Texts to 22 Oct 2026

Recital 36a (new)

Only Parliament amendments propose this recital. Parliament committees have tabled 2 amendments to this recital.

Latest text22 October 2026ST 14756/26

Contains no amendment to this recital.

Numbering

Only Parliament amendments propose this recital. The Commission proposal and the Council texts number other recitals 36: Recital 36.

Parliament amendments

2 amendments to this recital

2 would add wording.

By political group; co-sponsored amendments count for each group
TypeEPPECRPfE
+ Addition111

By political group

  • + Addition EPP 1 ECR 1 PfE 1
  1. 347 Addition Andrea Wechsler +8EPP · ITRE–LIBE “To reduce administrative burdens for civil-society and volunteer-based organisations, associations and non-profit entities should not be subject to…” numbered 36a

    (36a)To reduce administrative burdens for civil-society and volunteer-based organisations, associations and non-profit entities should not be subject to the full scope of the regulation and in particular not of information and record-keeping obligations of Regulation 2016/679, provided their data processing is limited to low-risk internal administrative purposes and does not involve systematic monitoring or high-risk operations. Member States should ensure that such entities can fulfil transparency obligations through general public information rather than individual notices

    Tabled by
    Andrea Wechsler, Marie-Sophie Lanig, Stefan Köhler, Alexandra Mehnert, Lena Düpont, Angelika Niebler, Verena Mertens, Christian Doleschal, Sabine Verheyen
    Group
    EPP
    Targets
    Digital Omnibus proposal Recital 36a (new)
    Document
    ITRE–LIBE amendments 251–400 to the draft report
    Printed header
    Recital 36 a (new)
  2. 348 Addition Julie Rechagneux +8ECR, PfE · ITRE–LIBE “Article 22(1) confers on the data subject the right not to be subject to such a decision. That right is a prohibition of principle, subject to the…” numbered 36a

    (36a)Article 22(1) confers on the data subject the right not to be subject to such a decision. That right is a prohibition of principle, subject to the limited exceptions laid down in Article 22(2), and not an authorisation subject to conditions. The safeguards laid down in Article 22(3), and in particular the right to obtain human intervention, to express one’s point of view and to contest the decision, apply in full. The requirements of human oversight laid down in Article 14 of Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 apply in addition to, and not in substitution for, those safeguards.

    Tabled by
    Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pierre-Romain Thionnet, Alexandre Varaut, Fabrice Leggeri, Marion Maréchal, António Tânger Corrêa, Christophe Bay
    Group
    ECR, PfE
    Targets
    Digital Omnibus proposal Recital 36a (new)
    Document
    ITRE–LIBE amendments 251–400 to the draft report
    Printed header
    Recital 36 a (new)