Digital Omnibus proposal· Recital 3
Text
Recital 3 Digital Omnibus proposal as printed in the Council text of 22 October 2026
Source Council, 22 October 2026. Recital 3: ST 14756/26, page 3 · exact text page
Union digital legislation has evolved incrementally over the past years, in response to the rapidly growing footprint of digital technologies in the Union’s economy and societal dynamic, and in view of addressing emerging challenges and promoting business opportunities in the EU. Notwithstanding the Commission’s commitment to a systematic ‘stress test’ of the digital rules, along with other Union rules, which might lead to further regulatory adjustments notably following the forthcoming Digital Fitness Check, as well as other targeted evaluations of digital rules, immediate regulatory changes are necessary. Consequently, this Regulation proposes a first set of amendments to the digital legislative framework, aimed at providing immediate regulatory clarifications that stimulate innovation in the Union market, and that cut administrative compliance costs in particular for businesses, while also streamlining supervisory and administrative costs for supervisory authorities and advisory bodies. The amendments also seek to provide clarity to individuals.
How the recital changed
Each text against the text before it
| Recital | Commission19 Nov 2025Rec 3 | Council21 May 2026Rec 3 | Council10 Jun 2026Rec 3 | Council18 Jun 2026Rec 3 | Council3 Sep 2026Rec 3 | Council2 Oct 2026Rec 3 | Council22 Oct 2026Rec 3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Compared with | law in force | the proposal | 21 May text | 10 Jun text | 18 Jun text | 3 Sep text | 2 Oct text |
| Recital 3 | 3 Added | 3 Unchanged | 3 Unchanged | 3 Unchanged | 3 Unchanged | 3 Unchanged | 3 Unchanged |
Each text against the text before it: +Added in this text, not in the text before=Unchanged same as the text before
Parliament amendments propose other recitals under these numbers: Recital 3a (new) and Recital 3b (new).
Parliament amendments
16 amendments to this recital
16 propose alternative wording.
| Type | The Left | S&D | Greens/EFA | Renew | EPP | ECR | NI | Rapporteur |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ~ Alternative | 1 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 1 |
By political group
- ~ Alternative The Left 1 S&D 4 Greens/EFA 3 Renew 1 EPP 3 ECR 2 NI 1 Rapporteur 1
1 ~Alternative Alex Agius Saliba (rapporteur)Rapporteur · IMCO “and maintaining the highest standard of protections for”
(3) Union digital legislation has evolved incrementally over the past years, in response to the rapidly growing footprint of digital technologies in the Union’s economy and societal dynamic, and in view of addressing emerging challenges and promoting business opportunities in the EU.
Notwithstanding the Commission’s commitment to a systematic ‘stress test’ of the digital rules, along with other Union rules, which might lead to further regulatory adjustments notably following the forthcoming Digital Fitness Check, as well as other targeted evaluations of digital rules, immediate regulatory changes are necessary. Consequently, this Regulation proposes a first set of amendments to the digital legislative framework, aimed at providing immediate regulatory clarifications that stimulate innovation in the Union market, and that cut administrative compliance costs in particular for businesses, while also streamlining supervisory and administrative costs for supervisory authorities and advisory bodies.Notwithstanding the Commission’s commitment to its duties a Guardian of the Treaties, to a high level of consumer protection, fundamental rights and freedoms the Commission proposed regulatory changes in this Regulation aimed at providing immediate regulatory clarifications for businesses, while also streamlining supervisory and administrative costs for supervisory authorities and advisory bodies.The amendments also seek to provide clarity to individuals.This Regulation also seeks to provide clarity to and maintaining the highest standard of protections for individuals.- Rapporteur
- Alex Agius Saliba
- Group
- Rapporteur
- Targets
- Digital Omnibus proposal Recital 3
- Document
- IMCO draft opinion
- Source
- Official text, page 4
- Printed header
- Recital 3
71 ~Alternative David CormandGreens/EFA · JURI “Amendments to Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and (EU) 2023/2854 should be supported by a dedicated impact assessment, evaluating the cumulative effects on…”
(3) Union digital legislation has evolved incrementally over the past years, in response to the rapidly growing footprint of digital technologies in the Union’s economy and societal dynamic, and in view of addressing emerging challenges and promoting business opportunities in the EU. Notwithstanding the Commission’s commitment to a systematic ‘stress test’ of the digital rules, along with other Union rules, which might lead to further regulatory adjustments notably following the forthcoming Digital Fitness Check, as well as other targeted evaluations of digital rules, immediate regulatory changes are necessary. The Digital Fitness Check should constitute the appropriate forum for conducting proper impact assessment on the need to amend further the legislative Acquis. Consequently, this Regulation proposes a first set of amendments to the digital legislative framework, aimed at providing immediate regulatory clarifications that stimulate innovation in the Union market, and that cut administrative compliance costs in particular for businesses, while also streamlining supervisory and administrative costs for supervisory authorities and advisory bodies. The amendments also seek to provide clarity to individuals. Amendments to Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and (EU) 2023/2854 should be supported by a dedicated impact assessment, evaluating the cumulative effects on Articles 7, 8 and 47 of the Charter of Fundamentals Rights of the European Union and the requirements of Article 52(1) thereof. Substantial amendments to fundamental-rights safeguards, such as those on the rights to privacy and for protection of personal data, should be duly justified beyond the goals of simplification, competitiveness, innovation or reduction of administrative burden.
