Digital Omnibus proposal· Recital 21

4 amendments would delete the whole recital: members of S&D and Greens/EFA, and the JURI rapporteur.

1. 9 −Deletion Brando Benifei (rapporteur)Rapporteur · JURI Deletes the recital

   (21) Both Directive (EU) 2019/1024 and Chapter II of Regulation (EU) 2022/868 regulate the re-use of public sector information for innovation purposes. The interplay of the two sets of rules has created legal uncertainty, mainly for public sector bodies. An alignment of the rules in one legal instrument is therefore necessary to bring further legal coherence and certainty.

   Rapporteur

   Brando Benifei

   Group

   Rapporteur

   Targets

   Digital Omnibus proposal Recital 21

   Document

   JURI draft opinion

   Source

   Official text, page 13

   Printed header

   Recital 21

   Links

   Link to this amendment
   Cite this amendment

2. 102 −Deletion David CormandGreens/EFA · JURI Deletes the recital

   (21) Both Directive (EU) 2019/1024 and Chapter II of Regulation (EU) 2022/868 regulate the re-use of public sector information for innovation purposes. The interplay of the two sets of rules has created legal uncertainty, mainly for public sector bodies. An alignment of the rules in one legal instrument is therefore necessary to bring further legal coherence and certainty.

   Tabled by

   David Cormand

   Group

   Greens/EFA

   Targets

   Digital Omnibus proposal Recital 21

   Document

   JURI amendments 69–296 to the draft opinion

   Source

   Official text, page 35

   Printed header

   Recital 21

   Links

   Link to this amendment
   Cite this amendment

3. 152 −Deletion David CormandGreens/EFA · IMCO Deletes the recital

   (21) Both Directive (EU) 2019/1024 and Chapter II of Regulation (EU) 2022/868 regulate the re-use of public sector information for innovation purposes. The interplay of the two sets of rules has created legal uncertainty, mainly for public sector bodies. An alignment of the rules in one legal instrument is therefore necessary to bring further legal coherence and certainty.

   Tabled by

   David Cormand on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group

   Group

   Greens/EFA

   Targets

   Digital Omnibus proposal Recital 21

   Document

   IMCO amendments 125–328 to the draft opinion

   Source

   Official text, page 28

   Printed header

   Recital 21

   Links

   Link to this amendment
   Cite this amendment

4. 175 −Deletion Elena Sancho Murillo +6S&D · ITRE–LIBE Deletes the recital

   (21) Both Directive (EU) 2019/1024 and Chapter II of Regulation (EU) 2022/868 regulate the re-use of public sector information for innovation purposes. The interplay of the two sets of rules has created legal uncertainty, mainly for public sector bodies. An alignment of the rules in one legal instrument is therefore necessary to bring further legal coherence and certainty.

   Tabled by

   Elena Sancho Murillo, Marina Kaljurand, Brando Benifei, José Cepeda, Lina Gálvez, Francisco Assis, Alex Agius Saliba

   Group

   S&D

   Targets

   Digital Omnibus proposal Recital 21

   Document

   ITRE–LIBE amendments 79–250 to the draft report

   Source

   Official text, page 97

   Printed header

   Recital 21

   Links

   Link to this amendment
   Cite this amendment

5. 176 ~Alternative João OliveiraThe Left · ITRE–LIBE “interest into account. Action should be taken to promote data or document re-use models that are based on open licences, including for non-commercial…”

   (21) Both Directive (EU) 2019/1024 and Chapter II of Regulation (EU) 2022/868 regulate the re-use of public sector information for innovation purposes. The interplay of the two sets of rules has created legal uncertainty, mainly for public sector bodies.The interplay of the two sets of rules could be clarified and consolidated to ensure that the conditions for re-use are objective, transparent, proportionate, democratic and consistent with standardised open licences, and take the public interest into account. Action should be taken to promote data or document re-use models that are based on open licences, including for non-commercial users, researchers, civil society organisations, public interest bodies and community-led open knowledge projects. Public sector bodies should pursue open data regimes except where they determine that the data or documents in question contain information comprising certain categories of protected data. An alignment of the rules in one legal instrument is therefore necessary to bring further legal coherence and certainty.In those circumstances, they should limit public access thereto and consider making the data available for re-use in a protected format. Re-use regimes should seek to safeguard the public domain, the open licence status of the data or documents in question, interoperability, and the capacity for open knowledge projects to re-use and disseminate data and documents from the public sector.

   Tabled by

   João Oliveira

   Group

   The Left

   Targets

   Digital Omnibus proposal Recital 21

   Document

   ITRE–LIBE amendments 79–250 to the draft report

   Source

   Official text, pages 97–98

   Printed header

   Recital 21

   Links

   Link to this amendment
   Cite this amendment

6. 177 ~Alternative Diana Iovanovici ŞoşoacăNI · ITRE–LIBE “so as to improve European sustainability and boost competitiveness at Union level”

   (21) Both Directive (EU) 2019/1024 and Chapter II of Regulation (EU) 2022/868 regulate the re-use of public sector information for innovation purposes. The interplay of the two sets of rules has created legal uncertainty, mainly for public sector bodies. An alignment of the rules in one legal instrument with standard and clear wordings is therefore necessary to bring further legal coherence and certainty so as to improve European sustainability and boost competitiveness at Union level.

   Tabled by

   Diana Iovanovici Şoşoacă

   Group

   NI

   Targets

   Digital Omnibus proposal Recital 21

   Document

   ITRE–LIBE amendments 79–250 to the draft report

   Source

   Official text, page 98

   Printed header

   Recital 21

   Links

   Link to this amendment
   Cite this amendment