Compare the available Commission, Council and Parliament texts and amendments affecting this recital.
Recital total: 1 part · 3 Council drafts · 8 Parliament amendments
Removed wording is struck through; added or replacement wording is highlighted.
Institutional text
European Commission proposal
The wording proposed by the Commission at the start of this legislative file.
No standalone Commission wording is mapped to this tracked part. A newly proposed provision may have no earlier text of its own.
Commission source wording and instructions
Recital 26
Commission proposal
In the spirit of fostering innovation and maintaining fair competition within the Union’s digital market, it is imperative to ensure that access to and reuse of public sector data benefit a wide range of market participants and do not inadvertently reinforce existing dominant positions. Very large enterprises, and in particular undertakings designated as gatekeepers under Regulation (EU) 2022/1925, hold significant power and influence over the internal market. To prevent such entities from leveraging their substantial means to the detriment of fair competition and innovation, public sector bodies should be able to set out higher charges and fees for the re-use of open government data and protected data. Such higher charges and fees should be proportionate and should be based on objective criteria, taking into consideration the economic power and the entity’s ability to acquire data. This measure serves to safeguard opportunities for smaller businesses and new market entrants to innovate and compete in the digital economy.
Institutional text
Council Presidency texts
Successive Presidency compromise texts. Their inclusion does not imply agreement or adoption.
No Council wording is mapped to this tracked part.
Recital 26
June Presidency compromise · 10 June
In the spirit of fostering innovation and maintaining fair competition within the Union’s digital market, it is imperative to ensure that access to and reuse of public sector data benefit a wide range of market participants and do not inadvertently reinforce existing dominant positions. Very large enterprises, and in particular undertakings designated as gatekeepers under Regulation (EU) 2022/1925, hold significant power and influence over the internal market. To prevent such entities from leveraging their substantial means to the detriment of fair competition and innovation, public sector bodies should be able to set out higher charges and fees for the re-use of public sector open data and protected data. Such higher charges and fees should be proportionate and should be based on 13 Commission Recommendation of 6 May 2003 concerning the definition of micro, small and medium-sized enterprises (OJ L 124, 20.5.2003, p. 36, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reco/2003/361/oj). 14 Regulation (EU) 2022/1925 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 September 2022 on contestable and fair markets in the digital sector and amending Directives (EU) 2019/1937 and (EU) 2020/1828 (Digital Markets Act) (OJ L 265, 12.10.2022, p. 1, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2022/1925/oj). objective criteria, taking into consideration the economic power and the entity’s ability to acquire data. This measure serves to safeguard opportunities for smaller businesses and new market entrants to innovate and compete in the digital economy.
Recital 26
June Presidency compromise · 18 June
In the spirit of fostering innovation and maintaining fair competition within the Union’s digital market, it is imperative to ensure that access to and reuse of public sector data benefit a wide range of market participants and do not inadvertently reinforce existing dominant positions. Very large enterprises, and in particular undertakings designated as gatekeepers under Regulation (EU) 2022/1925, hold significant power and influence over the internal market. To prevent such entities from leveraging their substantial means to the detriment of fair competition and innovation, public sector bodies should be able to set out higher charges and fees for the re-use of public sector open data and protected data. Such higher charges and fees should be proportionate and should be based 13 Commission Recommendation of 6 May 2003 concerning the definition of micro, small and medium-sized enterprises (OJ L 124, 20.5.2003, p. 36, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reco/2003/361/oj). 14 Regulation (EU) 2022/1925 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 September 2022 on contestable and fair markets in the digital sector and amending Directives (EU) 2019/1937 and (EU) 2020/1828 (Digital Markets Act) (OJ L 265, 12.10.2022, p. 1, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2022/1925/oj). on objective criteria, taking into consideration the economic power and the entity’s ability to acquire data. This measure serves to safeguard opportunities for smaller businesses and new market entrants to innovate and compete in the digital economy.
Recital 26
September Presidency compromise
In the spirit of fostering innovation and maintaining fair competition within the Union’s digital market, it is imperative to ensure that access to and reuse of public sector data benefit a wide range of market participants and do not inadvertently reinforce existing dominant positions. Very large enterprises, and in particular undertakings designated as gatekeepers under Regulation (EU) 2022/1925, hold significant power and influence over the internal market. To prevent such entities from leveraging their substantial means to the detriment of fair competition and innovation, public sector bodies should be able to set out higher charges and fees for the re-use of public sector open data and protected data. Such higher charges and fees should be proportionate and should be based 13 Commission Recommendation of 6 May 2003 concerning the definition of micro, small and medium-sized enterprises (OJ L 124, 20.5.2003, p. 36, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reco/2003/361/oj). 14 Regulation (EU) 2022/1925 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 September 2022 on contestable and fair markets in the digital sector and amending Directives (EU) 2019/1937 and (EU) 2020/1828 (Digital Markets Act) (OJ L 265, 12.10.2022, p. 1, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2022/1925/oj). on objective criteria, taking into consideration the economic power and the entity’s ability to acquire data. This measure serves to safeguard opportunities for smaller businesses and new market entrants to innovate and compete in the digital economy.
Recital 26 3 Council drafts
Recital 26
10 June 2026 · June Presidency compromise · 10 June
In the spirit of fostering innovation and maintaining fair competition within the Union’s digital market, it is imperative to ensure that access to and reuse of public sector data benefit a wide range of market participants and do not inadvertently reinforce existing dominant positions. Very large enterprises, and in particular undertakings designated as gatekeepers under Regulation (EU) 2022/1925, hold significant power and influence over the internal market. To prevent such entities from leveraging their substantial means to the detriment of fair competition and innovation, public sector bodies should be able to set out higher charges and fees for the re-use of public sector open data and protected data. Such higher charges and fees should be proportionate and should be based on 13 Commission Recommendation of 6 May 2003 concerning the definition of micro, small and medium-sized enterprises (OJ L 124, 20.5.2003, p. 36, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reco/2003/361/oj). 14 Regulation (EU) 2022/1925 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 September 2022 on contestable and fair markets in the digital sector and amending Directives (EU) 2019/1937 and (EU) 2020/1828 (Digital Markets Act) (OJ L 265, 12.10.2022, p. 1, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2022/1925/oj). objective criteria, taking into consideration the economic power and the entity’s ability to acquire data. This measure serves to safeguard opportunities for smaller businesses and new market entrants to innovate and compete in the digital economy.
