EUTechRegResearch
MenuClose menu
Digital Omnibus legislative tracker
Texts to 22 Oct 2026

Digital Omnibus proposal· Recital 50

Text

Recital 50 Digital Omnibus proposal as printed in the Council text of 22 October 2026

Source Council, 22 October 2026. Recital 50: ST 14756/26, page 53 · exact text page

To ensure the security of national entry points in particular and with a view to designing interoperable national entry points, ENISA should develop non-binding recommendations addressing the appropriate and proportionate technical, operational and organisational measures for Member States to develop, maintain and securely operate their respective national entry point . ENISA should establish a cross-sector working group to develop these recommendations in cooperation with CSIRTs and competent authorities under the relevant Union legal acts, making use of existing cooperation groups and networks of Member States established under these acts, with a view draft the technical, operational and organisational measures necessary to establish, maintain and securely operate the national entry point .

How the recitals changed

Each text against the text before it

Recital Commission19 Nov 2025Rec 50Council21 May 2026Rec 50–50bCouncil10 Jun 2026Rec 50–50bCouncil18 Jun 2026Rec 50–50cCouncil3 Sep 2026Rec 50–50cCouncil2 Oct 2026Rec 50–50cCouncil22 Oct 2026Rec 50–50c
Compared withlaw in forcethe proposal21 May text10 Jun text18 Jun text3 Sep text2 Oct text
Recital 50 50 Added 50 Changed 50 Changed 50 Changed 50 Unchanged 50 Unchanged 50 Unchanged
Recital 50a In neither text 50a Added 50a Changed 50a Changed 50a Unchanged 50a Unchanged 50a Unchanged
Recital 50b In neither text In neither text In neither text 50b Added 50b Unchanged 50b Unchanged 50b Unchanged
Recital 50c In neither text 50b Added 50b Changed 50c Unchanged 50c Unchanged 50c Unchanged 50c Unchanged

Each text against the text before it: +Added in this text, not in the text before~Changed wording changed=Unchanged same as the text before— in neither text

Parliament amendments propose other recitals under these numbers: Recital 50a (new).

Renumbering and wording

10 June to 18 June 2026

ST 10677/26 renumbers the 10 June recital 50b as 50c and adds a new recital 50b.

18 June recitalRenumbered fromWording
50 10 June 50same number Changed from 10 June recital 50
50a 10 June 50asame number Changed from 10 June recital 50a
50b no earlier recital New in this text
50c 10 June 50brenumbered in this text Same wording as 10 June recital 50b

Parliament amendments

5 amendments to this recital

5 propose alternative wording.

By political group; co-sponsored amendments count for each group
TypeS&DRenewECRPfENIRapporteur
~ Alternative111111

By political group

  • ~ Alternative S&D 1 Renew 1 ECR 1 PfE 1 NI 1 Rapporteur 1
  1. 25 Alternative Alex Agius Saliba (rapporteur)Rapporteur · IMCO “and take utmost account of feedback from”

    (50) To ensure the security of the single-entry point, ENISA should take appropriate and proportionate technical, operational and organisational measures to manage the risks posed to the security of the single-entry point and the information submitted or disseminated via the single-entry point. When assessing the risk, and the appropriateness and proportionality of those measures, ENISA should take into account the sensitivity of information submitted or disseminated pursuant to the relevant Union legal acts. ENISA should consult and take utmost account of feedback from competent authorities under the relevant Union legal acts when drafting the technical, operational and organisational measures necessary to establish, maintain and securely operate the single-entry point by making use of existing cooperation groups and networks of Member States established under these acts.

    Rapporteur
    Alex Agius Saliba
    Group
    Rapporteur
    Targets
    Digital Omnibus proposal Recital 50
    Document
    IMCO draft opinion
    Printed header
    Recital 50
  2. 498 Alternative Bart Groothuis +7Renew · ITRE–LIBE “ENISA’s role in the reporting process is limited to establishing and operating the single-entry point portal and routing reports to the competent…”

    (50) To ensure the security of the single-entry point, ENISA should take appropriate and proportionate technical, operational and organisational measures to manage the risks posed to the security of the single-entry point and the information submitted or disseminated via the single-entry point. When assessing the risk, and the appropriateness and proportionality of those measures, ENISA should take into account the sensitivity of information submitted or disseminated pursuant to the relevant Union legal acts. ENISA should consult competent authorities under the relevant Union legal acts when drafting the technical, operational and organisational measures necessary to establish, maintain and securely operate the single-entry point by making use of existing cooperation groups and networks of Member States established under these acts. ENISA’s role in the reporting process is limited to establishing and operating the single-entry point portal and routing reports to the competent CSIRT(s) without having access to the content of incident reports. Responsibility for the management and follow-up of incident reports remains with the national CSIRTs or competent authorities to which ENISA directs them.

