Digital Omnibus proposal
Recital 60a
Compare the available Commission, Council and Parliament texts and amendments affecting this recital.
Recital total: 1 part · 0 Council drafts · 2 Parliament amendments
Source notes (1)
- No Commission counterpart is printed for this Parliament-proposed recital.
Removed wording is struck through; added or replacement wording is highlighted.
Institutional text
European Commission proposal
The wording proposed by the Commission at the start of this legislative file.
No standalone Commission wording is mapped to these tracked parts. A newly proposed provision may have no earlier text of its own.
Institutional text
Council Presidency texts
Successive Presidency compromise texts. Their inclusion does not imply agreement or adoption.
No Council wording is mapped to these tracked parts.
Competing proposals
European Parliament amendments
These are alternative tabled amendments. An amendment affecting several tracked parts appears once here, with each target identified.
More filters
Additional proposed wording Amendment 139 · Arash Saeidi JURI
Whereas, in the absence of a European legal framework capable of addressing local monopolistic practices of digital platforms outside the scope of the Digital Markets Act (DMA), Regulation (EU) 2019/1150 (P2B Regulation) remains necessary; Whereas the P2B Regulation continues to provide essential safeguards for fairness and transparency in platform-to-business relations in the digital economy;
Additional proposed wording Amendment 526 · Francesco Torselli ITRE · LIBE
Advances in neurotechnology and artificial intelligence make it possible to derive information about individuals’ cognitive, emotional and mental states, including through the automated processing of personal data other than that directly collected by the nervous system. With a view to providing a high level of protection for fundamental rights, it should be clarified that Regulation (EU) 2016/679 also applies to processing operations that produce cognitive inferences likely to affect a person’s dignity, decision-making autonomy and free development.
No amendments match these filters.
Selected texts
Compare wording
Choose a tracked part and a named pair of texts. Comparisons are offered only where both sides cover the same legal unit.
Select a specific tracked part above to compare wording.
No same-scope comparison is available for this tracked part. Its source wording remains available in the article text sections.