Recital 26
18 June 2026 · June Presidency compromise · 18 June
In the spirit of fostering innovation and maintaining fair competition within the Union’s digital market, it is imperative to ensure that access to and reuse of public sector data benefit a wide range of market participants and do not inadvertently reinforce existing dominant positions. Very large enterprises, and in particular undertakings designated as gatekeepers under Regulation (EU) 2022/1925, hold significant power and influence over the internal market. To prevent such entities from leveraging their substantial means to the detriment of fair competition and innovation, public sector bodies should be able to set out higher charges and fees for the re-use of public sector open data and protected data. Such higher charges and fees should be proportionate and should be based 13 Commission Recommendation of 6 May 2003 concerning the definition of micro, small and medium-sized enterprises (OJ L 124, 20.5.2003, p. 36, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reco/2003/361/oj). 14 Regulation (EU) 2022/1925 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 September 2022 on contestable and fair markets in the digital sector and amending Directives (EU) 2019/1937 and (EU) 2020/1828 (Digital Markets Act) (OJ L 265, 12.10.2022, p. 1, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2022/1925/oj). on objective criteria, taking into consideration the economic power and the entity’s ability to acquire data. This measure serves to safeguard opportunities for smaller businesses and new market entrants to innovate and compete in the digital economy.
Recital 26
3 September 2026 · September Presidency compromise
In the spirit of fostering innovation and maintaining fair competition within the Union’s digital market, it is imperative to ensure that access to and reuse of public sector data benefit a wide range of market participants and do not inadvertently reinforce existing dominant positions. Very large enterprises, and in particular undertakings designated as gatekeepers under Regulation (EU) 2022/1925, hold significant power and influence over the internal market. To prevent such entities from leveraging their substantial means to the detriment of fair competition and innovation, public sector bodies should be able to set out higher charges and fees for the re-use of public sector open data and protected data. Such higher charges and fees should be proportionate and should be based 13 Commission Recommendation of 6 May 2003 concerning the definition of micro, small and medium-sized enterprises (OJ L 124, 20.5.2003, p. 36, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reco/2003/361/oj). 14 Regulation (EU) 2022/1925 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 September 2022 on contestable and fair markets in the digital sector and amending Directives (EU) 2019/1937 and (EU) 2020/1828 (Digital Markets Act) (OJ L 265, 12.10.2022, p. 1, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2022/1925/oj). on objective criteria, taking into consideration the economic power and the entity’s ability to acquire data. This measure serves to safeguard opportunities for smaller businesses and new market entrants to innovate and compete in the digital economy.
Competing proposals
European Parliament amendments
These are alternative tabled amendments. An amendment affecting several tracked parts appears once here, with each target identified.
More filters
Political group at the amendment date where available; otherwise the current Parliament affiliation.
Alternative wordingAmendment 16 IMCO draft opinion · Alex Agius Saliba (rapporteur)
(26) In the spirit of fostering innovation and maintaining fair competition within the Union’s digital market, it is imperative to ensure that access to and reuse of public sector data benefit a wide range of market participants and do not inadvertently reinforce existing dominant positions. Very large enterprises, and in particularincluding undertakings designated as gatekeepers under Regulation (EU) 2022/1925, hold significant power and influence over the internal market. To prevent such entities from leveraging their substantial means to the detriment of fair competition and innovation, public sector bodies should be able to set out higher charges and fees for the re-use of open government data and protected data. Such higher charges and fees should be proportionate and should be based on objective criteria, taking into consideration the economic power and the entity’s ability to acquire data. This measure serves to safeguard opportunities for smaller businesses and new market entrants to innovate and compete in the digital economy.
Alternative wordingAmendment 109 · Victor Negrescu JURI
(26) In the spirit of fostering innovation and maintaining fair competition within the Union’s digital market, it is imperative to ensure that access to and reuse of public sector data benefit a wide range of market participants and do not inadvertently reinforce existing dominant positions. Very large enterprises, and in particular undertakings designated as gatekeepers under Regulation (EU) 2022/1925, hold significant power and influence over the internal market. To prevent such entities from leveraging their substantial means to the detriment of fair competition and innovation, public sector bodies should be able to set out higher charges and fees for the re-use of open government data and protected data. Such higher charges and fees should be proportionate and should be based on objective criteria, taking into consideration the economic power and the entity’s ability to acquire data. This measure serves to safeguard opportunities for smaller businesses and new market entrants to innovate and compete in the digital economy across all regions of the Union, including less digitally developed areas, thereby contributing to economic, social and territorial cohesion.
Alternative wordingAmendment 156 · Piotr Müller IMCO
(26) In the spirit of fostering innovation and maintaining fair competition within the Union’s digital market, it is imperative to ensure that access to and reuse of public sector data benefit a wide range of market participants and do not inadvertently reinforce existing dominant positions. Very large enterprises, and in particular undertakings designated as gatekeepers under Regulation (EU) 2022/1925, hold significant power and influence over the internal market. To prevent such entities from leveraging their substantial means to the detriment of fair competition and innovation, public sector bodies should be able to set out higher charges and fees for the re-use of open government data and protected data. Such higher charges and fees should be proportionate predictable and should be based on objective and transparent criteria, taking into consideration the economic power and the entity’s ability to acquire data. This measure serves to safeguard opportunities for smaller businesses and new market entrants to innovate and compete in the digital economy.
Remove proposed wordingAmendment 201 · João Oliveira ITRE · LIBE
(26) In the spirit of fostering innovation and maintaining fair competition within the Union’s digital market, it is imperative to ensure that access to and reuse of public sector data benefit a wide range of market participants and do not inadvertently reinforce existing dominant positions. Very large enterprises, and in particular undertakings designated as gatekeepers under Regulation (EU) 2022/1925, hold significant power and influence over the internal market. To prevent such entities from leveraging their substantial means to the detriment of fair competition and innovation, public sector bodies should be able to set out higher charges and fees for the re-use of open government data and protected data. Such higher charges and fees should be proportionate and should be based on objective criteria, taking into consideration the economic power and the entity’s ability to acquire data. This measure serves to safeguard opportunities for smaller businesses and new market entrants to innovate and compete in the digital economy.
