Texts to 22 Oct 2026

Digital Omnibus proposal· Recital 3

Text

Recital 3 Digital Omnibus proposal as printed in the Council text of 22 October 2026

Source Council, 22 October 2026. Recital 3: ST 14756/26, page 3 · exact text page

Union digital legislation has evolved incrementally over the past years, in response to the rapidly growing footprint of digital technologies in the Union’s economy and societal dynamic, and in view of addressing emerging challenges and promoting business opportunities in the EU. Notwithstanding the Commission’s commitment to a systematic ‘stress test’ of the digital rules, along with other Union rules, which might lead to further regulatory adjustments notably following the forthcoming Digital Fitness Check, as well as other targeted evaluations of digital rules, immediate regulatory changes are necessary. Consequently, this Regulation proposes a first set of amendments to the digital legislative framework, aimed at providing immediate regulatory clarifications that stimulate innovation in the Union market, and that cut administrative compliance costs in particular for businesses, while also streamlining supervisory and administrative costs for supervisory authorities and advisory bodies. The amendments also seek to provide clarity to individuals.

How the recital changed

Each text against the text before it

Recital Commission19 Nov 2025Rec 3Council21 May 2026Rec 3Council10 Jun 2026Rec 3Council18 Jun 2026Rec 3Council3 Sep 2026Rec 3Council2 Oct 2026Rec 3Council22 Oct 2026Rec 3
Compared withlaw in forcethe proposal21 May text10 Jun text18 Jun text3 Sep text2 Oct text
Recital 3 3 Added 3 Unchanged 3 Unchanged 3 Unchanged 3 Unchanged 3 Unchanged 3 Unchanged

Each text against the text before it: +Added in this text, not in the text before=Unchanged same as the text before

Parliament amendments propose other recitals under these numbers: Recital 3a (new) and Recital 3b (new).

Parliament amendments

16 amendments to this recital

16 propose alternative wording.

By political group; co-sponsored amendments count for each group
TypeThe LeftS&DGreens/EFARenewEPPECRNIRapporteur
~ Alternative14313211

By political group

  • ~ Alternative The Left 1 S&D 4 Greens/EFA 3 Renew 1 EPP 3 ECR 2 NI 1 Rapporteur 1
  1. 1 Alternative Alex Agius Saliba (rapporteur)Rapporteur · IMCO “and maintaining the highest standard of protections for”

    (3) Union digital legislation has evolved incrementally over the past years, in response to the rapidly growing footprint of digital technologies in the Union’s economy and societal dynamic, and in view of addressing emerging challenges and promoting business opportunities in the EU. Notwithstanding the Commission’s commitment to a systematic ‘stress test’ of the digital rules, along with other Union rules, which might lead to further regulatory adjustments notably following the forthcoming Digital Fitness Check, as well as other targeted evaluations of digital rules, immediate regulatory changes are necessary. Consequently, this Regulation proposes a first set of amendments to the digital legislative framework, aimed at providing immediate regulatory clarifications that stimulate innovation in the Union market, and that cut administrative compliance costs in particular for businesses, while also streamlining supervisory and administrative costs for supervisory authorities and advisory bodies.Notwithstanding the Commission’s commitment to its duties a Guardian of the Treaties, to a high level of consumer protection, fundamental rights and freedoms the Commission proposed regulatory changes in this Regulation aimed at providing immediate regulatory clarifications for businesses, while also streamlining supervisory and administrative costs for supervisory authorities and advisory bodies. The amendments also seek to provide clarity to individuals.This Regulation also seeks to provide clarity to and maintaining the highest standard of protections for individuals.

    Rapporteur
    Alex Agius Saliba
    Group
    Rapporteur
    Targets
    Digital Omnibus proposal Recital 3
    Document
    IMCO draft opinion
    Printed header
    Recital 3
  2. 71 Alternative David CormandGreens/EFA · JURI “Amendments to Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and (EU) 2023/2854 should be supported by a dedicated impact assessment, evaluating the cumulative effects on…”

