Data Act· Article 32r
Text
Article 32r Data Act as printed in the Council text of 22 October 2026
Standard licences
Source Council, 22 October 2026. Article 32r: ST 14756/26, page 106 · pp. 106–107 · exact text page
Article 32r
Its wording is printed below, under Article 32r, heading, (1), (2), (3) and (4).
Article 32r, heading
Standard licences
Article 32r(1)
The re-use of data or documents shall not be subject to conditions, unless such conditions are objective, proportionate, non-discriminatory and justified on grounds of a public interest objective.
Article 32r(2)
When re-use is subject to conditions, those conditions shall not unnecessarily restrict possibilities for re-use and shall not be used to restrict competition.
Article 32r(3)
In Member States where licences are used, public sector bodies and public undertakings shall ensure that the standard licences for the re-use of public sector data or documents, which can be adapted to meet particular licence applications, are available in digital format and able to be processed electronically.
Article 32r(4)
Public sector bodies and public undertakings may establish special conditions for the re-use of data and documents by very large enterprises. Such conditions shall be proportionate and should be based on objective criteria. They shall be established taking into consideration the economic power, or the ability of the entity to acquire data and documents, including in particular a designation as a gatekeeper under Regulation (EU) 2022/1925.
How each paragraph has changed
| What each text would do to the law in force | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paragraph | Commission19 Nov 2025 | Council10 Jun 2026 | Council18 Jun 2026 | Council3 Sep 2026 | Council2 Oct 2026 | Council22 Oct 2026 | Parliamentamendments |
| Compared with | law in force | the proposal | 10 Jun text | 18 Jun text | 3 Sep text | 2 Oct text | |
| 32rText of the articleheading | Adds Added | Adds , changed since the proposal Changed | Adds Unchanged | Adds , changed since 18 Jun Changed | Adds , changed since 3 Sep Changed | Adds Unchanged | 0 |
| 1Paragraph 1 | Not in the law in force or this text In neither text | Not in the law in force or this text In neither text | Not in the law in force or this text In neither text | Not in the law in force or this text In neither text | Adds , added since 3 Sep Added | Adds Unchanged | 0 |
| 2Paragraph 2 | Not in the law in force or this text In neither text | Not in the law in force or this text In neither text | Not in the law in force or this text In neither text | Not in the law in force or this text In neither text | Adds , added since 3 Sep Added | Adds Unchanged | 3 |
| 3Paragraph 3 | Not in the law in force or this text In neither text | Not in the law in force or this text In neither text | Not in the law in force or this text In neither text | Not in the law in force or this text In neither text | Adds , added since 3 Sep Added | Adds Unchanged | 8 |
| 4Paragraph 4 | Not in the law in force or this text In neither text | Not in the law in force or this text In neither text | Not in the law in force or this text In neither text | Not in the law in force or this text In neither text | Adds , added since 3 Sep Added | Adds Unchanged | 10 |
Each text against the law in force: +Adds adds a provision the law in force lacks— neither the law in force nor the text has it changed from the text before
Each text against the text before it: +Added in this text, not in the text before~Changed wording changed=Unchanged same as the text before— in neither text
What each text does
- 19 Nov 2025 Commission proposalCOM(2025) 837 Adds Adds the article. Article 32r in this text
- 5 Jun 2026 JURI draft opinion · Brando Benifei (rapporteur)JURI-PA-789142 3 amendments to this article. Amendments in this document
- 10 Jun 2026 Council textST 10426/26 Changed Changes the article. Article 32r in this text
- 18 Jun 2026 Council textST 10677/26 Unchanged Same as the text before. Article 32r in this text
- 29 Jun 2026 JURI amendments 69–296 to the draft opinionJURI-AM-790236 5 amendments to this article. Amendments in this document
- 16 Jul 2026 IMCO amendments 125–328 to the draft opinionIMCO-AM-790905 2 amendments to this article. Amendments in this document
- 27 Jul 2026 ITRE–LIBE amendments 777–1052 to the draft reportCJ72-AM-791072 11 amendments to this article. Amendments in this document
- 3 Sep 2026 Council textST 12535/26 Changed Changes the article. Article 32r in this text
- 2 Oct 2026 Council textST 13886/26 Changed Adds paragraphs 1 to 4 and changes the article. Article 32r in this text
- 22 Oct 2026 Council textST 14756/26 Unchanged Same as the text before. Article 32r in this text
Article 32r: Text of the article
Added by the Commission · changed by the Council on 10 June · changed on 3 September · changed on 2 October
Paragraph 1
Added by the Council on 2 October
Paragraph 2
Added by the Council on 2 October
Parliament amendments 3
3 propose alternative wording.
