EU KIDS Act / Articles / Article 32 — Existing accounts CHAPTER V – AGE ASSURANCE
Section II – Specific obligations on age assurance
Article 32 Existing accounts 1. For the purposes of establishing, in accordance with Article 6(4), whether an existing account belongs to a recipient below the age of 15 years, providers referred to in Article 6(1) shall rely on an age verification solution referred to in Article 30(2).
2. By way of derogation from paragraph 1 of this Article, providers referred to in that paragraph shall not be required to carry out age verification where they can establish, with a high degree of confidence, that the recipient of the service has reached the minimum age set out in Article 6.
3. By way of derogation from Article 8(1), providers falling within the scope of that Article and providers of software application stores shall not be required to assess the age of the recipient where they can establish, with a high degree of confidence that the recipient of the services is not a minor .
4. Providers of very large online platforms designated in accordance with Article 33 of Regulation (EU) 2022/2065 that fall within the scope of this Article, shall submit a plan to the competent authority specifying how they intend to comply with paragraph 1 and Article 8(1) and, in case they intend to rely on the exceptions laid down in paragraphs 2 and 3, how they intend to establish that the recipient of the service or the user of the system has reached the minimum age, in accordance with those paragraphs.
Refers to (3) Source-reference notes (1) References are retained as printed.
Article 32(1) → Article 30(2) — The reference to an age-verification solution points to the implementing-power provision; the reference is retained as printed. Commission context
Commission memorandum Age assurance — specific obligations This passage covers Articles 29–32, not only this provision.
Quotation · Explanatory memorandum — COM(2026) 681 final
Section 2 complements this with specific obligations for age assurance, setting out that for the purpose of compliance with Articles 5 and 6, providers should put in place age verification, and for the purpose of compliance with Chapter III they may use both age verification and other age assurance solutions under specific conditions (Article 29), complemented by an empowerment for the Commission to specify details set out in the age assurance Chapter (Article 30). Furthermore, this section requires Member States to take the necessary measures to ensure the availability of different means of obtaining a proof of age attestation to verify the minimum age and to make available at least one age verification solution (Article 31). Finally, this section contains measures on age verification for existing accounts (Article 32).
Source wording and references are reproduced as published; the memorandum does not replace the operative text.
Section 5 · Detailed explanation of the specific provisions
Read official Commission context ↗ Commission analysis of impacts Age assurance and parental responsibility Editorially associated policy context. This passage covers a group of measures, not a transcription or interpretation of this article alone.
Quotation · SWD(2026) 681 final — Analysis of impacts
The implementation of access delays and of safety by design rules requires robust and effective age assurance systems. In line with Recommendation 2 of Chapter 3 of the Report of the Co-Chairs of the Special Panel, the proposed Regulation establishes clear criteria and safeguards for the use and deployment of such systems, ensuring proportionality, data protection and non-discrimination.
The proposed Regulation requires age verification and age assurance for three reasons. First, the access delay requires age verification before account creation for certain social networking and video-sharing services. In this case, providers should exclusively on an EU Age Verification Solution using and EU proof of age attestation, in accordance with the EU Age Verification Scheme. Second, the safety by design obligations may require age assurance to enable settings and features reserved for adults. For instance, a platform may prompt adult users to prove that they are not a minor activate recommender systems drawing primarily on engagement-based signals, to get access to information that may pose a risk to minors when encountered repeatedly or to appear in the contact suggestions of other users. For the purpose of fulfilling the relevant safety by design obligations, providers may use alternative age assurance methods, such as age estimation, provided that they meet the requirements set out in the proposed Regulation. Providers of software application stores should use age assurance to prevent minors from accessing or purchasing age inappropriate or age restricted applications. Third, where an operating system has obtained an age signal in compliance with those requirements, it should, with the user’s consent, enable the sharing of that signal with providers where required for compliance with the Regulation.
