Texts to 22 Oct 2026

Amendment 1017· GDPR Article 7a (new)

Addition

Tabled by
Julie Rechagneux and 8 others (ECR, PfE)Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pierre-Romain Thionnet, Alexandre Varaut, Fabrice Leggeri, Marion Maréchal, António Tânger Corrêa, Christophe Bay
Committee and document
ITRE–LIBE·amendments 777–1052 to the draft report (CJ72-AM-791072, PE791.072v01-00)·27 July 2026
Source
Official text, pp. 150–153·printed header: Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 2 g (new) / Regulation (EU) 2016/679 / Article 7a (new)
Targets
Article 7a (new) of the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR)

Text of the amendment

As tabled

Amending instruction

2g. The following Article 7a is inserted

Article 7a it would add

Article 7a

Consent interfaces

1.Any interface used to request, give, refuse or withdraw consent under this Regulation, including for the storing of, or access to, information in terminal equipment, shall be fair, neutral, intelligible and easily accessible.

2.Consent shall be freely given, specific, informed and unambiguous. It shall be requested separately for each purpose and require a statement or clear affirmative action. Silence, inactivity, pre-ticked boxes or the mere continued use of a service shall not constitute consent. Fresh consent shall be required for any other purpose.

3.Consent shall not be freely given where the data subject has no genuine choice, cannot refuse or withdraw consent without detriment, including in the presence of a clear imbalance between the data subject and the controller, or where access to a service, its functionalities or an equivalent version thereof is made conditional on consent to processing, storing or access that is not necessary for that service.

4.Before consent is given, the data subject shall receive, in clear and plain language, information on the controller, any joint controllers, recipients or categories of recipients relying on the consent, the purposes pursued, the categories of data concerned, the right to withdraw consent, and, where relevant, automated decision-making under Article 22 or transfers to a third country without an adequacy decision or appropriate safeguards. Consent requests shall be clearly distinguishable from other matters and shall not be concealed within general terms and conditions.

5.Consent interfaces shall not deceive, coerce or manipulate the data subject, give greater prominence to acceptance than to refusal, make refusal, withdrawal or non-consent options less easy, less accessible or more time-consuming than acceptance, or repeat requests in a manner liable to pressure the data subject. Where an option to accept is presented, an equivalent option to refuse shall be presented at the same level of the interface.

6.Refusing or withdrawing consent shall be as easy as giving consent and shall not entail any cost, disadvantage or degradation of the service. Where consent was given through an electronic interface, withdrawal shall be possible through the same interface. Following withdrawal, the controller shall cease the processing concerned and, in the absence of another lawful basis, erase the data concerned.

7.Where consent is withdrawn or found to be invalid, the controller shall not retroactively rely on another legal basis under Article 6 to justify the same processing.

8.The controller shall be able to demonstrate that valid consent was given. The information retained for that purpose shall be limited to what is necessary.

9.Where this Regulation requires explicit consent, consent shall be given by an express statement.

GDPR Article 7a with this amendment

Amendment 1017 applied to the Commission proposal, no other amendment

1.

Any interface used to request, give, refuse or withdraw consent under this Regulation, including for the storing of, or access to, information in terminal equipment, shall be fair, neutral, intelligible and easily accessible.

New
2.

Consent shall be freely given, specific, informed and unambiguous. It shall be requested separately for each purpose and require a statement or clear affirmative action. Silence, inactivity, pre-ticked boxes or the mere continued use of a service shall not constitute consent. Fresh consent shall be required for any other purpose.

New
3.

Consent shall not be freely given where the data subject has no genuine choice, cannot refuse or withdraw consent without detriment, including in the presence of a clear imbalance between the data subject and the controller, or where access to a service, its functionalities or an equivalent version thereof is made conditional on consent to processing, storing or access that is not necessary for that service.

New
4.

Before consent is given, the data subject shall receive, in clear and plain language, information on the controller, any joint controllers, recipients or categories of recipients relying on the consent, the purposes pursued, the categories of data concerned, the right to withdraw consent, and, where relevant, automated decision-making under Article 22 or transfers to a third country without an adequacy decision or appropriate safeguards. Consent requests shall be clearly distinguishable from other matters and shall not be concealed within general terms and conditions.

New
5.

Consent interfaces shall not deceive, coerce or manipulate the data subject, give greater prominence to acceptance than to refusal, make refusal, withdrawal or non-consent options less easy, less accessible or more time-consuming than acceptance, or repeat requests in a manner liable to pressure the data subject. Where an option to accept is presented, an equivalent option to refuse shall be presented at the same level of the interface.

New
6.

Refusing or withdrawing consent shall be as easy as giving consent and shall not entail any cost, disadvantage or degradation of the service. Where consent was given through an electronic interface, withdrawal shall be possible through the same interface. Following withdrawal, the controller shall cease the processing concerned and, in the absence of another lawful basis, erase the data concerned.

New
7.

Where consent is withdrawn or found to be invalid, the controller shall not retroactively rely on another legal basis under Article 6 to justify the same processing.

New
8.

The controller shall be able to demonstrate that valid consent was given. The information retained for that purpose shall be limited to what is necessary.

New
9.

Where this Regulation requires explicit consent, consent shall be given by an express statement.

New

Full text on the GDPR Article 7a page

Justification

Codifies the EDPB Guidelines 05/2020 on consent and 03/2022 on deceptive design patterns. Consent must be freely given, specific, informed and unambiguous; the interface must be fair and neutral and must not give visual or other prominence to acceptance over refusal, whether through size, colour, positioning or wording; refusal must be as easy to exercise, and as prominent, as acceptance; consent must be capable of being withdrawn as easily as it was given; and the controller may not retroactively rely on another legal basis where consent is withdrawn or found invalid. Consent obtained through a manipulated interface is not consent.

Target

Wording of the targeted provisionlaw in force, Commission proposal, latest Council text

No Council text amends Article 7a (new).

Cite this amendment

Amendment 1017 (Julie Rechagneux and others), European Parliament, Committee on Industry, Research and Energy and Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs, amendments 777–1052 to the draft report on COM(2025) 837 (CJ72-AM-791072, PE791.072v01-00, 27 July 2026), pp. 150–153

Link, short form and official text
Reference

Amendment 1017 (Julie Rechagneux and others), European Parliament, Committee on Industry, Research and Energy and Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs, amendments 777–1052 to the draft report on COM(2025) 837 (CJ72-AM-791072, PE791.072v01-00, 27 July 2026), pp. 150–153

Short form

ITRE–LIBE Amendment 1017 (CJ72-AM-791072), p. 150

Entry in the source list