58 ~Alternative Brando Benifei (rapporteur)Rapporteur · JURI “nor shall they undermine the principle of open data as freely reusable for any purpose, subject only to proportionate and justified limitations in…”
(2) When re-use is subject to conditions, those conditions shall not unnecessarily restrict possibilities for re-use and shall not be used to restrict competition, nor shall they undermine the principle of open data as freely reusable for any purpose, subject only to proportionate and justified limitations in line with paragraph 1.
Justification
This amendment preserves the core principles of the open data framework, in particular non-discriminatory re-use and the use of open licences as the default regime. It seeks to avoid fragmentation and legal uncertainty resulting from differentiated licence conditions for certain categories of re-users, while still allowing proportionate contributions from very large enterprises that do not undermine open access, interoperability or public-interest re-use.
- Rapporteur
- Brando Benifei
- Group
- Rapporteur
- Targets
- Data Act Article 32r(2)
- Document
- JURI draft opinion
- Printed header
- Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 18 / Regulation (EU) 2023/2854 / Article 32r – paragraph 2
221 ~Alternative David CormandGreens/EFA · JURI “nor shall they undermine the principle of open data as freely reusable for any purpose, subject only to proportionate and justified limitations in…”
(2) When re-use is subject to conditions, those conditions shall not unnecessarily restrict possibilities for re-use and shall not be used to restrict competition, nor shall they undermine the principle of open data as freely reusable for any purpose, subject only to proportionate and justified limitations in line with paragraph 1.
- Tabled by
- David Cormand
- Group
- Greens/EFA
- Targets
- Data Act Article 32r(2)
- Document
- JURI amendments 69–296 to the draft opinion
- Source
- Official text, page 125
- Printed header
- Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 18 / Regulation (EU) 2023/2854 / Article 32 r – paragraph 2
826 ~Alternative Damian BoeselagerGreens/EFA · ITRE–LIBE “nor shall they undermine the principle of open data as freely reusable for any purpose, subject only to proportionate and justified limitations in…”
(2) When re-use is subject to conditions, those conditions shall not unnecessarily restrict possibilities for re-use and shall not be used to restrict competition, nor shall they undermine the principle of open data as freely reusable for any purpose, subject only to proportionate and justified limitations in line with paragraph 1.
- Tabled by
- Damian Boeselager on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group
- Group
- Greens/EFA
- Targets
- Data Act Article 32r(2)
- Document
- ITRE–LIBE amendments 777–1052 to the draft report
- Source
- Official text, page 32
- Printed header
- Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 18 / Regulation (EU) 2023/2854 / Article 32r – paragraph 2
Paragraph 3
Added by the Council on 2 October
Parliament amendments 8
8 propose alternative wording.
| Type | The Left | Greens/EFA | Renew | EPP | Rapporteur |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ~ Alternative | 1 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 1 |
By political group
- ~ Alternative The Left 1 Greens/EFA 2 Renew 1 EPP 3 Rapporteur 1
59 ~Alternative Brando Benifei (rapporteur)Rapporteur · JURI “and that such licences are, as a default, open licences enabling free and unrestricted re-use, in particular for public interest purposes”
(3) In Member States where licences are used, public sector bodies shall ensure that the standard licences for the re-use of public sector data or documents, which can be adapted to meet particular licence applications, are available in digital format and able to be processed electronically, and that such licences are, as a default, open licences enabling free and unrestricted re-use, in particular for public interest purposes.
