Texts to 22 Oct 2026

Amendment 257· Digital Omnibus proposal Recital 30

Alternative

Tabled by
Julie Rechagneux and 7 others (ECR, PfE)Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pierre-Romain Thionnet, Alexandre Varaut, Fabrice Leggeri, Marion Maréchal, Christophe Bay
Committee and document
ITRE–LIBE·amendments 251–400 to the draft report (CJ72-AM-790967, PE790.967v01-00)·27 July 2026
Source
Official text, pp. 8–9·printed header: Recital 30
Targets
Recital 30 of the Digital Omnibus proposal

Text of the amendment

As tabled

Wordingagainst the Commission’s

(30) Trustworthy AI is key in providing for economic growth and supporting innovation with socially beneficial outcomes. The development and use of AI systems and the underlying models such as large language models and generative video models rely on data, including personal data, in various phases in the AI lifecycle, such as the training, testing and validation phase and personal data may, in some instances, be retainedextracted infrom, regurgitated by, or inferred from the AI system or the AI model. The processing of personal data in this context may therefore be carried out for purposes of a legitimate interest pursued by the controller or by a third party, including the provider of a pre-trained model, within the meaning of Article 6 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679, where appropriate. This does not affect the obligation of the controller to ensure that the development or use (deployment) of AI in a specific context or for specific purposes complies with other Union or national law, or to ensure compliance where its use is explicitly prohibited by law. Such processing shall not benefit from any presumption of lawfulness and remains subject to a balancing test carried out on a case-by-case basis. The fact that a system or model is presented as producing anonymised data shall not, in itself, exclude the application of that Regulation where personal data may be extracted from, or inferred from, that system or model by means reasonably likely to be used. It also does not affect its obligation to ensure that all other conditions of Article 6(1)(f) of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 as well as all other requirements and principles of that Regulation are met.

Struck CommissionHighlighted amendment

Justification

Two corrections. First, the notions of ‘retained’, ‘memorised’ or ‘stored’ data mischaracterise how AI models function: what matters legally is whether personal data can be extracted from, regurgitated by, or inferred from the model. Second, the reference to third-party legitimate interest, which has existed since 1995, secures the position of downstream SMEs deploying pre-trained models, while the explicit refusal of any presumption of lawfulness preserves the in concreto balancing required by the Court (C-252/21).

Target

Wording of the targeted provisionlaw in force, Commission proposal, latest Council text

Commission proposalCOM(2025) 837

Trustworthy AI is key in providing for economic growth and supporting innovation with socially beneficial outcomes. The development and use of AI systems and the underlying models such as large language models and generative video models rely on data, including personal data, in various phases in the AI lifecycle, such as the training, testing and validation phase and may in some instances be retained in the AI system or the AI model. The processing of personal data in this context may therefore be carried out for purposes of a legitimate interest within the meaning of Article 6 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679, where appropriate. This does not affect the obligation of the controller to ensure that the development or use (deployment) of AI in a specific context or for specific purposes complies with other Union or national law, or to ensure compliance where its use is explicitly prohibited by law. It also does not affect its obligation to ensure that all other conditions of Article 6(1)(f) of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 as well as all other requirements and principles of that Regulation are met.

The Council text of 22 October 2026 drops the Commission’s wording.

Cite this amendment

Amendment 257 (Julie Rechagneux and others), European Parliament, Committee on Industry, Research and Energy and Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs, amendments 251–400 to the draft report on COM(2025) 837 (CJ72-AM-790967, PE790.967v01-00, 27 July 2026), pp. 8–9

Link, short form and official text
Reference

Amendment 257 (Julie Rechagneux and others), European Parliament, Committee on Industry, Research and Energy and Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs, amendments 251–400 to the draft report on COM(2025) 837 (CJ72-AM-790967, PE790.967v01-00, 27 July 2026), pp. 8–9

Short form

ITRE–LIBE Amendment 257 (CJ72-AM-790967), p. 8

Entry in the source list