Texts to 22 Oct 2026

Amendment 184· Digital Omnibus proposal Recital 24

Alternative

Tabled by
Diana Iovanovici Şoşoacă (NI)
Committee and document
ITRE–LIBE·amendments 79–250 to the draft report (CJ72-AM-786820, PE786.820v01-00)·27 July 2026
Source
Official text, p. 103·printed header: Recital 24
Targets
Recital 24 of the Digital Omnibus proposal

Text of the amendment

As tabled

Wordingagainst the Commission’s

(24) The existing rules should be streamlined to enhance clarity and consistency. Nevertheless, the two reuse regimes should remain distinct and their respective scope of application should continue to depend on the characteristics of the data or documents and the context of their reuse. Public sector bodies should apply the open data regime whenever possible, while also ensuring legal certainty and uniform application of the relevant rules. Only where they determine that data or a document contains information corresponding to certain categories of protected data should they limit its public availability and consider making it available for reuse as protected data.

Struck CommissionHighlighted amendment

Target

Wording of the targeted provisionlaw in force, Commission proposal, latest Council text

Commission proposalCOM(2025) 837

The existing rules should be streamlined to enhance clarity and consistency. Nevertheless, the two reuse regimes should remain distinct and their respective scope of application should continue to depend on the characteristics of the data or documents and the context of their reuse. Public sector bodies should apply the open data regime whenever possible. Only where they determine that data or a document contains information corresponding to certain categories of protected data should they limit its public availability and consider making it available for reuse as protected data.

Council text of 22 October 2026ST 14756/26

The existing rules should be streamlined to enhance clarity and consistency. Nevertheless, the two reuse regimes should remain distinct and their respective scope of application should continue to depend on the characteristics of the data or documents and the context of their reuse. Public sector bodies should apply the open data regime whenever possible. Only where they determine that data contains information corresponding to certain categories of protected data, should they limit its public availability and consider making it available for reuse as protected data.

Cite this amendment

Amendment 184 (Diana Iovanovici Şoşoacă), European Parliament, Committee on Industry, Research and Energy and Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs, amendments 79–250 to the draft report on COM(2025) 837 (CJ72-AM-786820, PE786.820v01-00, 27 July 2026), p. 103

Link, short form and official text
Reference

Amendment 184 (Diana Iovanovici Şoşoacă), European Parliament, Committee on Industry, Research and Energy and Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs, amendments 79–250 to the draft report on COM(2025) 837 (CJ72-AM-786820, PE786.820v01-00, 27 July 2026), p. 103

Short form

ITRE–LIBE Amendment 184 (CJ72-AM-786820), p. 103

Entry in the source list