EUTechRegResearch
MenuClose menu
Digital Omnibus legislative tracker
Texts to 22 Oct 2026

Digital Omnibus proposal· Recital 51

Text

Recital 51 Digital Omnibus proposal as printed in the Council text of 22 October 2026

Source Council, 22 October 2026. Recital 51: ST 14756/26, page 55 · exact text page

It is important to support the further harmonisation of incident notification and reporting, including by working on the exchange and interoperability of information regarding incident reporting. For this purpose and in cooperation withhe CSIRTs network, the Cooperation Group and competent authorities under the relevant Union legal acts, ENISA should develop guidelines to foster the harmonisation of incident notifications .

How the recital changed

Each text against the text before it

Recital Commission19 Nov 2025Rec 51Council21 May 2026Rec 51Council10 Jun 2026Rec 51Council18 Jun 2026Rec 51Council3 Sep 2026Rec 51Council2 Oct 2026Rec 51Council22 Oct 2026Rec 51
Compared withlaw in forcethe proposal21 May text10 Jun text18 Jun text3 Sep text2 Oct text
Recital 51 51 Added 51 Changed 51 Changed 51 Unchanged 51 Unchanged 51 Unchanged 51 Unchanged

Each text against the text before it: +Added in this text, not in the text before~Changed wording changed=Unchanged same as the text before

Parliament amendments

4 amendments to this recital

4 propose alternative wording.

By political group; co-sponsored amendments count for each group
TypeS&DECRPfENIRapporteur
~ Alternative11111

By political group

  • ~ Alternative S&D 1 ECR 1 PfE 1 NI 1 Rapporteur 1
  1. 26 Alternative Alex Agius Saliba (rapporteur)Rapporteur · IMCO “Before enabling the notification of incidents, ENISA should pilot the functioning of the single-entry point which should include a thorough testing…”

    (51) Before enabling the notification of incidents, ENISA should pilot the functioning of the single-entry point which should include a thorough testing of the specificities and requirements for the notifications for the relevant Union legal acts. Based on the results of the piloting, the Commission should assess the proper functioning, reliability, integrity and confidentiality of the single-entry point. The Commission should consult the CSIRTs network and the competent authorities under the relevant Union legal acts, by making use of existing cooperation groups and networks of Member States established under these acts, when carrying out the assessment. Where the Commission finds that the single-entry point ensures the proper functioning, reliability, integrity and confidentiality, it should publish a notice to that effect in the Official Journal of the European Union. In case the Commission considers that the proper functioning, reliability, integrity and confidentiality is not ensured, ENISA should take all necessary corrective measures without undue delay, followed by a reassessment by the Commission without undue delay.

    Rapporteur
    Alex Agius Saliba
    Group
    Rapporteur
    Targets
    Digital Omnibus proposal Recital 51
    Document
    IMCO draft opinion
    Printed header
    Recital 51
  2. 503 Alternative Diana Iovanovici ŞoşoacăNI · ITRE–LIBE “and notification of the respective reassessment measures to Parliament and the Council”

    (51) Before enabling the notification of incidents, ENISA should pilot the functioning of the single-entry point which should include a thorough testing of the specificities and requirements for the notifications for the relevant Union legal acts. Based on the results of the piloting, the Commission should assess the proper functioning, reliability, integrity and confidentiality of the single-entry point. The Commission should consult the CSIRTs network and the competent authorities under the relevant Union legal acts, by making use of existing cooperation groups and networks of Member States established under these acts, when carrying out the assessment. Where the Commission finds that the single-entry point ensures the proper functioning, reliability, integrity and confidentiality, it should publish a notice to that effect in the Official Journal of the European Union. In case the Commission considers that the proper functioning, reliability, integrity and confidentiality is not ensured, ENISA should take all necessary corrective measures, including punitive measures for failure to comply with the provisions in force, followed by a reassessment by the Commission and notification of the respective reassessment measures to Parliament and the Council.

    Tabled by
    Diana Iovanovici Şoşoacă
    Group
    NI
    Targets
    Digital Omnibus proposal Recital 51
    Document
    ITRE–LIBE amendments 401–526 to the draft report
    Printed header
    Recital 51
  3. 504 Alternative Elena Sancho Murillo +7S&D · ITRE–LIBE “Before enabling the notification of incidents, ENISA should pilot the functioning of the single-entry point which should include a thorough testing…”

    (51) Before enabling the notification of incidents, ENISA should pilot the functioning of the single-entry point which should include a thorough testing of the specificities and requirements for the notifications for the relevant Union legal acts. Based on the results of the piloting, the Commission should assess the proper functioning, reliability, integrity and confidentiality of the single-entry point. The Commission should consult the CSIRTs network and the competent authorities under the relevant Union legal acts, by making use of existing cooperation groups and networks of Member States established under these acts, when carrying out the assessment. Where the Commission finds that the single-entry point ensures the proper functioning, reliability, integrity and confidentiality, it should publish a notice to that effect in the Official Journal of the European Union. In case the Commission considers that the proper functioning, reliability, integrity and confidentiality is not ensured, ENISA should take all necessary corrective measures without undue delay, followed by a reassessment by the Commission without undue delay.

    Tabled by
    Elena Sancho Murillo, Marina Kaljurand, Brando Benifei, José Cepeda, Matthias Ecke, Lina Gálvez, Francisco Assis, Alex Agius Saliba
    Group
    S&D
    Targets
    Digital Omnibus proposal Recital 51
    Document
    ITRE–LIBE amendments 401–526 to the draft report
    Printed header
    Recital 51
  4. 505 Alternative Julie Rechagneux +8ECR, PfE · ITRE–LIBE “Before enabling the notification of incidents, ENISA should pilot the functioning of the EU entry point which should include a thorough testing of…”

    (51) Before enabling the notification of incidents, ENISA should pilot the functioning of the single-entryEU entry point which should include a thorough testing of the specificities and requirements for the notifications for the relevant Union legal acts. Based on the results of the piloting, the Commission should assess the proper functioning, reliability, integrity and confidentiality of the single-entryEU entry point. The Commission should consult the CSIRTs network and the competent authorities under the relevant Union legal acts, by making use of existing cooperation groups and networks of Member States established under these acts, when carrying out the assessment. Where the Commission finds that the single-entryEU entry point ensures the proper functioning, reliability, integrity and confidentiality, it should publish a notice to that effect in the Official Journal of the European Union. In case the Commission considers that the proper functioning, reliability, integrity and confidentiality is not ensured, ENISA should take all necessary corrective measures, followed by a reassessment by the Commission.

    Tabled by
    Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Aleksandar Nikolic, Ewa Zajączkowska-Hernik, Pierre-Romain Thionnet, Alexandre Varaut, Fabrice Leggeri, Marion Maréchal, Christophe Bay
    Group
    ECR, PfE
    Targets
    Digital Omnibus proposal Recital 51
    Document
    ITRE–LIBE amendments 401–526 to the draft report
    Printed header
    Recital 51