Digital Omnibus proposal — Recital 50a

Recital total: 1 part · 4 Council drafts · 1 Parliament amendment

Tracked part

Removed wording is struck through; added or replacement wording is highlighted.

Institutional text

European Commission proposal

The wording proposed by the Commission at the start of this legislative file.

No standalone Commission wording is mapped to these tracked parts. A newly proposed provision may have no earlier text of its own.

Institutional text

Council Presidency texts

Successive Presidency compromise texts. Their inclusion does not imply agreement or adoption.

Council document

Recital 50a

May Presidency compromise

The term 'national entry point' should be understood as a national infrastructure or arrangement, which may take the form of a digital interface, platform or technical interoperability hub, established and maintained by the Member State, enabling entities to fulfil their incident notification obligations across multiple regulatory frameworks through a single notification at national level which will reach all competent authorities. Member States should retain flexibility to configure such infrastructure or arrangement in accordance with their specific needs, notably their national infrastructures and the allocation of competences among authorities, including by connecting existing systems and enabling the sharing, routing or distribution of relevant information where needed. The creation of the national entry point does not necessarily interfere with the allocation of functions among competent authorities within each national system.

Recital 50a 4 Council drafts

Recital 50a

21 May 2026 · May Presidency compromise

Recital 50a

10 June 2026 · June Presidency compromise · 10 June

The term 'national entry point' should be understood as a national infrastructure or arrangement, which may take the form of an online digital interface, platform or technical interoperability hub, established and maintained by the Member State, supporting entities to fulfil their incident notification obligations across multiple regulatory frameworks through a single notification at national level which will reach all competent authorities, CSIRTs and/or other designated authorities. Member States should retain flexibility to configure such infrastructure or arrangement in accordance with their specific needs, notably their national infrastructures and the allocation of competences among CSIRT’s and competent and/or other designated authorities, including by connecting existing systems and enabling the sharing, routing or distribution of relevant information where needed. The creation of the national entry point does not necessarily interfere with the allocation of functions among competent authorities, CSIRT’s and/or other designated authorities within each national system.

Recital 50a

18 June 2026 · June Presidency compromise · 18 June

The term 'national entry point' should be understood as a national infrastructure or arrangement, which may take the form of an online digital interface, platform or technical interoperability hub, established and maintained by the Member State, supporting entities to fulfil their incident notification obligations across multiple regulatory frameworks through notifications at national level which will reach all competent authorities, CSIRTs and/or other designated authorities. Member States should retain flexibility to configure such infrastructure or arrangement in accordance with their specific needs, notably their national infrastructures and the allocation of competences among CSIRT’s and competent and/or other designated authorities, including by connecting existing systems and enabling the sharing, routing or distribution of relevant information where needed. The creation of the national entry point does not necessarily interfere with the allocation of functions among competent authorities, CSIRT’s and/or other designated authorities within each national system.

Recital 50a

3 September 2026 · September Presidency compromise

The term 'national entry point' should be understood as a national infrastructure or arrangement, which may take the form of an online digital interface, platform or technical interoperability hub, established and maintained by the Member State, supporting entities to fulfil their incident notification obligations across multiple regulatory frameworks through notifications at national level which will reach all competent authorities, CSIRTs and/or other designated authorities. Member States should retain flexibility to configure such infrastructure or arrangement in accordance with their specific needs, notably their national infrastructures and the allocation of competences among CSIRT’s and competent and/or other designated authorities, including by connecting existing systems and enabling the sharing, routing or distribution of relevant information where needed. The creation of the national entry point does not necessarily interfere with the allocation of functions among competent authorities, CSIRT’s and/or other designated authorities within each national system.

Competing proposals

European Parliament amendments

These are alternative tabled amendments. An amendment affecting several tracked parts appears once here, with each target identified.

Search amendments

Additional proposed wording Amendment 502 ITRE · LIBE

(50a)

A layered architecture also strengthens the security and resilience of incident reporting. By limiting the concentration of sensitive information within a single body and by relying on the involvement of national authorities, such an architecture reduces the systemic risk associated with a single point of failure. To that end, and consistently with the fact that ENISA should not, as a rule, have access to the notifications submitted through the single-entry point, the security measures referred to in this Regulation should ensure the confidentiality and integrity of information in transit between reporting entities and the competent national authorities. The EU entry point should become operational for a given Union legal act only after the Member States have assessed and confirmed that it meets those requirements and is interoperable with the national reporting arrangements. Member States should not be required to dismantle or replace functioning national reporting systems, nor to bear disproportionate adaptation costs.

Justification

Conditions the deployment of the single entry point on prior verification of its interoperability by the Member States, and rules out any obligation to dismantle functioning national systems.

Selected texts

Compare wording

Choose a tracked part and a named pair of texts. Comparisons are offered only where both sides cover the same legal unit.

Select a specific tracked part above to compare wording.

