Article 9 – Location data other than traffic data
Only Parliament amendments would change this article. Parliament committees have tabled 2 amendments to this article.
Latest text22 October 2026ST 14756/26
Contains no amendment to this article.
What each text does
- 19 Nov 2025 Commission proposalCOM(2025) 837 No amendment to this article.
- 21 May 2026 Council textST 9547/26 No amendment to this article.ST 9547/26 reproduces only some of the proposal’s changes, so this comparison applies only those it shows or visibly drops. It says nothing about the others.
- 10 Jun 2026 Council textST 10426/26 No amendment to this article.
- 18 Jun 2026 Council textST 10677/26 No amendment to this article.
- 27 Jul 2026 ITRE–LIBE amendments 1565–1740 to the draft reportCJ72-AM-791874 2 amendments to this article. Amendments in this document
- 3 Sep 2026 Council textST 12535/26 No amendment to this article.
- 2 Oct 2026 Council textST 13886/26 No amendment to this article.
- 22 Oct 2026 Council textST 14756/26 No amendment to this article.
Parliament amendments
2 amendments to this article
2 would add wording.
| Type | S&D | EPP |
|---|---|---|
| + Addition | 1 | 1 |
By political group
- + Addition S&D 1 EPP 1
1733 +Addition Axel Voss +1EPP · ITRE–LIBE “Article 9 is deleted.” numbered 2b
Effectnew Parliament proposal instruction expressly deletes existing law
2b.Article 9 is deleted.
Justification
The AM removes overlapping ePrivacy rules on security, terminal access, metadata, location data and direct marketing where personal-data processing is already governed by the GDPR. Keeping parallel regimes creates consent fatigue, divergent national transpositions and legal uncertainty, including stricter rules for some anonymous device data than for personal data. Consolidation under the GDPR’s risk-based framework simplifies compliance, strengthens coherent rights exercise, supports innovation and preserves sector-specific rules in dedicated instruments.
- Tabled by
- Axel Voss, Oliver Schenk
- Group
- EPP
- Targets
- ePrivacy Directive Article 9
- Document
- ITRE–LIBE amendments 1565–1740 to the draft report
- Source
- Official text, page 144
- Printed header
- Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 2 b (new) / Directive 2002/58/EC / Article 9
1734 +Addition Marina Kaljurand +8S&D · ITRE–LIBE “Article 9 is deleted.” numbered 2b
Effectnew Parliament proposal instruction expressly deletes existing law
2b.Article 9 is deleted.
Justification
This change is proposed due to other amendments tabled moving e-privacy provisions under Regulation (EU) 2016/679.
- Tabled by
- Marina Kaljurand, Elena Sancho Murillo, Brando Benifei, Birgit Sippel, Alex Agius Saliba, Francisco Assis, Elisabeth Grossmann, Kristian Vigenin, Matjaž Nemec
- Group
- S&D
- Targets
- ePrivacy Directive Article 9
- Document
- ITRE–LIBE amendments 1565–1740 to the draft report
- Printed header
- Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 2 b (new) / Directive 2002/58/EC / Article 9