- EUDPR Article 10(4)
- Document
- ITRE–LIBE amendments 1565–1740 to the draft report
- Source
- Official text, page 81
- Printed header
- Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point b / Regulation (EU) 2018/1725 / Article 10 – paragraph 4
1641 −Deletion Pernando Barrena Arza +1The Left · ITRE–LIBE Deletes the Commission’s wording
(b) the following paragraph 4 is added: 4. For processing referred to in point (k) of paragraph 2, appropriate organisational and technical measures shall be implemented to avoid the collection and otherwise processing of special categories of personal data. Where, despite the implementation of such measures, the controller identifies special categories of personal data in the datasets used for training, testing or validation or in the AI system or AI model, the controller shall remove such data. If removal of those data requires disproportionate effort, the controller shall in any event effectively protect without undue delay such data from being used to produce outputs, from being disclosed or otherwise made available to third parties.’- Tabled by
- Pernando Barrena Arza, João Oliveira
- Group
- The Left
- Targets
- EUDPR Article 10(4)
- Document
- ITRE–LIBE amendments 1565–1740 to the draft report
- Printed header
- Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point b / Regulation (EU) 2018/1725 / Article 10 – paragraph 4
1642 −Deletion Marina Kaljurand +8S&D · ITRE–LIBE Deletes the Commission’s wording
(b) the following paragraph 4 is added: 4. For processing referred to in point (k) of paragraph 2, appropriate organisational and technical measures shall be implemented to avoid the collection and otherwise processing of special categories of personal data. Where, despite the implementation of such measures, the controller identifies special categories of personal data in the datasets used for training, testing or validation or in the AI system or AI model, the controller shall remove such data. If removal of those data requires disproportionate effort, the controller shall in any event effectively protect without undue delay such data from being used to produce outputs, from being disclosed or otherwise made available to third parties.’- Tabled by
- Marina Kaljurand, Elena Sancho Murillo, Brando Benifei, Birgit Sippel, Alex Agius Saliba, Francisco Assis, Elisabeth Grossmann, Kristian Vigenin, Matjaž Nemec
- Group
- S&D
- Targets
- EUDPR Article 10(4)
- Document
- ITRE–LIBE amendments 1565–1740 to the draft report
- Printed header
- Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point b / Regulation (EU) 2018/1725 / Article 10 – paragraph 4
1643 ~Alternative Irena Joveva +5Renew · ITRE–LIBE “Processing referred to in point (k) of paragraph 2 should exlude the processing of special categories of personal data originating from data provided…”
4. For processing referred to in point (k) of paragraph 2,
appropriatestrict organisational and technical measures shall be implemented toavoidprevent the collection and otherwise processing of special categories of personal data. Where, despite the implementation of such measures, the controller identifies special categories of personal data in the datasets used for training, testing, the controller shall erase such data without undue delay prior to completion of the training phase of the Ai system orvalidationAIormodel.inIftheerasure of those data from an already trained AI system or AI model proves to be technically impossible, the controller shallremovefullysuch data. If removal of those data requires disproportionate effort,document thecontrollertechnicalshallimpossibility, notify the competent supervisory authority, and, without undue delay and in any event effectively protectwithoutsuchunduedatadelayby applying state of the art filtering or aligment techniques to guarantee such datafromcannotbeingbe further procesed, used to produce outputs,from beingre-identified, disclosed or otherwise made available to third parties. Processing referred to in point (k) of paragraph 2 should exlude the processing of special categories of personal data originating from data provided by, or generated through, the activity of end users on an online platforms or a core platfrom services as defined in Regulation (EU) 2022/1925, irrespective of whether such processing occurs during the development, training, or operational phase of any AI system or AI model.- Tabled by
- Irena Joveva, Michael McNamara, Raquel García Hermida-Van Der Walle, Oihane Agirregoitia Martínez, Veronika Cifrová Ostrihoňová, Fabienne Keller
- Group
- Renew
- Targets
- EUDPR Article 10(4)
- Document
- ITRE–LIBE amendments 1565–1740 to the draft report
- Printed header
- Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point b / (EU) 2018/1725 / Article 10 – paragraph 4
1644 ~Alternative Julie Rechagneux +8ECR, PfE · ITRE–LIBE “In assessing whether the removal of those data requires a disproportionate effort, account shall be taken of the state of the art, the costs of…”
4. For processing referred to in point (k) of paragraph 2, appropriate organisational and technical measures shall be implemented to avoid the collection and otherwise processing of special categories of personal data, such as pseudonymisation, data minimisation and filtering at the point of collection, input filtering of training data, access restrictions, and state-of-the-art privacy-preserving and privacy-enhancing techniques. Where, despite the implementation of such measures, the controller identifies special categories of personal data in the datasets used for training, testing or validation or in the AI system or AI model, the controller shall remove such data, without undue delay. If removal of those data requires disproportionate effort, the controller shall in any event effectively protect without undue delay such data from being used to produce outputs, from being disclosed or otherwise made available to third parties. In assessing whether the removal of those data requires a disproportionate effort, account shall be taken of the state of the art, the costs of implementation, the volume of data concerned, the technical feasibility of isolating or extracting the data, and the nature, scope and purposes of the processing.
