Digital Omnibus proposal
Recital 40a
Compare the available Commission, Council and Parliament texts and amendments affecting this recital.
Recital total: 1 part · 4 Council drafts · 2 Parliament amendments
Removed wording is struck through; added or replacement wording is highlighted.
Institutional text
European Commission proposal
The wording proposed by the Commission at the start of this legislative file.
No standalone Commission wording is mapped to these tracked parts. A newly proposed provision may have no earlier text of its own.
Institutional text
Council Presidency texts
Successive Presidency compromise texts. Their inclusion does not imply agreement or adoption.
No Council wording is mapped to this tracked part.
Recital 40a
May Presidency compromise
In order to ensure consistency of interpretation of this Regulation (EU) 2016/679, it is important that national supervisory authorities ensure that the adoption of guidelines, recommendations and best practices at national level on matters already covered by guidelines adopted by the Board, is consistent and does not contradict those issued by the Board, including by updating national relevant guidelines, recommendations and best practices when necessary. It is also important that national supervisory authorities and the Board duly consider matters of consistent application of this Regulation, including when such matters are identified and brought to their attention by controllers or other relevant stakeholders. Regulation (EU) 2018/1725 of the European Parliament and of the Council6 applies to the
Recital 40a
June Presidency compromise · 10 June
In order to ensure consistency of interpretation of this Regulation (EU) 2016/679, it is important that national supervisory authorities ensure that the adoption of guidelines, recommendations and best practices at national level on matters already covered by guidelines adopted by the Board, is consistent and does not contradict those issued by the Board, including by updating or repealing national relevant guidelines, recommendations and best practices when necessary. It is also important that national supervisory authorities and the Board duly consider matters of consistent application of this Regulation, including when such matters are identified and brought to their attention by controllers or other relevant stakeholders. Regulation (EU) 2018/1725 of the European Parliament and of the Council16 applies to the
Recital 40a
June Presidency compromise · 18 June
In order to ensure consistency of interpretation of this Regulation (EU) 2016/679, it is important that national supervisory authorities ensure that the adoption of guidelines, recommendations and best practices at national level on matters already covered by guidelines adopted by the Board, is consistent and does not contradict those issued by the Board, including by updating or repealing national relevant guidelines, recommendations and best practices when necessary. It is also important that national supervisory authorities and the Board duly consider matters of consistent application of this Regulation, including when such matters are identified and brought to their attention by controllers or other relevant stakeholders. Regulation (EU) 2018/1725 of the European Parliament and of the Council16 applies to the
Recital 40a
September Presidency compromise
In order to ensure consistency of interpretation of this Regulation (EU) 2016/679, it is important that national supervisory authorities ensure that the adoption of guidelines, recommendations and best practices at national level on matters already covered by guidelines adopted by the Board, is consistent and does not contradict those issued by the Board, including by updating or repealing national relevant guidelines, recommendations and best practices when necessary. It is also important that national supervisory authorities and the Board duly consider matters of consistent application of this Regulation, including when such matters are identified and brought to their attention by controllers or other relevant stakeholders. The consistent application of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 should also contribute to innovation and competitiveness of the Union.
