Amendment 349· Digital Omnibus proposal Recital 36b (new)
+Addition
Text of the amendment
As tabled
Wording it would add
(36b)Micro, small and medium-sized enterprises and small mid-caps which are not related undertakings should be able to designate a single data protection officer jointly, provided that the officer is easily accessible from each establishment and that the conditions of independence and absence of conflict of interest laid down in Articles 38 and 39 are met in respect of each controller concerned. Such pooling reduces compliance costs without lowering the level of protection, and should not result in the officer being placed in a position of dependence in relation to any of the controllers concerned.
Justification
The cost of a dedicated DPO is prohibitive for small structures. Pooling across unrelated undertakings is possible provided that accessibility and independence are guaranteed for each controller.
Target
Wording of the targeted provisionlaw in force, Commission proposal, latest Council text
No Council text amends Recital 36b (new).
Cite this amendment
Amendment 349 (Julie Rechagneux and others), European Parliament, Committee on Industry, Research and Energy and Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs, amendments 251–400 to the draft report on COM(2025) 837 (CJ72-AM-790967, PE790.967v01-00, 27 July 2026), p. 112
Link, short form and official text
Amendment 349 (Julie Rechagneux and others), European Parliament, Committee on Industry, Research and Energy and Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs, amendments 251–400 to the draft report on COM(2025) 837 (CJ72-AM-790967, PE790.967v01-00, 27 July 2026), p. 112
ITRE–LIBE Amendment 349 (CJ72-AM-790967), p. 112