Alternative wordingAmendment 202 · Diana Iovanovici Şoşoacă ITRE · LIBE
(26) In the spirit of fostering innovation and maintaining fair competition within the Union’s digital market, it is imperative to ensure that access to and reuse of public sector data benefit a wide range of market participants and do not inadvertently reinforce existing dominant positions. Very large enterprises, and in particular undertakings designated as gatekeepers under Regulation (EU) 2022/1925, hold significant power and influence over the internal market. To prevent such entities from leveraging their substantial means to the detriment of fair competition and innovation, public sector bodies should be able to set out higher charges and fees for the re-use of open government data and protected data. Such higher charges and fees should be proportionate and should be based on objective criteria, taking into consideration the economic power and the entity’s ability to acquire data. This measure serves to safeguard opportunities for smaller businesses and new market entrants to innovate and compete in the digital economy. At the same time, a differentiated system of charges must be applied in such a way as to comply with the principles of transparency, proportionality and non-discrimination so that access to data is not restricted arbitrarily, but reflects the aim of ensuring effective competition in the internal market. Establishing such mechanisms helps to prevent an excessive concentration of competitive advantages in the hands of a small number of economic operators and promotes the development of a balanced digital ecosystem in which small and medium-sized enterprises, start-ups and research organisations have real opportunities to develop innovative, data-driven products and services. Reuse of public-sector data thus becomes a tool to stimulate innovation and competitiveness, in accordance with the aims of the European Data Strategy and the principles of the data economy.
Alternative wordingAmendment 203 · Markus Buchheit ITRE · LIBE
(26) In the spirit of fostering innovation and maintaining fair competition within the Union’s digital market, it is imperative to ensure that access to and reuse of public sector data benefit a wide range of market participants and do not inadvertently reinforce existing dominant positions. Very large enterprises, and in particular undertakings designated as gatekeepers under Regulation (EU) 2022/1925, hold significant power and influence over the internal market. To prevent such entities from leveraging their substantial means to the detriment of fair competition and innovation, public sector bodies should be able to set out higher chargesCharges and fees for the re-use of openpublicgovernmentsector data and protecteddocumentsdata.mustSuchbehighertransparent,chargesobjective, cost-oriented and feesnon-discriminatory.shouldDifferential treatment on the basis of the size of an undertaking, its market significance or its designation as a gatekeeper shall be proportionate and should be based on objective criteria, taking into consideration the economic power and the entity’s ability to acquire dataexcluded. This measure serves to safeguard opportunities for smaller businesses and new market entrants to innovate and compete in the digital economy.
Alternative wordingAmendment 204 · Elena Sancho Murillo, Marina Kaljurand, Brando Benifei, José Cepeda, Matthias Ecke, Lina Gálvez, Francisco Assis, Alex Agius Saliba ITRE · LIBE
(26) In the spirit of fostering innovation and maintaining fair competition within the Union’s digital market, it is imperative to ensure that access to and reuse of public sector data benefit society and a wide range of market participants and do not inadvertently reinforce existing dominant positions. Very large enterprises, and in particularincluding undertakings designated as gatekeepers under Regulation (EU) 2022/1925, hold significant power and influence over the internal market. To prevent such entities from leveraging their substantial means to the detriment of fair competition and innovation, public sector bodies should be able to set out higher charges and fees for the re-use of open government data and protected data. Such higher charges and fees should be proportionate and should be based on objective criteria, taking into consideration the economic power and the entity’s ability to acquire data. This measure serves to safeguard opportunities for smaller businesses and new market entrants to innovate and compete in the digital economy.
Alternative wordingAmendment 205 · Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pierre-Romain Thionnet, Alexandre Varaut, Fabrice Leggeri, Marion Maréchal, Christophe Bay ITRE · LIBE
(26) In the spirit of fostering innovation and maintaining fair competition within the Union’s digital market, it is imperative to ensure that access to and reuse of public sector data benefit a wide range of market participants and do not inadvertently reinforce existing dominant positions. Very large enterprises, and in particular undertakings designated as gatekeepers under Regulation (EU) 2022/1925, hold significant power and influence over the internal market. To prevent such entities from leveraging their substantial means to the detriment of fair competition and innovation, public sector bodies should be able to set out higher charges and fees for the re-use of public sector open government data and protected data. Such higher charges and fees should be proportionate and should be based on objective criteria, taking into consideration the economic power and the entity’s ability to acquire data. This measure serves to safeguard opportunities for smaller businesses and new market entrants to innovate and compete in the digital economy.
No amendments match these filters.
Selected texts
Compare wording
Choose a tracked part and a named pair of texts. Comparisons are offered only where both sides cover the same legal unit.
Select a specific tracked part above to compare wording.
No same-scope comparison is available for this tracked part. Its source wording remains available in the article text sections.
Recital 26
European Commission proposal → Council Presidency text · ST 10426/26
Changes in context
In the spirit of fostering innovation and maintaining fair competition within the Union’s digital market, it is imperative to ensure that access to and reuse of public sector data benefit a wide range of market participants and do not inadvertently reinforce existing dominant positions. Very large enterprises, and in particular undertakings designated as gatekeepers under Regulation (EU) 2022/1925, hold significant power and influence over the internal market. To prevent such entities from leveraging their substantial means to the detriment of fair competition and innovation, public sector bodies should be able to set out higher charges and fees for the re-use of public sector open government data and protected data. Such higher charges and fees should be proportionate and should be based on 13 Commission Recommendation of 6 May 2003 concerning the definition of micro, small and medium-sized enterprises (OJ L 124, 20.5.2003, p. 36, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reco/2003/361/oj). 14 Regulation (EU) 2022/1925 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 September 2022 on contestable and fair markets in the digital sector and amending Directives (EU) 2019/1937 and (EU) 2020/1828 (Digital Markets Act) (OJ L 265, 12.10.2022, p. 1, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2022/1925/oj). objective criteria, taking into consideration the economic power and the entity’s ability to acquire data. This measure serves to safeguard opportunities for smaller businesses and new market entrants to innovate and compete in the digital economy.
