Texts to 22 Oct 2026

Digital Omnibus proposal· Recital 32

Analysis in our dossiers
Scientific research and commercial R&D

Text

Recital 32 Digital Omnibus proposal as printed in the Council text of 22 October 2026

Source Council, 22 October 2026. Recital 32: ST 14756/26, page 30 · exact text page

The processing of personal data for scientific research purposes and the application of the GDPR’s provisions on scientific research are conditional on the adoption of appropriate safeguards for the rights and freedoms of data subjects, pursuant to Article 89(1) GDPR. To that end, the GDPR balances the right to protection of personal data, pursuant to Article 8 CFREU, with the freedom of science, pursuant to Article 13 CFREU. The processing of personal data for the purpose of scientific research can follow public interest within the meaning of Article 6(1)(e) of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 or be based on Member States and Union law. The processing of personal data for the purpose of scientific research may also be necessary for the purposes of the legitimate interests pursued by a controller or by a third-party within the meaning of Article 6(1)(f) of Regulation (EU) 2016/679, provided that such research is not contrary to Union or Member State law. This is without prejudice to the obligation of the controller to ensure that all other conditions of Article 6(1)(f) of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 as well as all other requirements and principles of that Regulation are met.

How the recital changed

Each text against the text before it

Recital Commission19 Nov 2025Rec 32Council21 May 2026Rec 32Council10 Jun 2026Rec 32Council18 Jun 2026Rec 32Council3 Sep 2026Rec 32Council2 Oct 2026Rec 32Council22 Oct 2026Rec 32
Compared withlaw in forcethe proposal21 May text10 Jun text18 Jun text3 Sep text2 Oct text
Recital 32 32 Added 32 Changed 32 Unchanged 32 Unchanged 32 Unchanged 32 Unchanged 32 Unchanged

Each text against the text before it: +Added in this text, not in the text before~Changed wording changed=Unchanged same as the text before

Parliament amendments propose other recitals under these numbers: Recital 32a (new) and Recital 32b (new).

Parliament amendments

14 amendments to this recital

2 amendments would delete the whole recital: members of Greens/EFA.

By political group; co-sponsored amendments count for each group
TypeThe LeftS&DGreens/EFAEPPECRNIRapporteur
− Deletion··2····
~ Alternative2214111

By political group

  • − Deletion Greens/EFA 2
  • ~ Alternative The Left 2 S&D 2 Greens/EFA 1 EPP 4 ECR 1 NI 1 Rapporteur 1

Show

  1. 3 Alternative Aura Salla and Marina Kaljurand (rapporteurs)Rapporteurs · ITRE–LIBE “of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (the ‘”

    (32) The processing of personal data for scientific research purposes and the application of the GDPR’s provisions on scientific research of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 are conditional on the adoption of appropriate safeguards for the rights and freedoms of data subjects, pursuant to Article 89(1) GDPRof Regulation (EU) 2016/679. To that end, the GDPR balancesseeks to ensure a proportionate balance between the right to protection of personal data, pursuant to Article 8 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (the ‘CFREU’), withand the freedom of science, pursuant to Article 13 CFREU. The processing of personal data for the purpose of scientific research therefore pursues a legitimate interest within the meaning of Article 6(1)(f) of Regulation (EU) 2016/679, provided that such research is not contrary to Union or Member State law. This is without prejudice to the obligation of the controller to ensure that all other conditions of Article 6(1)(f) of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 as well as all other requirements and principles of that Regulation are met.

    Rapporteurs
    Aura Salla and Marina Kaljurand
    Group
    Rapporteurs
    Targets
    Digital Omnibus proposal Recital 32
    Document
    ITRE–LIBE draft report
    Printed header
    Recital 32
  2. 119 Deletion David CormandGreens/EFA · JURI Deletes the recital

    (32) The processing of personal data for scientific research purposes and the application of the GDPR’s provisions on scientific research are conditional on the adoption of appropriate safeguards for the rights and freedoms of data subjects, pursuant to Article 89(1) GDPR. To that end, the GDPR balances the right to protection of personal data, pursuant to Article 8 CFREU, with the freedom of science, pursuant to Article 13 CFREU. The processing of personal data for the purpose of scientific research therefore pursues a legitimate interest within the meaning of Article 6(1)(f) of Regulation (EU) 2016/679, provided that such research is not contrary to Union or Member State law. This is without prejudice to the obligation of the controller to ensure that all other conditions of Article 6(1)(f) of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 as well as all other requirements and principles of that Regulation are met.

