Texts to 22 Oct 2026

Amendment 492· Digital Omnibus proposal Recital 49

Alternative

Tabled by
Julie Rechagneux and 9 others (ECR, PfE)Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Aleksandar Nikolic, Ewa Zajączkowska-Hernik, Pierre-Romain Thionnet, Alexandre Varaut, Fabrice Leggeri, Marion Maréchal, António Tânger Corrêa, Christophe Bay
Committee and document
ITRE–LIBE·amendments 401–526 to the draft report (CJ72-AM-790968, PE790.968v01-00)·27 July 2026
Source
Official text, pp. 79–80·printed header: Recital 49
Targets
Recital 49 of the Digital Omnibus proposal

Text of the amendment

As tabled

Wordingagainst the Commission’s

(49) Several horizontal or sectorial Union legal acts require the notification of the same event to different authorities using different technical means and channels. The EU entry point and national single-entry pointpoints for incident reporting should allow entities to fulfil reporting obligations under Directive (EU) 2022/2555, Regulation (EU) 2016/679, Regulation (EU) 2022/2554, Regulation (EU) No 910/2014 and Directive (EU) 2022/2557 by submitting notifications to a single interface. Furthermore, the single-entry point should give a possibility for entities to retrieve information that they have previously submitted using the single-entry point, thereby helping entities to keep track of their compliance with reporting obligations in connection with specific incidents.Member States should establish a single national entry point for the submission of those notifications. The competent national authorities should remain solely responsible for receiving, assessing and handling notifications. Information received through the national single entry points may be made available, where relevant and in accordance with applicable Union law, to ENISA for the purposes of situational awareness, trend analysis, risk monitoring and the identification of systemic vulnerabilities. Such cooperation should not affect the competences of national authorities nor the independence of supervisory authorities established under Union law. Furthermore, the layered single-entry points structure should give a possibility for entities to retrieve information that they have previously submitted using the single-entry points, thereby helping entities to keep track of their compliance with reporting obligations in connection with specific incidents.

Struck CommissionHighlighted amendment

Justification

Simplification for reporting entities does not justify transferring to a Union body competences exercised at national level. The single entry point must be national; ENISA’s role is one of aggregation for situational awareness, not of substantive handling.

Target

Wording of the targeted provisionlaw in force, Commission proposal, latest Council text

Commission proposalCOM(2025) 837

Several horizontal or sectorial Union legal acts require the notification of the same event to different authorities using different technical means and channels. The single-entry point for incident reporting should allow entities to fulfil reporting obligations under Directive (EU) 2022/2555, Regulation (EU) 2016/679, Regulation (EU) 2022/2554, Regulation (EU) No 910/2014 and Directive (EU) 2022/2557 by submitting notifications to a single interface. Furthermore, the single-entry point should give a possibility for entities to retrieve information that they have previously submitted using the single-entry point, thereby helping entities to keep track of their compliance with reporting obligations in connection with specific incidents.

Council text of 22 October 2026ST 14756/26

Several horizontal or sectorial Union legal acts require the notification of the same event to different authorities using different technical means and channels. The establishment by Member States of a national entry point should support and facilitate the fulfilment of obligations to the reporting of incidents and related events under Directive (EU) 2022/2555, Regulation (EU) 2016/679, Regulation (EU) 2022/2554, Regulation (EU) No 910/2014 and Directive (EU) 2022/2557. Furthermore, the national entry point could give a possibility for entities to retrieve information that they have previously submitted using the national entry point, thereby helping entities to keep track of their compliance with reporting obligations in connection with specific incidents.

Cite this amendment

Amendment 492 (Julie Rechagneux and others), European Parliament, Committee on Industry, Research and Energy and Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs, amendments 401–526 to the draft report on COM(2025) 837 (CJ72-AM-790968, PE790.968v01-00, 27 July 2026), pp. 79–80

Link, short form and official text
Reference

Amendment 492 (Julie Rechagneux and others), European Parliament, Committee on Industry, Research and Energy and Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs, amendments 401–526 to the draft report on COM(2025) 837 (CJ72-AM-790968, PE790.968v01-00, 27 July 2026), pp. 79–80

Short form

ITRE–LIBE Amendment 492 (CJ72-AM-790968), p. 79

Entry in the source list