To remain proportionate, existing accounts can be exempted from the obligation to verify or assess the age, where the provider can determine with a high degree of confidence the account belongs to an adult or that the user is not a minor, as applicable. This avoids subjecting the entire adult population to unnecessary age checks. To further limit potential exclusion, providers must offer effective internal complaint-handling mechanisms that allow users to appeal incorrect age assessment.
To facilitate the implementation of privacy-preserving age verification solutions , Members States must ensure the availability of means for citizens to obtain a proof of age attestation and of at least an Age Verification Solution for the age thresholds set in the Regulation. Detailed technical, organisational, privacy and security requirements will be specified in limited secondary legislation.
Where parents create accounts for their minors or want to use tools for guardians, providers have to verify the parental responsibility of the respective adult over the child concerned. For providers to be able to carry out this verification, and for the parents concerned to be able to share this necessary proof, Member States must establish at least one privacy-preserving electronic means by which a guardian can obtain and present an attestation of parental responsibility in respect of a minor. When doing so, Member States should ensure that such means are based on authentic sources established under national law, are free of charge for the guardian, and do not entail making information on parental responsibility accessible to providers or to the public beyond confirmation that parental responsibility exists. When providers already possess a signal that an adult is a guardian of a minor, the providers can rely on that as well. Additionally, adults should be able to self-declare that they are the parent and that they exercise parental responsibility. In those cases, providers should make reasonable efforts to verify that the adult is the guardian of the minor concerned. This verification should be carried out in a privacy-preserving manner and should not lead to additional processing of personal data that could enable the identification or tracking of the adult or minor concerned. The Commission may adopt a delegated act in order to specify the proof and signals that might indicate the parental responsibility.
Section 3.2.4
Read official Commission context ↗ Commission analysis of impacts App stores and operating systems Editorial association with this article’s subject. This quotation may discuss several measures or policy recommendations; it does not replace or interpret the operative text.
Quotation · SWD(2026) 681 final — Analysis of impacts
The proposed Regulation also requires providers of software application stores to put in place an age‑rating system that developers must use when submitting apps. The principal administrative burden therefore falls on the providers of the software application store who will need to operate the rating framework and implement the age assurance solution. Developers may have to provide age‑related information through a short questionnaire as part of the standard app‑submission procedure, which is expected to represent only a marginal increase in workload relative to the overall app publication process.
Besides the direct administrative effort, developers may incur indirect costs if age rating process step leads to delayed approvals or if legitimate users are unable to complete the age check, potentially reducing downloads. This risk is mitigated by allowing a range of possible age‑assurance options. While the new duties could increase the market power of app‑store providers, this is mitigated by drawing up codes of conduct for age‑rating systems that aims to harmonise labels and to ensure mutual recognition and consistent application of the ratings by online‑platform providers throughout the internal market.
On the positive side, the codes of conduct will likely reduce collective costs of age ratings. On the developer side, a common age rating system across app stores significantly lowers costs as it eliminates the need to handle several age rating systems and better facilitates multihoming. This simplified entry also benefits app stores by increasing the number of available applications, in addition to the benefits of reduced efforts to developing and updating age rating methodologies and greater legal uncertainty. Common standards also help consumers navigate app stores, which in turn may benefit developers and app stores through increased downloads. Overall, the additional compliance requirements are expected to be manageable and to contribute to a higher level of protection for minors without imposing disproportionate burdens on developers or app‑store operators.
The obligations on operating systems are minimal and only require providers to share relevant age signals they have obtained. This concerns only a small number of entities and builds on existing architecture for sharing OS-level information. Hence, the necessary adjustments are expected to be minimal. On the other hand, this provision may reduce age assurance costs for other providers by avoiding repeated age assurance. The obligation therefore seems very likely to be net beneficial.
Wording and references are retained as published, including any inconsistencies with the proposal. Graphical figures, where mentioned, can be viewed in the official HTML.