    Tabled by
    David Cormand
    Group
    Greens/EFA
    Targets
    Digital Omnibus proposal Recital 32
    Document
    JURI amendments 69–296 to the draft opinion
    Printed header
    Recital 32
  3. 167 Deletion David CormandGreens/EFA · IMCO Deletes the recital

    (32) The processing of personal data for scientific research purposes and the application of the GDPR’s provisions on scientific research are conditional on the adoption of appropriate safeguards for the rights and freedoms of data subjects, pursuant to Article 89(1) GDPR. To that end, the GDPR balances the right to protection of personal data, pursuant to Article 8 CFREU, with the freedom of science, pursuant to Article 13 CFREU. The processing of personal data for the purpose of scientific research therefore pursues a legitimate interest within the meaning of Article 6(1)(f) of Regulation (EU) 2016/679, provided that such research is not contrary to Union or Member State law. This is without prejudice to the obligation of the controller to ensure that all other conditions of Article 6(1)(f) of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 as well as all other requirements and principles of that Regulation are met.

    Tabled by
    David Cormand on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group
    Group
    Greens/EFA
    Targets
    Digital Omnibus proposal Recital 32
    Document
    IMCO amendments 125–328 to the draft opinion
    Printed header
    Recital 32
  4. 168 Alternative Sophia KircherEPP · IMCO “seeks to ensure a proportionate balance between”

    (32) The processing of personal data for scientific research purposes and the application of the GDPR’s provisions on scientific research are conditional on the adoption of appropriate safeguards for the rights and freedoms of data subjects, pursuant to Article 89(1) GDPR. To that end, the GDPR balancesseeks to ensure a proportionate balance between the right to protection of personal data, pursuant to Article 8 CFREU, with the freedom of science, pursuant to Article 13 CFREU. The processing of personal data for the purpose of scientific research therefore pursues a legitimate interest within the meaning of Article 6(1)(f) of Regulation (EU) 2016/679, provided that such research is not contrary to Union or Member State law. This is without prejudice to the obligation of the controller to ensure that all other conditions of Article 6(1)(f) of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 as well as all other requirements and principles of that Regulation are met.

    Tabled by
    Sophia Kircher
    Group
    EPP
    Targets
    Digital Omnibus proposal Recital 32
    Document
    IMCO amendments 125–328 to the draft opinion
    Printed header
    Recital 32
  5. 281 Alternative Pernando Barrena ArzaThe Left · ITRE–LIBE “the processing is necessary for the legitimate interests pursued and that those interests are not overridden by the interests or fundamental rights…”

    (32) The processing of personal data for scientific research purposes and the application of the GDPR’s provisions on scientific research are conditional on the adoption of appropriate safeguards for the rights and freedoms of data subjects, pursuant to Article 89(1) GDPR. To that end, the GDPR balances the right to protection of personal data, pursuant to Article 8 CFREU, with the freedom of science, pursuant to Article 13 CFREU. The processing of personal data for the purpose of scientific research therefore pursues a legitimate interest within the meaning of Article 6(1)(f) of Regulation (EU) 2016/679, provided that such research is not contrary to Union or Member State law.Processing for scientific research purposes may, where appropriate, rely on a legal basis provided for in Regulation (EU) 2016/679. Where a controller relies on Article 6(1)(f), it must demonstrate, in the specific circumstances of the processing, that the processing is necessary for the legitimate interests pursued and that those interests are not overridden by the interests or fundamental rights and freedoms of the data subject. Ordinary product optimisation, behavioural advertising, engagement optimisation, commercial profiling, customer analytics, or the development, training or optimisation of artificial intelligence systems shall not qualify as scientific research merely because they involve systematic analysis, testing or technical experimentation. This is without prejudice to legitimate public-interest, qualitative, critical, civil society or participatory research, where carried out according to recognised methodological and ethical standards and subject to appropriate safeguards under Article 89(1). This is without prejudice to the obligation of the controller to ensure that all other conditions of Article 6(1)(f) of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 as well as all other requirements and principles of that Regulation are met.