- Tabled by
- Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pierre-Romain Thionnet, Alexandre Varaut, Fabrice Leggeri, Marion Maréchal, António Tânger Corrêa, Christophe Bay
- Group
- ECR, PfE
- Targets
- EUDPR Article 10(4)
- Document
- ITRE–LIBE amendments 1565–1740 to the draft report
- Printed header
- Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point b / Regulation (EU) 2018/1725 / Article 10 – Paragraph 4
1645 ~Alternative Sebastian Tynkkynen +1ECR · ITRE–LIBE “taking into account technical feasibility, available resources, the nature of the AI system or model, and state of the art technology”
4. For processing referred to in point (k) of paragraph 2, appropriate organisational and technical measures shall be implemented to avoid v the collection and otherwise processing of special categories of personal data. Where, despite the implementation of such measures, the controller identifies special categories of personal data in the datasets used for training, testing or validation or in the AI system or AI model, the controller shall remove such data. If removal of those data requires disproportionate effort, taking into account technical feasibility, available resources, the nature of the AI system or model, and state of the art technology, the controller shall in any event
effectivelytakeprotectappropriate measures proportionate to the risks posed that without undue delay such data from being used to produce outputs, from being disclosed or otherwise made available to third parties.- Tabled by
- Sebastian Tynkkynen, Diego Solier
- Group
- ECR
- Targets
- EUDPR Article 10(4)
- Document
- ITRE–LIBE amendments 1565–1740 to the draft report
- Printed header
- Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point b / Regulation (EU) 2018/1275 / Article 10 – paragraph 4
1646 +Addition Julie Rechagneux +8ECR, PfE · ITRE–LIBE “Where the processing referred to in point (k) of paragraph 2 is carried out in the context of an AI regulatory sandbox established under Article 57…”
4a. In Article 10, the following paragraph is added:
Where the processing referred to in point (k) of paragraph 2 is carried out in the context of an AI regulatory sandbox established under Article 57 of Regulation (EU) 2024/1689, or in the context of testing in real world conditions under Article 60 of that Regulation, the processing shall comply with the conditions and safeguards laid down, respectively, in Article 59 and in Articles 60 and 61 of that Regulation. In particular, the personal data shall be processed in a functionally separate, isolated and protected environment under the control of the controller; effective monitoring and response mechanisms shall be in place to identify and mitigate high risks to the rights and freedoms of the data subjects and, where necessary, to stop the processing; and any personal data shall be deleted once the participation in the sandbox or the testing has terminated.'
- Tabled by
- Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pierre-Romain Thionnet, Alexandre Varaut, Fabrice Leggeri, Marion Maréchal, António Tânger Corrêa, Christophe Bay
- Group
- ECR, PfE
- Document
- ITRE–LIBE amendments 1565–1740 to the draft report
- Printed header
- Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point b / Regulation (EU) 2018/1725 / Article 10 – paragraph 4a (new)