RemovedAdded
Both texts in full
European Commission proposal
In the spirit of fostering innovation and maintaining fair competition within the Union’s digital market, it is imperative to ensure that access to and reuse of public sector data benefit a wide range of market participants and do not inadvertently reinforce existing dominant positions. Very large enterprises, and in particular undertakings designated as gatekeepers under Regulation (EU) 2022/1925, hold significant power and influence over the internal market. To prevent such entities from leveraging their substantial means to the detriment of fair competition and innovation, public sector bodies should be able to set out higher charges and fees for the re-use of open government data and protected data. Such higher charges and fees should be proportionate and should be based on objective criteria, taking into consideration the economic power and the entity’s ability to acquire data. This measure serves to safeguard opportunities for smaller businesses and new market entrants to innovate and compete in the digital economy.
Council Presidency text · ST 10426/26
In the spirit of fostering innovation and maintaining fair competition within the Union’s digital market, it is imperative to ensure that access to and reuse of public sector data benefit a wide range of market participants and do not inadvertently reinforce existing dominant positions. Very large enterprises, and in particular undertakings designated as gatekeepers under Regulation (EU) 2022/1925, hold significant power and influence over the internal market. To prevent such entities from leveraging their substantial means to the detriment of fair competition and innovation, public sector bodies should be able to set out higher charges and fees for the re-use of public sector open data and protected data. Such higher charges and fees should be proportionate and should be based on 13 Commission Recommendation of 6 May 2003 concerning the definition of micro, small and medium-sized enterprises (OJ L 124, 20.5.2003, p. 36, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reco/2003/361/oj). 14 Regulation (EU) 2022/1925 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 September 2022 on contestable and fair markets in the digital sector and amending Directives (EU) 2019/1937 and (EU) 2020/1828 (Digital Markets Act) (OJ L 265, 12.10.2022, p. 1, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2022/1925/oj). objective criteria, taking into consideration the economic power and the entity’s ability to acquire data. This measure serves to safeguard opportunities for smaller businesses and new market entrants to innovate and compete in the digital economy.
Recital 26
Council Presidency text · ST 10426/26 → Council Presidency text · ST 10677/26
Changes in context
In the spirit of fostering innovation and maintaining fair competition within the Union’s digital market, it is imperative to ensure that access to and reuse of public sector data benefit a wide range of market participants and do not inadvertently reinforce existing dominant positions. Very large enterprises, and in particular undertakings designated as gatekeepers under Regulation (EU) 2022/1925, hold significant power and influence over the internal market. To prevent such entities from leveraging their substantial means to the detriment of fair competition and innovation, public sector bodies should be able to set out higher charges and fees for the re-use of public sector open data and protected data. Such higher charges and fees should be proportionate and should be based on 13 Commission Recommendation of 6 May 2003 concerning the definition of micro, small and medium-sized enterprises (OJ L 124, 20.5.2003, p. 36, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reco/2003/361/oj). 14 Regulation (EU) 2022/1925 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 September 2022 on contestable and fair markets in the digital sector and amending Directives (EU) 2019/1937 and (EU) 2020/1828 (Digital Markets Act) (OJ L 265, 12.10.2022, p. 1, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2022/1925/oj). on objective criteria, taking into consideration the economic power and the entity’s ability to acquire data. This measure serves to safeguard opportunities for smaller businesses and new market entrants to innovate and compete in the digital economy.
RemovedAdded
Both texts in full
Council Presidency text · ST 10426/26
In the spirit of fostering innovation and maintaining fair competition within the Union’s digital market, it is imperative to ensure that access to and reuse of public sector data benefit a wide range of market participants and do not inadvertently reinforce existing dominant positions. Very large enterprises, and in particular undertakings designated as gatekeepers under Regulation (EU) 2022/1925, hold significant power and influence over the internal market. To prevent such entities from leveraging their substantial means to the detriment of fair competition and innovation, public sector bodies should be able to set out higher charges and fees for the re-use of public sector open data and protected data. Such higher charges and fees should be proportionate and should be based on 13 Commission Recommendation of 6 May 2003 concerning the definition of micro, small and medium-sized enterprises (OJ L 124, 20.5.2003, p. 36, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reco/2003/361/oj). 14 Regulation (EU) 2022/1925 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 September 2022 on contestable and fair markets in the digital sector and amending Directives (EU) 2019/1937 and (EU) 2020/1828 (Digital Markets Act) (OJ L 265, 12.10.2022, p. 1, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2022/1925/oj). objective criteria, taking into consideration the economic power and the entity’s ability to acquire data. This measure serves to safeguard opportunities for smaller businesses and new market entrants to innovate and compete in the digital economy.
Council Presidency text · ST 10677/26
In the spirit of fostering innovation and maintaining fair competition within the Union’s digital market, it is imperative to ensure that access to and reuse of public sector data benefit a wide range of market participants and do not inadvertently reinforce existing dominant positions. Very large enterprises, and in particular undertakings designated as gatekeepers under Regulation (EU) 2022/1925, hold significant power and influence over the internal market. To prevent such entities from leveraging their substantial means to the detriment of fair competition and innovation, public sector bodies should be able to set out higher charges and fees for the re-use of public sector open data and protected data. Such higher charges and fees should be proportionate and should be based 13 Commission Recommendation of 6 May 2003 concerning the definition of micro, small and medium-sized enterprises (OJ L 124, 20.5.2003, p. 36, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reco/2003/361/oj). 14 Regulation (EU) 2022/1925 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 September 2022 on contestable and fair markets in the digital sector and amending Directives (EU) 2019/1937 and (EU) 2020/1828 (Digital Markets Act) (OJ L 265, 12.10.2022, p. 1, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2022/1925/oj). on objective criteria, taking into consideration the economic power and the entity’s ability to acquire data. This measure serves to safeguard opportunities for smaller businesses and new market entrants to innovate and compete in the digital economy.
