Texts to 22 Oct 2026

Amendment 356· Digital Omnibus proposal Recital 37

Alternative

Tabled by
Irena Joveva and 5 others (Renew)Irena Joveva, Michael McNamara, Raquel García Hermida-Van Der Walle, Oihane Agirregoitia Martínez, Veronika Cifrová Ostrihoňová, Fabienne Keller
Committee and document
ITRE–LIBE·amendments 251–400 to the draft report (CJ72-AM-790967, PE790.967v01-00)·27 July 2026
Source
Official text, pp. 118–119·printed header: Recital 37
Targets
Recital 37 of the Digital Omnibus proposal

Text of the amendment

As tabled

Wordingagainst the Commission’s

(37) Where the processing takes place for the purpose of scientific research, andprovided it is not used for commercial product development, advertising, marketing, profiling or the training of data processing models for commercial deployment, transparency should remain effective. In such cases, if the provision of information to the data subject proves to be impossible or would involve a disproportionate effort, it should not be necessary to provide the information provided for under Article 13 of this Regulation. The controller should make reasonable efforts to acquire contact details if they are readily available and acquisition would not require a disproportionate effort., while public information should not replace direct information where contact details are available or can be reasonably obtained The provision of the information would involve a disproportionate effort in particular where the controller at the time of collection of the personal data did not know or anticipate that it would process personal data for scientific research purposes at a later stage, in which case it may not have easily available contact details of the data subjects. In such situations, the controller should document its reliance on this exception, make such documentation available to the supervisory authority upon request, and should inform data subjects indirectly, such as by making the information publicly available. The provision of such information should ensure that as many data subjects concerned as possible are reached, and where information is made publicly available, such public information should be prominent, accessible and sufficiently specific to enable data subjects to understand the processing and exercise their rights. Relevant means to make the information publicly available should be determined depending on the context of the research project and the data subjects involved.

Struck CommissionHighlighted amendment

Target

Wording of the targeted provisionlaw in force, Commission proposal, latest Council text

Commission proposalCOM(2025) 837

Where the processing takes place for the purpose of scientific research and the provision of information to the data subject proves to be impossible or would involve a disproportionate effort it should not be necessary to provide the information provided for under Article 13 of this Regulation. The controller should make reasonable efforts to acquire contact details if they are readily available and acquisition would not require a disproportionate effort. The provision of the information would involve a disproportionate effort in particular where the controller at the time of collection of the personal data did not know or anticipate that it would process personal data for scientific research purposes at a later stage, in which case it may not have easily available contact details of the data subjects. In such situations the controller should inform data subjects indirectly, such as by making the information publicly available. The provision of such information should ensure that as many data subjects concerned as possible are reached. Relevant means to make the information publicly available should be determined depending on the context of the research project and the data subjects involved.

Council text of 22 October 2026ST 14756/26

Where the further processing by the same controller takes place for the purpose of scientific research and the provision of information to the data subject proves to be impossible or would involve a disproportionate effort it should not be necessary to provide the information provided for under Article 13 of this Regulation. The controller should make reasonable efforts to acquire contact details if they are readily available and acquisition would not require a disproportionate effort. The provision of the information would involve a disproportionate effort in particular where the controller at the time of collection of the personal data did not know or anticipate that it would process personal data for scientific research purposes at a later stage, in which case it may not have easily available contact details of the data subjects. In such situations the controller should inform data subjects indirectly, such as by making the information publicly available. The provision of such information should ensure that as many data subjects concerned as possible are reached. Relevant means to make the information publicly available should be determined depending on the context of the research project and the data subjects involved.

Cite this amendment

Amendment 356 (Irena Joveva and others), European Parliament, Committee on Industry, Research and Energy and Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs, amendments 251–400 to the draft report on COM(2025) 837 (CJ72-AM-790967, PE790.967v01-00, 27 July 2026), pp. 118–119

Link, short form and official text
Reference

Amendment 356 (Irena Joveva and others), European Parliament, Committee on Industry, Research and Energy and Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs, amendments 251–400 to the draft report on COM(2025) 837 (CJ72-AM-790967, PE790.967v01-00, 27 July 2026), pp. 118–119

Short form

ITRE–LIBE Amendment 356 (CJ72-AM-790967), p. 118

Entry in the source list