- Tabled by
- David Cormand
- Group
- Greens/EFA
- Targets
- Digital Omnibus proposal Recital 3
- Document
- JURI amendments 69–296 to the draft opinion
- Source
- Official text, pages 4–5
- Printed header
- Recital 3
72 ~Alternative Victor NegrescuS&D · JURI “Those clarifications and streamlining measures shall not reduce the level of protection of consumers, workers or other data subjects, nor lower…”
(3) Union digital legislation has evolved incrementally over the past years, in response to the rapidly growing footprint of digital technologies in the Union’s economy and societal dynamic, and in view of addressing emerging challenges and promoting business opportunities in the EU. Notwithstanding the Commission’s commitment to a systematic ‘stress test’ of the digital rules, along with other Union rules, which might lead to further regulatory adjustments notably following the forthcoming Digital Fitness Check, as well as other targeted evaluations of digital rules, immediate regulatory changes are necessary. Consequently, this Regulation proposes a first set of amendments to the digital legislative framework, aimed at providing immediate regulatory clarifications that stimulate innovation in the Union market, and that cut administrative compliance costs in particular for businesses, especially micro, small and medium-sized enterprises, while also streamlining supervisory and administrative costs for supervisory authorities and advisory bodies. The amendments also seek to provide clarity to individuals. Those clarifications and streamlining measures shall not reduce the level of protection of consumers, workers or other data subjects, nor lower existing cybersecurity, confidentiality or safety standards, but shall instead improve predictability and legal certainty for all actors.
- Tabled by
- Victor Negrescu
- Group
- S&D
- Targets
- Digital Omnibus proposal Recital 3
- Document
- JURI amendments 69–296 to the draft opinion
- Source
- Official text, pages 5–6
- Printed header
- Recital 3
73 ~Alternative Daniel BudaEPP · JURI “and ‘simplicity by design’ principles”
(3) Union digital legislation has evolved incrementally over the past years, in response to the rapidly growing footprint of digital technologies in the Union’s economy and societal dynamic, and in view of addressing emerging challenges and promoting business opportunities in the EU. Notwithstanding the Commission’s commitment to a systematic ‘stress test’ of the digital rules, along with other Union rules, which might lead to further regulatory adjustments
notablybasedfollowingon theforthcoming‘digitalDigitalbyFitnessdefault’Checkand ‘simplicity by design’ principles,aswhichwellwouldaseffectivelyotherreducetargetedadministrativeevaluationscostsoffordigital rulesbusinesses,immediatenotablyregulatoryforchangesSMEsareandnecessarysmall mid-caps. Consequently, this Regulation proposes a first set of amendments to the digital legislative framework, aimed at providing immediate regulatory clarifications that stimulate innovation in the Union market, and that cut administrative compliance costs in particular for businesses, while also streamlining supervisory and administrative costs for supervisory authorities and advisory bodies. The amendments also seek to provide clarity to individuals.- Tabled by
- Daniel Buda
- Group
- EPP
- Targets
- Digital Omnibus proposal Recital 3
- Document
- JURI amendments 69–296 to the draft opinion
- Source
- Official text, pages 6–7
- Printed header
- Recital 3
86 ~Alternative Elena Sancho Murillo +6S&D · ITRE–LIBE “consumer protection, fundamental rights and freedoms”
(3) Union digital legislation has evolved incrementally over the past years, in response to the rapidly growing footprint of digital technologies in the Union’s economy and societal dynamic, and in view of addressing emerging challenges and promoting business opportunities in the EU.
