Digital Omnibus tracker

Digital Omnibus proposal

Recital 22

Compare the available Commission, Council and Parliament texts and amendments affecting this recital.

Recital total: 1 part · 3 Council drafts · 4 Parliament amendments

Removed wording is struck through; added or replacement wording is highlighted.

Institutional text

European Commission proposal

The wording proposed by the Commission at the start of this legislative file.

Commission source wording and instructions

Recital 22

Commission proposal

Since both Directive (EU) 2019/1024 and Regulation (EU) 2022/868 share the goal of enhancing the re-use of public sector information, and inn order to simplify rules from the perspective of both public sector bodies and of re-users of public sector information, it is rational to repeal Directive (EU) 2019/1024 and Regulation (EU) 2022/868 and align the two regimes and consolidate the rules in a single Chapter under this Regulation. This solution will increase harmonisation of those rules across the Union, reduce the administrative burden associated with interpreting and implementing national legislation and make it easier for businesses to develop cross-border services and products. When designating competent bodies, Member States should ensure that even where sector-specific competent bodies are designated, all relevant sectors are ultimately covered. The amendments in this Regulation should be understood not to alter the interpretation of the different definition and terms, unless clearly specified.

Institutional text

Council Presidency texts

Successive Presidency compromise texts. Their inclusion does not imply agreement or adoption.

Recital 22

June Presidency compromise · 10 June

Since both Directive (EU) 2019/1024 and Regulation (EU) 2022/868 share the goal of enhancing the re-use of public sector information, and in order to simplify rules from the perspective of both public sector bodies and re-users of public sector information, it is rational to repeal Directive (EU) 2019/1024 and Regulation (EU) 2022/868, align the two regimes and consolidate the rules in a single Chapter under this Regulation. This solution will increase harmonisation of those rules across the Union, reduce the administrative burden associated with interpreting and implementing national legislation and make it easier for businesses to develop cross-border services and products. However, the consolidation respects and allows to maintain national organisational specificities to ensure flexibility for national, regional and local administrations. When designating competent bodies, Member States should ensure that even where sector-specific competent bodies are designated, all relevant sectors are ultimately covered. The amendments in this Regulation should be understood not to alter the interpretation of the different definition and terms, unless clearly specified. In line with this rationale, it should be recalled that the intellectual property rights of third parties are not affected by Chapter VIIc. The term ‘intellectual property rights’ refers to copyright and related rights only, including sui generis forms of protection. Section 2 of Chapter VIIc does not apply to data or documents covered by industrial property rights, such as patents and registered designs and trade marks.

Competing proposals

European Parliament amendments

These are alternative tabled amendments. An amendment affecting several tracked parts appears once here, with each target identified.

More filters

Political group at the amendment date where available; otherwise the current Parliament affiliation.

Remove proposed wording Amendment 10 JURI draft opinion · Brando Benifei (rapporteur)
(22) Since both Directive (EU) 2019/1024 and Regulation (EU) 2022/868 share the goal of enhancing the re-use of public sector information, and inn order to simplify rules from the perspective of both public sector bodies and of re-users of public sector information, it is rational to repeal Directive (EU) 2019/1024 and Regulation (EU) 2022/868 and align the two regimes and consolidate the rules in a single Chapter under this Regulation. This solution will increase harmonisation of those rules across the Union, reduce the administrative burden associated with interpreting and implementing national legislation and make it easier for businesses to develop cross-border services and products. When designating competent bodies, Member States should ensure that even where sector-specific competent bodies are designated, all relevant sectors are ultimately covered. The amendments in this Regulation should be understood not to alter the interpretation of the different definition and terms, unless clearly specified.
Source identification

Header printed in the source: Recital 22

Deletion marker printed in the source: deleted

Alternative wording Amendment 103 · Emil Radev JURI
(22) Since both Directive (EU) 2019/1024 and Regulation (EU) 2022/868 share the goal of enhancing the re-use of public sector information, and innin order to simplify rules from the perspective of both public sector bodies and of re-users of public sector information, it is rational to repeal Directive (EU) 2019/1024 and Regulation (EU) 2022/868 and align the two regimes and consolidate the rules in a single Chapter under this Regulation. This solution will increase harmonisation of those rules across the Union, reduce the administrative burden associated with interpreting and implementing national legislation and make it easier for businesses to develop cross-border services and products. When designating competent bodies, Member States should ensure that even where sector-specific competent bodies are designated, all relevant sectors are ultimately covered. The amendments in this Regulation should be understood not to alter the interpretation of the different definition and terms, unless clearly specified.
Remove proposed wording Amendment 178 · João Oliveira ITRE · LIBE
(22) Since both Directive (EU) 2019/1024 and Regulation (EU) 2022/868 share the goal of enhancing the re-use of public sector information, and inn order to simplify rules from the perspective of both public sector bodies and of re-users of public sector information, it is rational to repeal Directive (EU) 2019/1024 and Regulation (EU) 2022/868 and align the two regimes and consolidate the rules in a single Chapter under this Regulation. This solution will increase harmonisation of those rules across the Union, reduce the administrative burden associated with interpreting and implementing national legislation and make it easier for businesses to develop cross-border services and products. When designating competent bodies, Member States should ensure that even where sector-specific competent bodies are designated, all relevant sectors are ultimately covered. The amendments in this Regulation should be understood not to alter the interpretation of the different definition and terms, unless clearly specified.
Source identification

Header printed in the source: Recital 22

Deletion marker printed in the source: deleted

Remove proposed wording Amendment 179 · Elena Sancho Murillo, Marina Kaljurand, Brando Benifei, José Cepeda, Lina Gálvez, Francisco Assis, Alex Agius Saliba ITRE · LIBE
(22) Since both Directive (EU) 2019/1024 and Regulation (EU) 2022/868 share the goal of enhancing the re-use of public sector information, and inn order to simplify rules from the perspective of both public sector bodies and of re-users of public sector information, it is rational to repeal Directive (EU) 2019/1024 and Regulation (EU) 2022/868 and align the two regimes and consolidate the rules in a single Chapter under this Regulation. This solution will increase harmonisation of those rules across the Union, reduce the administrative burden associated with interpreting and implementing national legislation and make it easier for businesses to develop cross-border services and products. When designating competent bodies, Member States should ensure that even where sector-specific competent bodies are designated, all relevant sectors are ultimately covered. The amendments in this Regulation should be understood not to alter the interpretation of the different definition and terms, unless clearly specified.
Source identification

Header printed in the source: Recital 22

Deletion marker printed in the source: deleted