    (3) Union digital legislation has evolved incrementally over the past years, in response to the rapidly growing footprint of digital technologies in the Union’s economy and societal dynamic, and in view of addressing emerging challenges and promoting business opportunities in the EU. Notwithstanding the Commission’s commitment to a systematic ‘stress test’ of the digital rules, along with other Union rules, which might lead to further regulatory adjustments notably following the forthcoming Digital Fitness Check, as well as other targeted evaluations of digital rules, immediate regulatory changes are necessary. The Digital Fitness Check should constitute the appropriate forum for conducting proper impact assessment on the need to amend further the legislative Acquis. Consequently, this Regulation proposes a first set of amendments to the digital legislative framework, aimed at providing immediate regulatory clarifications that stimulate innovation in the Union market, and that cut administrative compliance costs in particular for businesses, while also streamlining supervisory and administrative costs for supervisory authorities and advisory bodies. The amendments also seek to provide clarity to individuals. Amendments to Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and (EU) 2023/2854 should be supported by a dedicated impact assessment, evaluating the cumulative effects on Articles 7, 8 and 47 of the Charter of Fundamentals Rights of the European Union and the requirements of Article 52(1) thereof. Substantial amendments to fundamental-rights safeguards, such as those on the rights to privacy and for protection of personal data, should be duly justified beyond the goals of simplification, competitiveness, innovation or reduction of administrative burden.

    Tabled by
    David Cormand
    Group
    Greens/EFA
    Targets
    Digital Omnibus proposal Recital 3
    Document
    JURI amendments 69–296 to the draft opinion
    Printed header
    Recital 3
  3. 72 Alternative Victor NegrescuS&D · JURI “Those clarifications and streamlining measures shall not reduce the level of protection of consumers, workers or other data subjects, nor lower…”

    (3) Union digital legislation has evolved incrementally over the past years, in response to the rapidly growing footprint of digital technologies in the Union’s economy and societal dynamic, and in view of addressing emerging challenges and promoting business opportunities in the EU. Notwithstanding the Commission’s commitment to a systematic ‘stress test’ of the digital rules, along with other Union rules, which might lead to further regulatory adjustments notably following the forthcoming Digital Fitness Check, as well as other targeted evaluations of digital rules, immediate regulatory changes are necessary. Consequently, this Regulation proposes a first set of amendments to the digital legislative framework, aimed at providing immediate regulatory clarifications that stimulate innovation in the Union market, and that cut administrative compliance costs in particular for businesses, especially micro, small and medium-sized enterprises, while also streamlining supervisory and administrative costs for supervisory authorities and advisory bodies. The amendments also seek to provide clarity to individuals. Those clarifications and streamlining measures shall not reduce the level of protection of consumers, workers or other data subjects, nor lower existing cybersecurity, confidentiality or safety standards, but shall instead improve predictability and legal certainty for all actors.

    Tabled by
    Victor Negrescu
    Group
    S&D
    Targets
    Digital Omnibus proposal Recital 3
    Document
    JURI amendments 69–296 to the draft opinion
    Printed header
    Recital 3
  4. 73 Alternative Daniel BudaEPP · JURI “and ‘simplicity by design’ principles”

    (3) Union digital legislation has evolved incrementally over the past years, in response to the rapidly growing footprint of digital technologies in the Union’s economy and societal dynamic, and in view of addressing emerging challenges and promoting business opportunities in the EU. Notwithstanding the Commission’s commitment to a systematic ‘stress test’ of the digital rules, along with other Union rules, which might lead to further regulatory adjustments notablybased followingon the forthcoming‘digital Digitalby Fitnessdefault’ Checkand ‘simplicity by design’ principles, aswhich wellwould aseffectively otherreduce targetedadministrative evaluationscosts offor digital rulesbusinesses, immediatenotably regulatoryfor changesSMEs areand necessarysmall mid-caps. Consequently, this Regulation proposes a first set of amendments to the digital legislative framework, aimed at providing immediate regulatory clarifications that stimulate innovation in the Union market, and that cut administrative compliance costs in particular for businesses, while also streamlining supervisory and administrative costs for supervisory authorities and advisory bodies. The amendments also seek to provide clarity to individuals.