Notwithstanding the Commission’s commitment to a systematic ‘stress test’ of the digital rules, along with other Union rules, which might lead to further regulatory adjustments notably following the forthcoming Digital Fitness Check, as well as other targeted evaluations of digital rules, immediate regulatory changes are necessary. Consequently, this Regulation proposes a first set of amendments to the digital legislative framework, aimed at providing immediate regulatory clarifications that stimulate innovation in the Union market, and that cut administrative compliance costs in particular for businesses, while also streamlining supervisory and administrative costs for supervisory authorities and advisory bodies.Notwithstanding the Commission’s commitment to its duties as a Guardian of the Treaties, to a high level of consumer protection, fundamental rights and freedoms, the Commission proposed regulatory changes aimed at providing regulatory clarifications for businesses, while also streamlining supervisory and administrative costs for supervisory authorities and advisory bodies.The amendments also seek to provide clarity to individuals.This Regulation also seeks to provide clarity and maintain the highest standard of protections for individuals.- Tabled by
- Elena Sancho Murillo, Marina Kaljurand, Brando Benifei, José Cepeda, Lina Gálvez, Francisco Assis, Alex Agius Saliba
- Group
- S&D
- Targets
- Digital Omnibus proposal Recital 3
- Document
- ITRE–LIBE amendments 79–250 to the draft report
- Source
- Official text, page 7
- Printed header
- Recital 3
87 ~Alternative Tomas Tobé +2EPP · ITRE–LIBE “This Regulation should be seen as a first step towards further simplification of the Digital Rulebook and further efforts to reduce fragmented…”
(3) Union digital legislation has evolved incrementally over the past years, in response to the rapidly growing footprint of digital technologies in the Union’s economy and societal dynamic, and in view of addressing emerging challenges and promoting business opportunities in the EU. Notwithstanding the Commission’s commitment to a systematic ‘stress test’ of the digital rules and potential overlaps of requirements, along with other Union rules, which might lead to further regulatory adjustments notably following the forthcoming Digital Fitness Check, as well as other targeted evaluations of digital rules, immediate regulatory changes are necessary. This Regulation should be seen as a first step towards further simplification of the Digital Rulebook and further efforts to reduce fragmented enforcement of Union rules. Consequently, this Regulation proposes a first set of amendments to the digital legislative framework, aimed at providing immediate regulatory clarifications that stimulate innovation in the Union market, and that cut administrative compliance costs in particular for businesses, while also streamlining supervisory and administrative costs for supervisory authorities and advisory bodies. The amendments also seek to provide clarity to individuals.
- Tabled by
- Tomas Tobé, Arba Kokalari, Jörgen Warborn
- Group
- EPP
- Targets
- Digital Omnibus proposal Recital 3
- Document
- ITRE–LIBE amendments 79–250 to the draft report
- Source
- Official text, pages 7–8
- Printed header
- Recital 3
88 ~Alternative Michael McNamara +4Renew · ITRE–LIBE “Any future proposed changes to the EU’s digital rulebook should be accompanied by a full impact assessment in line with Better Regulation principles…”
(3) Union digital legislation has evolved incrementally over the past years, in response to the rapidly growing footprint of digital technologies in the Union’s economy and societal dynamic, and in view of addressing emerging challenges and promoting business opportunities in the EU. Notwithstanding the Commission’s commitment to a systematic ‘stress test’ of the digital rules, along with other Union rules, which might lead to further regulatory adjustments notably following the forthcoming Digital Fitness Check, as well as other targeted evaluations of digital rules, immediate regulatory changes are necessary. Any future proposed changes to the EU’s digital rulebook should be accompanied by a full impact assessment in line with Better Regulation principles, evaluating in particular the impact on fundamental rights. Consequently, this Regulation proposes a first set of amendments to the digital legislative framework, aimed at providing immediate regulatory clarifications that stimulate innovation in the Union market, and that cut administrative compliance costs in particular for businesses, while also streamlining supervisory and administrative costs for supervisory authorities and advisory bodies. The amendments also seek to provide clarity to individuals.