Section 4.3.2.3 · Software application stores and operating systems
Read official Commission context ↗ minor ‘minor’ or ‘child’ means any natural person under the age of 18;
EU KIDS Act Article 3(5)(a) →
guardian ‘guardian’ means any person holding parental responsibility over a minor pursuant to applicable national law;
EU KIDS Act Article 3(5)(b) →
AI companion ‘AI companion’ means an AI system, including a general-purpose AI system, that provides sustained, personalised interaction or companionship which simulates or facilitates a social, emotional or interpersonal relationship with a user;
EU KIDS Act Article 3(5)(c) →
general conversational chatbot ‘general conversational chatbot’ means a general-purpose AI system with general conversational functionalities for direct interaction with users that is capable of providing assistance across multiple domains and tasks; this definition excludes AI systems whose conversational functionality is limited to a specialised service, task or pre-defined set of functions, including specialised customer-service, business operation, technical-support, transactional, educational, information-retrieval, industrial or manufacturing AI applications;
EU KIDS Act Article 3(5)(d) →
online games ‘online games’ means a video game or video gaming platform;
EU KIDS Act Article 3(5)(e) →
video game ‘video game’ means an information society service as defined in Article 1(1), point (b), of Directive (EU) 2015/1535, that allows the recipients of the service to engage, by means of application accessed locally or remotely, including through the use of a durable medium and that involves interaction with a user interface or input device to generate visual feedback from a display device in a simulated environment for play or entertainment purposes;
EU KIDS Act Article 3(5)(f) →
video gaming platform ‘video gaming platform’ means an “online platform" as defined in Article 3, point (i) of Regulation (EU) 2022/2065, that involves interaction with a user interface or input device to generate visual feedback from a display device in a simulated environment [for play or entertainment purposes];
EU KIDS Act Article 3(5)(g) →
age verification ‘age verification’ means a process or system for establishing, with a high degree of certainty, whether the recipient or user of a system of the service has attained a specific age or age threshold, on the basis of information derived from identification documents or other reliable, verified sources of identification;
EU KIDS Act Article 3(5)(h) →
age assurance ‘age assurance’ means the set of methods, that can be used to determine, estimate or verify the age of a natural person, encompassing age estimation and age verification and excluding self-declaration by recipients of the service;
EU KIDS Act Article 3(5)(i) →
age signal ‘age signal’ means any data, attribute, token, credential, or other information provided, transmitted, or generated for the purpose of establishing, verifying, or demonstrating a specific age, age threshold, or age range of an individual;
EU KIDS Act Article 3(5)(j) →
EU age verification solution ‘EU age verification solution’ means an age verification solution that meets the requirements of the EU Age Verification Scheme and is certified by a public authority and included in the EU list of EU age verification solutions after notification by a Member State;
EU KIDS Act Article 3(5)(k) →
EU list of providers of EU proof of age attestations ‘EU list of providers of EU proof of age attestations’ means the list established and published by the Commission of providers issuing EU proof of age attestations
EU KIDS Act Article 3(5)(l) →
EU list of EU age verification solutions ‘EU list of EU age verification solutions’ means the list established and published by the Commission of EU age verification solutions certified as conforming with the EU Age Verification Scheme and notified by Member States;
EU KIDS Act Article 3(5)(m) →
EU Age Verification Scheme ‘EU Age Verification Scheme’ means a scheme for the attestation of attributes as defined in Article 2(4) of Commission implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/1569 with the rules applicable to providers of EU age verification solutions and of EU proof of age attestation, their approval and inclusion in the EU list of providers of EU proof of age attestations and the certification of EU age verification solutions for their inclusion in the EU list of EU age verification solutions;
EU KIDS Act Article 3(5)(n) →
proof of age attestation ‘proof of age attestation’ means an electronic attestation of attributes, as defined in Article 3(44) of Regulation (EU) No 910/2014, that allows the authentication of the fact that its holder meets a given age, age threshold, or age range;
EU KIDS Act Article 3(5)(o) →
tools for guardians ‘tools for guardians’ means software, features, functionalities, or applications designed to help guardians accompany minors' online activity to ensure their privacy, safety and well-being.