Recital 26
Council Presidency text · ST 10677/26 → Council Presidency text · ST 12535/26
Changes in context
In the spirit of fostering innovation and maintaining fair competition within the Union’s digital market, it is imperative to ensure that access to and reuse of public sector data benefit a wide range of market participants and do not inadvertently reinforce existing dominant positions. Very large enterprises, and in particular undertakings designated as gatekeepers under Regulation (EU) 2022/1925, hold significant power and influence over the internal market. To prevent such entities from leveraging their substantial means to the detriment of fair competition and innovation, public sector bodies should be able to set out higher charges and fees for the re-use of public sector open data and protected data. Such higher charges and fees should be proportionate and should be based 13 Commission Recommendation of 6 May 2003 concerning the definition of micro, small and medium-sized enterprises (OJ L 124, 20.5.2003, p. 36, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reco/2003/361/oj). 14 Regulation (EU) 2022/1925 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 September 2022 on contestable and fair markets in the digital sector and amending Directives (EU) 2019/1937 and (EU) 2020/1828 (Digital Markets Act) (OJ L 265, 12.10.2022, p. 1, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2022/1925/oj). on objective criteria, taking into consideration the economic power and the entity’s ability to acquire data. This measure serves to safeguard opportunities for smaller businesses and new market entrants to innovate and compete in the digital economy.
RemovedAdded
Both texts in full
Council Presidency text · ST 10677/26
In the spirit of fostering innovation and maintaining fair competition within the Union’s digital market, it is imperative to ensure that access to and reuse of public sector data benefit a wide range of market participants and do not inadvertently reinforce existing dominant positions. Very large enterprises, and in particular undertakings designated as gatekeepers under Regulation (EU) 2022/1925, hold significant power and influence over the internal market. To prevent such entities from leveraging their substantial means to the detriment of fair competition and innovation, public sector bodies should be able to set out higher charges and fees for the re-use of public sector open data and protected data. Such higher charges and fees should be proportionate and should be based 13 Commission Recommendation of 6 May 2003 concerning the definition of micro, small and medium-sized enterprises (OJ L 124, 20.5.2003, p. 36, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reco/2003/361/oj). 14 Regulation (EU) 2022/1925 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 September 2022 on contestable and fair markets in the digital sector and amending Directives (EU) 2019/1937 and (EU) 2020/1828 (Digital Markets Act) (OJ L 265, 12.10.2022, p. 1, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2022/1925/oj). on objective criteria, taking into consideration the economic power and the entity’s ability to acquire data. This measure serves to safeguard opportunities for smaller businesses and new market entrants to innovate and compete in the digital economy.
Council Presidency text · ST 12535/26
In the spirit of fostering innovation and maintaining fair competition within the Union’s digital market, it is imperative to ensure that access to and reuse of public sector data benefit a wide range of market participants and do not inadvertently reinforce existing dominant positions. Very large enterprises, and in particular undertakings designated as gatekeepers under Regulation (EU) 2022/1925, hold significant power and influence over the internal market. To prevent such entities from leveraging their substantial means to the detriment of fair competition and innovation, public sector bodies should be able to set out higher charges and fees for the re-use of public sector open data and protected data. Such higher charges and fees should be proportionate and should be based 13 Commission Recommendation of 6 May 2003 concerning the definition of micro, small and medium-sized enterprises (OJ L 124, 20.5.2003, p. 36, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reco/2003/361/oj). 14 Regulation (EU) 2022/1925 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 September 2022 on contestable and fair markets in the digital sector and amending Directives (EU) 2019/1937 and (EU) 2020/1828 (Digital Markets Act) (OJ L 265, 12.10.2022, p. 1, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2022/1925/oj). on objective criteria, taking into consideration the economic power and the entity’s ability to acquire data. This measure serves to safeguard opportunities for smaller businesses and new market entrants to innovate and compete in the digital economy.
Recital 26
Wording reproduced in the amendment → Amendment 201 · ITRE–LIBE amendments 79–250 to the draft report: removal
Changes in context
(26) In the spirit of fostering innovation and maintaining fair competition within the Union’s digital market, it is imperative to ensure that access to and reuse of public sector data benefit a wide range of market participants and do not inadvertently reinforce existing dominant positions. Very large enterprises, and in particular undertakings designated as gatekeepers under Regulation (EU) 2022/1925, hold significant power and influence over the internal market. To prevent such entities from leveraging their substantial means to the detriment of fair competition and innovation, public sector bodies should be able to set out higher charges and fees for the re-use of open government data and protected data. Such higher charges and fees should be proportionate and should be based on objective criteria, taking into consideration the economic power and the entity’s ability to acquire data. This measure serves to safeguard opportunities for smaller businesses and new market entrants to innovate and compete in the digital economy.
RemovedAdded
Both texts in full
Wording reproduced in the amendment
(26) In the spirit of fostering innovation and maintaining fair competition within the Union’s digital market, it is imperative to ensure that access to and reuse of public sector data benefit a wide range of market participants and do not inadvertently reinforce existing dominant positions. Very large enterprises, and in particular undertakings designated as gatekeepers under Regulation (EU) 2022/1925, hold significant power and influence over the internal market. To prevent such entities from leveraging their substantial means to the detriment of fair competition and innovation, public sector bodies should be able to set out higher charges and fees for the re-use of open government data and protected data. Such higher charges and fees should be proportionate and should be based on objective criteria, taking into consideration the economic power and the entity’s ability to acquire data. This measure serves to safeguard opportunities for smaller businesses and new market entrants to innovate and compete in the digital economy.
