Article 49 – Derogations for specific situations
Only Parliament amendments would change this article. Parliament committees have tabled 1 amendment to this article.
Latest text22 October 2026ST 14756/26
Contains no amendment to this article.
What each text does
- 19 Nov 2025 Commission proposalCOM(2025) 837 No amendment to this article.
- 21 May 2026 Council textST 9547/26 No amendment to this article.ST 9547/26 reproduces only some of the proposal’s changes, so this comparison applies only those it shows or visibly drops. It says nothing about the others.
- 10 Jun 2026 Council textST 10426/26 No amendment to this article.
- 18 Jun 2026 Council textST 10677/26 No amendment to this article.
- 27 Jul 2026 ITRE–LIBE amendments 1261–1564 to the draft reportCJ72-AM-791873 1 amendment to this article. Amendments in this document
- 3 Sep 2026 Council textST 12535/26 No amendment to this article.
- 2 Oct 2026 Council textST 13886/26 No amendment to this article.Page 126 prints “(9a)” without an instruction or target, so no change can be assigned to that marker.
- 22 Oct 2026 Council textST 14756/26 No amendment to this article.
Parliament amendments
1 amendment to this article
1 proposes alternative wording.
| Type | EPP |
|---|---|
| ~ Alternative | 1 |
By political group
- ~ Alternative EPP 1
1309 ~Alternative Axel VossEPP · ITRE–LIBE “10f. In Article 49, the first paragraph is ammended: "”
10f. In Article 49, the first paragraph is ammended: "Article 49 Derogations for specific situations 1. In the absence of
an adequacya decision pursuant to Article 45(3), or of appropriate safeguards pursuant to Article 46, including binding corporate rules, a transfer or a set of transfers of personal data to a third country or an international organisation shall take place only on one of the following conditions:"Justification
The amendments support necessary cross-border data flows for EU companies in global value chains, cloud services and multinational groups. Transfer assessments must remain aligned with the Charter and CJEU case law, but should apply a risk-based and proportionate assessment of the safeguards actually used. Where groups apply binding internal rules, common security standards and effective remedies, a rebuttable presumption under Article 46 can reduce formalism without lowering protection or ignoring public-authority access risks.
- Tabled by
- Axel Voss
- Group
- EPP
- Targets
- GDPR Article 49 – paragraph 1
- Document
- ITRE–LIBE amendments 1261–1564 to the draft report
- Printed header
- Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 10 f (new) / Regulation (EU) 2016/679 / Article 49 – paragraph 1