Digital Omnibus tracker

Digital Omnibus proposal

Recital 49a

Compare the available Commission, Council and Parliament texts and amendments affecting this recital.

Recital total: 1 part · 4 Council drafts · 4 Parliament amendments

Removed wording is struck through; added or replacement wording is highlighted.

Institutional text

European Commission proposal

The wording proposed by the Commission at the start of this legislative file.

No standalone Commission wording is mapped to these tracked parts. A newly proposed provision may have no earlier text of its own.

Institutional text

Council Presidency texts

Successive Presidency compromise texts. Their inclusion does not imply agreement or adoption.

Recital 49a

May Presidency compromise

In order to facilitate compliance with the obligation to report incidents and related events, including the identification of the applicable related obligations, ENISA should develop and maintain a single information point for incident reporting. Structured communication channels should be established to ensure that the information available on the single information point is swiftly updated based on all the relevant and necessary information communicated by Member States.

Competing proposals

European Parliament amendments

These are alternative tabled amendments. An amendment affecting several tracked parts appears once here, with each target identified.

More filters

Political group at the amendment date where available; otherwise the current Parliament affiliation.

Additional proposed wording Amendment 11 ITRE–LIBE draft report · Aura Salla and Marina Kaljurand (rapporteurs)
Additional proposed wording Amendment 495 · Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Aleksandar Nikolic, Ewa Zajączkowska-Hernik, Pierre-Romain Thionnet, Alexandre Varaut, Fabrice Leggeri, Marion Maréchal, António Tânger Corrêa, Christophe Bay ITRE · LIBE
Justification

A single database of incident notifications would by its very nature be a target of the first order. The layered architecture preserves the proximity and expertise of national authorities while delivering, for reporting entities, the benefit of a single interface.

Additional proposed wording Amendment 496 · Elena Sancho Murillo, Marina Kaljurand, Brando Benifei, José Cepeda, Matthias Ecke, Lina Gálvez, Francisco Assis, Alex Agius Saliba ITRE · LIBE
Justification

The development of detailed guidance on sector-specific cybersecurity obligations should be addressed in the context of the revision of the Cybersecurity Act, which provides the appropriate framework for considering horizontal cybersecurity governance, certification and related guidance mechanisms. This approach ensures coherence between Directive (EU) 2022/2555 and the evolving Union cybersecurity framework, while allowing sector-specific legislation to define requirements reflecting the specific risks and operational characteristics of each sector. It also avoids duplication, divergent interpretations and additional administrative burdens for entities subject to multiple cybersecurity obligations.

Additional proposed wording Amendment 497 · Michael McNamara, Irena Joveva, Sophie Wilmès, Oihane Agirregoitia Martínez, Bart Groothuis, Veronika Cifrová Ostrihoňová ITRE · LIBE