Justification
This amendment preserves the core principles of the open data framework, in particular non-discriminatory re-use and the use of open licences as the default regime. It seeks to avoid fragmentation and legal uncertainty resulting from differentiated licence conditions for certain categories of re-users, while still allowing proportionate contributions from very large enterprises that do not undermine open access, interoperability or public-interest re-use.
- Rapporteur
- Brando Benifei
- Group
- Rapporteur
- Targets
- Data Act Article 32r(3)
- Document
- JURI draft opinion
- Source
- Official text, page 47
- Printed header
- Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 18 / Regulation (EU) 2023/2854 / Article 32r – paragraph 3
222 ~Alternative David CormandGreens/EFA · JURI “and that such licences are, as a default, open licences enabling free and unrestricted re-use, in particular for public interest purposes”
(3) In Member States where licences are used, public sector bodies shall ensure that the standard licences for the re-use of public sector data or documents, which can be adapted to meet particular licence applications, are available in digital format and able to be processed electronically, and that such licences are, as a default, open licences enabling free and unrestricted re-use, in particular for public interest purposes.
- Tabled by
- David Cormand
- Group
- Greens/EFA
- Targets
- Data Act Article 32r(3)
- Document
- JURI amendments 69–296 to the draft opinion
- Printed header
- Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 18 / Regulation (EU) 2023/2854 / Article 32 r – paragraph 3
223 ~Alternative Emil RadevEPP · JURI “Member States shall encourage the use of standard licenses for the re-use of”
(3) In Member States where licences are used, Member States shall encourage the use of standard licenses for the re-use of public sector data or documents. Public sector bodies shall ensure that
thesuch standard licences for the re-use of public sector data or documents, which can be adapted to meet particular licence applications, are available in digital format and able to be processed electronically.- Tabled by
- Emil Radev
- Group
- EPP
- Targets
- Data Act Article 32r(3)
- Document
- JURI amendments 69–296 to the draft opinion
- Source
- Official text, page 126
- Printed header
- Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 18 / Regulation (EU) 2023/2854 / Article 32 r – paragraph 3
311 ~Alternative Sophia KircherEPP · IMCO “Member States shall encourage the use of standard licenses for the re-use of”
(3) In Member States where licences are used, Member States shall encourage the use of standard licenses for the re-use of public sector data or documents. Public sector bodies shall ensure that
thesuch standard licences for the re-use of public sector data or documents, which can be adapted to meet particular licence applications, are available in digital format and able to be processed electronically.- Tabled by
- Sophia Kircher
- Group
- EPP
- Targets
- Data Act Article 32r(3)
- Document
- IMCO amendments 125–328 to the draft opinion
- Source
- Official text, page 149
- Printed header
- Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 18 / Regulation (EU) 2023/2854 / Article 32r – paragraph 3
827 ~Alternative Dario TamburranoThe Left · ITRE–LIBE “or documents for any purpose and do not discriminate between categories of re-users, unless specific conditions are necessary and proportionate in…”
(3)
In Member States where licences are used, public sector bodies shall ensure that the standard licences for the re-use of public sector data or documents, which can be adapted to meet particular licence applications, are available in digital format and able to be processed electronically.In Member States where licences are used, public sector bodies and public undertakings shall use standard open licences that permit the re-use of data or documents for any purpose and do not discriminate between categories of re-users, unless specific conditions are necessary and proportionate in view of the nature of the data or documents and justified on grounds of a public interest objective. Such licences shall be available in digital format and capable of being processed electronically.Justification
Standard open licences maximise legal certainty, interoperability and the ability to combine information from different public sources. Specific conditions should be permitted only where they are justified by the nature of the data or documents, not by the identity or economic power of the re-user.