Amendment 201 · ITRE–LIBE amendments 79–250 to the draft report: removal
Wording reproduced in the amendment → Amendment 202 · ITRE–LIBE amendments 79–250 to the draft report
Changes in context
(26) In the spirit of fostering innovation and maintaining fair competition within the Union’s digital market, it is imperative to ensure that access to and reuse of public sector data benefit a wide range of market participants and do not inadvertently reinforce existing dominant positions. Very large enterprises, and in particular undertakings designated as gatekeepers under Regulation (EU) 2022/1925, hold significant power and influence over the internal market. To prevent such entities from leveraging their substantial means to the detriment of fair competition and innovation, public sector bodies should be able to set out higher charges and fees for the re-use of open government data and protected data. Such higher charges and fees should be proportionate and should be based on objective criteria, taking into consideration the economic power and the entity’s ability to acquire data. This measure serves to safeguard opportunities for smaller businesses and new market entrants to innovate and compete in the digital economy. At the same time, a differentiated system of charges must be applied in such a way as to comply with the principles of transparency, proportionality and non-discrimination so that access to data is not restricted arbitrarily, but reflects the aim of ensuring effective competition in the internal market. Establishing such mechanisms helps to prevent an excessive concentration of competitive advantages in the hands of a small number of economic operators and promotes the development of a balanced digital ecosystem in which small and medium-sized enterprises, start-ups and research organisations have real opportunities to develop innovative, data-driven products and services. Reuse of public-sector data thus becomes a tool to stimulate innovation and competitiveness, in accordance with the aims of the European Data Strategy and the principles of the data economy.
RemovedAdded
Both texts in full
Wording reproduced in the amendment
(26) In the spirit of fostering innovation and maintaining fair competition within the Union’s digital market, it is imperative to ensure that access to and reuse of public sector data benefit a wide range of market participants and do not inadvertently reinforce existing dominant positions. Very large enterprises, and in particular undertakings designated as gatekeepers under Regulation (EU) 2022/1925, hold significant power and influence over the internal market. To prevent such entities from leveraging their substantial means to the detriment of fair competition and innovation, public sector bodies should be able to set out higher charges and fees for the re-use of open government data and protected data. Such higher charges and fees should be proportionate and should be based on objective criteria, taking into consideration the economic power and the entity’s ability to acquire data. This measure serves to safeguard opportunities for smaller businesses and new market entrants to innovate and compete in the digital economy.
Amendment 202 · ITRE–LIBE amendments 79–250 to the draft report
(26) In the spirit of fostering innovation and maintaining fair competition within the Union’s digital market, it is imperative to ensure that access to and reuse of public sector data benefit a wide range of market participants and do not inadvertently reinforce existing dominant positions. Very large enterprises, and in particular undertakings designated as gatekeepers under Regulation (EU) 2022/1925, hold significant power and influence over the internal market. To prevent such entities from leveraging their substantial means to the detriment of fair competition and innovation, public sector bodies should be able to set out higher charges and fees for the re-use of open government data and protected data. Such higher charges and fees should be proportionate and should be based on objective criteria, taking into consideration the economic power and the entity’s ability to acquire data. This measure serves to safeguard opportunities for smaller businesses and new market entrants to innovate and compete in the digital economy. At the same time, a differentiated system of charges must be applied in such a way as to comply with the principles of transparency, proportionality and non-discrimination so that access to data is not restricted arbitrarily, but reflects the aim of ensuring effective competition in the internal market. Establishing such mechanisms helps to prevent an excessive concentration of competitive advantages in the hands of a small number of economic operators and promotes the development of a balanced digital ecosystem in which small and medium-sized enterprises, start-ups and research organisations have real opportunities to develop innovative, data-driven products and services. Reuse of public-sector data thus becomes a tool to stimulate innovation and competitiveness, in accordance with the aims of the European Data Strategy and the principles of the data economy.
Wording reproduced in the amendment → Amendment 203 · ITRE–LIBE amendments 79–250 to the draft report
Changes in context
(26) In the spirit of fostering innovation and maintaining fair competition within the Union’s digital market, it is imperative to ensure that access to and reuse of public sector data benefit a wide range of market participants and do not inadvertently reinforce existing dominant positions. Very large enterprises, and in particular undertakings designated as gatekeepers under Regulation (EU) 2022/1925, hold significant power and influence over the internal market. To prevent such entities from leveraging their substantial means to the detriment of fair competition and innovation, public sector bodies should be able to set out higher chargesCharges and fees for the re-use of openpublicgovernmentsector data and protecteddocumentsdata.mustSuchbehighertransparent,chargesobjective, cost-oriented and feesnon-discriminatory.shouldDifferential treatment on the basis of the size of an undertaking, its market significance or its designation as a gatekeeper shall be proportionate and should be based on objective criteria, taking into consideration the economic power and the entity’s ability to acquire dataexcluded. This measure serves to safeguard opportunities for smaller businesses and new market entrants to innovate and compete in the digital economy.
RemovedAdded
Both texts in full
Wording reproduced in the amendment
(26) In the spirit of fostering innovation and maintaining fair competition within the Union’s digital market, it is imperative to ensure that access to and reuse of public sector data benefit a wide range of market participants and do not inadvertently reinforce existing dominant positions. Very large enterprises, and in particular undertakings designated as gatekeepers under Regulation (EU) 2022/1925, hold significant power and influence over the internal market. To prevent such entities from leveraging their substantial means to the detriment of fair competition and innovation, public sector bodies should be able to set out higher charges and fees for the re-use of open government data and protected data. Such higher charges and fees should be proportionate and should be based on objective criteria, taking into consideration the economic power and the entity’s ability to acquire data. This measure serves to safeguard opportunities for smaller businesses and new market entrants to innovate and compete in the digital economy.
Amendment 203 · ITRE–LIBE amendments 79–250 to the draft report
(26) In the spirit of fostering innovation and maintaining fair competition within the Union’s digital market, it is imperative to ensure that access to and reuse of public sector data benefit a wide range of market participants and do not inadvertently reinforce existing dominant positions. Very large enterprises, and in particular undertakings designated as gatekeepers under Regulation (EU) 2022/1925, hold significant power and influence over the internal market. Charges and fees for the re-use of public sector data and documents must be transparent, objective, cost-oriented and non-discriminatory. Differential treatment on the basis of the size of an undertaking, its market significance or its designation as a gatekeeper shall be excluded.