    Tabled by
    Pernando Barrena Arza
    Group
    The Left
    Targets
    Digital Omnibus proposal Recital 32
    Document
    ITRE–LIBE amendments 251–400 to the draft report
    Printed header
    Recital 32
  6. 282 Alternative Verena MertensEPP · ITRE–LIBE “Directive (EU) 2016/680 constitutes the lex specialis governing the processing of personal data by competent authorities for law enforcement purposes…”

    (32) The processing of personal data for scientific research purposes and the application of the GDPR’s provisions on scientific research are conditional on the adoption of appropriate safeguards for the rights and freedoms of data subjects, pursuant to Article 89(1) GDPR. To that end, the GDPR balances the right to protection of personal data, pursuant to Article 8 CFREU, with the freedom of science, pursuant to Article 13 CFREU. Directive (EU) 2016/680 constitutes the lex specialis governing the processing of personal data by competent authorities for law enforcement purposes and provides the specific data protection framework applicable to such processing. The obligations laid down in this Regulation should therefore be interpreted and applied in a manner that avoids unnecessary duplication of safeguards and administrative obligations already ensured under Directive (EU) 2016/680 and national law. The processing of personal data for the purpose of scientific research therefore pursues a legitimate interest within the meaning of Article 6(1)(f) of Regulation (EU) 2016/679, provided that such research is not contrary to Union or Member State law. This is without prejudice to the obligation of the controller to ensure that all other conditions of Article 6(1)(f) of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 as well as all other requirements and principles of that Regulation are met.

    Tabled by
    Verena Mertens
    Group
    EPP
    Targets
    Digital Omnibus proposal Recital 32
    Document
    ITRE–LIBE amendments 251–400 to the draft report
    Printed header
    Recital 32
  7. 283 Alternative Marina Kaljurand +8S&D · ITRE–LIBE “seeks to ensure a proportionate balance between”

    (32) The processing of personal data for scientific research purposes and the application of the GDPR’s provisions on scientific research are conditional on the adoption of appropriate safeguards for the rights and freedoms of data subjects, pursuant to Article 89(1) GDPR. To that end, the GDPR balancesseeks to ensure a proportionate balance between the right to protection of personal data, pursuant to Article 8 CFREU, withand the freedom of science, pursuant to Article 13 CFREU. The processing of personal data for the purpose of scientific research therefore pursues a legitimate interest within the meaning of Article 6(1)(f) of Regulation (EU) 2016/679, provided that such research is not contrary to Union or Member State law. This is without prejudice to the obligation of the controller to ensure that all other conditions of Article 6(1)(f) of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 as well as all other requirements and principles of that Regulation are met.

    Tabled by
    Marina Kaljurand, Elena Sancho Murillo, Brando Benifei, Birgit Sippel, Alex Agius Saliba, Francisco Assis, Elisabeth Grossmann, Kristian Vigenin, Matjaž Nemec
    Group
    S&D
    Targets
    Digital Omnibus proposal Recital 32
    Document
    ITRE–LIBE amendments 251–400 to the draft report
    Printed header
    Recital 32
  8. 284 Alternative Angelika WinzigEPP · ITRE–LIBE “appropriate safeguards ensuring the rights and freedoms of data subjects pursuant to Article 89(1) Regulation (EU) 2016/679, is necessary in order to…”

