Digital Omnibus proposal
Recital 22
Compare the available Commission, Council and Parliament texts and amendments affecting this recital.
Recital total: 1 part · 3 Council drafts · 4 Parliament amendments
Removed wording is struck through; added or replacement wording is highlighted.
Institutional text
European Commission proposal
The wording proposed by the Commission at the start of this legislative file.
No standalone Commission wording is mapped to this tracked part. A newly proposed provision may have no earlier text of its own.
Commission source wording and instructions
Recital 22
Commission proposal
Since both Directive (EU) 2019/1024 and Regulation (EU) 2022/868 share the goal of enhancing the re-use of public sector information, and inn order to simplify rules from the perspective of both public sector bodies and of re-users of public sector information, it is rational to repeal Directive (EU) 2019/1024 and Regulation (EU) 2022/868 and align the two regimes and consolidate the rules in a single Chapter under this Regulation. This solution will increase harmonisation of those rules across the Union, reduce the administrative burden associated with interpreting and implementing national legislation and make it easier for businesses to develop cross-border services and products. When designating competent bodies, Member States should ensure that even where sector-specific competent bodies are designated, all relevant sectors are ultimately covered. The amendments in this Regulation should be understood not to alter the interpretation of the different definition and terms, unless clearly specified.
Institutional text
Council Presidency texts
Successive Presidency compromise texts. Their inclusion does not imply agreement or adoption.
No Council wording is mapped to this tracked part.
Recital 22
June Presidency compromise · 10 June
Since both Directive (EU) 2019/1024 and Regulation (EU) 2022/868 share the goal of enhancing the re-use of public sector information, and in order to simplify rules from the perspective of both public sector bodies and re-users of public sector information, it is rational to repeal Directive (EU) 2019/1024 and Regulation (EU) 2022/868, align the two regimes and consolidate the rules in a single Chapter under this Regulation. This solution will increase harmonisation of those rules across the Union, reduce the administrative burden associated with interpreting and implementing national legislation and make it easier for businesses to develop cross-border services and products. However, the consolidation respects and allows to maintain national organisational specificities to ensure flexibility for national, regional and local administrations. When designating competent bodies, Member States should ensure that even where sector-specific competent bodies are designated, all relevant sectors are ultimately covered. The amendments in this Regulation should be understood not to alter the interpretation of the different definition and terms, unless clearly specified. In line with this rationale, it should be recalled that the intellectual property rights of third parties are not affected by Chapter VIIc. The term ‘intellectual property rights’ refers to copyright and related rights only, including sui generis forms of protection. Section 2 of Chapter VIIc does not apply to data or documents covered by industrial property rights, such as patents and registered designs and trade marks.
Recital 22
June Presidency compromise · 18 June
Since both Directive (EU) 2019/1024 and Regulation (EU) 2022/868 share the goal of enhancing the re-use of public sector information, and in order to simplify rules from the perspective of both public sector bodies and re-users of public sector information, it is rational to repeal Directive (EU) 2019/1024 and Regulation (EU) 2022/868, align the two regimes and consolidate the rules in a single Chapter under this Regulation. This solution will increase harmonisation of those rules across the Union, reduce the administrative burden associated with interpreting and implementing national legislation and make it easier for businesses to develop cross-border services and products. However, the consolidation respects and allows to maintain national organisational specificities to ensure flexibility for national, regional and local administrations. When designating competent bodies, Member States should ensure that even where sector-specific competent bodies are designated, all relevant sectors are ultimately covered. The amendments in this Regulation should be understood not to alter the interpretation of the different definition and terms, unless clearly specified. In line with this rationale, it should be recalled that the intellectual property rights of third parties are not affected by Chapter VIIc. The term ‘intellectual property rights’ refers to copyright and related rights only, including sui generis forms of protection. Section 2 of Chapter VIIc does not apply to data or documents covered by industrial property rights, such as patents and registered designs and trade marks.