    Tabled by
    Daniel Buda
    Group
    EPP
    Targets
    Digital Omnibus proposal Recital 3
    Document
    JURI amendments 69–296 to the draft opinion
    Printed header
    Recital 3
  5. 86 Alternative Elena Sancho Murillo +6S&D · ITRE–LIBE “consumer protection, fundamental rights and freedoms”

    (3) Union digital legislation has evolved incrementally over the past years, in response to the rapidly growing footprint of digital technologies in the Union’s economy and societal dynamic, and in view of addressing emerging challenges and promoting business opportunities in the EU. Notwithstanding the Commission’s commitment to a systematic ‘stress test’ of the digital rules, along with other Union rules, which might lead to further regulatory adjustments notably following the forthcoming Digital Fitness Check, as well as other targeted evaluations of digital rules, immediate regulatory changes are necessary. Consequently, this Regulation proposes a first set of amendments to the digital legislative framework, aimed at providing immediate regulatory clarifications that stimulate innovation in the Union market, and that cut administrative compliance costs in particular for businesses, while also streamlining supervisory and administrative costs for supervisory authorities and advisory bodies.Notwithstanding the Commission’s commitment to its duties as a Guardian of the Treaties, to a high level of consumer protection, fundamental rights and freedoms, the Commission proposed regulatory changes aimed at providing regulatory clarifications for businesses, while also streamlining supervisory and administrative costs for supervisory authorities and advisory bodies. The amendments also seek to provide clarity to individuals.This Regulation also seeks to provide clarity and maintain the highest standard of protections for individuals.

    Tabled by
    Elena Sancho Murillo, Marina Kaljurand, Brando Benifei, José Cepeda, Lina Gálvez, Francisco Assis, Alex Agius Saliba
    Group
    S&D
    Targets
    Digital Omnibus proposal Recital 3
    Document
    ITRE–LIBE amendments 79–250 to the draft report
    Printed header
    Recital 3
  6. 87 Alternative Tomas Tobé +2EPP · ITRE–LIBE “This Regulation should be seen as a first step towards further simplification of the Digital Rulebook and further efforts to reduce fragmented…”

    (3) Union digital legislation has evolved incrementally over the past years, in response to the rapidly growing footprint of digital technologies in the Union’s economy and societal dynamic, and in view of addressing emerging challenges and promoting business opportunities in the EU. Notwithstanding the Commission’s commitment to a systematic ‘stress test’ of the digital rules and potential overlaps of requirements, along with other Union rules, which might lead to further regulatory adjustments notably following the forthcoming Digital Fitness Check, as well as other targeted evaluations of digital rules, immediate regulatory changes are necessary. This Regulation should be seen as a first step towards further simplification of the Digital Rulebook and further efforts to reduce fragmented enforcement of Union rules. Consequently, this Regulation proposes a first set of amendments to the digital legislative framework, aimed at providing immediate regulatory clarifications that stimulate innovation in the Union market, and that cut administrative compliance costs in particular for businesses, while also streamlining supervisory and administrative costs for supervisory authorities and advisory bodies. The amendments also seek to provide clarity to individuals.

    Tabled by
    Tomas Tobé, Arba Kokalari, Jörgen Warborn
    Group
    EPP
    Targets
    Digital Omnibus proposal Recital 3
    Document
    ITRE–LIBE amendments 79–250 to the draft report
    Printed header
    Recital 3
  7. 88 Alternative Michael McNamara +4Renew · ITRE–LIBE “Any future proposed changes to the EU’s digital rulebook should be accompanied by a full impact assessment in line with Better Regulation principles…”

    (3) Union digital legislation has evolved incrementally over the past years, in response to the rapidly growing footprint of digital technologies in the Union’s economy and societal dynamic, and in view of addressing emerging challenges and promoting business opportunities in the EU. Notwithstanding the Commission’s commitment to a systematic ‘stress test’ of the digital rules, along with other Union rules, which might lead to further regulatory adjustments notably following the forthcoming Digital Fitness Check, as well as other targeted evaluations of digital rules, immediate regulatory changes are necessary. Any future proposed changes to the EU’s digital rulebook should be accompanied by a full impact assessment in line with Better Regulation principles, evaluating in particular the impact on fundamental rights. Consequently, this Regulation proposes a first set of amendments to the digital legislative framework, aimed at providing immediate regulatory clarifications that stimulate innovation in the Union market, and that cut administrative compliance costs in particular for businesses, while also streamlining supervisory and administrative costs for supervisory authorities and advisory bodies. The amendments also seek to provide clarity to individuals.

