Texts to 22 Oct 2026

Amendment 105· Digital Omnibus proposal Recital 24

Alternative

Tabled by
Victor Negrescu (S&D)
Committee and document
JURI·amendments 69–296 to the draft opinion (JURI-AM-790236, PE790.236v01-00)·29 June 2026
Source
Official text, p. 37·printed header: Recital 24
Targets
Recital 24 of the Digital Omnibus proposal

Text of the amendment

As tabled

Wordingagainst the Commission’s

(24) The existing rules should be streamlined to enhance clarity and consistency. Nevertheless, the two reuse regimes should remain distinct and their respective scope of application should continue to depend on the characteristics of the data or documents and the context of their reuse. Public sector bodies should apply the open data regime whenever possible and give priority to making data and documents available in machine-readable, open and interoperable formats, on a non-discriminatory basis and under standard open licences, where appropriate. Only where they determine that data or a document contains information corresponding to certain categories of protected data should they limit its public availability and consider making it available for reuse as protected data under proportionate conditions that are strictly necessary to protect those interests.

Struck CommissionHighlighted amendment

Target

Wording of the targeted provisionlaw in force, Commission proposal, latest Council text

Commission proposalCOM(2025) 837

The existing rules should be streamlined to enhance clarity and consistency. Nevertheless, the two reuse regimes should remain distinct and their respective scope of application should continue to depend on the characteristics of the data or documents and the context of their reuse. Public sector bodies should apply the open data regime whenever possible. Only where they determine that data or a document contains information corresponding to certain categories of protected data should they limit its public availability and consider making it available for reuse as protected data.

Council text of 22 October 2026ST 14756/26

The existing rules should be streamlined to enhance clarity and consistency. Nevertheless, the two reuse regimes should remain distinct and their respective scope of application should continue to depend on the characteristics of the data or documents and the context of their reuse. Public sector bodies should apply the open data regime whenever possible. Only where they determine that data contains information corresponding to certain categories of protected data, should they limit its public availability and consider making it available for reuse as protected data.

Cite this amendment

Amendment 105 (Victor Negrescu), European Parliament, Committee on Legal Affairs, amendments 69–296 to the draft opinion on COM(2025) 837 (JURI-AM-790236, PE790.236v01-00, 29 June 2026), p. 37

Link, short form and official text
Reference

Amendment 105 (Victor Negrescu), European Parliament, Committee on Legal Affairs, amendments 69–296 to the draft opinion on COM(2025) 837 (JURI-AM-790236, PE790.236v01-00, 29 June 2026), p. 37

Short form

JURI Amendment 105 (JURI-AM-790236), p. 37

Entry in the source list