Wording reproduced in the amendment → Amendment 204 · ITRE–LIBE amendments 79–250 to the draft report
Changes in context
(26) In the spirit of fostering innovation and maintaining fair competition within the Union’s digital market, it is imperative to ensure that access to and reuse of public sector data benefit society and a wide range of market participants and do not inadvertently reinforce existing dominant positions. Very large enterprises, and in particularincluding undertakings designated as gatekeepers under Regulation (EU) 2022/1925, hold significant power and influence over the internal market. To prevent such entities from leveraging their substantial means to the detriment of fair competition and innovation, public sector bodies should be able to set out higher charges and fees for the re-use of open government data and protected data. Such higher charges and fees should be proportionate and should be based on objective criteria, taking into consideration the economic power and the entity’s ability to acquire data. This measure serves to safeguard opportunities for smaller businesses and new market entrants to innovate and compete in the digital economy.
RemovedAdded
Both texts in full
Wording reproduced in the amendment
(26) In the spirit of fostering innovation and maintaining fair competition within the Union’s digital market, it is imperative to ensure that access to and reuse of public sector data benefit a wide range of market participants and do not inadvertently reinforce existing dominant positions. Very large enterprises, and in particular undertakings designated as gatekeepers under Regulation (EU) 2022/1925, hold significant power and influence over the internal market. To prevent such entities from leveraging their substantial means to the detriment of fair competition and innovation, public sector bodies should be able to set out higher charges and fees for the re-use of open government data and protected data. Such higher charges and fees should be proportionate and should be based on objective criteria, taking into consideration the economic power and the entity’s ability to acquire data. This measure serves to safeguard opportunities for smaller businesses and new market entrants to innovate and compete in the digital economy.
Amendment 204 · ITRE–LIBE amendments 79–250 to the draft report
(26) In the spirit of fostering innovation and maintaining fair competition within the Union’s digital market, it is imperative to ensure that access to and reuse of public sector data benefit society and a wide range of market participants and do not inadvertently reinforce existing dominant positions. Very large enterprises, including undertakings designated as gatekeepers under Regulation (EU) 2022/1925, hold significant power and influence over the internal market. To prevent such entities from leveraging their substantial means to the detriment of fair competition and innovation, public sector bodies should be able to set out higher charges and fees for the re-use of open government data and protected data. Such higher charges and fees should be proportionate and should be based on objective criteria, taking into consideration the economic power and the entity’s ability to acquire data. This measure serves to safeguard opportunities for smaller businesses and new market entrants to innovate and compete in the digital economy.
Wording reproduced in the amendment → Amendment 205 · ITRE–LIBE amendments 79–250 to the draft report
Changes in context
(26) In the spirit of fostering innovation and maintaining fair competition within the Union’s digital market, it is imperative to ensure that access to and reuse of public sector data benefit a wide range of market participants and do not inadvertently reinforce existing dominant positions. Very large enterprises, and in particular undertakings designated as gatekeepers under Regulation (EU) 2022/1925, hold significant power and influence over the internal market. To prevent such entities from leveraging their substantial means to the detriment of fair competition and innovation, public sector bodies should be able to set out higher charges and fees for the re-use of public sector open government data and protected data. Such higher charges and fees should be proportionate and should be based on objective criteria, taking into consideration the economic power and the entity’s ability to acquire data. This measure serves to safeguard opportunities for smaller businesses and new market entrants to innovate and compete in the digital economy.
RemovedAdded
Both texts in full
Wording reproduced in the amendment
(26) In the spirit of fostering innovation and maintaining fair competition within the Union’s digital market, it is imperative to ensure that access to and reuse of public sector data benefit a wide range of market participants and do not inadvertently reinforce existing dominant positions. Very large enterprises, and in particular undertakings designated as gatekeepers under Regulation (EU) 2022/1925, hold significant power and influence over the internal market. To prevent such entities from leveraging their substantial means to the detriment of fair competition and innovation, public sector bodies should be able to set out higher charges and fees for the re-use of open government data and protected data. Such higher charges and fees should be proportionate and should be based on objective criteria, taking into consideration the economic power and the entity’s ability to acquire data. This measure serves to safeguard opportunities for smaller businesses and new market entrants to innovate and compete in the digital economy.
Amendment 205 · ITRE–LIBE amendments 79–250 to the draft report
(26) In the spirit of fostering innovation and maintaining fair competition within the Union’s digital market, it is imperative to ensure that access to and reuse of public sector data benefit a wide range of market participants and do not inadvertently reinforce existing dominant positions. Very large enterprises, and in particular undertakings designated as gatekeepers under Regulation (EU) 2022/1925, hold significant power and influence over the internal market. To prevent such entities from leveraging their substantial means to the detriment of fair competition and innovation, public sector bodies should be able to set out higher charges and fees for the re-use of public sector open data and protected data. Such higher charges and fees should be proportionate and should be based on objective criteria, taking into consideration the economic power and the entity’s ability to acquire data. This measure serves to safeguard opportunities for smaller businesses and new market entrants to innovate and compete in the digital economy.
Wording reproduced in the amendment → Amendment 156 · IMCO amendments 125–328 to the draft opinion
Changes in context
(26) In the spirit of fostering innovation and maintaining fair competition within the Union’s digital market, it is imperative to ensure that access to and reuse of public sector data benefit a wide range of market participants and do not inadvertently reinforce existing dominant positions. Very large enterprises, and in particular undertakings designated as gatekeepers under Regulation (EU) 2022/1925, hold significant power and influence over the internal market. To prevent such entities from leveraging their substantial means to the detriment of fair competition and innovation, public sector bodies should be able to set out higher charges and fees for the re-use of open government data and protected data. Such higher charges and fees should be proportionate predictable and should be based on objective and transparent criteria, taking into consideration the economic power and the entity’s ability to acquire data. This measure serves to safeguard opportunities for smaller businesses and new market entrants to innovate and compete in the digital economy.
RemovedAdded
Both texts in full
Wording reproduced in the amendment
(26) In the spirit of fostering innovation and maintaining fair competition within the Union’s digital market, it is imperative to ensure that access to and reuse of public sector data benefit a wide range of market participants and do not inadvertently reinforce existing dominant positions. Very large enterprises, and in particular undertakings designated as gatekeepers under Regulation (EU) 2022/1925, hold significant power and influence over the internal market. To prevent such entities from leveraging their substantial means to the detriment of fair competition and innovation, public sector bodies should be able to set out higher charges and fees for the re-use of open government data and protected data. Such higher charges and fees should be proportionate and should be based on objective criteria, taking into consideration the economic power and the entity’s ability to acquire data. This measure serves to safeguard opportunities for smaller businesses and new market entrants to innovate and compete in the digital economy.