    Tabled by
    Michael McNamara, Irena Joveva, Oihane Agirregoitia Martínez, Veronika Cifrová Ostrihoňová, Christophe Grudler
    Group
    Renew
    Targets
    Digital Omnibus proposal Recital 3
    Document
    ITRE–LIBE amendments 79–250 to the draft report
    Printed header
    Recital 3
  8. 89 Alternative João OliveiraThe Left · ITRE–LIBE “proportionate and consistent and maintain those objectives”

    (3) Union digital legislation has evolved incrementally over the past years, in response to the rapidly growing footprint of digital technologies in the Union’s economy and societal dynamic, and in view of addressing emerging challenges and promoting business opportunities in the EU. Notwithstanding the Commission’s commitment to a systematic ‘stress test’ of the digital rules, along with other Union rules, which might lead to further regulatory adjustments notably following the forthcoming Digital Fitness Check, as well as other targeted evaluations of digital rules, immediate regulatory changes are necessary.Union digital legislation has evolved incrementally over the past years, in response to the rapidly growing economic and social footprint of digital technologies in the Union. These developments highlight the need for clear and effective regulation of the use of personal and non-personal data. To that end, data protection should be made a central pillar and robust safeguards should be put in place for Union citizens and SMEs, including systematic ‘stress tests’ and targeted evaluations of digital rules, which could provide scope for future regulatory adjustments that are proportionate and consistent and maintain those objectives. Consequently, this Regulation proposes a first set of amendments to the digital legislative framework, aimed at providing immediate regulatory clarifications that stimulate innovation in the Union market, and that cut administrative compliance costs in particular for businesses, while also streamlining supervisory and administrative costs for supervisory authorities and advisory bodies.Consequently, a proper assessment should be undertaken of administrative compliance costs, in particular for individuals and SMEs, as well as the main difficulties faced by national supervisory and oversight authorities in the digital sector. The amendments also seek to provide clarity to individuals.

    Tabled by
    João Oliveira
    Group
    The Left
    Targets
    Digital Omnibus proposal Recital 3
    Document
    ITRE–LIBE amendments 79–250 to the draft report
    Printed header
    Recital 3
  9. 90 Alternative Markéta GregorováGreens/EFA · ITRE–LIBE “by bringing needed simplification on the so-called cookie banners”

    (3) Union digital legislation has evolved incrementally over the past years, in response to the rapidly growing footprint of digital technologies in the Union’s economy and societal dynamic, and in view of addressing emerging challenges and promoting business opportunities in the EU. Notwithstanding the Commission’s commitment to a systematic ‘stress test’ of the digital rules, along with other Union rules, which might lead to further regulatory adjustments notably following the forthcoming Digital Fitness Check, as well as other targeted evaluations of digital rules, immediate regulatory changes are necessary.The Commission committed to a systematic ‘stress test’ of the digital rules, along with other Union rules. Consequently, thisThis Regulation proposes a first set of amendments to the digital legislative framework, aimed at providing immediate regulatory clarifications that stimulate innovation in the Union market, and that cut administrative compliance costs in particular for businesses, while also streamlining supervisory and administrative costs for supervisory authorities and advisory bodies. The amendments also seek to provide clarity to individuals, by bringing needed simplification on the so-called cookie banners.

    Tabled by
    Markéta Gregorová on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group
    Group
    Greens/EFA
    Targets
    Digital Omnibus proposal Recital 3
    Document
    ITRE–LIBE amendments 79–250 to the draft report
    Printed header
    Recital 3
  10. 91 Alternative Diana Iovanovici ŞoşoacăNI · ITRE–LIBE “and respect their fundamental rights and freedoms and the presumption of innocence”

    (3) Union digital legislation has evolved incrementally over the past years, in response to the rapidly growing footprint of digital technologies in the Union’s economy and societal dynamic, and in view of addressing emerging challenges and promoting business opportunities in the EU. Notwithstanding the Commission’s commitment to a systematic ‘stress test’ of the digital rules, along with other Union rules, which might lead to further regulatory and implementation-related adjustments notably following the forthcoming Digital Fitness Check, as well as other targeted evaluations of digital rules, immediate regulatory changes are necessary. Consequently, this Regulation proposes a first set of amendments to the digital legislative framework, aimed at providing immediate regulatory clarifications that stimulate innovation in the Union market, and that cut administrative compliance costs in particular for businesses, while also streamlining supervisory and administrative costs for supervisory authorities and advisory bodies. The amendments also seek to provide clarity to individuals and respect their fundamental rights and freedoms and the presumption of innocence.

