Digital Omnibus proposal· Recital 6
Text
Recital 6 Digital Omnibus proposal as printed in the Council text of 22 October 2026
Source Council, 22 October 2026. Recital 6: ST 14756/26, page 4 · exact text page
Similarly, with the iterative regulation of online platforms over the past years, more recent rules have established a clearer and more ambitious framework than some of the predating rules, rendering them obsolete. It is therefore necessary that the legal framework evolves, eliminating any unnecessary duplications that add legal complexity.
How the recital changed
Each text against the text before it
| Recital | Commission19 Nov 2025Rec 6 | Council21 May 2026 | Council10 Jun 2026Rec 6 | Council18 Jun 2026Rec 6 | Council3 Sep 2026Rec 6 | Council2 Oct 2026Rec 6 | Council22 Oct 2026Rec 6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Compared with | law in force | the proposal | 21 May text | 10 Jun text | 18 Jun text | 3 Sep text | 2 Oct text |
| Recital 6 | 6 Added | In neither text | 6 Unchanged | 6 Unchanged | 6 Unchanged | 6 Unchanged | 6 Unchanged |
Each text against the text before it: +Added in this text, not in the text before=Unchanged same as the text before— in neither text
Parliament amendments propose other recitals under these numbers: Recital 6a (new), Recital 6b (new), Recital 6c (new) and Recital 6d (new).
Parliament amendments
11 amendments to this recital
7 amendments would delete the whole recital: members of The Left, S&D, Greens/EFA and Renew, and the ITRE–LIBE rapporteur and the IMCO rapporteur.
| Type | The Left | S&D | Greens/EFA | Renew | EPP | ECR | PfE | NI | Rapporteur |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| − Deletion | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | · | · | · | · | 2 |
| ~ Alternative | · | · | · | · | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | · |
By political group
- − Deletion The Left 1 S&D 1 Greens/EFA 2 Renew 1 Rapporteur 2
- ~ Alternative EPP 2 ECR 1 PfE 1 NI 1
Show
1 −Deletion Aura Salla and Marina Kaljurand (rapporteurs)Rapporteurs · ITRE–LIBE Deletes the recital
(6) Similarly, with the iterative regulation of online platforms over the past years, more recent rules have established a clearer and more ambitious framework than some of the predating rules, rendering them obsolete. It is therefore necessary that the legal framework evolves, eliminating any unnecessary duplications that add legal complexity.- Rapporteurs
- Aura Salla and Marina Kaljurand
- Group
- Rapporteurs
- Targets
- Digital Omnibus proposal Recital 6
- Document
- ITRE–LIBE draft report
- Source
- Official text, page 6
- Printed header
- Recital 6
3 −Deletion Alex Agius Saliba (rapporteur)Rapporteur · IMCO Deletes the recital
(6) Similarly, with the iterative regulation of online platforms over the past years, more recent rules have established a clearer and more ambitious framework than some of the predating rules, rendering them obsolete. It is therefore necessary that the legal framework evolves, eliminating any unnecessary duplications that add legal complexity.- Rapporteur
- Alex Agius Saliba
- Group
- Rapporteur
- Targets
- Digital Omnibus proposal Recital 6
- Document
- IMCO draft opinion
- Source
- Official text, page 5
- Printed header
- Recital 6
104 −Deletion João OliveiraThe Left · ITRE–LIBE Deletes the recital
(6) Similarly, with the iterative regulation of online platforms over the past years, more recent rules have established a clearer and more ambitious framework than some of the predating rules, rendering them obsolete. It is therefore necessary that the legal framework evolves, eliminating any unnecessary duplications that add legal complexity.- Tabled by
- João Oliveira
- Group
- The Left
- Targets
- Digital Omnibus proposal Recital 6
- Document
- ITRE–LIBE amendments 79–250 to the draft report
- Source
- Official text, page 23
- Printed header
- Recital 6
105 −Deletion Elena Sancho Murillo +7S&D · ITRE–LIBE Deletes the recital
(6) Similarly, with the iterative regulation of online platforms over the past years, more recent rules have established a clearer and more ambitious framework than some of the predating rules, rendering them obsolete. It is therefore necessary that the legal framework evolves, eliminating any unnecessary duplications that add legal complexity.Justification
The recital makes reference to the repeal on Platform to Business Regulation. P2B Regulation continues to provide essential safeguards for fairness and transparency in platform-to-business relationships. Its provisions remain complementary to the Union’s broader digital regulatory framework and address issues that are not fully covered by other instruments such as the DSA and the DMA. Repealing the Regulation would reduce legal certainty for businesses and could weaken existing protections.
