Texts to 22 Oct 2026

Digital Omnibus proposal· Recital 20

Text

Recital 20 Digital Omnibus proposal as printed in the Council text of 22 October 2026

Source Council, 22 October 2026. Recital 20: ST 14756/26, page 14 · exact text page

The concept of ‘public security’, within the meaning of Article 52 TFEU and as interpreted by the Court of Justice, covers both the internal and external security of a Member State, as well as issues of public safety, in order, in particular, to facilitate the investigation, detection and prosecution of criminal offences. It presupposes the existence of a genuine and sufficiently serious threat affecting one of the fundamental interests of society, such as a threat to the functioning of institutions and essential public services and the survival of the population, as well as the risk of a serious disturbance to foreign relations or the peaceful coexistence of nations, or a risk to military interests. In compliance with the principle of proportionality, data localisation requirements that are justified on grounds of public security should be suitable for attaining the objective pursued, and should not go beyond what is necessary to attain that objective.

How the recital changed

Each text against the text before it

Recital Commission19 Nov 2025Rec 20Council21 May 2026Council10 Jun 2026Rec 20Council18 Jun 2026Rec 20Council3 Sep 2026Rec 20Council2 Oct 2026Rec 20Council22 Oct 2026Rec 20
Compared withlaw in forcethe proposal21 May text10 Jun text18 Jun text3 Sep text2 Oct text
Recital 20 20 Added In neither text 20 Unchanged 20 Unchanged 20 Unchanged 20 Unchanged 20 Unchanged

Each text against the text before it: +Added in this text, not in the text before=Unchanged same as the text before— in neither text

Parliament amendments propose other recitals under these numbers: Recital 20a (new).

Parliament amendments

2 amendments to this recital

1 amendment would delete the whole recital: members of The Left.

By political group; co-sponsored amendments count for each group
TypeThe LeftNI
− Deletion1·
~ Alternative·1

By political group

  • − Deletion The Left 1
  • ~ Alternative NI 1

Show

  1. 172 Deletion João OliveiraThe Left · ITRE–LIBE Deletes the recital

    (20) The concept of ‘public security’, within the meaning of Article 52 TFEU and as interpreted by the Court of Justice, covers both the internal and external security of a Member State, as well as issues of public safety, in order, in particular, to facilitate the investigation, detection and prosecution of criminal offences. It presupposes the existence of a genuine and sufficiently serious threat affecting one of the fundamental interests of society, such as a threat to the functioning of institutions and essential public services and the survival of the population, as well as the risk of a serious disturbance to foreign relations or the peaceful coexistence of nations, or a risk to military interests. In compliance with the principle of proportionality, data localisation requirements that are justified on grounds of public security should be suitable for attaining the objective pursued, and should not go beyond what is necessary to attain that objective.

    Tabled by
    João Oliveira
    Group
    The Left
    Targets
    Digital Omnibus proposal Recital 20
    Document
    ITRE–LIBE amendments 79–250 to the draft report
    Printed header
    Recital 20
  2. 173 Alternative Diana Iovanovici ŞoşoacăNI · ITRE–LIBE “Therefore, Member States may not impose data localisation requirements in a generalised or preventive manner, but only insofar as they are justified…”

    (20) The concept of ‘public security’, within the meaning of Article 52 TFEU and as interpreted by the Court of Justice, covers both the internal and external security of a Member State, as well as issues of public safety, in order, in particular, to facilitate the investigation, detection and prosecution of criminal offences. It presupposes the existence of a genuine and sufficiently serious threat affecting one of the fundamental interests of society, such as a threat to the functioning of institutions and essential public services and the survival of the population, as well as the risk of a serious disturbance to foreign relations or the peaceful coexistence of nations, or a risk to military interests. In compliance with the principle of proportionality, data localisation requirements that are justified on grounds of public security should be suitable for attaining the objective pursued, and should not go beyond what is necessary to attain that objective. Therefore, Member States may not impose data localisation requirements in a generalised or preventive manner, but only insofar as they are justified by an essential public interest and accompanied by appropriate safeguards against any unjustified restrictions of the free movement of data within the European Union. Any measure of this kind must be necessary, proportionate, non-discriminatory, subject to judicial review, and compatible with Union law, including the fundamental freedoms enshrined in the Treaties. In this context, Regulation (EU) 2023/2854 aims to prevent misuse of data localisation requirements as barriers to the internal market, while also promoting the free movement of data and cross-border access to them. Exceptions based on grounds of public safety must be interpreted restrictively and applied only in exceptional situations where the competent authorities can demonstrate a genuine and sufficiently serious risk to a fundamental interest of society. The Regulation thus seeks to strike a balance between protecting the essential interests of Member States and developing a single European data market based on trust, interoperability and legal certainty.

    Tabled by
    Diana Iovanovici Şoşoacă
    Group
    NI
    Targets
    Digital Omnibus proposal Recital 20
    Document
    ITRE–LIBE amendments 79–250 to the draft report
    Printed header
    Recital 20