Amendment 156 · IMCO amendments 125–328 to the draft opinion
(26) In the spirit of fostering innovation and maintaining fair competition within the Union’s digital market, it is imperative to ensure that access to and reuse of public sector data benefit a wide range of market participants and do not inadvertently reinforce existing dominant positions. Very large enterprises, and in particular undertakings designated as gatekeepers under Regulation (EU) 2022/1925, hold significant power and influence over the internal market. To prevent such entities from leveraging their substantial means to the detriment of fair competition and innovation, public sector bodies should be able to set out higher charges and fees for the re-use of open government data and protected data. Such higher charges and fees should be proportionate predictable and should be based on objective and transparent criteria, taking into consideration the economic power and the entity’s ability to acquire data. This measure serves to safeguard opportunities for smaller businesses and new market entrants to innovate and compete in the digital economy.
Wording reproduced in the amendment → Amendment 16 · IMCO draft opinion · Alex Agius Saliba (rapporteur)
Changes in context
(26) In the spirit of fostering innovation and maintaining fair competition within the Union’s digital market, it is imperative to ensure that access to and reuse of public sector data benefit a wide range of market participants and do not inadvertently reinforce existing dominant positions. Very large enterprises, and in particularincluding undertakings designated as gatekeepers under Regulation (EU) 2022/1925, hold significant power and influence over the internal market. To prevent such entities from leveraging their substantial means to the detriment of fair competition and innovation, public sector bodies should be able to set out higher charges and fees for the re-use of open government data and protected data. Such higher charges and fees should be proportionate and should be based on objective criteria, taking into consideration the economic power and the entity’s ability to acquire data. This measure serves to safeguard opportunities for smaller businesses and new market entrants to innovate and compete in the digital economy.
RemovedAdded
Both texts in full
Wording reproduced in the amendment
(26) In the spirit of fostering innovation and maintaining fair competition within the Union’s digital market, it is imperative to ensure that access to and reuse of public sector data benefit a wide range of market participants and do not inadvertently reinforce existing dominant positions. Very large enterprises, and in particular undertakings designated as gatekeepers under Regulation (EU) 2022/1925, hold significant power and influence over the internal market. To prevent such entities from leveraging their substantial means to the detriment of fair competition and innovation, public sector bodies should be able to set out higher charges and fees for the re-use of open government data and protected data. Such higher charges and fees should be proportionate and should be based on objective criteria, taking into consideration the economic power and the entity’s ability to acquire data. This measure serves to safeguard opportunities for smaller businesses and new market entrants to innovate and compete in the digital economy.
(26) In the spirit of fostering innovation and maintaining fair competition within the Union’s digital market, it is imperative to ensure that access to and reuse of public sector data benefit a wide range of market participants and do not inadvertently reinforce existing dominant positions. Very large enterprises, including undertakings designated as gatekeepers under Regulation (EU) 2022/1925, hold significant power and influence over the internal market. To prevent such entities from leveraging their substantial means to the detriment of fair competition and innovation, public sector bodies should be able to set out higher charges and fees for the re-use of open government data and protected data. Such higher charges and fees should be proportionate and should be based on objective criteria, taking into consideration the economic power and the entity’s ability to acquire data. This measure serves to safeguard opportunities for smaller businesses and new market entrants to innovate and compete in the digital economy.
Wording reproduced in the amendment → Amendment 109 · JURI amendments 69–296 to the draft opinion
Changes in context
(26) In the spirit of fostering innovation and maintaining fair competition within the Union’s digital market, it is imperative to ensure that access to and reuse of public sector data benefit a wide range of market participants and do not inadvertently reinforce existing dominant positions. Very large enterprises, and in particular undertakings designated as gatekeepers under Regulation (EU) 2022/1925, hold significant power and influence over the internal market. To prevent such entities from leveraging their substantial means to the detriment of fair competition and innovation, public sector bodies should be able to set out higher charges and fees for the re-use of open government data and protected data. Such higher charges and fees should be proportionate and should be based on objective criteria, taking into consideration the economic power and the entity’s ability to acquire data. This measure serves to safeguard opportunities for smaller businesses and new market entrants to innovate and compete in the digital economy across all regions of the Union, including less digitally developed areas, thereby contributing to economic, social and territorial cohesion.
RemovedAdded
Both texts in full
Wording reproduced in the amendment
(26) In the spirit of fostering innovation and maintaining fair competition within the Union’s digital market, it is imperative to ensure that access to and reuse of public sector data benefit a wide range of market participants and do not inadvertently reinforce existing dominant positions. Very large enterprises, and in particular undertakings designated as gatekeepers under Regulation (EU) 2022/1925, hold significant power and influence over the internal market. To prevent such entities from leveraging their substantial means to the detriment of fair competition and innovation, public sector bodies should be able to set out higher charges and fees for the re-use of open government data and protected data. Such higher charges and fees should be proportionate and should be based on objective criteria, taking into consideration the economic power and the entity’s ability to acquire data. This measure serves to safeguard opportunities for smaller businesses and new market entrants to innovate and compete in the digital economy.
Amendment 109 · JURI amendments 69–296 to the draft opinion
(26) In the spirit of fostering innovation and maintaining fair competition within the Union’s digital market, it is imperative to ensure that access to and reuse of public sector data benefit a wide range of market participants and do not inadvertently reinforce existing dominant positions. Very large enterprises, and in particular undertakings designated as gatekeepers under Regulation (EU) 2022/1925, hold significant power and influence over the internal market. To prevent such entities from leveraging their substantial means to the detriment of fair competition and innovation, public sector bodies should be able to set out higher charges and fees for the re-use of open government data and protected data. Such higher charges and fees should be proportionate and should be based on objective criteria, taking into consideration the economic power and the entity’s ability to acquire data. This measure serves to safeguard opportunities for smaller businesses and new market entrants to innovate and compete in the digital economy across all regions of the Union, including less digitally developed areas, thereby contributing to economic, social and territorial cohesion.