    Tabled by
    Bart Groothuis, Ivars Ijabs, Morten Løkkegaard, Nikola Minchev, Svenja Hahn, Andreas Glück, João Cotrim De Figueiredo, Ana Vasconcelos
    Group
    Renew
    Targets
    Digital Omnibus proposal Recital 50
    Document
    ITRE–LIBE amendments 401–526 to the draft report
    Printed header
    Recital 50
  3. 499 Alternative Diana Iovanovici ŞoşoacăNI · ITRE–LIBE “as well as providing for potential penalties in the event of failure to comply with the provisions on data protection and the potential dissemination…”

    (50) To ensure the security of the single-entry point, ENISA should take appropriate and proportionate technical, operational and organisational measures to manage the risks posed to the security of the single-entry point and the information submitted or disseminated via the single-entry point, including measures to protect against cyberattacks. When assessing the risk, and the appropriateness and proportionality of those measures, ENISA should take into account the sensitivity of information submitted or disseminated pursuant to the relevant Union legal acts. ENISA should consult competent authorities under the relevant Union legal acts when drafting the technical, operational and organisational measures necessary to establish, maintain and securely operate the single-entry point by making use of existing cooperation groups and networks of Member States established under these acts, as well as providing for potential penalties in the event of failure to comply with the provisions on data protection and the potential dissemination of personal data without the consent of the persons in question.

    Tabled by
    Diana Iovanovici Şoşoacă
    Group
    NI
    Targets
    Digital Omnibus proposal Recital 50
    Document
    ITRE–LIBE amendments 401–526 to the draft report
    Printed header
    Recital 50
  4. 500 Alternative Julie Rechagneux +8ECR, PfE · ITRE–LIBE “To ensure the security of the layered single-entry points structure, ENISA should take appropriate and proportionate technical, operational and…”

    (50) To ensure the security of the layered single-entry pointpoints structure, ENISA should take appropriate and proportionate technical, operational and organisational measures to manage the risks posed to the security of the EU and national single-entry pointpoints and the information submitted or disseminated via the national single-entry points to the EU entry point. When assessing the risk, and the appropriateness and proportionality of those measures, ENISA should take into account the sensitivity of information submitted or disseminated pursuant to the relevant Union legal acts. ENISA should consult competent authorities under the relevant Union legal acts when drafting the technical, operational and organisational measures necessary to establish, maintain and securely operate the layered single-entry pointpoints structure by making use of existing cooperation groups and networks of Member States established under these acts.

    Tabled by
    Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Aleksandar Nikolic, Ewa Zajączkowska-Hernik, Pierre-Romain Thionnet, Alexandre Varaut, Fabrice Leggeri, Marion Maréchal, Christophe Bay
    Group
    ECR, PfE
    Targets
    Digital Omnibus proposal Recital 50
    Document
    ITRE–LIBE amendments 401–526 to the draft report
    Printed header
    Recital 50
  5. 501 Alternative Elena Sancho Murillo +7S&D · ITRE–LIBE “and take utmost account of feedback from”

    (50) To ensure the security of the single-entry point, ENISA should take appropriate and proportionate technical, operational and organisational measures to manage the risks posed to the security of the single-entry point and the information submitted or disseminated via the single-entry point. When assessing the risk, and the appropriateness and proportionality of those measures, ENISA should take into account the sensitivity of information submitted or disseminated pursuant to the relevant Union legal acts. ENISA should consult and take utmost account of feedback from competent authorities under the relevant Union legal acts when drafting the technical, operational and organisational measures necessary to establish, maintain and securely operate the single-entry point by making use of existing cooperation groups and networks of Member States established under these acts.

    Tabled by
    Elena Sancho Murillo, Marina Kaljurand, Brando Benifei, José Cepeda, Matthias Ecke, Lina Gálvez, Francisco Assis, Alex Agius Saliba
    Group
    S&D
    Targets
    Digital Omnibus proposal Recital 50
    Document
    ITRE–LIBE amendments 401–526 to the draft report
    Printed header
    Recital 50