Recital 40a 4 Council drafts
Recital 40a
21 May 2026 · May Presidency compromise
In order to ensure consistency of interpretation of this Regulation (EU) 2016/679, it is important that national supervisory authorities ensure that the adoption of guidelines, recommendations and best practices at national level on matters already covered by guidelines adopted by the Board, is consistent and does not contradict those issued by the Board, including by updating national relevant guidelines, recommendations and best practices when necessary. It is also important that national supervisory authorities and the Board duly consider matters of consistent application of this Regulation, including when such matters are identified and brought to their attention by controllers or other relevant stakeholders. Regulation (EU) 2018/1725 of the European Parliament and of the Council6 applies to the
Recital 40a
10 June 2026 · June Presidency compromise · 10 June
In order to ensure consistency of interpretation of this Regulation (EU) 2016/679, it is important that national supervisory authorities ensure that the adoption of guidelines, recommendations and best practices at national level on matters already covered by guidelines adopted by the Board, is consistent and does not contradict those issued by the Board, including by updating or repealing national relevant guidelines, recommendations and best practices when necessary. It is also important that national supervisory authorities and the Board duly consider matters of consistent application of this Regulation, including when such matters are identified and brought to their attention by controllers or other relevant stakeholders. Regulation (EU) 2018/1725 of the European Parliament and of the Council16 applies to the
Recital 40a
18 June 2026 · June Presidency compromise · 18 June
In order to ensure consistency of interpretation of this Regulation (EU) 2016/679, it is important that national supervisory authorities ensure that the adoption of guidelines, recommendations and best practices at national level on matters already covered by guidelines adopted by the Board, is consistent and does not contradict those issued by the Board, including by updating or repealing national relevant guidelines, recommendations and best practices when necessary. It is also important that national supervisory authorities and the Board duly consider matters of consistent application of this Regulation, including when such matters are identified and brought to their attention by controllers or other relevant stakeholders. Regulation (EU) 2018/1725 of the European Parliament and of the Council16 applies to the
Recital 40a
3 September 2026 · September Presidency compromise
In order to ensure consistency of interpretation of this Regulation (EU) 2016/679, it is important that national supervisory authorities ensure that the adoption of guidelines, recommendations and best practices at national level on matters already covered by guidelines adopted by the Board, is consistent and does not contradict those issued by the Board, including by updating or repealing national relevant guidelines, recommendations and best practices when necessary. It is also important that national supervisory authorities and the Board duly consider matters of consistent application of this Regulation, including when such matters are identified and brought to their attention by controllers or other relevant stakeholders. The consistent application of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 should also contribute to innovation and competitiveness of the Union.
Competing proposals
European Parliament amendments
These are alternative tabled amendments. An amendment affecting several tracked parts appears once here, with each target identified.
More filters
Additional proposed wording Amendment 393 · Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pierre-Romain Thionnet, Alexandre Varaut, Fabrice Leggeri, Marion Maréchal, António Tânger Corrêa, Christophe Bay ITRE · LIBE
Where, in respect of the same processing operation, a controller is required to carry out a data protection impact assessment under Article 35 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and is also subject to an obligation to carry out a fundamental rights impact assessment under Article 27 of Regulation (EU) 2024/1689, or to a reporting obligation in respect of automated monitoring or decision-making systems under other Union law, those obligations may be satisfied by means of a single integrated assessment. Such an assessment satisfies each of those obligations only where it covers all the elements required by each applicable provision; the substantive requirements, thresholds and triggering conditions laid down in those provisions remain unaffected. The integrated assessment should be made available to each competent authority within the framework of its respective competences and should not be required to be submitted to a single authority. The single Union list of processing operations subject to a data protection impact assessment should reflect processing operations presenting genuinely high risks to the rights and freedoms of natural persons, and should not consist of the accumulation of the requirements laid down in national lists.
Justification
Vertically integrated operators face a triple documentation burden for one and the same activity. The amendment mutualises the documentary instrument.
Additional proposed wording Amendment 394 · Aura Salla, Niels Flemming Hansen, Ana Miguel Pedro, Paulo Cunha, Andrea Wechsler, Oliver Schenk, Pekka Toveri, Christian Ehler ITRE · LIBE
Regulation (EU) 2016/679 follows a technology-neutral, risk-based and purpose-driven approach to the processing of personal data. The lawfulness of processing should be determined by reference to a specific and legitimate purpose and an assessment of the risks posed to the rights and freedoms of natural persons, taking into account the nature, scope, context and purposes of the processing. Where personal data are processed through the terminal equipment of natural persons, and the available indicators demonstrate that the likelihood and severity of risks to those rights and freedoms are limited, reliance on legal bases other than consent may be justified, where appropriate.
No amendments match these filters.
Selected texts
Compare wording
Choose a tracked part and a named pair of texts. Comparisons are offered only where both sides cover the same legal unit.
Select a specific tracked part above to compare wording.
No same-scope comparison is available for this tracked part. Its source wording remains available in the article text sections.
Recital 40a
Council Presidency text · ST 9547/26 → Council Presidency text · ST 10426/26
Changes in context
RemovedAdded
Both texts in full
Council Presidency text · ST 9547/26
Council Presidency text · ST 10426/26
Recital 40a
Council Presidency text · ST 10426/26 → Council Presidency text · ST 10677/26
Changes in context
RemovedAdded
Both texts in full
Council Presidency text · ST 10426/26
Council Presidency text · ST 10677/26
Recital 40a
Council Presidency text · ST 10677/26 → Council Presidency text · ST 12535/26
Changes in context
RemovedAdded