Recital 22
September Presidency compromise
Since both Directive (EU) 2019/1024 and Regulation (EU) 2022/868 share the goal of enhancing the re-use of public sector information, and in order to simplify rules from the perspective of both public sector bodies and re-users of public sector information, it is rational to repeal Directive (EU) 2019/1024 and Regulation (EU) 2022/868, align the two regimes and consolidate the rules in a single Chapter under this Regulation. This solution will increase harmonisation of those rules across the Union, reduce the administrative burden associated with interpreting and implementing national legislation and make it easier for businesses to develop cross-border services and products. However, the consolidation respects and allows to maintain national organisational specificities to ensure flexibility for national, regional and local administrations. When designating competent bodies, Member States should ensure that even where sector-specific competent bodies are designated, all relevant sectors are ultimately covered. The amendments in this Regulation should be understood not to alter the interpretation of the different definition and terms, unless clearly specified. In line with this rationale, it should be recalled that the intellectual property rights of third parties are not affected by Chapter VIIc. The term ‘intellectual property rights’ refers to copyright and related rights only, including sui generis forms of protection. Section 2 of Chapter VIIc does not apply to data or documents covered by industrial property rights, such as patents and registered designs and trade marks.
Recital 22 3 Council drafts
Recital 22
10 June 2026 · June Presidency compromise · 10 June
Since both Directive (EU) 2019/1024 and Regulation (EU) 2022/868 share the goal of enhancing the re-use of public sector information, and in order to simplify rules from the perspective of both public sector bodies and re-users of public sector information, it is rational to repeal Directive (EU) 2019/1024 and Regulation (EU) 2022/868, align the two regimes and consolidate the rules in a single Chapter under this Regulation. This solution will increase harmonisation of those rules across the Union, reduce the administrative burden associated with interpreting and implementing national legislation and make it easier for businesses to develop cross-border services and products. However, the consolidation respects and allows to maintain national organisational specificities to ensure flexibility for national, regional and local administrations. When designating competent bodies, Member States should ensure that even where sector-specific competent bodies are designated, all relevant sectors are ultimately covered. The amendments in this Regulation should be understood not to alter the interpretation of the different definition and terms, unless clearly specified. In line with this rationale, it should be recalled that the intellectual property rights of third parties are not affected by Chapter VIIc. The term ‘intellectual property rights’ refers to copyright and related rights only, including sui generis forms of protection. Section 2 of Chapter VIIc does not apply to data or documents covered by industrial property rights, such as patents and registered designs and trade marks.
Recital 22
18 June 2026 · June Presidency compromise · 18 June
Since both Directive (EU) 2019/1024 and Regulation (EU) 2022/868 share the goal of enhancing the re-use of public sector information, and in order to simplify rules from the perspective of both public sector bodies and re-users of public sector information, it is rational to repeal Directive (EU) 2019/1024 and Regulation (EU) 2022/868, align the two regimes and consolidate the rules in a single Chapter under this Regulation. This solution will increase harmonisation of those rules across the Union, reduce the administrative burden associated with interpreting and implementing national legislation and make it easier for businesses to develop cross-border services and products. However, the consolidation respects and allows to maintain national organisational specificities to ensure flexibility for national, regional and local administrations. When designating competent bodies, Member States should ensure that even where sector-specific competent bodies are designated, all relevant sectors are ultimately covered. The amendments in this Regulation should be understood not to alter the interpretation of the different definition and terms, unless clearly specified. In line with this rationale, it should be recalled that the intellectual property rights of third parties are not affected by Chapter VIIc. The term ‘intellectual property rights’ refers to copyright and related rights only, including sui generis forms of protection. Section 2 of Chapter VIIc does not apply to data or documents covered by industrial property rights, such as patents and registered designs and trade marks.
