Digital Omnibus proposal
Article 1
Compare the available Commission, Council and Parliament texts and amendments affecting this article.
Article total: 3 parts · 0 Council drafts · 6 Parliament amendments
Removed wording is struck through; added or replacement wording is highlighted.
Institutional text
European Commission proposal
The wording proposed by the Commission at the start of this legislative file.
No standalone Commission wording is mapped to this tracked part. A newly proposed provision may have no earlier text of its own.
Commission source wording and instructions
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – introductory part
Commission proposal
3. in Article 4, paragraph 8 is replaced by the following:
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 – introductory part
Commission proposal
4. in Article 5, paragraph 11 is replaced by the following:
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 15 – introductory part
Commission proposal
15. in Article 31, the following paragraphs 1a and 1b are inserted:
Institutional text
Council Presidency texts
Successive Presidency compromise texts. Their inclusion does not imply agreement or adoption.
No Council wording is mapped to these tracked parts.
Competing proposals
European Parliament amendments
These are alternative tabled amendments. An amendment affecting several tracked parts appears once here, with each target identified.
More filters
Political group at the amendment date where available; otherwise the current Parliament affiliation.
Alternative wording Amendment 37 IMCO draft opinion · Alex Agius Saliba (rapporteur)
This amendment changes an instruction in the amending proposal, not standalone wording of the amended act.
Digital Omnibus proposal · Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – introductory part
Alternative wording Amendment 42 IMCO draft opinion · Alex Agius Saliba (rapporteur)
This amendment changes an instruction in the amending proposal, not standalone wording of the amended act.
Digital Omnibus proposal · Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 – introductory part
Alternative wording Amendment 226 · Piotr Müller IMCO
This amendment changes an instruction in the amending proposal, not standalone wording of the amended act.
Digital Omnibus proposal · Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – introductory part
Alternative wording Amendment 590 · Bart Groothuis, Ivars Ijabs, Morten Løkkegaard, Sophie Wilmès, Nikola Minchev, Svenja Hahn, Andreas Glück, João Cotrim De Figueiredo, Ana Vasconcelos ITRE · LIBE
This amendment changes an instruction in the amending proposal, not standalone wording of the amended act.
Digital Omnibus proposal · Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – introductory part
Justification
Chapter II creates legal uncertainty for B2B relationships as well as huge administrative burdens for companies that want to protect their trade secrets (on a case-by-case basis). Businesses that already have negotiated data-sharing arrangements now face statutory obligations based on legally defined conditions rather than mutual agreement. This amendment introduces a trade secret safeguard to preserve the Data Act's objectives without undermining existing commercial arrangements or business confidentiality.
Additional proposed wording Amendment 591 · Elena Sancho Murillo, Marina Kaljurand, Brando Benifei, José Cepeda, Lina Gálvez, Francisco Assis, Alex Agius Saliba ITRE · LIBE
This amendment changes an instruction in the amending proposal, not standalone wording of the amended act.
Digital Omnibus proposal · Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – introductory part
in Article 4, the following paragraphs are added after paragraph 8:
Context reproduced in the official amendment
The amendment reproduces a wider legal passage. It is shown as context because it does not cover the same legal unit as the proposed wording.
in Article 4, paragraph 8 is replaced by the following:
Alternative wording Amendment 687 · Aura Salla, Niels Flemming Hansen, Ana Miguel Pedro, Andrea Wechsler, Christian Ehler ITRE · LIBE
This amendment changes an instruction in the amending proposal, not standalone wording of the amended act.
Digital Omnibus proposal · Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 15 – introductory part
No amendments match these filters.
Selected texts
Compare wording
Choose a tracked part and a named pair of texts. Comparisons are offered only where both sides cover the same legal unit.
Select a specific tracked part above to compare wording.
No same-scope comparison is available for this tracked part. Its source wording remains available in the article text sections.
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – introductory part
Wording reproduced in the amendment → Amendment 590 · ITRE–LIBE amendments 527–776 to the draft report
Changes in context
RemovedAdded
Both texts in full
Wording reproduced in the amendment
Amendment 590 · ITRE–LIBE amendments 527–776 to the draft report
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – introductory part
Wording reproduced in the amendment → Amendment 226 · IMCO amendments 125–328 to the draft opinion
Changes in context
RemovedAdded
Both texts in full
Wording reproduced in the amendment
Amendment 226 · IMCO amendments 125–328 to the draft opinion
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – introductory part
Wording reproduced in the amendment → Amendment 37 · IMCO draft opinion · Alex Agius Saliba (rapporteur)
Changes in context
RemovedAdded
Both texts in full
Wording reproduced in the amendment
Amendment 37 · IMCO draft opinion · Alex Agius Saliba (rapporteur)
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 – introductory part
Wording reproduced in the amendment → Amendment 42 · IMCO draft opinion · Alex Agius Saliba (rapporteur)
Changes in context
RemovedAdded
Both texts in full
Wording reproduced in the amendment
Amendment 42 · IMCO draft opinion · Alex Agius Saliba (rapporteur)
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 15 – introductory part
Wording reproduced in the amendment → Amendment 687 · ITRE–LIBE amendments 527–776 to the draft report
Changes in context
RemovedAdded