Digital Omnibus tracker

Data Act · Regulation (EU) 2023/2854

Article 49

Compare the available Commission, Council and Parliament texts and amendments affecting this article.

Article total: 13 parts · 3 Council drafts · 19 Parliament amendments

Source notes (1)
  • The proposal visibly closes a quotation after point (b), then continues with indented points (c) to (g) and prints another closing quotation after (g). The published text treats (a) to (g) as one paragraph only as an explicit editorial inference; the literal punctuation remains available unchanged.

Removed wording is struck through; added or replacement wording is highlighted.

Institutional text

European Commission proposal

All Commission’s changes to Data Act

The wording proposed by the Commission at the start of this legislative file.

Full article with Commission changes

Article with proposed changes

Official consolidated text dated 13 December 2023, with all 4 Commission proposal changes affecting this article applied.

Article 49

Evaluation and review

  1. 1.

    By 12 September 2028, the Commission shall carry out an evaluation of thischapters RegulationII, III, IV, V, VI, VII, and VIII and submit a report on its main findings to the European Parliament and to the Council, and to the European Economic and Social Committee. That evaluation shall assess, in particular:

    1. (a)

      situations to be considered to be situations of exceptional need for the purpose of Article 15 of this Regulation and the application of Chapter V of this Regulation in practice, in particular the experience in the application of Chapter V of this Regulation by public sector bodies, the Commission, the European Central Bank and Union bodies; the number and outcome of the proceedings brought to the competent authority under Article 18(5) on the application of Chapter V of this Regulation, as reported by the competent authorities; the impact of other obligations laid down in Union or national law for the purposes of complying with requests for access to information; the impact of voluntary data-sharing mechanisms, such as those put in place by data altruism organisations recognised under Regulation (EU) 2022/868, on meeting the objectives of Chapter V of this Regulation, and the role of personal data in the context of Article 15 of this Regulation, including the evolution of privacy-enhancing technologies;

    2. (b)

      the impact of this Regulation on the use of data in the economy, including on data innovation, data monetisation practices and data intermediation services, as well as on data sharing within the common European data spaces;

    3. (c)

      the accessibility and use of different categories and types of data;

    4. (d)

      the exclusion of certain categories of enterprises as beneficiaries under Article 5;

    5. (e)

      the absence of any impact on intellectual property rights;

    6. (f)

      the impact on trade secrets, including on the protection against their unlawful acquisition, use and disclosure, as well as the impact of the mechanism allowing the data holder to refuse the user’s request under Article 4(8) and Article 5(11), taking into account, to the extent possible, any revision of Directive (EU) 2016/943;

    7. (g)

      whether the list of unfair contractual terms referred to in Article 13 is up-to-date in light of new business practices and the rapid pace of market innovation;

    8. (h)

      changes in the contractual practices of providers of data processing services and whether this results in sufficient compliance with Article 25;

    9. (i)

      the diminution of charges imposed by providers of data processing services for the switching process, in line with the gradual withdrawal of switching charges pursuant to Article 29;

    10. (j)

      the interplay of this Regulation with other Union legal acts of relevance to the data economy;

    11. (k)

      the prevention of unlawful governmental access to non-personal data;

    12. (l)

      the efficacy of the enforcement regime required under Article 37;

    13. (m)

      the impact of this Regulation on SMEs and SMCs with regard to their capacity to innovate and to the availability of data processing services for users in the Union and the burden of complying with new obligations.

  2. 2.

    By 12 September 2028, the Commission shall carry out an evaluation of this Regulation and submit a report on its main findings to the European Parliament and to the Council, and to the European Economic and Social Committee. That evaluation shall assess the impact of Articles 23 to 31 and Articles 34 and 35, in particular regarding pricing and the diversity of data processing services offered within the Union, with a special focus on SME providers.

  3. 2a.