- Tabled by
- Michael McNamara, Irena Joveva, Oihane Agirregoitia Martínez, Veronika Cifrová Ostrihoňová, Christophe Grudler
- Group
- Renew
- Targets
- Digital Omnibus proposal Recital 3
- Document
- ITRE–LIBE amendments 79–250 to the draft report
- Source
- Official text, pages 8–9
- Printed header
- Recital 3
89 ~Alternative João OliveiraThe Left · ITRE–LIBE “proportionate and consistent and maintain those objectives”
(3)
Union digital legislation has evolved incrementally over the past years, in response to the rapidly growing footprint of digital technologies in the Union’s economy and societal dynamic, and in view of addressing emerging challenges and promoting business opportunities in the EU. Notwithstanding the Commission’s commitment to a systematic ‘stress test’ of the digital rules, along with other Union rules, which might lead to further regulatory adjustments notably following the forthcoming Digital Fitness Check, as well as other targeted evaluations of digital rules, immediate regulatory changes are necessary.Union digital legislation has evolved incrementally over the past years, in response to the rapidly growing economic and social footprint of digital technologies in the Union. These developments highlight the need for clear and effective regulation of the use of personal and non-personal data. To that end, data protection should be made a central pillar and robust safeguards should be put in place for Union citizens and SMEs, including systematic ‘stress tests’ and targeted evaluations of digital rules, which could provide scope for future regulatory adjustments that are proportionate and consistent and maintain those objectives.Consequently, this Regulation proposes a first set of amendments to the digital legislative framework, aimed at providing immediate regulatory clarifications that stimulate innovation in the Union market, and that cut administrative compliance costs in particular for businesses, while also streamlining supervisory and administrative costs for supervisory authorities and advisory bodies.Consequently, a proper assessment should be undertaken of administrative compliance costs, in particular for individuals and SMEs, as well as the main difficulties faced by national supervisory and oversight authorities in the digital sector.The amendments also seek to provide clarity to individuals.- Tabled by
- João Oliveira
- Group
- The Left
- Targets
- Digital Omnibus proposal Recital 3
- Document
- ITRE–LIBE amendments 79–250 to the draft report
- Printed header
- Recital 3
90 ~Alternative Markéta GregorováGreens/EFA · ITRE–LIBE “by bringing needed simplification on the so-called cookie banners”
(3) Union digital legislation has evolved incrementally over the past years, in response to the rapidly growing footprint of digital technologies in the Union’s economy and societal dynamic, and in view of addressing emerging challenges and promoting business opportunities in the EU.
Notwithstanding the Commission’s commitment to a systematic ‘stress test’ of the digital rules, along with other Union rules, which might lead to further regulatory adjustments notably following the forthcoming Digital Fitness Check, as well as other targeted evaluations of digital rules, immediate regulatory changes are necessary.The Commission committed to a systematic ‘stress test’ of the digital rules, along with other Union rules.Consequently, thisThis Regulation proposes afirstset of amendments to the digital legislative framework, aimed at providingimmediateregulatory clarifications that stimulate innovation in the Union market, and that cut administrative compliance costs in particular for businesses, while also streamlining supervisory and administrative costs for supervisory authorities and advisory bodies. The amendments also seek to provide clarity to individuals, by bringing needed simplification on the so-called cookie banners.- Tabled by
- Markéta Gregorová on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group
- Group
- Greens/EFA
- Targets
- Digital Omnibus proposal Recital 3
- Document
- ITRE–LIBE amendments 79–250 to the draft report
- Printed header
- Recital 3
91 ~Alternative Diana Iovanovici ŞoşoacăNI · ITRE–LIBE “and respect their fundamental rights and freedoms and the presumption of innocence”
(3) Union digital legislation has evolved incrementally over the past years, in response to the rapidly growing footprint of digital technologies in the Union’s economy and societal dynamic, and in view of addressing emerging challenges and promoting business opportunities in the EU. Notwithstanding the Commission’s commitment to a systematic ‘stress test’ of the digital rules, along with other Union rules, which might lead to further regulatory and implementation-related adjustments notably following the forthcoming Digital Fitness Check, as well as other targeted evaluations of digital rules, immediate regulatory changes are necessary. Consequently, this Regulation proposes a first set of amendments to the digital legislative framework, aimed at providing immediate regulatory clarifications that stimulate innovation in the Union market, and that cut administrative compliance costs in particular for businesses, while also streamlining supervisory and administrative costs for supervisory authorities and advisory bodies. The amendments also seek to provide clarity to individuals and respect their fundamental rights and freedoms and the presumption of innocence.