- Tabled by
- Dario Tamburrano
- Group
- The Left
- Targets
- Data Act Article 32r(3)
- Document
- ITRE–LIBE amendments 777–1052 to the draft report
- Printed header
- Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 18 / Regulation (EU) 2023/2854 / Article 32r – paragraph 3
828 ~Alternative Damian BoeselagerGreens/EFA · ITRE–LIBE “and that such licences are, as a default, open licences enabling free and unrestricted re-use, in particular for public interest purposes”
(3) In Member States where licences are used,
publicMembersector bodiesStates shallensure thatencourage the use of standardlicenceslicenses for the re-use of public sector data or documents,. Public sector bodies shall ensure that such standard licences which can be adapted to meet particular licence applications, are available in digital format and able to be processed electronically and that such licences are, as a default, open licences enabling free and unrestricted re-use, in particular for public interest purposes.- Tabled by
- Damian Boeselager on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group
- Group
- Greens/EFA
- Targets
- Data Act Article 32r(3)
- Document
- ITRE–LIBE amendments 777–1052 to the draft report
- Printed header
- Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 18 / Regulation (EU) 2023/2854 / Article 32r – paragraph 3
829 ~Alternative Aura SallaEPP · ITRE–LIBE “Member States shall encourage the use of standard licenses for the re-use of public sector data or documents.”
(3) In Member States where licences are used, Member States shall encourage the use of standard licenses for the re-use of public sector data or documents. public sector bodies shall ensure that
thesuch standard licences for the re-use of public sector data or documents, which can be adapted to meet particular licence applications, are available in digital format and able to be processed electronically.- Tabled by
- Aura Salla
- Group
- EPP
- Targets
- Data Act Article 32r(3)
- Document
- ITRE–LIBE amendments 777–1052 to the draft report
- Source
- Official text, page 34
- Printed header
- Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 18 / 2023/2854 / Article 32r – paragraph 3
830 ~Alternative Michael McNamara +5Renew · ITRE–LIBE “Public sector bodies shall ensure that such standard licences”
(3) In Member States where licences are used,
publicMembersector bodiesStates shallensure thatencourage the use of standardlicenceslicenses for the re-use of public sector data or documents,.whichPublic sector bodies shall ensure that such standard licences can be adapted to meet particular licence applications, are available in digital format and able to be processed electronically.- Tabled by
- Michael McNamara, Irena Joveva, Sophie Wilmès, Oihane Agirregoitia Martínez, Veronika Cifrová Ostrihoňová, Christophe Grudler
- Group
- Renew
- Targets
- Data Act Article 32r(3)
- Document
- ITRE–LIBE amendments 777–1052 to the draft report
- Printed header
- Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 18 / Regulation (EU) 2023/2854 / Article 32r – paragraph 3
Paragraph 4
Added by the Council on 2 October
Parliament amendments 10
4 would delete the wording and 6 propose alternative wording. Deletion amendments come from The Left, S&D, Greens/EFA and Renew.
| Type | The Left | S&D | Greens/EFA | Renew | EPP | Rapporteur |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| − Deletion | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | · | · |
| ~ Alternative | · | · | 1 | · | 4 | 1 |
By political group
- − Deletion The Left 1 S&D 1 Greens/EFA 1 Renew 1
- ~ Alternative Greens/EFA 1 EPP 4 Rapporteur 1
Show
60 ~Alternative Brando Benifei (rapporteur)Rapporteur · JURI “and may include requirements to contribute financially or otherwise to the sustainability, maintenance, and enrichment of the underlying data…”
(4) Public sector bodies may establish special conditions for the re-use of data and documents by very large enterprises. Such conditions shall be proportionate and should be based on objective criteria. They shall be established taking into consideration the economic power, or the ability of the entity to acquire data, including in particular a designation as a gatekeeper under Regulation (EU) 2022/1925, and may include requirements to contribute financially or otherwise to the sustainability, maintenance, and enrichment of the underlying data infrastructure, provided that such conditions do not restrict or negatively affect re-use by research organisations, non-commercial users, or open knowledge projects.
Justification
This amendment preserves the core principles of the open data framework, in particular non-discriminatory re-use and the use of open licences as the default regime. It seeks to avoid fragmentation and legal uncertainty resulting from differentiated licence conditions for certain categories of re-users, while still allowing proportionate contributions from very large enterprises that do not undermine open access, interoperability or public-interest re-use.
