Texts to 22 Oct 2026

Amendment 90· Digital Omnibus proposal Recital 13

Alternative

Tabled by
Daniel Buda (EPP)
Committee and document
JURI·amendments 69–296 to the draft opinion (JURI-AM-790236, PE790.236v01-00)·29 June 2026
Source
Official text, pp. 23–24·printed header: Recital 13
Targets
Recital 13 of the Digital Omnibus proposal

Text of the amendment

As tabled

Wordingagainst the Commission’s

(13) An insufficient protection of trade secrets and the challenges in enforcing them in third countries may cause irreparable harm to European businesses, particularly SMEs, which lack the developed infrastructures needed to ensure effective protection in this regard. The objective is therefore to strengthen the safeguards for trade secrets, especially by preventing their leakage to natural or legal persons that are established in or subject to jurisdictions posing such risks. This includes Union-based entities controlled by third country entities, who may be acting in bad faith or as fronts for third country entities. Additionally, the objective is to avert direct exposure to third country entities operating within the Union, that are subject to such jurisdictions. Being subject to a third country jurisdiction means the natural or legal person is legally governed, controlled or otherwise bound by the laws or regulatory authority of a third country. Subsidiaries or affiliates of third country parent companies may exploit these jurisdictions to evade or circumvent Union laws. Direct or indirect control refers to the ability to exercise decisive or dominant influence over another entity’s management or strategic decisions, whether through ownership of capital or voting rights, financial participation, contractual arrangements, or intermediary entities. Control may be exercised directly or through other means, even without majority ownership. Data holders should use best efforts to obtain the relevant information, which may include searches in public registers or requesting it from the user or third party directly, while ensuring it remains appropriately non-intrusive.

Struck CommissionHighlighted amendment

Target

Wording of the targeted provisionlaw in force, Commission proposal, latest Council text

Commission proposalCOM(2025) 837

An insufficient protection of trade secrets and the challenges in enforcing them in third countries may cause irreparable harm to European businesses. The objective is therefore to strengthen the safeguards for trade secrets by preventing their leakage to natural or legal persons that are established in or subject to jurisdictions posing such risks. This includes Union-based entities controlled by third country entities, who may be acting in bad faith or as fronts for third country entities. Additionally, the objective is to avert direct exposure to third country entities operating within the Union, that are subject to such jurisdictions. Being subject to a third country jurisdiction means the natural or legal person is legally governed, controlled or otherwise bound by the laws or regulatory authority of a third country. Subsidiaries or affiliates of third country parent companies may exploit these jurisdictions to evade or circumvent Union laws. Direct or indirect control refers to the ability to exercise decisive or dominant influence over another entity’s management or strategic decisions, whether through ownership of capital or voting rights, financial participation, contractual arrangements, or intermediary entities. Control may be exercised directly or through other means, even without majority ownership. Data holders should use best efforts to obtain the relevant information, which may include searches in public registers or requesting it from the user or third party directly, while ensuring it remains appropriately non-intrusive.

Council text of 22 October 2026ST 14756/26

An insufficient protection of trade secrets and the challenges in enforcing it in third countries may cause irreparable harm to European businesses. The objective is therefore to strengthen the safeguards for trade secrets by preventing their leakage to natural or legal persons that are established in or subject to jurisdictions posing such risks. This includes Union-based entities controlled by third country entities, who may be acting in bad faith or as fronts for third country entities. Additionally, the objective is to avert direct exposure to third country entities operating within the Union, that are subject to such jurisdictions. Being subject to a third country jurisdiction means the natural or legal person is legally governed, controlled or otherwise bound by the laws or regulatory authority of a third country. Subsidiaries or affiliates of third country companies may exploit these jurisdictions to evade or circumvent Union laws. Direct or indirect control refers to the ability to exercise decisive or dominant influence over another entity’s management or strategic decisions, whether through ownership of capital or voting rights, financial participation, contractual arrangements, or intermediary entities. Control may be exercised directly or through other means, even without majority ownership. Data holders should use best efforts to obtain the relevant information, which may include searches in public registers or requesting it from the user or third party directly, while ensuring it remains appropriately non-intrusive.

Cite this amendment

Amendment 90 (Daniel Buda), European Parliament, Committee on Legal Affairs, amendments 69–296 to the draft opinion on COM(2025) 837 (JURI-AM-790236, PE790.236v01-00, 29 June 2026), pp. 23–24

Link, short form and official text
Reference

Amendment 90 (Daniel Buda), European Parliament, Committee on Legal Affairs, amendments 69–296 to the draft opinion on COM(2025) 837 (JURI-AM-790236, PE790.236v01-00, 29 June 2026), pp. 23–24

Short form

JURI Amendment 90 (JURI-AM-790236), p. 23

Entry in the source list