    By [date = entry into force plus 5 years], the Commission shall carry out an evaluation of chapters VIIa, VIIb and VIIc of this Regulation and submit a report on its main findings to the European Parliament and to the Council as well as to the European Economic and Social Committee. The report shall assess, in particular:

    1. (a)

      the state of registrations of data intermediation services and the type of services they offer;

    2. (b)

      the type of data altruism organisations registered and an overview of the objectives of general interests for which data are shared in view of establishing clear criteria in that respect;

    3. (c)

      the scope and social and economic impact of Chapter VIIc Section 2 including

    4. (d)

      the extent of the increase in re-use of public sector documents to which Section 2 of Chapter VIIc applies, especially by SMEs and SMCs;

    5. (e)

      the impact of the high-value datasets;

    6. (f)

      the interaction between data protection rules and re-use possibilities;

    7. (g)

      Member States shall provide the Commission with the Information necessary for the preparation of that report.

  4. 3.

    Member States shall provide the Commission with the information necessary for the preparation of the reports referred to in paragraphs 1 and 2.

  5. 4.

    On the basis of the reports referred to in paragraphs 1, and 2 and 2a, the Commission may, where appropriate, submit a legislative proposal to the European Parliament and to the Council to amend this Regulation.

Commission source wording and instructions

Article 49(1), introductory wording

Commission proposal

1. By 12 September 2028, the Commission shall carry out an evaluation of chapters II, III, IV, V, VI, VII, and VIII and submit a report on its main findings to the European Parliament and to the Council, and to the European Economic and Social Committee. That evaluation shall assess, in particular:

Article 49(1)(m)

Commission proposal

(m) the impact of this Regulation on SMEs and SMCs with regard to their capacity to innovate and to the availability of data processing services for users in the Union and the burden of complying with new obligations

Article 49(2a)

Commission proposal

2a. By [date = entry into force plus 5 years], the Commission shall carry out an evaluation of chapters VIIa, VIIb and VIIc of this Regulation and submit a report on its main findings to the European Parliament and to the Council as well as to the European Economic and Social Committee. The report shall assess, in particular: (a) the state of registrations of data intermediation services and the type of services they offer; (b) the type of data altruism organisations registered and an overview of the objectives of general interests for which data are shared in view of establishing clear criteria in that respect; (c) the scope and social and economic impact of Chapter VIIc Section 2 including (d) the extent of the increase in re-use of public sector documents to which Section 2 of Chapter VIIc applies, especially by SMEs and SMCs; (e) the impact of the high-value datasets; (f) the interaction between data protection rules and re-use possibilities; (g) Member States shall provide the Commission with the Information necessary for the preparation of that report.

Article 49(5)

Commission proposal

5. On the basis of the reports referred to in paragraphs 1, and 2 and 2a, the Commission may, where appropriate, submit a legislative proposal to the European Parliament and to the Council to amend this Regulation.

Institutional text

Council Presidency texts

Successive Presidency compromise texts. Their inclusion does not imply agreement or adoption.

Article 49(1), introductory wording

June Presidency compromise · 10 June

1. By 12 September 2028, the Commission shall carry out an evaluation of chapters II, III, IV, V, VI, VII, and VIII and submit a report on its main findings to the European Parliament and to the Council, and to the European Economic and Social Committee. That evaluation shall assess, in particular:

Article 49(1)(m)

June Presidency compromise · 10 June

(m) the impact of this Regulation on SMEs and SMCs with regard to their capacity to innovate and to the availability of data processing services for users in the Union and the burden of complying with new obligations

Article 49(2a)

June Presidency compromise · 10 June

Council wording reconstructed for this provision from the official operation

Article 49(4)

June Presidency compromise · 10 June

Council wording reconstructed for this provision from the official operation

4. On the basis of the reports referred to in paragraphs 1, 2 and 2a, the Commission may, where appropriate, submit a legislative proposal to the European Parliament and to the Council to amend this Regulation.

Competing proposals

European Parliament amendments

These are alternative tabled amendments. An amendment affecting several tracked parts appears once here, with each target identified.

More filters

Political group at the amendment date where available; otherwise the current Parliament affiliation.