- Tabled by
- Diana Iovanovici Şoşoacă
- Group
- NI
- Targets
- Digital Omnibus proposal Recital 3
- Document
- ITRE–LIBE amendments 79–250 to the draft report
- Printed header
- Recital 3
Show 6 more amendments
92 ~Alternative Marina Kaljurand +8S&D · ITRE–LIBE “and safeguard the protection of privacy and personal data”
(3) Union digital legislation has evolved incrementally over the past years, in response to the rapidly growing footprint of digital technologies in the Union’s economy and societal dynamic, and in view of addressing emerging challenges and promoting business opportunities in the EU. Notwithstanding the Commission’s commitment to a systematic ‘stress test’ of the digital rules, along with other Union rules, which might lead to further regulatory adjustments notably following the forthcoming Digital Fitness Check, as well as other targeted evaluations of digital rules, immediate regulatory changes are necessary. Consequently, this Regulation proposes a first set of amendments to the digital legislative framework, aimed at providing immediate regulatory clarifications that stimulate innovation in the Union market, and that cut administrative compliance costs in particular for businesses, while also streamlining supervisory and administrative costs for supervisory authorities and advisory bodies. The amendments
alsoseek to provide clarity to individuals and safeguard the protection of privacy and personal data.- Tabled by
- Marina Kaljurand, Elena Sancho Murillo, Brando Benifei, Birgit Sippel, Alex Agius Saliba, Francisco Assis, Elisabeth Grossmann, Kristian Vigenin, Matjaž Nemec
- Group
- S&D
- Targets
- Digital Omnibus proposal Recital 3
- Document
- ITRE–LIBE amendments 79–250 to the draft report
- Printed header
- Recital 3
93 ~Alternative Elena Sancho Murillo +6S&D · ITRE–LIBE “mainain the highest standard of protection for”
(3) Union digital legislation has evolved incrementally over the past years, in response to the rapidly growing footprint of digital technologies in the Union’s economy and societal dynamic, and in view of addressing emerging challenges and promoting business opportunities in the EU. Notwithstanding the Commission’s commitment to a systematic ‘stress test’ of the digital rules, along with other Union rules, which might lead to further regulatory adjustments notably following the forthcoming Digital Fitness Check, as well as other targeted evaluations of digital rules, immediate regulatory changes are necessary. Consequently, this Regulation proposes a first set of amendments to the digital legislative framework, aimed at providing immediate regulatory clarifications that stimulate innovation in the Union market, and that cut administrative compliance costs in particular for businesses, while also streamlining supervisory and administrative costs for supervisory authorities and advisory bodies. The amendments also
seekseeks to provide clarity and to mainain the highest standard of protection for individuals.- Tabled by
- Elena Sancho Murillo, Marina Kaljurand, Brando Benifei, José Cepeda, Lina Gálvez, Francisco Assis, Alex Agius Saliba
- Group
- S&D
- Targets
- Digital Omnibus proposal Recital 3
- Document
- ITRE–LIBE amendments 79–250 to the draft report
- Printed header
- Recital 3
94 ~Alternative Sebastian Tynkkynen +1ECR · ITRE–LIBE “The number of union digital legislation has significantly increased over the past years, partly in response to the rapidly growing footprint of…”
(3)
UnionThe number of union digital legislation hasevolvedsignificantlyincrementallyincreased over the past years, partly in response to the rapidly growing footprint of digital technologies in the Union’s economy and societal dynamic, and in view of addressing emerging challenges and promoting business opportunities in the EU. Notwithstanding the Commission’s commitment to a systematic ‘stress test’ of the digital rules, along with other Union rules, which might lead to further regulatory adjustments notably following the forthcoming Digital Fitness Check, as well as other targeted evaluations of digital rules, immediate regulatory changes are necessary. Consequently, this Regulation proposes a first set of amendments to the digital legislative framework, aimed at providing immediate regulatory clarifications that stimulate innovation in the Union market, and that cut administrative compliance costs in particular for businesses, while also streamlining supervisory and administrative costs for supervisory authorities and advisory bodies. The amendments also seek to provide clarity to individuals.- Tabled by
- Sebastian Tynkkynen, Diego Solier
- Group
- ECR
- Targets
- Digital Omnibus proposal Recital 3
- Document
- ITRE–LIBE amendments 79–250 to the draft report
- Source
- Official text, page 14
- Printed header
- Recital 3
125 ~Alternative Piotr MüllerECR · IMCO “Such simplification should strengthen the competitiveness of European businesses, including by protecting sensitive European data, know-how and trade…”