- Tabled by
- Elena Sancho Murillo, Marina Kaljurand, Brando Benifei, José Cepeda, Matthias Ecke, Lina Gálvez, Francisco Assis, Alex Agius Saliba
- Group
- S&D
- Targets
- Digital Omnibus proposal Recital 6
- Document
- ITRE–LIBE amendments 79–250 to the draft report
- Printed header
- Recital 6
106 −Deletion Damian BoeselagerGreens/EFA · ITRE–LIBE Deletes the recital
(6) Similarly, with the iterative regulation of online platforms over the past years, more recent rules have established a clearer and more ambitious framework than some of the predating rules, rendering them obsolete. It is therefore necessary that the legal framework evolves, eliminating any unnecessary duplications that add legal complexity.- Tabled by
- Damian Boeselager on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group
- Group
- Greens/EFA
- Targets
- Digital Omnibus proposal Recital 6
- Document
- ITRE–LIBE amendments 79–250 to the draft report
- Printed header
- Recital 6
107 −Deletion Michael McNamara +4Renew · ITRE–LIBE Deletes the recital
(6) Similarly, with the iterative regulation of online platforms over the past years, more recent rules have established a clearer and more ambitious framework than some of the predating rules, rendering them obsolete. It is therefore necessary that the legal framework evolves, eliminating any unnecessary duplications that add legal complexity.- Tabled by
- Michael McNamara, Irena Joveva, Oihane Agirregoitia Martínez, Veronika Cifrová Ostrihoňová, Christophe Grudler
- Group
- Renew
- Targets
- Digital Omnibus proposal Recital 6
- Document
- ITRE–LIBE amendments 79–250 to the draft report
- Source
- Official text, page 25
- Printed header
- Recital 6
108 ~Alternative Tomas Tobé +2EPP · ITRE–LIBE “In cases where predating rules have been kept, these should be further assessed and analysed whether they still serve a function or whether they can…”
(6) Similarly, with the iterative regulation of online platforms over the past years, more recent rules have established a clearer and more ambitious framework than some of the predating rules, rendering them obsolete. It is therefore necessary that the legal framework evolves, eliminating any unnecessary duplications that add legal complexity. In cases where predating rules have been kept, these should be further assessed and analysed whether they still serve a function or whether they can be withdrawn at a later stage.
- Tabled by
- Tomas Tobé, Arba Kokalari, Jörgen Warborn
- Group
- EPP
- Targets
- Digital Omnibus proposal Recital 6
- Document
- ITRE–LIBE amendments 79–250 to the draft report
- Printed header
- Recital 6
109 ~Alternative Diana Iovanovici ŞoşoacăNI · ITRE–LIBE “and excessive European Union bureaucracy”
(6) Similarly, with the iterative regulation of online platforms over the past years, more recent rules have established a clearer and more ambitious framework than some of the predating rules, rendering them obsolete. It is therefore necessary that the legal framework evolves so as to make robust social provisions, eliminating any unnecessary duplications that add legal complexity and excessive European Union bureaucracy.
- Tabled by
- Diana Iovanovici Şoşoacă
- Group
- NI
- Targets
- Digital Omnibus proposal Recital 6
- Document
- ITRE–LIBE amendments 79–250 to the draft report
- Source
- Official text, page 26
- Printed header
- Recital 6
110 ~Alternative Julie Rechagneux +7ECR, PfE · ITRE–LIBE “The elimination of duplications should not result in the removal of protections whose scope”
(6) Similarly, with the iterative regulation of online platforms over the past years, more recent rules have established a clearer and more ambitious framework than some of the predating rules, without, however, rendering them obsolete.
It is therefore necessary that the legal framework evolves, eliminating any unnecessary duplications that add legal complexity.The elimination of duplications should not result in the removal of protections whose scope is not covered by the more recent rules.- Tabled by
- Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pierre-Romain Thionnet, Alexandre Varaut, Fabrice Leggeri, Marion Maréchal, Christophe Bay
- Group
- ECR, PfE
- Targets
- Digital Omnibus proposal Recital 6
- Document
- ITRE–LIBE amendments 79–250 to the draft report
- Source
- Official text, page 26
- Printed header
- Recital 6
132 −Deletion David CormandGreens/EFA · IMCO Deletes the recital
(6) Similarly, with the iterative regulation of online platforms over the past years, more recent rules have established a clearer and more ambitious framework than some of the predating rules, rendering them obsolete. It is therefore necessary that the legal framework evolves, eliminating any unnecessary duplications that add legal complexity.- Tabled by
- David Cormand on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group
- Group
- Greens/EFA
- Targets
- Digital Omnibus proposal Recital 6
- Document
- IMCO amendments 125–328 to the draft opinion
- Printed header
- Recital 6
133 ~Alternative Arba KokalariEPP · IMCO “In cases where predating rules have been kept, these should be further assessed and analysed whether they still serve a function or whether they can…”
(6) Similarly, with the iterative regulation of online platforms over the past years, more recent rules have established a clearer and more ambitious framework than some of the predating rules, rendering them obsolete. It is therefore necessary that the legal framework evolves, eliminating any unnecessary duplications that add legal complexity. In cases where predating rules have been kept, these should be further assessed and analysed whether they still serve a function or whether they can be withdrawn at a later stage.
- Tabled by
- Arba Kokalari
- Group
- EPP
- Targets
- Digital Omnibus proposal Recital 6
- Document
- IMCO amendments 125–328 to the draft opinion
- Source
- Official text, page 10
- Printed header
- Recital 6