    Tabled by
    Diana Iovanovici Şoşoacă
    Group
    NI
    Targets
    Digital Omnibus proposal Recital 3
    Document
    ITRE–LIBE amendments 79–250 to the draft report
    Printed header
    Recital 3
Show 6 more amendments
  1. 92 Alternative Marina Kaljurand +8S&D · ITRE–LIBE “and safeguard the protection of privacy and personal data”

    (3) Union digital legislation has evolved incrementally over the past years, in response to the rapidly growing footprint of digital technologies in the Union’s economy and societal dynamic, and in view of addressing emerging challenges and promoting business opportunities in the EU. Notwithstanding the Commission’s commitment to a systematic ‘stress test’ of the digital rules, along with other Union rules, which might lead to further regulatory adjustments notably following the forthcoming Digital Fitness Check, as well as other targeted evaluations of digital rules, immediate regulatory changes are necessary. Consequently, this Regulation proposes a first set of amendments to the digital legislative framework, aimed at providing immediate regulatory clarifications that stimulate innovation in the Union market, and that cut administrative compliance costs in particular for businesses, while also streamlining supervisory and administrative costs for supervisory authorities and advisory bodies. The amendments also seek to provide clarity to individuals and safeguard the protection of privacy and personal data.

    Tabled by
    Marina Kaljurand, Elena Sancho Murillo, Brando Benifei, Birgit Sippel, Alex Agius Saliba, Francisco Assis, Elisabeth Grossmann, Kristian Vigenin, Matjaž Nemec
    Group
    S&D
    Targets
    Digital Omnibus proposal Recital 3
    Document
    ITRE–LIBE amendments 79–250 to the draft report
    Printed header
    Recital 3
  2. 93 Alternative Elena Sancho Murillo +6S&D · ITRE–LIBE “mainain the highest standard of protection for”

    (3) Union digital legislation has evolved incrementally over the past years, in response to the rapidly growing footprint of digital technologies in the Union’s economy and societal dynamic, and in view of addressing emerging challenges and promoting business opportunities in the EU. Notwithstanding the Commission’s commitment to a systematic ‘stress test’ of the digital rules, along with other Union rules, which might lead to further regulatory adjustments notably following the forthcoming Digital Fitness Check, as well as other targeted evaluations of digital rules, immediate regulatory changes are necessary. Consequently, this Regulation proposes a first set of amendments to the digital legislative framework, aimed at providing immediate regulatory clarifications that stimulate innovation in the Union market, and that cut administrative compliance costs in particular for businesses, while also streamlining supervisory and administrative costs for supervisory authorities and advisory bodies. The amendments also seekseeks to provide clarity and to mainain the highest standard of protection for individuals.

    Tabled by
    Elena Sancho Murillo, Marina Kaljurand, Brando Benifei, José Cepeda, Lina Gálvez, Francisco Assis, Alex Agius Saliba
    Group
    S&D
    Targets
    Digital Omnibus proposal Recital 3
    Document
    ITRE–LIBE amendments 79–250 to the draft report
    Printed header
    Recital 3
  3. 94 Alternative Sebastian Tynkkynen +1ECR · ITRE–LIBE “The number of union digital legislation has significantly increased over the past years, partly in response to the rapidly growing footprint of…”

    (3) UnionThe number of union digital legislation has evolvedsignificantly incrementallyincreased over the past years, partly in response to the rapidly growing footprint of digital technologies in the Union’s economy and societal dynamic, and in view of addressing emerging challenges and promoting business opportunities in the EU. Notwithstanding the Commission’s commitment to a systematic ‘stress test’ of the digital rules, along with other Union rules, which might lead to further regulatory adjustments notably following the forthcoming Digital Fitness Check, as well as other targeted evaluations of digital rules, immediate regulatory changes are necessary. Consequently, this Regulation proposes a first set of amendments to the digital legislative framework, aimed at providing immediate regulatory clarifications that stimulate innovation in the Union market, and that cut administrative compliance costs in particular for businesses, while also streamlining supervisory and administrative costs for supervisory authorities and advisory bodies. The amendments also seek to provide clarity to individuals.