Recital 50a

Council Presidency text · ST 9547/26 → Council Presidency text · ST 10426/26

Changes in context

The term 'national entry point' should be understood as a national infrastructure or arrangement, which may take the form of aan online digital interface, platform or technical interoperability hub, established and maintained by the Member State, ~~enabling~~supporting entities to fulfil their incident notification obligations across multiple regulatory frameworks through a single notification at national level which will reach all competent authorities, CSIRTs and/or other designated authorities. Member States should retain flexibility to configure such infrastructure or arrangement in accordance with their specific needs, notably their national infrastructures and the allocation of competences among CSIRT’s and competent and/or other designated authorities, including by connecting existing systems and enabling the sharing, routing or distribution of relevant information where needed. The creation of the national entry point does not necessarily interfere with the allocation of functions among competent authorities, CSIRT’s and/or other designated authorities within each national system.

RemovedAdded

Both texts in full

Council Presidency text · ST 9547/26

Council Presidency text · ST 10426/26

Recital 50a

Council Presidency text · ST 10426/26 → Council Presidency text · ST 10677/26

Changes in context

The term 'national entry point' should be understood as a national infrastructure or arrangement, which may take the form of an online digital interface, platform or technical interoperability hub, established and maintained by the Member State, supporting entities to fulfil their incident notification obligations across multiple regulatory frameworks through ~~a single notification~~notifications at national level which will reach all competent authorities, CSIRTs and/or other designated authorities. Member States should retain flexibility to configure such infrastructure or arrangement in accordance with their specific needs, notably their national infrastructures and the allocation of competences among CSIRT’s and competent and/or other designated authorities, including by connecting existing systems and enabling the sharing, routing or distribution of relevant information where needed. The creation of the national entry point does not necessarily interfere with the allocation of functions among competent authorities, CSIRT’s and/or other designated authorities within each national system.

RemovedAdded

Both texts in full

Council Presidency text · ST 10426/26

Council Presidency text · ST 10677/26

The term 'national entry point' should be understood as a national infrastructure or arrangement, which may take the form of an online digital interface, platform or technical interoperability hub, established and maintained by the Member State, supporting entities to fulfil their incident notification obligations across multiple regulatory frameworks through notifications at national level which will reach all competent authorities, CSIRTs and/or other designated authorities. Member States should retain flexibility to configure such infrastructure or arrangement in accordance with their specific needs, notably their national infrastructures and the allocation of competences among CSIRT’s and competent and/or other designated authorities, including by connecting existing systems and enabling the sharing, routing or distribution of relevant information where needed. The creation of the national entry point does not necessarily interfere with the allocation of functions among competent authorities, CSIRT’s and/or other designated authorities within each national system.

Recital 50a

Council Presidency text · ST 10677/26 → Council Presidency text · ST 12535/26

Changes in context

The term 'national entry point' should be understood as a national infrastructure or arrangement, which may take the form of an online digital interface, platform or technical interoperability hub, established and maintained by the Member State, supporting entities to fulfil their incident notification obligations across multiple regulatory frameworks through notifications at national level which will reach all competent authorities, CSIRTs and/or other designated authorities. Member States should retain flexibility to configure such infrastructure or arrangement in accordance with their specific needs, notably their national infrastructures and the allocation of competences among CSIRT’s and competent and/or other designated authorities, including by connecting existing systems and enabling the sharing, routing or distribution of relevant information where needed. The creation of the national entry point does not necessarily interfere with the allocation of functions among competent authorities, CSIRT’s and/or other designated authorities within each national system.

RemovedAdded

Both texts in full

Council Presidency text · ST 10677/26

The term 'national entry point' should be understood as a national infrastructure or arrangement, which may take the form of an online digital interface, platform or technical interoperability hub, established and maintained by the Member State, supporting entities to fulfil their incident notification obligations across multiple regulatory frameworks through notifications at national level which will reach all competent authorities, CSIRTs and/or other designated authorities. Member States should retain flexibility to configure such infrastructure or arrangement in accordance with their specific needs, notably their national infrastructures and the allocation of competences among CSIRT’s and competent and/or other designated authorities, including by connecting existing systems and enabling the sharing, routing or distribution of relevant information where needed. The creation of the national entry point does not necessarily interfere with the allocation of functions among competent authorities, CSIRT’s and/or other designated authorities within each national system.

Council Presidency text · ST 12535/26

The term 'national entry point' should be understood as a national infrastructure or arrangement, which may take the form of an online digital interface, platform or technical interoperability hub, established and maintained by the Member State, supporting entities to fulfil their incident notification obligations across multiple regulatory frameworks through notifications at national level which will reach all competent authorities, CSIRTs and/or other designated authorities. Member States should retain flexibility to configure such infrastructure or arrangement in accordance with their specific needs, notably their national infrastructures and the allocation of competences among CSIRT’s and competent and/or other designated authorities, including by connecting existing systems and enabling the sharing, routing or distribution of relevant information where needed. The creation of the national entry point does not necessarily interfere with the allocation of functions among competent authorities, CSIRT’s and/or other designated authorities within each national system.