Amendment 132· Digital Omnibus proposal Recital 11
−Deletion
Text of the amendment
As tabled
Wording it would delete
(11) It is necessary to strengthen Regulation (EU) 2023/2854 by introducing an additional ground for data holders to refuse the disclosure of trade secrets, supplementing existing provisions which allow refusal based on the data holder’s demonstration of a high likelihood of serious economic damage. Under the new provision, data holders may refuse to disclose trade secrets if they demonstrate a high risk of unlawful acquisition, use, or disclosure to entities subject to regimes with inadequate protection, non-equivalent, or weaker legal frameworks than the applicable Union rules. The new provision also covers instances where the third country legal framework, in theory, is robust or exceeds such Union rules, but lacks appropriate enforcement in practice. Such risks highlight the possibility that trade secrets could be acquired, used, or disclosed in violation of Union law, threatening the integrity and confidentiality of trade secrets.
Struck CommissionHighlighted amendment
Justification
There are no grounds or substantial evidence – whether divulged by the Commission or available in the public domain – to justify the introduction of these measures, which provide much broader and much more subjective scope to refuse data-sharing requests from data subjects or third parties.
Target
Wording of the targeted provisionlaw in force, Commission proposal, latest Council text
Commission proposalCOM(2025) 837
It is necessary to strengthen Regulation (EU) 2023/2854 by introducing an additional ground for data holders to refuse the disclosure of trade secrets, supplementing existing provisions which allow refusal based on the data holder’s demonstration of a high likelihood of serious economic damage. Under the new provision, data holders may refuse to disclose trade secrets if they demonstrate a high risk of unlawful acquisition, use, or disclosure to entities subject to regimes with inadequate protection, non-equivalent, or weaker legal frameworks than the applicable Union rules. The new provision also covers instances where the third country legal framework, in theory, is robust or exceeds such Union rules, but lacks appropriate enforcement in practice. Such risks highlight the possibility that trade secrets could be acquired, used, or disclosed in violation of Union law, threatening the integrity and confidentiality of trade secrets.
Council text of 22 October 2026ST 14756/26
It is necessary to strengthen Regulation (EU) 2023/2854 by introducing an additional ground for data holders to refuse access to data where such access could lead to the disclosure of trade secrets, supplementing existing provisions which allow refusal based on the data holder’s demonstration of a likelihood of serious economic damage. Under the new provision, data holders may refuse a request to access to data if they demonstrate a high risk of unlawful acquisition, use, or disclosure to entities subject to regimes with inadequate protection, non-equivalent, or weaker legal frameworks than the applicable Union rules. The new provision also covers instances where the third country legal framework, in theory, is robust or exceeds such Union rules, but lacks appropriate enforcement in practice. Such risks highlight the possibility that trade secrets could be acquired, used, or disclosed in violation of Union law, threatening the integrity and confidentiality of trade secrets.
Cite this amendment
Amendment 132 (João Oliveira), European Parliament, Committee on Industry, Research and Energy and Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs, amendments 79–250 to the draft report on COM(2025) 837 (CJ72-AM-786820, PE786.820v01-00, 27 July 2026), pp. 51–52
Link, short form and official text
Amendment 132 (João Oliveira), European Parliament, Committee on Industry, Research and Energy and Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs, amendments 79–250 to the draft report on COM(2025) 837 (CJ72-AM-786820, PE786.820v01-00, 27 July 2026), pp. 51–52
ITRE–LIBE Amendment 132 (CJ72-AM-786820), p. 51