Texts to 22 Oct 2026

Amendment 154· Digital Omnibus proposal Recital 14

Alternative

Tabled by
Markus Buchheit (ESN)
Committee and document
ITRE–LIBE·amendments 79–250 to the draft report (CJ72-AM-786820, PE786.820v01-00)·27 July 2026
Source
Official text, pp. 72–73·printed header: Recital 14
Targets
Recital 14 of the Digital Omnibus proposal

Text of the amendment

As tabled

Wordingagainst the Commission’s

(14) Protecting trade secrets from those vulnerabilities is essential for European industries to sustain their market position and competitive advantage. While data holders may exercise discretion in protecting their trade secrets, refusals to share data should be limited to justified, exceptional circumstances, in order to preserve the objectives of Regulation (EU) 2023/2854 of fostering data-driven innovation and a thriving digital economy in the Union.Data holders must be able to protect trade secrets and sensitive operational data effectively. Where serious risks exist to confidentiality, integrity, economic substance or technological sovereignty, refusal to share data must be permitted. The objectives of data-driven innovation shall not be interpreted as requiring undertakings to surrender strategically sensitive information. Safeguards against misuse of the refusal mechanism should remain in place, including the data holder’s obligation to demonstrate in a duly substantiated manner that disclosure poses a high risk and to notify competent authorities. This demonstration should be provided in writing without undue delay to the user or third party and proportionate to the case at hand. All parties involved should treat the decision and supporting demonstration as confidential in order to uphold the confidential nature of the trade secrets concerned. Users and third parties, as the case may be, may challenge the data holder’s decision with the competent authority, in court, or through dispute settlement bodies.

Struck CommissionHighlighted amendment

Target

Wording of the targeted provisionlaw in force, Commission proposal, latest Council text

Commission proposalCOM(2025) 837

Protecting trade secrets from those vulnerabilities is essential for European industries to sustain their market position and competitive advantage. While data holders may exercise discretion in protecting their trade secrets, refusals to share data should be limited to justified, exceptional circumstances, in order to preserve the objectives of Regulation (EU) 2023/2854 of fostering data-driven innovation and a thriving digital economy in the Union. Safeguards against misuse of the refusal mechanism should remain in place, including the data holder’s obligation to demonstrate in a duly substantiated manner that disclosure poses a high risk and to notify competent authorities. This demonstration should be provided in writing without undue delay to the user or third party and proportionate to the case at hand. All parties involved should treat the decision and supporting demonstration as confidential in order to uphold the confidential nature of the trade secrets concerned. Users and third parties, as the case may be, may challenge the data holder’s decision with the competent authority, in court, or through dispute settlement bodies.

Council text of 22 October 2026ST 14756/26

Protecting trade secrets from those vulnerabilities is essential for European businesses to sustain their market position and competitive advantage. While data holders may exercise discretion in protecting their trade secrets, refusals to share data should be limited to justified circumstances in order to preserve the objectives of Regulation (EU) 2023/2854 of fostering data-driven innovation and a thriving digital economy in the Union. Safeguards against misuse of the refusal mechanism should remain in place, including the data holder’s obligation to demonstrate in a duly substantiated manner that disclosure poses a high risk and to notify competent authorities. This demonstration should be provided in writing without undue delay to the user or third party and proportionate to the case at hand. All parties involved should treat the decision and supporting demonstration as confidential in order to uphold the confidential nature of the trade secrets concerned. Users and third parties, as the case may be, may challenge the data holder’s decision with the competent authority, in court, or through dispute settlement bodies.

Cite this amendment

Amendment 154 (Markus Buchheit), European Parliament, Committee on Industry, Research and Energy and Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs, amendments 79–250 to the draft report on COM(2025) 837 (CJ72-AM-786820, PE786.820v01-00, 27 July 2026), pp. 72–73

Link, short form and official text
Reference

Amendment 154 (Markus Buchheit), European Parliament, Committee on Industry, Research and Energy and Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs, amendments 79–250 to the draft report on COM(2025) 837 (CJ72-AM-786820, PE786.820v01-00, 27 July 2026), pp. 72–73

Short form

ITRE–LIBE Amendment 154 (CJ72-AM-786820), p. 72

Entry in the source list