- Rapporteur
- Brando Benifei
- Group
- Rapporteur
- Targets
- Data Act Article 32r(4)
- Document
- JURI draft opinion
- Source
- Official text, page 48
- Printed header
- Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 18 / Regulation (EU) 2023/2854 / Article 32r – paragraph 3
224 ~Alternative David CormandGreens/EFA · JURI “and may include requirements to contribute financially or otherwise to the sustainability, maintenance, and enrichment of the underlying data…”
(4) Public sector bodies may establish special conditions for the re-use of data and documents by very large enterprises. Such conditions shall be proportionate and should be based on objective criteria. They shall be established taking into consideration the economic power, or the ability of the entity to acquire data, including in particular a designation as a gatekeeper under Regulation (EU) 2022/1925, and may include requirements to contribute financially or otherwise to the sustainability, maintenance, and enrichment of the underlying data infrastructure, provided that such conditions do not restrict or negatively affect re-use by research organisations, non-commercial users, or open knowledge projects.
- Tabled by
- David Cormand
- Group
- Greens/EFA
- Targets
- Data Act Article 32r(4)
- Document
- JURI amendments 69–296 to the draft opinion
- Printed header
- Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 18 / Regulation (EU) 2023/2854 / Article 32 r
225 ~Alternative Emil RadevEPP · JURI “with a designation as a gatekeeper under Regulation (EU) 2022/1925”
(4) Public sector bodies may establish special conditions for the re-use of data and documents by very large enterprises with a designation as a gatekeeper under Regulation (EU) 2022/1925. Such conditions shall be proportionate and should be based on objective criteria. They shall be established taking into consideration the economic power, or the ability of the entity to acquire data
, including in particular a designation as a gatekeeper under Regulation (EU) 2022/1925.- Tabled by
- Emil Radev
- Group
- EPP
- Targets
- Data Act Article 32r(4)
- Document
- JURI amendments 69–296 to the draft opinion
- Source
- Official text, page 127
- Printed header
- Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 18 / Regulation (EU) 2023/2854 / Article 32 r – paragraph 4
312 ~Alternative Sophia KircherEPP · IMCO “with a designation as a gatekeeper under Regulation (EU) 2022/1925”
(4) Public sector bodies may establish special conditions for the re-use of data and documents by very large enterprises with a designation as a gatekeeper under Regulation (EU) 2022/1925. Such conditions shall be proportionate and should be based on objective criteria. They shall be established taking into consideration the economic power, or the ability of the entity to acquire data
, including in particular a designation as a gatekeeper under Regulation (EU) 2022/1925.- Tabled by
- Sophia Kircher
- Group
- EPP
- Targets
- Data Act Article 32r(4)
- Document
- IMCO amendments 125–328 to the draft opinion
- Printed header
- Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 18 / Regulation (EU) 2023/2854 / Article 32r – paragraph 4
831 −Deletion Elena Sancho Murillo +7S&D · ITRE–LIBE Deletes the Commission’s wording
(4) Public sector bodies may establish special conditions for the re-use of data and documents by very large enterprises. Such conditions shall be proportionate and should be based on objective criteria. They shall be established taking into consideration the economic power, or the ability of the entity to acquire data, including in particular a designation as a gatekeeper under Regulation (EU) 2022/1925.Justification
This amendment seeks to preserve the Open Data Directive’s ‘open by default’ principle by ensuring that market concerns are addressed through differentiated charging rather than restrictive licensing. Charging and licensing serve different purposes: fees can be adjusted for very large enterprises without limiting reuse rights. Removing actor-specific licence conditions and reinforcing standard licences will safeguard legal certainty, interoperability, and the ability to combine public sector information across Europe.