EU KIDS Act Article 3(5)(p) →
online platform Definition incorporated by reference
‘online platform’ means a hosting service that, at the request of a recipient of the service, stores and disseminates information to the public, unless that activity is a minor and purely ancillary feature of another service or a minor functionality of the principal service and, for objective and technical reasons, cannot be used without that other service, and the integration of the feature or functionality into the other service is not a means to circumvent the applicability of this Regulation;
Digital Services Act, Article 3(i) ↗
Wording in EU KIDS Act Article 3(1) For the purposes of this Regulation, the definitions of ‘online platform’, ‘recipient of the service’, ‘online interface’, ‘recommender system’ set out in Article 3 of Regulation (EU) 2022/2065 shall apply.
EU KIDS Act Article 3(1) →
recipient of the service Definition incorporated by reference
‘recipient of the service’ means any natural or legal person who uses an intermediary service, in particular for the purposes of seeking information or making it accessible;
Digital Services Act, Article 3(b) ↗
Wording in EU KIDS Act Article 3(1) For the purposes of this Regulation, the definitions of ‘online platform’, ‘recipient of the service’, ‘online interface’, ‘recommender system’ set out in Article 3 of Regulation (EU) 2022/2065 shall apply.
EU KIDS Act Article 3(1) →
online interface Definition incorporated by reference
‘online interface’ means any software, including a website or a part thereof, and applications, including mobile applications;
Digital Services Act, Article 3(m) ↗
Wording in EU KIDS Act Article 3(1) For the purposes of this Regulation, the definitions of ‘online platform’, ‘recipient of the service’, ‘online interface’, ‘recommender system’ set out in Article 3 of Regulation (EU) 2022/2065 shall apply.
EU KIDS Act Article 3(1) →
recommender system Definition incorporated by reference
‘recommender system’ means a fully or partially automated system used by an online platform to suggest in its online interface specific information to recipients of the service or prioritise that information, including as a result of a search initiated by the recipient of the service or otherwise determining the relative order or prominence of information displayed;
Digital Services Act, Article 3(s) ↗
Wording in EU KIDS Act Article 3(1) For the purposes of this Regulation, the definitions of ‘online platform’, ‘recipient of the service’, ‘online interface’, ‘recommender system’ set out in Article 3 of Regulation (EU) 2022/2065 shall apply.
EU KIDS Act Article 3(1) →
online social networking service Definition incorporated by reference
‘online social networking service’ means a platform that enables end users to connect and communicate with each other, share content and discover other users and content across multiple devices and, in particular, via chats, posts, videos and recommendations;
Digital Markets Act, Article 2(7) ↗
Wording in EU KIDS Act Article 3(2) For the purposes of this Regulation, the definitions of ‘online social networking service’, ‘video-sharing platform service’, and ‘software application store’ set out in Article 2 of Regulation (EU) 2022/1925 shall apply. Those services shall be considered an ‘online platform’ within the meaning of Article 3, point (i), of Regulation (EU) 2022/2065 for the purpose of this Regulation.
EU KIDS Act Article 3(2) →
video-sharing platform service Definition incorporated by reference
‘video-sharing platform service’ means a video-sharing platform service as defined in Article 1(1), point (aa), of Directive 2010/13/EU;
Digital Markets Act, Article 2(8) ↗
Further definition incorporated by that source
‘video-sharing platform service’ means a service as defined by Articles 56 and 57 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, where the principal purpose of the service or of a dissociable section thereof or an essential functionality of the service is devoted to providing programmes, user-generated videos, or both, to the general public, for which the video-sharing platform provider does not have editorial responsibility, in order to inform, entertain or educate, by means of electronic communications networks within the meaning of point (a) of Article 2 of Directive 2002/21/EC and the organisation of which is determined by the video-sharing platform provider, including by automatic means or algorithms in particular by displaying, tagging and sequencing;
Audiovisual Media Services Directive, Article 1(1)(aa) · consolidated 8 February 2025 ↗
Wording in EU KIDS Act Article 3(2) For the purposes of this Regulation, the definitions of ‘online social networking service’, ‘video-sharing platform service’, and ‘software application store’ set out in Article 2 of Regulation (EU) 2022/1925 shall apply. Those services shall be considered an ‘online platform’ within the meaning of Article 3, point (i), of Regulation (EU) 2022/2065 for the purpose of this Regulation.
