EUTechRegResearch
MenuClose menu
Digital Omnibus legislative tracker
Texts to 22 Oct 2026

Digital Omnibus proposal· Recital 43

Text

Recital 43 Digital Omnibus proposal as printed in the Council text of 22 October 2026

Source Council, 22 October 2026. Recital 43: ST 14756/26, page 44 · exact text page

Dropped

How the recitals changed

Each text against the text before it

Recital Commission19 Nov 2025Rec 43Council21 May 2026Rec 43aCouncil10 Jun 2026Rec 43aCouncil18 Jun 2026Rec 43aCouncil3 Sep 2026Rec 43aCouncil2 Oct 2026Rec 43–43aCouncil22 Oct 2026Rec 43–43a
Compared withlaw in forcethe proposal21 May text10 Jun text18 Jun text3 Sep text2 Oct text
Recital 43 43 Added In neither text In neither text In neither text In neither text 43 Dropped 43 Dropped
Recital 43a In neither text 43a Added Wording moved 43a Unchanged 43a Unchanged 43a Unchanged 43a Unchanged 43a Unchanged

Each text against the text before it: +Added in this text, not in the text before−Dropped drops a provision the text before added=Unchanged same as the text before— in neither text

Wording moved the wording comes from a different earlier recital

Parliament amendments propose other recitals under these numbers: Recital 43a (new), Recital 43b (new), Recital 43c (new), Recital 43d (new), Recital 43e (new), Recital 43f (new), Recital 43g (new), Recital 43h (new), Recital 43i (new), Recital 43j (new), Recital 43k (new), Recital 43l (new), Recital 43m (new), Recital 43n (new), Recital 43o (new), Recital 43p (new), Recital 43q (new) and Recital 43r (new).

Parliament amendments

2 amendments to this recital

1 amendment would delete the whole recital: the ITRE–LIBE rapporteur.

By political group; co-sponsored amendments count for each group
TypeEPPRapporteur
− Deletion·1
~ Alternative1·

By political group

  • − Deletion Rapporteur 1
  • ~ Alternative EPP 1

Show

  1. 10 Deletion Aura Salla and Marina Kaljurand (rapporteurs)Rapporteurs · ITRE–LIBE Deletes the recital

    (43) In order to provide a strong and coherent data protection framework in the Union, the necessary adaptations of Directive (EU) 2016/680 and any other Union legal act applicable to such processing of personal data should follow after the adoption of this regulation, in order to allow for their application as close as possible to the entry into application of the amendments to Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Regulation (EU) 2018/1725.

    Rapporteurs
    Aura Salla and Marina Kaljurand
    Group
    Rapporteurs
    Targets
    Digital Omnibus proposal Recital 43
    Document
    ITRE–LIBE draft report
    Printed header
    Recital 43
  2. 401 Alternative Lena Düpont +1EPP · ITRE–LIBE “Any following adaption of Directive (EU) 2016/680 should not impair the ability of competent authorities to process personal data collected in the…”

    (43) In order to provide a strong and coherent data protection framework in the Union, the necessary adaptations of Directive (EU) 2016/680 and any other Union legal act applicable to such processing of personal data should follow after the adoption of this regulation, in order to allow for their application as close as possible to the entry into application of the amendments to Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Regulation (EU) 2018/1725. Any following adaption of Directive (EU) 2016/680 should not impair the ability of competent authorities to process personal data collected in the context of the prevention, investigation, detection or prosecution of specific criminal offences in order to develop an understanding of criminal activities and to make links between different criminal offences detected. Moreover, any concurrent adaptation of Regulation (EU) 2018/1725 shall not impair the processing of personal data for the purpose of preventing threats to public security, internal security of Union institutions and bodies, or other important objectives of general public interest of the Union or of a Member State, in particular the objectives of the Common Foreign and Security Policy of the Union or an important economic or financial interest of the Union or of a Member State.

    Tabled by
    Lena Düpont, Oliver Schenk
    Group
    EPP
    Targets
    Digital Omnibus proposal Recital 43
    Document
    ITRE–LIBE amendments 401–526 to the draft report
    Printed header
    Recital 43