EUTechRegResearch
MenuClose menu
Digital Omnibus legislative tracker
Texts to 22 Oct 2026

Digital Omnibus proposal· Recital 53

Text

Recital 53 Digital Omnibus proposal as printed in the Council text of 22 October 2026

Source Council, 22 October 2026. Recital 53: ST 14756/26, page 55 · exact text page

Dropped

How the recital changed

Each text against the text before it

Recital Commission19 Nov 2025Rec 53Council21 May 2026Council10 Jun 2026Council18 Jun 2026Council3 Sep 2026Council2 Oct 2026Rec 53Council22 Oct 2026Rec 53
Compared withlaw in forcethe proposal21 May text10 Jun text18 Jun text3 Sep text2 Oct text
Recital 53 53 Added In neither text In neither text In neither text In neither text 53 Dropped 53 Dropped

Each text against the text before it: +Added in this text, not in the text before−Dropped drops a provision the text before added— in neither text

Parliament amendments propose other recitals under these numbers: Recital 53a (new).

Parliament amendments

3 amendments to this recital

3 propose alternative wording.

By political group; co-sponsored amendments count for each group
TypeRenewECRPfENI
~ Alternative1111

By political group

  • ~ Alternative Renew 1 ECR 1 PfE 1 NI 1
  1. 508 Alternative Diana Iovanovici ŞoşoacăNI · ITRE–LIBE “Accordingly, ENISA, in cooperation with the Commission and the competent authorities, should establish a common framework for the type of information…”

    (53) To ensure that the single-entry point enables the relevant entities to submit the type of information and the format required under the relevant Union legal acts, ENISA should consult the Commission and the competent authorities under those acts. Where a Union legal act is not fully harmonized regarding the type of information and the format of notifications, Member States should inform ENISA about their national provisions. Accordingly, ENISA, in cooperation with the Commission and the competent authorities, should establish a common framework for the type of information and the format of notifications, including technical guidelines, interfaces and transmission channels, reporting deadlines and update mechanisms. Where a Union legal act is not fully harmonised for this purpose, Member States will inform ENISA about their national provisions, and ENISA, in consultation with the Commission, will ensure interoperability, adaptability to regulatory developments and compliance monitoring.

    Tabled by
    Diana Iovanovici Şoşoacă
    Group
    NI
    Targets
    Digital Omnibus proposal Recital 53
    Document
    ITRE–LIBE amendments 401–526 to the draft report
    Printed header
    Recital 53
  2. 509 Alternative Michael McNamara +5Renew · ITRE–LIBE “and the Commission would be empowered to issue a delegated act to harmonize further”

    (53) To ensure that the single-entry point enables the relevant entities to submit the type of information and the format required under the relevant Union legal acts, ENISA should consult the Commission and the competent authorities under those acts. Where a Union legal act is not fully harmonized regarding the type of information and the format of notifications, Member States should inform ENISA about their national provisions, and the Commission would be empowered to issue a delegated act to harmonize further.

    Tabled by
    Michael McNamara, Irena Joveva, Sophie Wilmès, Oihane Agirregoitia Martínez, Bart Groothuis, Veronika Cifrová Ostrihoňová
    Group
    Renew
    Targets
    Digital Omnibus proposal Recital 53
    Document
    ITRE–LIBE amendments 401–526 to the draft report
    Printed header
    Recital 53
  3. 510 Alternative Julie Rechagneux +8ECR, PfE · ITRE–LIBE “To ensure that the layered single-entry points structure enables the relevant entities to submit the type of information and the format required…”

    (53) To ensure that the layered single-entry pointpoints structure enables the relevant entities to submit the type of information and the format required under the relevant Union legal acts, ENISA should consult the Commission and the competent authorities under those acts. Where a Union legal act is not fully harmonized regarding the type of information and the format of notifications, Member States should inform ENISA about their national provisions.

    Tabled by
    Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Aleksandar Nikolic, Ewa Zajączkowska-Hernik, Pierre-Romain Thionnet, Alexandre Varaut, Fabrice Leggeri, Marion Maréchal, Christophe Bay
    Group
    ECR, PfE
    Targets
    Digital Omnibus proposal Recital 53
    Document
    ITRE–LIBE amendments 401–526 to the draft report
    Printed header
    Recital 53