EU KIDS Act Article 3(2) →
software application stores Definition incorporated by reference
‘software application stores’ means a type of online intermediation services, which is focused on software applications as the intermediated product or service;
Digital Markets Act, Article 2(14) ↗
Wording in EU KIDS Act Article 3(2) For the purposes of this Regulation, the definitions of ‘online social networking service’, ‘video-sharing platform service’, and ‘software application store’ set out in Article 2 of Regulation (EU) 2022/1925 shall apply. Those services shall be considered an ‘online platform’ within the meaning of Article 3, point (i), of Regulation (EU) 2022/2065 for the purpose of this Regulation.
EU KIDS Act Article 3(2) →
AI system Definition incorporated by reference
‘AI system’ means a machine-based system that is designed to operate with varying levels of autonomy and that may exhibit adaptiveness after deployment, and that, for explicit or implicit objectives, infers, from the input it receives, how to generate outputs such as predictions, content, recommendations, or decisions that can influence physical or virtual environments;
AI Act, Article 3(1) ↗
Wording in EU KIDS Act Article 3(3) For the purposes of this Regulation, the definitions of ‘AI system’ and ‘general-purpose AI system’ offset out in Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 shall apply; the definition of ‘provider’ as defined in Article 3 point (3) of that Regulation shall apply with regard to AI systems regulated by this Regulation.
EU KIDS Act Article 3(3) →
general-purpose AI system Definition incorporated by reference
‘general-purpose AI system’ means an AI system which is based on a general-purpose AI model and which has the capability to serve a variety of purposes, both for direct use as well as for integration in other AI systems;
AI Act, Article 3(66) ↗
Wording in EU KIDS Act Article 3(3) For the purposes of this Regulation, the definitions of ‘AI system’ and ‘general-purpose AI system’ offset out in Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 shall apply; the definition of ‘provider’ as defined in Article 3 point (3) of that Regulation shall apply with regard to AI systems regulated by this Regulation.
EU KIDS Act Article 3(3) →
provider Definition incorporated by reference
‘provider’ means a natural or legal person, public authority, agency or other body that develops an AI system or a general-purpose AI model or that has an AI system or a general-purpose AI model developed and places it on the market or puts the AI system into service under its own name or trademark, whether for payment or free of charge;
KIDS Article 3(3) applies this definition only with regard to AI systems regulated by the proposal. It is not a general definition of providers of every service covered by KIDS.
AI Act, Article 3(3) ↗
Wording in EU KIDS Act Article 3(3) For the purposes of this Regulation, the definitions of ‘AI system’ and ‘general-purpose AI system’ offset out in Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 shall apply; the definition of ‘provider’ as defined in Article 3 point (3) of that Regulation shall apply with regard to AI systems regulated by this Regulation.
EU KIDS Act Article 3(3) →
operating system Definition incorporated by reference
‘operating system’ means a system software that controls the basic functions of the hardware or software and enables software applications to run on it;
The proposal prints Article 2, point (1), which defines “gatekeeper”. The operating-system definition reproduced here is at point (10). The proposal’s wording is retained below; this is not a silent correction of its reference.
Digital Markets Act, Article 2(10) ↗
Wording in EU KIDS Act Article 3(4) For the purposes of this Regulation, the definition of ‘operating system’ set out in Article 2, point (1), of Regulation (EU) 2022/1925 shall apply.
EU KIDS Act Article 3(4) →