Texts to 22 Oct 2026

Amendment 6· Digital Omnibus proposal Recital 38

Alternative

Rapporteurs
Aura Salla and Marina Kaljurand
Committee and document
ITRE–LIBE·draft report (CJ72-PR-786818, PE786.818v01-00)·22 June 2026
Source
Official text, p. 11·printed header: Recital 38
Targets
Recital 38 of the Digital Omnibus proposal

Text of the amendment

As tabled

Wordingagainst the Commission’s

(38) Article 22 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 provides forthat data subjects have the right not to be subject to a decision based solely on automated processing, except where specific conditions are met and in accordance with rules governing the processing of personal data when the data controller makes decisions which have legal effects or similarly significant effects on the data subject, based solely on automated processing. In order to provide greater legal certainty, it should be clarified that decisionswhen assessing whether a decision based solely on automated processing are allowed when specific conditions are met, as set out in Regulation (EU) 2016/679. It should also be clarified that when assessing whether a decision is necessary for entering into, or performance of, a contract between the data subject and a data controller, as set out in Article 22(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2016/679, it should not be required that the decision could be taken only by solely automated processing. This means that the fact that the decision could also be taken by a human does not prevent the controller from taking the decision by solely automated processing. WhenHowever, when several equally effective automated processing solutions exist, the controller should use the less intrusive one. The data subject’s rights should not be negatively impacted by the implementation of automated individual decision-making. Human involvement with regard to automated decision-making should be meaningful, and a mere symbolic gesture by a human of viewing the decision made without having a real and factual influence on the decision-making should not be categorised as human involvement.

Struck CommissionHighlighted amendment

Target

Wording of the targeted provisionlaw in force, Commission proposal, latest Council text

Commission proposalCOM(2025) 837

Article 22 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 provides for rules governing the processing of personal data when the data controller makes decisions which have legal effects or similarly significant effects on the data subject, based solely on automated processing. In order to provide greater legal certainty, it should be clarified that decisions based solely on automated processing are allowed when specific conditions are met, as set out in Regulation (EU) 2016/679. It should also be clarified that when assessing whether a decision is necessary for entering into, or performance of, a contract between the data subject and a data controller, as set out in Article 22(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2016/679, it should not be required that the decision could be taken only by solely automated processing. This means that the fact that the decision could also be taken by a human does not prevent the controller from taking the decision by solely automated processing When several equally effective automated processing solutions exist, the controller should use the less intrusive one.

Council text of 22 October 2026ST 14756/26

Article 22 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 provides that data subject has the right not to be subject to a decision based solely on automated processing, except when specific conditions are met and in accordance with rules governing the processing of personal data when the controller makes decisions which have legal effects concerning the data subject or similarly significant effects on the data subject, based solely on automated processing. In order to provide greater legal certainty, it should be clarified that when assessing whether a decision based solely on automated processing is necessary for entering into, or performance of, a contract between the data subject and a controller, as set out in Article 22(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2016/679, it should not be required that the decision could be taken only by solely automated processing. The fact that the decision could also be taken by a human does not prevent the controller from taking the decision by solely automated processing. When several equally effective automated processing solutions exist, the controller should use the less intrusive one.

Cite this amendment

Amendment 6 (draft report by Aura Salla and Marina Kaljurand), European Parliament, Committee on Industry, Research and Energy and Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs, draft report on COM(2025) 837 (CJ72-PR-786818, PE786.818v01-00, 22 June 2026), p. 11

Link, short form and official text
Reference

Amendment 6 (draft report by Aura Salla and Marina Kaljurand), European Parliament, Committee on Industry, Research and Energy and Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs, draft report on COM(2025) 837 (CJ72-PR-786818, PE786.818v01-00, 22 June 2026), p. 11

Short form

ITRE–LIBE Amendment 6 (CJ72-PR-786818), p. 11

Entry in the source list