Digital Omnibus tracker

Digital Omnibus proposal

Recital 26

Compare the available Commission, Council and Parliament texts and amendments affecting this recital.

Recital total: 1 part · 3 Council drafts · 8 Parliament amendments

Removed wording is struck through; added or replacement wording is highlighted.

Institutional text

European Commission proposal

The wording proposed by the Commission at the start of this legislative file.

Commission source wording and instructions

Recital 26

Commission proposal

In the spirit of fostering innovation and maintaining fair competition within the Union’s digital market, it is imperative to ensure that access to and reuse of public sector data benefit a wide range of market participants and do not inadvertently reinforce existing dominant positions. Very large enterprises, and in particular undertakings designated as gatekeepers under Regulation (EU) 2022/1925, hold significant power and influence over the internal market. To prevent such entities from leveraging their substantial means to the detriment of fair competition and innovation, public sector bodies should be able to set out higher charges and fees for the re-use of open government data and protected data. Such higher charges and fees should be proportionate and should be based on objective criteria, taking into consideration the economic power and the entity’s ability to acquire data. This measure serves to safeguard opportunities for smaller businesses and new market entrants to innovate and compete in the digital economy.

Institutional text

Council Presidency texts

Successive Presidency compromise texts. Their inclusion does not imply agreement or adoption.

Recital 26

June Presidency compromise · 10 June

In the spirit of fostering innovation and maintaining fair competition within the Union’s digital market, it is imperative to ensure that access to and reuse of public sector data benefit a wide range of market participants and do not inadvertently reinforce existing dominant positions. Very large enterprises, and in particular undertakings designated as gatekeepers under Regulation (EU) 2022/1925, hold significant power and influence over the internal market. To prevent such entities from leveraging their substantial means to the detriment of fair competition and innovation, public sector bodies should be able to set out higher charges and fees for the re-use of public sector open data and protected data. Such higher charges and fees should be proportionate and should be based on 13 Commission Recommendation of 6 May 2003 concerning the definition of micro, small and medium-sized enterprises (OJ L 124, 20.5.2003, p. 36, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reco/2003/361/oj). 14 Regulation (EU) 2022/1925 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 September 2022 on contestable and fair markets in the digital sector and amending Directives (EU) 2019/1937 and (EU) 2020/1828 (Digital Markets Act) (OJ L 265, 12.10.2022, p. 1, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2022/1925/oj). objective criteria, taking into consideration the economic power and the entity’s ability to acquire data. This measure serves to safeguard opportunities for smaller businesses and new market entrants to innovate and compete in the digital economy.

Competing proposals

European Parliament amendments

These are alternative tabled amendments. An amendment affecting several tracked parts appears once here, with each target identified.

More filters

Political group at the amendment date where available; otherwise the current Parliament affiliation.

Alternative wording Amendment 16 IMCO draft opinion · Alex Agius Saliba (rapporteur)
(26) In the spirit of fostering innovation and maintaining fair competition within the Union’s digital market, it is imperative to ensure that access to and reuse of public sector data benefit a wide range of market participants and do not inadvertently reinforce existing dominant positions. Very large enterprises, and in particularincluding undertakings designated as gatekeepers under Regulation (EU) 2022/1925, hold significant power and influence over the internal market. To prevent such entities from leveraging their substantial means to the detriment of fair competition and innovation, public sector bodies should be able to set out higher charges and fees for the re-use of open government data and protected data. Such higher charges and fees should be proportionate and should be based on objective criteria, taking into consideration the economic power and the entity’s ability to acquire data. This measure serves to safeguard opportunities for smaller businesses and new market entrants to innovate and compete in the digital economy.
Alternative wording Amendment 109 · Victor Negrescu JURI
(26) In the spirit of fostering innovation and maintaining fair competition within the Union’s digital market, it is imperative to ensure that access to and reuse of public sector data benefit a wide range of market participants and do not inadvertently reinforce existing dominant positions. Very large enterprises, and in particular undertakings designated as gatekeepers under Regulation (EU) 2022/1925, hold significant power and influence over the internal market. To prevent such entities from leveraging their substantial means to the detriment of fair competition and innovation, public sector bodies should be able to set out higher charges and fees for the re-use of open government data and protected data. Such higher charges and fees should be proportionate and should be based on objective criteria, taking into consideration the economic power and the entity’s ability to acquire data. This measure serves to safeguard opportunities for smaller businesses and new market entrants to innovate and compete in the digital economy across all regions of the Union, including less digitally developed areas, thereby contributing to economic, social and territorial cohesion.
Alternative wording Amendment 156 · Piotr Müller IMCO
(26) In the spirit of fostering innovation and maintaining fair competition within the Union’s digital market, it is imperative to ensure that access to and reuse of public sector data benefit a wide range of market participants and do not inadvertently reinforce existing dominant positions. Very large enterprises, and in particular undertakings designated as gatekeepers under Regulation (EU) 2022/1925, hold significant power and influence over the internal market. To prevent such entities from leveraging their substantial means to the detriment of fair competition and innovation, public sector bodies should be able to set out higher charges and fees for the re-use of open government data and protected data. Such higher charges and fees should be proportionate predictable and should be based on objective and transparent criteria, taking into consideration the economic power and the entity’s ability to acquire data. This measure serves to safeguard opportunities for smaller businesses and new market entrants to innovate and compete in the digital economy.
Remove proposed wording Amendment 201 · João Oliveira ITRE · LIBE
(26) In the spirit of fostering innovation and maintaining fair competition within the Union’s digital market, it is imperative to ensure that access to and reuse of public sector data benefit a wide range of market participants and do not inadvertently reinforce existing dominant positions. Very large enterprises, and in particular undertakings designated as gatekeepers under Regulation (EU) 2022/1925, hold significant power and influence over the internal market. To prevent such entities from leveraging their substantial means to the detriment of fair competition and innovation, public sector bodies should be able to set out higher charges and fees for the re-use of open government data and protected data. Such higher charges and fees should be proportionate and should be based on objective criteria, taking into consideration the economic power and the entity’s ability to acquire data. This measure serves to safeguard opportunities for smaller businesses and new market entrants to innovate and compete in the digital economy.
Source identification

