Texts to 22 Oct 2026

Amendment 173· Digital Omnibus proposal Recital 20

Alternative

Tabled by
Diana Iovanovici Şoşoacă (NI)
Committee and document
ITRE–LIBE·amendments 79–250 to the draft report (CJ72-AM-786820, PE786.820v01-00)·27 July 2026
Source
Official text, pp. 95–96·printed header: Recital 20
Targets
Recital 20 of the Digital Omnibus proposal

Text of the amendment

As tabled

Wordingagainst the Commission’s

(20) The concept of ‘public security’, within the meaning of Article 52 TFEU and as interpreted by the Court of Justice, covers both the internal and external security of a Member State, as well as issues of public safety, in order, in particular, to facilitate the investigation, detection and prosecution of criminal offences. It presupposes the existence of a genuine and sufficiently serious threat affecting one of the fundamental interests of society, such as a threat to the functioning of institutions and essential public services and the survival of the population, as well as the risk of a serious disturbance to foreign relations or the peaceful coexistence of nations, or a risk to military interests. In compliance with the principle of proportionality, data localisation requirements that are justified on grounds of public security should be suitable for attaining the objective pursued, and should not go beyond what is necessary to attain that objective. Therefore, Member States may not impose data localisation requirements in a generalised or preventive manner, but only insofar as they are justified by an essential public interest and accompanied by appropriate safeguards against any unjustified restrictions of the free movement of data within the European Union. Any measure of this kind must be necessary, proportionate, non-discriminatory, subject to judicial review, and compatible with Union law, including the fundamental freedoms enshrined in the Treaties. In this context, Regulation (EU) 2023/2854 aims to prevent misuse of data localisation requirements as barriers to the internal market, while also promoting the free movement of data and cross-border access to them. Exceptions based on grounds of public safety must be interpreted restrictively and applied only in exceptional situations where the competent authorities can demonstrate a genuine and sufficiently serious risk to a fundamental interest of society. The Regulation thus seeks to strike a balance between protecting the essential interests of Member States and developing a single European data market based on trust, interoperability and legal certainty.

Struck CommissionHighlighted amendment

Target

Wording of the targeted provisionlaw in force, Commission proposal, latest Council text

Commission proposalCOM(2025) 837

The concept of ‘public security’, within the meaning of Article 52 TFEU and as interpreted by the Court of Justice, covers both the internal and external security of a Member State, as well as issues of public safety, in order, in particular, to facilitate the investigation, detection and prosecution of criminal offences. It presupposes the existence of a genuine and sufficiently serious threat affecting one of the fundamental interests of society, such as a threat to the functioning of institutions and essential public services and the survival of the population, as well as the risk of a serious disturbance to foreign relations or the peaceful coexistence of nations, or a risk to military interests. In compliance with the principle of proportionality, data localisation requirements that are justified on grounds of public security should be suitable for attaining the objective pursued, and should not go beyond what is necessary to attain that objective.

Council text of 22 October 2026ST 14756/26

The concept of ‘public security’, within the meaning of Article 52 TFEU and as interpreted by the Court of Justice, covers both the internal and external security of a Member State, as well as issues of public safety, in order, in particular, to facilitate the investigation, detection and prosecution of criminal offences. It presupposes the existence of a genuine and sufficiently serious threat affecting one of the fundamental interests of society, such as a threat to the functioning of institutions and essential public services and the survival of the population, as well as the risk of a serious disturbance to foreign relations or the peaceful coexistence of nations, or a risk to military interests. In compliance with the principle of proportionality, data localisation requirements that are justified on grounds of public security should be suitable for attaining the objective pursued, and should not go beyond what is necessary to attain that objective.

Cite this amendment

Amendment 173 (Diana Iovanovici Şoşoacă), European Parliament, Committee on Industry, Research and Energy and Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs, amendments 79–250 to the draft report on COM(2025) 837 (CJ72-AM-786820, PE786.820v01-00, 27 July 2026), pp. 95–96

Link, short form and official text
Reference

Amendment 173 (Diana Iovanovici Şoşoacă), European Parliament, Committee on Industry, Research and Energy and Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs, amendments 79–250 to the draft report on COM(2025) 837 (CJ72-AM-786820, PE786.820v01-00, 27 July 2026), pp. 95–96

Short form

ITRE–LIBE Amendment 173 (CJ72-AM-786820), p. 95

Entry in the source list