Recital 22
3 September 2026 · September Presidency compromise
Since both Directive (EU) 2019/1024 and Regulation (EU) 2022/868 share the goal of enhancing the re-use of public sector information, and in order to simplify rules from the perspective of both public sector bodies and re-users of public sector information, it is rational to repeal Directive (EU) 2019/1024 and Regulation (EU) 2022/868, align the two regimes and consolidate the rules in a single Chapter under this Regulation. This solution will increase harmonisation of those rules across the Union, reduce the administrative burden associated with interpreting and implementing national legislation and make it easier for businesses to develop cross-border services and products. However, the consolidation respects and allows to maintain national organisational specificities to ensure flexibility for national, regional and local administrations. When designating competent bodies, Member States should ensure that even where sector-specific competent bodies are designated, all relevant sectors are ultimately covered. The amendments in this Regulation should be understood not to alter the interpretation of the different definition and terms, unless clearly specified. In line with this rationale, it should be recalled that the intellectual property rights of third parties are not affected by Chapter VIIc. The term ‘intellectual property rights’ refers to copyright and related rights only, including sui generis forms of protection. Section 2 of Chapter VIIc does not apply to data or documents covered by industrial property rights, such as patents and registered designs and trade marks.
Competing proposals
European Parliament amendments
These are alternative tabled amendments. An amendment affecting several tracked parts appears once here, with each target identified.
More filters
Political group at the amendment date where available; otherwise the current Parliament affiliation.
Remove proposed wording Amendment 10 JURI draft opinion · Brando Benifei (rapporteur)
Alternative wording Amendment 103 · Emil Radev JURI
Remove proposed wording Amendment 178 · João Oliveira ITRE · LIBE
Remove proposed wording Amendment 179 · Elena Sancho Murillo, Marina Kaljurand, Brando Benifei, José Cepeda, Lina Gálvez, Francisco Assis, Alex Agius Saliba ITRE · LIBE
No amendments match these filters.
Selected texts
Compare wording
Choose a tracked part and a named pair of texts. Comparisons are offered only where both sides cover the same legal unit.
Select a specific tracked part above to compare wording.
No same-scope comparison is available for this tracked part. Its source wording remains available in the article text sections.
Recital 22
European Commission proposal → Council Presidency text · ST 10426/26
Changes in context
RemovedAdded
Both texts in full
European Commission proposal
Council Presidency text · ST 10426/26
Recital 22
Council Presidency text · ST 10426/26 → Council Presidency text · ST 10677/26
Changes in context
RemovedAdded
Both texts in full
Council Presidency text · ST 10426/26
Council Presidency text · ST 10677/26
Recital 22
Council Presidency text · ST 10677/26 → Council Presidency text · ST 12535/26
Changes in context
RemovedAdded
Both texts in full
Council Presidency text · ST 10677/26
Council Presidency text · ST 12535/26
Recital 22
Wording reproduced in the amendment → Amendment 178 · ITRE–LIBE amendments 79–250 to the draft report: removal
Changes in context
RemovedAdded
Both texts in full
Wording reproduced in the amendment
Amendment 178 · ITRE–LIBE amendments 79–250 to the draft report: removal
This wording is removed.
Recital 22
Wording reproduced in the amendment → Amendment 179 · ITRE–LIBE amendments 79–250 to the draft report: removal
Changes in context
RemovedAdded
Both texts in full
Wording reproduced in the amendment
Amendment 179 · ITRE–LIBE amendments 79–250 to the draft report: removal
This wording is removed.
Recital 22
Wording reproduced in the amendment → Amendment 103 · JURI amendments 69–296 to the draft opinion
Changes in context
RemovedAdded
Both texts in full
Wording reproduced in the amendment
Amendment 103 · JURI amendments 69–296 to the draft opinion
Recital 22
Wording reproduced in the amendment → Amendment 10 · JURI draft opinion · Brando Benifei (rapporteur): removal
Changes in context
RemovedAdded
Both texts in full
Wording reproduced in the amendment
Amendment 10 · JURI draft opinion · Brando Benifei (rapporteur): removal
This wording is removed.