Additional proposed wording Amendment 42 ITRE–LIBE draft report · Aura Salla and Marina Kaljurand (rapporteurs)

(iia) the following point is added

Preview
against:
Alternative wording Amendment 92 IMCO draft opinion · Alex Agius Saliba (rapporteur)
Preview
against:
Remove proposed wording Amendment 93 IMCO draft opinion · Alex Agius Saliba (rapporteur)
(m) the impact of this Regulation on SMEs and SMCs with regard to their capacity to innovate and to the availability of data processing services for users in the Union and the burden of complying with new obligations
Preview
against:
Additional proposed wording Amendment 94 IMCO draft opinion · Alex Agius Saliba (rapporteur)

(ma)

Justification

This makes the Commission assess whether the new framework increases concentration, weakens rights, or creates enforcement gaps, following concerns that the proposal assumes data availability creates value without asking who benefits or who loses power.

Preview
against:
Additional proposed wording Amendment 95 IMCO draft opinion · Alex Agius Saliba (rapporteur)
Justification

This makes the Commission assess whether the new framework increases concentration, weakens rights, or creates enforcement gaps, following concerns that the proposal assumes data availability creates value without asking who benefits or who loses power.

Preview
against:
Additional proposed wording Amendment 96 IMCO draft opinion · Alex Agius Saliba (rapporteur)
Justification

This makes the Commission assess whether the new framework increases concentration, weakens rights, or creates enforcement gaps, following concerns that the proposal assumes data availability creates value without asking who benefits or who loses power.

Preview
against:
Alternative wording Amendment 340 · David Cormand on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group IMCO
Preview
against:
Source identification

The source amends proposal instruction 26(a)(ii), changing 'point (m) is replaced by the following:' to 'point (m) is replaced by the following points:'. It changes the amending instruction, not the text of Article 49(2a), Article 49(5), or the introductory wording of Article 49(1).

Header printed in the source: Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 26 – point a – point ii – introductory part / Regulation (EU) 2023/2854 / Art 49

Alternative wording Amendment 341 · David Cormand on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group IMCO
(m) (m) the impact of this Regulation on SMEsconsumer protection and SMCsfundamental withrights, regardincluding the rights to theirprivacy capacityand the protection of personal data, non discrimination, access to innovateinformation, and tothe effective remedy; (ma) the availabilityimpact of this Regulation on concentration of data processingaccess, servicescontrol, forand usersintermediation inpower, including the Unionrole of undertakings designated as gatekeepers under Regulation (EU) 2022/1925 and thevery burdenlarge of complying with new obligationsenterprises;
Preview
against:
Source identification

The source replaces the Commission-proposed wording of Article 49(1)(m) and prints a new point (ma) immediately after it. It does not amend Article 49(2a), Article 49(5), or the introductory wording of Article 49(1).

Header printed in the source: Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 26 – point a – point ii / Regulation (EU) 2023/2854 / Article 49

Alternative wording Amendment 911 · Elena Sancho Murillo, Marina Kaljurand, Brando Benifei, José Cepeda, Lina Gálvez, Francisco Assis, Alex Agius Saliba ITRE · LIBE
1. By 12 September 2028, the Commission shall carry out an evaluation of chaptersthis IIRegulation, III,in IV,particular V,the VI,changes VIIintroduced via [Regulation (EU)xx/xx Digital Omnibus], and VIII and submit a report on its main findings to the European Parliament and to the Council, and to the European Economic and Social Committee. That evaluation shall assess, in particular:’
Justification

This amendment preserves the broader scope of the review provided for under the current legal framework by referring to the Regulation as a whole. The proposed limitation of the review would reduce the Commission's obligation to assess the Regulation's overall functioning and effectiveness. Given that these changes were proposed without a dedicated impact assessment, maintaining a comprehensive review clause is necessary to ensure that all aspects of the Regulation can be properly evaluated and, where appropriate, adapted in light of implementation and market developments.

Preview
against:
Source identification

Header printed in the source: Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 26 – point a – point i / Regulation (EU) 2023/2854 / Article 49 – paragraph 1 – introductory part

Alternative wording Amendment 912 · Michael McNamara, Irena Joveva, Oihane Agirregoitia Martínez, Veronika Cifrová Ostrihoňová, Christophe Grudler ITRE · LIBE
1. By 12 September 2028 and every four years thereafter, the Commission shall carry out an evaluation of chapters II, III, IV, V, VI, VII, and VIII and submit a report on its main findings to the European Parliament and to the Council, and to the European Economic and Social Committee. That evaluation shall assess, in particular:'
Preview
against:
Source identification