    Tabled by
    Sebastian Tynkkynen, Diego Solier
    Group
    ECR
    Targets
    Digital Omnibus proposal Recital 3
    Document
    ITRE–LIBE amendments 79–250 to the draft report
    Printed header
    Recital 3
  4. 125 Alternative Piotr MüllerECR · IMCO “Such simplification should strengthen the competitiveness of European businesses, including by protecting sensitive European data, know-how and trade…”

    (3) Union digital legislation has evolved incrementally over the past years, in response to the rapidly growing footprint of digital technologies in the Union’s economy and societal dynamic, and in view of addressing emerging challenges and promoting business opportunities in the EU. Notwithstanding the Commission’s commitment to a systematic ‘stress test’ of the digital rules, along with other Union rules, which might lead to further regulatory adjustments notably following the forthcoming Digital Fitness Check, as well as other targeted evaluations of digital rules, immediate regulatory changes are necessary. This Regulation should be followed without delay by further and more ambitious simplification of the digital legislative framework. Consequently, this Regulation proposes a first set of amendments to the digital legislative framework, aimed at providing immediate regulatory clarifications that stimulate innovation in the Union market, and that cut administrative compliance costs in particular for businesses, while also streamlining supervisory and administrative costs for supervisory authorities and advisory bodies. Such simplification should strengthen the competitiveness of European businesses, including by protecting sensitive European data, know-how and trade secrets against undue access by third-country entities, and should fully respect the competences of the Member States and the principle of subsidiarity. The amendments also seek to provide clarity to individuals.

    Tabled by
    Piotr Müller
    Group
    ECR
    Targets
    Digital Omnibus proposal Recital 3
    Document
    IMCO amendments 125–328 to the draft opinion
    Printed header
    Recital 3
  5. 126 Alternative Arba KokalariEPP · IMCO “This Regulation should be seen as a first step towards further simplification of the Digital Rulebook and further efforts to reduce fragmented…”

    (3) Union digital legislation has evolved incrementally over the past years, in response to the rapidly growing footprint of digital technologies in the Union’s economy and societal dynamic, and in view of addressing emerging challenges and promoting business opportunities in the EU. Notwithstanding the Commission’s commitment to a systematic ‘stress test’ of the digital rules and potential overlaps of requirements, along with other Union rules, which might lead to further regulatory adjustments notably following the forthcoming Digital Fitness Check, as well as other targeted evaluations of digital rules, immediate regulatory changes are necessary. This Regulation should be seen as a first step towards further simplification of the Digital Rulebook and further efforts to reduce fragmented enforcement of Union rules. Consequently, this Regulation proposes a first set of amendments to the digital legislative framework, aimed at providing immediate regulatory clarifications that stimulate innovation in the Union market, and that cut administrative compliance costs in particular for businesses, while also streamlining supervisory and administrative costs for supervisory authorities and advisory bodies. The amendments also seek to provide clarity to individuals.

    Tabled by
    Arba Kokalari
    Group
    EPP
    Targets
    Digital Omnibus proposal Recital 3
    Document
    IMCO amendments 125–328 to the draft opinion
    Printed header
    Recital 3
  6. 127 Alternative David CormandGreens/EFA · IMCO “The Digital Fitness Check should assess the interlinks and effects across the digital acquis and should not be used as a means to justify structural…”

    (3) Union digital legislation has evolved incrementally over the past years, in response to the rapidly growing footprint of digital technologies in the Union’s economy and societal dynamic, and in view of addressing emerging challenges and promoting business opportunities in the EU. Notwithstanding the Commission’s commitment to a systematic ‘stress test’ of the digital rules, along with other Union rules, which might lead to further regulatory adjustments notably following the forthcoming Digital Fitness Check, as well as other targeted evaluations of digital rules, immediate regulatory changes are necessary. The Digital Fitness Check should assess the interlinks and effects across the digital acquis and should not be used as a means to justify structural amendments or deregulation prior to such assessment. Consequently, this Regulation proposes a first set of amendments to the digital legislative framework, aimed at providing immediate regulatory clarifications that stimulate innovation in the Union market, and that cut administrative compliance costs in particular for businesses, while also streamlining supervisory and administrative costs for supervisory authorities and advisory bodies. The amendments also seek to provide clarity to individuals.

    Tabled by
    David Cormand on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group
    Group
    Greens/EFA
    Targets
    Digital Omnibus proposal Recital 3
    Document
    IMCO amendments 125–328 to the draft opinion
    Printed header
    Recital 3