(3) Union digital legislation has evolved incrementally over the past years, in response to the rapidly growing footprint of digital technologies in the Union’s economy and societal dynamic, and in view of addressing emerging challenges and promoting business opportunities in the EU. Notwithstanding the Commission’s commitment to a systematic ‘stress test’ of the digital rules, along with other Union rules, which might lead to further regulatory adjustments notably following the forthcoming Digital Fitness Check, as well as other targeted evaluations of digital rules, immediate regulatory changes are necessary. This Regulation should be followed without delay by further and more ambitious simplification of the digital legislative framework. Consequently, this Regulation proposes a first set of amendments to the digital legislative framework, aimed at providing immediate regulatory clarifications that stimulate innovation in the Union market, and that cut administrative compliance costs in particular for businesses, while also streamlining supervisory and administrative costs for supervisory authorities and advisory bodies. Such simplification should strengthen the competitiveness of European businesses, including by protecting sensitive European data, know-how and trade secrets against undue access by third-country entities, and should fully respect the competences of the Member States and the principle of subsidiarity. The amendments also seek to provide clarity to individuals.
- Tabled by
- Piotr Müller
- Group
- ECR
- Targets
- Digital Omnibus proposal Recital 3
- Document
- IMCO amendments 125–328 to the draft opinion
- Source
- Official text, page 3
- Printed header
- Recital 3
126 ~Alternative Arba KokalariEPP · IMCO “This Regulation should be seen as a first step towards further simplification of the Digital Rulebook and further efforts to reduce fragmented…”
(3) Union digital legislation has evolved incrementally over the past years, in response to the rapidly growing footprint of digital technologies in the Union’s economy and societal dynamic, and in view of addressing emerging challenges and promoting business opportunities in the EU. Notwithstanding the Commission’s commitment to a systematic ‘stress test’ of the digital rules and potential overlaps of requirements, along with other Union rules, which might lead to further regulatory adjustments notably following the forthcoming Digital Fitness Check, as well as other targeted evaluations of digital rules, immediate regulatory changes are necessary. This Regulation should be seen as a first step towards further simplification of the Digital Rulebook and further efforts to reduce fragmented enforcement of Union rules. Consequently, this Regulation proposes a first set of amendments to the digital legislative framework, aimed at providing immediate regulatory clarifications that stimulate innovation in the Union market, and that cut administrative compliance costs in particular for businesses, while also streamlining supervisory and administrative costs for supervisory authorities and advisory bodies. The amendments also seek to provide clarity to individuals.
- Tabled by
- Arba Kokalari
- Group
- EPP
- Targets
- Digital Omnibus proposal Recital 3
- Document
- IMCO amendments 125–328 to the draft opinion
- Source
- Official text, page 4
- Printed header
- Recital 3
127 ~Alternative David CormandGreens/EFA · IMCO “The Digital Fitness Check should assess the interlinks and effects across the digital acquis and should not be used as a means to justify structural…”
(3) Union digital legislation has evolved incrementally over the past years, in response to the rapidly growing footprint of digital technologies in the Union’s economy and societal dynamic, and in view of addressing emerging challenges and promoting business opportunities in the EU. Notwithstanding the Commission’s commitment to a systematic ‘stress test’ of the digital rules, along with other Union rules, which might lead to further regulatory adjustments notably following the forthcoming Digital Fitness Check, as well as other targeted evaluations of digital rules, immediate regulatory changes are necessary. The Digital Fitness Check should assess the interlinks and effects across the digital acquis and should not be used as a means to justify structural amendments or deregulation prior to such assessment. Consequently, this Regulation proposes a first set of amendments to the digital legislative framework, aimed at providing immediate regulatory clarifications that stimulate innovation in the Union market, and that cut administrative compliance costs in particular for businesses, while also streamlining supervisory and administrative costs for supervisory authorities and advisory bodies. The amendments also seek to provide clarity to individuals.
- Tabled by
- David Cormand on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group
- Group
- Greens/EFA
- Targets
- Digital Omnibus proposal Recital 3
- Document
- IMCO amendments 125–328 to the draft opinion
- Source
- Official text, pages 4–5
- Printed header
- Recital 3