Header printed in the source: Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 26 – point a – point i / Regulation (EU) 2023/2854 / Article 49 – paragraph 1 – point i

Alternative wording Amendment 913 · Elena Sancho Murillo, Marina Kaljurand, Brando Benifei, José Cepeda, Lina Gálvez, Francisco Assis, Alex Agius Saliba ITRE · LIBE
(ii) after point (m) is replaced by, the following points are added:
Preview
against:
Source identification

Header printed in the source: Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 26 – point a – point ii – introductory part / Regulation (EU) 2023/2854 / Article 49 – paragraph 1 – point m

Remove proposed wording Amendment 914 · Elena Sancho Murillo, Marina Kaljurand, Brando Benifei, José Cepeda, Lina Gálvez, Francisco Assis, Alex Agius Saliba ITRE · LIBE
(m) the impact of this Regulation on SMEs and SMCs with regard to their capacity to innovate and to the availability of data processing services for users in the Union and the burden of complying with new obligations
Justification

This amendments ensures that the Commission assesses whether the new framework increases concentration, weakens rights, or creates enforcement gaps, following concerns that the proposal assumes data availability creates value without asking who benefits or who loses power.

Preview
against:
Source identification

Header printed in the source: Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 26 – point a – point ii / Regulation (EU) 2023/2854 / Article 49 – paragraph 1 – point m

Deletion marker printed in the source: deleted

Alternative wording Amendment 915 · João Oliveira ITRE · LIBE
(m) the impact of this Regulation on SMEs and SMCs with regard to their capacity to innovate and to the availability of data processing services for users in the Union and the burden of complying with new obligations’
Preview
against:
Source identification

Header printed in the source: Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 26 – point a – point ii / Regulation (EU) 2023/2854 / Article 49 – paragraph 1 – point m

Additional proposed wording Amendment 916 · Elena Sancho Murillo, Marina Kaljurand, Brando Benifei, José Cepeda, Lina Gálvez, Francisco Assis, Alex Agius Saliba ITRE · LIBE
Preview
against:
Source identification

Header printed in the source: Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 26 – point a – point ii / Regulation (EU) 2023/2854 / Article 49 – paragraph 1 – point ma (new)

Additional proposed wording Amendment 917 · Elena Sancho Murillo, Marina Kaljurand, Brando Benifei, José Cepeda, Matthias Ecke, Lina Gálvez, Francisco Assis, Alex Agius Saliba ITRE · LIBE
Preview
against:
Source identification

Header printed in the source: Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 26 – point a – point ii / Regulation (EU) 2023/2854 / Article 49 – paragraph 1 – point mb (new)

Additional proposed wording Amendment 918 · Elena Sancho Murillo, Marina Kaljurand, Brando Benifei, José Cepeda, Lina Gálvez, Francisco Assis, Alex Agius Saliba ITRE · LIBE
Preview
against:
Source identification

Header printed in the source: Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 26 – point a – point ii / Regulation (EU) 2023/2854 / Article 49 – paragraph 1 – point mc (new)

Additional proposed wording Amendment 919 · Elena Sancho Murillo, Marina Kaljurand, Brando Benifei, José Cepeda, Lina Gálvez, Francisco Assis, Alex Agius Saliba ITRE · LIBE
Preview
against:
Source identification

Header printed in the source: Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 26 – point a – point ii / Regulation (EU) 2023/2854 / Article 49 – paragraph 1 – point md (new)

Additional proposed wording Amendment 920 · Michael McNamara, Irena Joveva, Oihane Agirregoitia Martínez, Veronika Cifrová Ostrihoňová, Christophe Grudler ITRE · LIBE

(iia) In Article 49, paragraph 1, the following point is added

Preview
against:
Source identification

Header printed in the source: Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 26 – point a – point ii a (new) / Regulation (EU) 2023/2854 / Article 49 – paragraph 1 – point n

Alternative wording Amendment 921 · João Oliveira ITRE · LIBE
(d) the extent of the increase in re-use of public sector documents to which Section 2 of Chapter VIIc applies, especially by SMEs and SMCs;
Preview
against:
Source identification

Header printed in the source: Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 26 – point b / Regulation (EU) 2023/2854 / Article 49 – paragraph 2a – point d