Header printed in the source: Recital 26

Deletion marker printed in the source: deleted

Alternative wording Amendment 202 · Diana Iovanovici Şoşoacă ITRE · LIBE
(26) In the spirit of fostering innovation and maintaining fair competition within the Union’s digital market, it is imperative to ensure that access to and reuse of public sector data benefit a wide range of market participants and do not inadvertently reinforce existing dominant positions. Very large enterprises, and in particular undertakings designated as gatekeepers under Regulation (EU) 2022/1925, hold significant power and influence over the internal market. To prevent such entities from leveraging their substantial means to the detriment of fair competition and innovation, public sector bodies should be able to set out higher charges and fees for the re-use of open government data and protected data. Such higher charges and fees should be proportionate and should be based on objective criteria, taking into consideration the economic power and the entity’s ability to acquire data. This measure serves to safeguard opportunities for smaller businesses and new market entrants to innovate and compete in the digital economy. At the same time, a differentiated system of charges must be applied in such a way as to comply with the principles of transparency, proportionality and non-discrimination so that access to data is not restricted arbitrarily, but reflects the aim of ensuring effective competition in the internal market. Establishing such mechanisms helps to prevent an excessive concentration of competitive advantages in the hands of a small number of economic operators and promotes the development of a balanced digital ecosystem in which small and medium-sized enterprises, start-ups and research organisations have real opportunities to develop innovative, data-driven products and services. Reuse of public-sector data thus becomes a tool to stimulate innovation and competitiveness, in accordance with the aims of the European Data Strategy and the principles of the data economy.
Alternative wording Amendment 203 · Markus Buchheit ITRE · LIBE
(26) In the spirit of fostering innovation and maintaining fair competition within the Union’s digital market, it is imperative to ensure that access to and reuse of public sector data benefit a wide range of market participants and do not inadvertently reinforce existing dominant positions. Very large enterprises, and in particular undertakings designated as gatekeepers under Regulation (EU) 2022/1925, hold significant power and influence over the internal market. To prevent such entities from leveraging their substantial means to the detriment of fair competition and innovation, public sector bodies should be able to set out higher chargesCharges and fees for the re-use of openpublic governmentsector data and protecteddocuments data.must Suchbe highertransparent, chargesobjective, cost-oriented and feesnon-discriminatory. shouldDifferential treatment on the basis of the size of an undertaking, its market significance or its designation as a gatekeeper shall be proportionate and should be based on objective criteria, taking into consideration the economic power and the entity’s ability to acquire dataexcluded. This measure serves to safeguard opportunities for smaller businesses and new market entrants to innovate and compete in the digital economy.
Alternative wording Amendment 204 · Elena Sancho Murillo, Marina Kaljurand, Brando Benifei, José Cepeda, Matthias Ecke, Lina Gálvez, Francisco Assis, Alex Agius Saliba ITRE · LIBE
(26) In the spirit of fostering innovation and maintaining fair competition within the Union’s digital market, it is imperative to ensure that access to and reuse of public sector data benefit society and a wide range of market participants and do not inadvertently reinforce existing dominant positions. Very large enterprises, and in particularincluding undertakings designated as gatekeepers under Regulation (EU) 2022/1925, hold significant power and influence over the internal market. To prevent such entities from leveraging their substantial means to the detriment of fair competition and innovation, public sector bodies should be able to set out higher charges and fees for the re-use of open government data and protected data. Such higher charges and fees should be proportionate and should be based on objective criteria, taking into consideration the economic power and the entity’s ability to acquire data. This measure serves to safeguard opportunities for smaller businesses and new market entrants to innovate and compete in the digital economy.
Alternative wording Amendment 205 · Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pierre-Romain Thionnet, Alexandre Varaut, Fabrice Leggeri, Marion Maréchal, Christophe Bay ITRE · LIBE
(26) In the spirit of fostering innovation and maintaining fair competition within the Union’s digital market, it is imperative to ensure that access to and reuse of public sector data benefit a wide range of market participants and do not inadvertently reinforce existing dominant positions. Very large enterprises, and in particular undertakings designated as gatekeepers under Regulation (EU) 2022/1925, hold significant power and influence over the internal market. To prevent such entities from leveraging their substantial means to the detriment of fair competition and innovation, public sector bodies should be able to set out higher charges and fees for the re-use of public sector open government data and protected data. Such higher charges and fees should be proportionate and should be based on objective criteria, taking into consideration the economic power and the entity’s ability to acquire data. This measure serves to safeguard opportunities for smaller businesses and new market entrants to innovate and compete in the digital economy.