Amendment 383· Digital Omnibus proposal Recital 39
~Alternative
Text of the amendment
As tabled
Wordingagainst the Commission’s
(39) In order to reduce the burden on controllers while ensuring that supervisory authorities have access to the relevant information and can act on violations of the Regulation, the threshold for notification of a personal data breach to the supervisory authority under Article 33 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 should be aligned with that of communication of a personal data breach to the data subject under Article 34 of that Regulation.In order to reduce the burden on controllers while ensuring that supervisory authorities have access to the relevant information and can act on violations of the Regulation, the threshold for notification of a personal data breach to the supervisory authority under Article 33 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 should be increased to situations in which a personal data breach is likely to result in an increased risk to the rights and freedoms of natural persons. Since all processing of personal data is connected with some inherent risk, an increased threshold is necessary in order to avoid that every single personal data breach leads to a notification obligation. In order to assess the impact of the data breach to the rights and freedoms of data subjects, the controller shall compare the level of risk prior to the data breach with the respective risk after the data breach. The risk should be considered increased if an existing risk is more likely to materialise or if a new risk emerged by the personal data breach. In the case of a data breach that is not likely to result in aan highincreased risk to the rights and freedoms of natural persons, the controller should not be required to notify the competent supervisory authority. The higher threshold for notifying a data breach to the supervisory authority does not affect the obligation of the controller to document the breach in accordance with paragraph 5 of Article 33 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679, or its obligation to be able to demonstrate its compliance with that Regulation, in accordance with Article 5(2) of that Regulation. In order to facilitate compliance by controllers and a harmonised approach in the Union, the Board should prepare a common template for notifying data breaches to the competent supervisory authority and a common list of circumstances in which a personal data breach is likely to result in a high risk to the rights and freedoms of a natural person. The Commission should take due account of the proposal prepared by the Board and review them, as necessary, prior to adoption. In order to take account of new information security threats, the common template and the list should be reviewed at least every three years and updated where necessary. The lack of a common list of circumstances in which a personal data breach is likely to result in a high risk to the rights and freedoms of a natural person should not affect the obligations of controllers to notify those breaches.The threshold for a notification of the supervisory authority about a personal data breach should be lower than the threshold for the obligation to communicate the personal data breach to the affected data subject. Therefore, not all personal data breaches notified to the supervisory authority also result in an obligation to communicate the personal data breach to the affected data subject.
Struck CommissionHighlighted amendment
Target
Wording of the targeted provisionlaw in force, Commission proposal, latest Council text
Commission proposalCOM(2025) 837
In order to reduce the burden on controllers while ensuring that supervisory authorities have access to the relevant information and can act on violations of the Regulation, the threshold for notification of a personal data breach to the supervisory authority under Article 33 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 should be aligned with that of communication of a personal data breach to the data subject under Article 34 of that Regulation. In the case of a data breach that is not likely to result in a high risk to the rights and freedoms of natural persons, the controller should not be required to notify the competent supervisory authority. The higher threshold for notifying a data breach to the supervisory authority does not affect the obligation of the controller to document the breach in accordance with paragraph 5 of Article 33 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679, or its obligation to be able to demonstrate its compliance with that Regulation, in accordance with Article 5(2) of that Regulation. In order to facilitate compliance by controllers and a harmonised approach in the Union, the Board should prepare a common template for notifying data breaches to the competent supervisory authority and a common list of circumstances in which a personal data breach is likely to result in a high risk to the rights and freedoms of a natural person. The Commission should take due account of the proposal prepared by the Board and review them, as necessary, prior to adoption. In order to take account of new information security threats, the common template and the list should be reviewed at least every three years and updated where necessary. The lack of a common list of circumstances in which a personal data breach is likely to result in a high risk to the rights and freedoms of a natural person should not affect the obligations of controllers to notify those breaches.
Council text of 22 October 2026ST 14756/26
In the case of a data breach that is not likely to result in a high risk to the rights and freedoms of natural persons, the controller should not be required to notify the competent supervisory authority. The higher threshold for notifying a data breach to the supervisory authority does not affect the obligation of the controller to document the breach in accordance with paragraph 5 of Article 33 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679, or its obligation to be able to demonstrate its compliance with that Regulation, in accordance with Article 5(2) of that Regulation. In order to facilitate compliance by controllers and a harmonised approach in the Union, the Board should establish and make public a common list of circumstances in which a personal data breach is likely to result in a high risk to the rights and freedoms of a natural person, and a common list of circumstances in which a personal data breach does not result in such a high risk. To further facilitate compliance, the Board should prepare a common template for notifying data breaches to the competent supervisory authority. The Commission should take due account of the proposal prepared by the Board and review it, as necessary, prior to adoption by means of an implementing act. In order to take account of new information security threats, the common template and the list should be reviewed at least every three years and updated where necessary. The lack of a common list of circumstances in which a personal data breach is likely to result in a high risk to the rights and freedoms of a natural person should not affect the obligations of controllers to notify those breaches. The alignment of notification thresholds should not affect the controller’s obligation to carry out an individual risk assessment and to maintain complete documentation of personal data breaches in accordance with Article 33(5) of Regulation (EU) 2016/679. The common lists of circumstances in which a personal data breach is likely to result in a high risk to the rights and freedom of a natural person and in which a personal data breach is not likely to result in a high risk should also apply in order to determine when communicating the data breaches to the data subject, in accordance with Article 34.
Cite this amendment
Amendment 383 (Pernando Barrena Arza), European Parliament, Committee on Industry, Research and Energy and Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs, amendments 251–400 to the draft report on COM(2025) 837 (CJ72-AM-790967, PE790.967v01-00, 27 July 2026), pp. 149–150
Link, short form and official text
Amendment 383 (Pernando Barrena Arza), European Parliament, Committee on Industry, Research and Energy and Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs, amendments 251–400 to the draft report on COM(2025) 837 (CJ72-AM-790967, PE790.967v01-00, 27 July 2026), pp. 149–150
ITRE–LIBE Amendment 383 (CJ72-AM-790967), p. 149