    (32) The processing of personal data for scientific research purposes and the application of the GDPR’s provisions on scientific research are conditional on the adoption of appropriate safeguards for the rights and freedoms of data subjects, pursuant to Article 89(1) GDPR.The adoption of appropriate safeguards ensuring the rights and freedoms of data subjects pursuant to Article 89(1) Regulation (EU) 2016/679, is necessary in order to process personal data for scientific research purposes and to apply the provisions on scientific research of Regulation (EU) 2016/679. To that end, the GDPR balancesseeks to ensure a proportionate balance between the right to protection of personal data, pursuant to Article 8 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (the ‘CFREU’), withand the freedom of science, pursuant to Article 13 CFREU. The processing of personal data for the purpose of scientific research therefore pursues a legitimate interest within the meaning of Article 6(1)(f) of Regulation (EU) 2016/679, provided that such research is not contrary to Union or Member State law. This is without prejudice to the obligation of the controller to ensure that all other conditions of Article 6(1)(f) of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 as well as all other requirements and principles of that Regulation are met.

    Tabled by
    Angelika Winzig
    Group
    EPP
    Targets
    Digital Omnibus proposal Recital 32
    Document
    ITRE–LIBE amendments 251–400 to the draft report
    Printed header
    Recital 32
  9. 285 Alternative Diana Iovanovici ŞoşoacăNI · ITRE–LIBE “and the informed consent of the data subjects who are the subject of the research has been obtained”

    (32) The processing of personal data for scientific research purposes and the application of the GDPR’s provisions on scientific research are conditional on the adoption of appropriate safeguards for the rights and freedoms of data subjects, pursuant to Article 89(1) GDPR. To that end, the GDPR balances the right to protection of personal data, pursuant to Article 8 CFREU, with the freedom of science, pursuant to Article 13 CFREU. The processing of personal data for the purpose of scientific research therefore pursues a legitimate interest within the meaning of Article 6(1)(f) of Regulation (EU) 2016/679, provided that such research is not contrary to Union or Member State law and the informed consent of the data subjects who are the subject of the research has been obtained. This is without prejudice to the obligation of the controller to ensure that all other conditions of Article 6(1)(f) of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 as well as all other requirements and principles of that Regulation are met.

    Tabled by
    Diana Iovanovici Şoşoacă
    Group
    NI
    Targets
    Digital Omnibus proposal Recital 32
    Document
    ITRE–LIBE amendments 251–400 to the draft report
    Printed header
    Recital 32
  10. 286 Alternative Alex Agius SalibaS&D · ITRE–LIBE “be necessary for the purposes of”

    (32) The processing of personal data for scientific research purposes and the application of the GDPR’s provisions on scientific research are conditional on the adoption of appropriate safeguards for the rights and freedoms of data subjects, pursuant to Article 89(1) GDPR. To that end, the GDPR aims at ensuring proportionate balances between the right to protection of personal data, pursuant to Article 8 CFREU, with the freedom of science, pursuant to Article 13 CFREU. The processing of personal data for the purpose of scientific research thereforemay pursuesbe necessary for the purposes of a legitimate interest within the meaning of Article 6(1)(f) of Regulation (EU) 2016/679, provided that such research is not contrary to Union or Member State law. This is without prejudice to the obligation of the controller to ensure that all other conditions of Article 6(1)(f) of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 as well as all other requirements and principles of that Regulation are met.

    Tabled by
    Alex Agius Saliba
    Group
    S&D
    Targets
    Digital Omnibus proposal Recital 32
    Document
    ITRE–LIBE amendments 251–400 to the draft report
    Printed header
    Recital 32
  11. 287 Alternative Sebastian Tynkkynen +1ECR · ITRE–LIBE “which may also pursue an additional commercial interest”

    (32) The processing of personal data for scientific research purposes and the application of the GDPR’s provisions on scientific research, which may also pursue an additional commercial interest, are conditional on the adoption of appropriate safeguards for the rights and freedoms of data subjects, pursuant to Article 89(1) GDPR. To that end, the GDPR balances the right to protection of personal data, pursuant to Article 8 CFREU, with the freedom of science, pursuant to Article 13 CFREU. The processing of personal data for the purpose of scientific research therefore pursues a legitimate interest within the meaning of Article 6(1)(f) of Regulation (EU) 2016/679, provided that such research is not contrary to Union or Member State law. This is without prejudice to the obligation of the controller to ensure that all other conditions of Article 6(1)(f) of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 as well as all other requirements and principles of that Regulation are met.