- Tabled by
- Elena Sancho Murillo, Marina Kaljurand, Brando Benifei, José Cepeda, Matthias Ecke, Lina Gálvez, Francisco Assis, Alex Agius Saliba
- Group
- S&D
- Targets
- Data Act Article 32r(4)
- Document
- ITRE–LIBE amendments 777–1052 to the draft report
- Source
- Official text, page 35
- Printed header
- Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 18 / Regulation (EU) 2023/2854 / Article 32r – paragraph 4
832 −Deletion Michael McNamara +3Renew · ITRE–LIBE Deletes the Commission’s wording
(4) Public sector bodies may establish special conditions for the re-use of data and documents by very large enterprises. Such conditions shall be proportionate and should be based on objective criteria. They shall be established taking into consideration the economic power, or the ability of the entity to acquire data, including in particular a designation as a gatekeeper under Regulation (EU) 2022/1925.- Tabled by
- Michael McNamara, Irena Joveva, Oihane Agirregoitia Martínez, Veronika Cifrová Ostrihoňová
- Group
- Renew
- Targets
- Data Act Article 32r(4)
- Document
- ITRE–LIBE amendments 777–1052 to the draft report
- Printed header
- Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 18 / Regulation (EU) 2023/2854 / Article 32r – paragraph 4
833 −Deletion Damian BoeselagerGreens/EFA · ITRE–LIBE Deletes the Commission’s wording
(4) Public sector bodies may establish special conditions for the re-use of data and documents by very large enterprises. Such conditions shall be proportionate and should be based on objective criteria. They shall be established taking into consideration the economic power, or the ability of the entity to acquire data, including in particular a designation as a gatekeeper under Regulation (EU) 2022/1925.- Tabled by
- Damian Boeselager on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group
- Group
- Greens/EFA
- Targets
- Data Act Article 32r(4)
- Document
- ITRE–LIBE amendments 777–1052 to the draft report
- Source
- Official text, page 36
- Printed header
- Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 18 / Regulation (EU) 2023/2854 / Article 32r – paragraph 4
834 −Deletion Dario TamburranoThe Left · ITRE–LIBE Deletes the Commission’s wording
(4) Public sector bodies may establish special conditions for the re-use of data and documents by very large enterprises. Such conditions shall be proportionate and should be based on objective criteria. They shall be established taking into consideration the economic power, or the ability of the entity to acquire data, including in particular a designation as a gatekeeper under Regulation (EU) 2022/1925.Justification
Differentiated licensing conditions would fragment the open data framework, undermine interoperability and make public sector information difficult or impossible to reuse in open knowledge projects. Economic asymmetries can be addressed through proportionate charging or technical service conditions under Article 32q, without introducing actor-specific licenses.
- Tabled by
- Dario Tamburrano
- Group
- The Left
- Targets
- Data Act Article 32r(4)
- Document
- ITRE–LIBE amendments 777–1052 to the draft report
- Source
- Official text, page 37
- Printed header
- Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 18 / Regulation (EU) 2023/285 / Article 32r – paragraph 4
835 ~Alternative Angelika WinzigEPP · ITRE–LIBE “charges for very large enterprises”
(4) Public sector bodies may
establishsetspecialdifferentconditionscharges for very large enterprises for the re-use of data and documentsby very large enterprises. Suchconditionscharges shall be proportionate and should be based on objective criteria. They shall be established taking into consideration the economic power, or the ability of the entity to acquire data, including in particular a designation as a gatekeeper under Regulation (EU) 2022/1925.- Tabled by
- Angelika Winzig
- Group
- EPP
- Targets
- Data Act Article 32r(4)
- Document
- ITRE–LIBE amendments 777–1052 to the draft report
- Printed header
- Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 18 / Regulation (EU) 2023/2854 / Article 32r – paragraph 4
836 ~Alternative Aura SallaEPP · ITRE–LIBE “with a designation as a gatekeeper under Regulation (EU) 2022/1925”
(4) Public sector bodies may establish special conditions for the re-use of data and documents by very large enterprises with a designation as a gatekeeper under Regulation (EU) 2022/1925. Such conditions shall be proportionate and should be based on objective criteria. They shall be established taking into consideration the economic power, or the ability of the entity to acquire data
, including in particular a designation as a gatekeeper under Regulation (EU) 2022/1925.- Tabled by
- Aura Salla
- Group
- EPP
- Targets
- Data Act Article 32r(4)
- Document
- ITRE–LIBE amendments 777–1052 to the draft report
- Source
- Official text, page 38
- Printed header
- Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 18 / Regulation (EU) 2023/2854 / Article 32r – paragraph 4