    Tabled by
    Sebastian Tynkkynen, Diego Solier
    Group
    ECR
    Targets
    Digital Omnibus proposal Recital 32
    Document
    ITRE–LIBE amendments 251–400 to the draft report
    Printed header
    Recital 32
  12. 288 Alternative Markéta GregorováGreens/EFA · ITRE–LIBE “The processing of personal data for scientific research purposes and the application of the GDPR’s provisions on scientific research are conditional…”

    (32) The processing of personal data for scientific research purposes and the application of the GDPR’s provisions on scientific research are conditional on the adoption of appropriate safeguards for the rights and freedoms of data subjects, pursuant to Article 89(1) GDPR. To that end, the GDPR balances the right to protection of personal data, pursuant to Article 8 CFREU, with the freedom of science, pursuant to Article 13 CFREU. The processing of personal data for the purpose of scientific research therefore pursuescan abe legitimateconsidered interestcompatible withinwith the meaningpurpose offor Articlewhich 6(1)(f)the ofpersonal Regulationdata (EU)originally 2016/679was collected, provided that such research is not contrary to Union or Member State law. This is without prejudice to the obligation of the controller to ensure that all other conditions of Article 6(1)(f) of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 as well as all other requirements and principles of that Regulation are met.

    Tabled by
    Markéta Gregorová on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group
    Group
    Greens/EFA
    Targets
    Digital Omnibus proposal Recital 32
    Document
    ITRE–LIBE amendments 251–400 to the draft report
    Printed header
    Recital 32
  13. 289 Alternative Aura Salla +6EPP · ITRE–LIBE “seeks to ensure a proportionate balance between”

    (32) The processing of personal data for scientific research purposes and the application of the GDPR’s provisions on scientific research are conditional on the adoption of appropriate safeguards for the rights and freedoms of data subjects, pursuant to Article 89(1) GDPR. To that end, the GDPR balancesseeks to ensure a proportionate balance between the right to protection of personal data, pursuant to Article 8 CFREU, with the freedom of science, pursuant to Article 13 CFREU. The processing of personal data for the purpose of scientific research therefore pursues a legitimate interest within the meaning of Article 6(1)(f) of Regulation (EU) 2016/679, provided that such research is not contrary to Union or Member State law. This is without prejudice to the obligation of the controller to ensure that all other conditions of Article 6(1)(f) of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 as well as all other requirements and principles of that Regulation are met.

    Tabled by
    Aura Salla, Niels Flemming Hansen, Ana Miguel Pedro, Andrea Wechsler, Eva Maydell, Oliver Schenk, Christian Ehler
    Group
    EPP
    Targets
    Digital Omnibus proposal Recital 32
    Document
    ITRE–LIBE amendments 251–400 to the draft report
    Printed header
    Recital 32
  14. 290 Alternative João OliveiraThe Left · ITRE–LIBE “is not contrary to Union or Member State law. Where the controller intends to process data in pursuit of”

    (32) The processing of personal data for scientific research purposes and the application of the GDPR’s provisions on scientific research are conditional on the adoption of appropriate safeguards for the rights and freedoms of data subjects, pursuant to Article 89(1) GDPR. To that end, the GDPR balancesshould aim to strike an appropriate and sensible balance between the right to protection of personal data, pursuant to Article 8 CFREU, withand the freedom of science, pursuant to Article 13 CFREU., Theprovided processing of personal data forthat the purpose of scientific research thereforeconducted pursuesis not contrary to Union or Member State law. Where the controller intends to process data in pursuit of a legitimate interest within the meaning of Article 6(1)(f) of Regulation (EU) 2016/679, providedit thatmust suchensure researchmandatory iscompliance notwith contrary to Union or Member State law. This is without prejudice to the obligationall of the controller to ensure that all other conditions of that Article 6(1)(f) of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 as well as all other requirements and principles of that Regulation are met.

    Tabled by
    João Oliveira
    Group
    The Left
    Targets
    Digital Omnibus proposal Recital 32
    Document
    ITRE–LIBE amendments 251–400 to the draft report
    Printed header
    Recital 32