Amendment 176· Digital Omnibus proposal Recital 44
~Alternative
Text of the amendment
As tabled
Wordingagainst the Commission’s
The storing of personal data, or the gaining of access to personal data already stored, in a terminal equipment and the subsequent processing of such data should be regulated under a single legal framework, namely Regulation (EU) 2016/679, where the subscriber of the electronic communications service or the user of the terminal equipment is a natural person. The amendments presented in this Regulation continue to offer the highest levels of protection for personal data, while simplifying the experiences of data subjects in exerting their rights and expressing their choices online. The amendments concern in particular storage of information in that equipment, accessing or otherwise collecting information from that equipment that entails the processing of personal data through cookies or similar technologies to gain information from the terminal equipment. The relevant rules should also apply regardless of whether the terminal equipment is owned by the natural person or by another legal or natural person.The introduction of Article 88a in the GDPR should continue to offer the highest levels of protection, in particular consumer protection and privacy, while simplifying the experiences of consumers in exerting their rights and expressing their choices online. This article should be seen as strengthening Article 5 of Directive 2002/58/EC on privacy and electronic communications (‘ePrivacy Directive’), last revised in 2009, by providing specific rules in relation to processing of personal data in the context of electronic communication services. The amendments concern in particular access to and storage of personal data in the terminal equipment, accessing or otherwise collecting personal data from that equipment through cookies or similar technologies to gain information from the terminal equipment. As this access and storage constitute by itself an interference with the private sphere of a consumers as protected by Article 7 and 8 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights, it begs the question whether the information qualifies as personal data. The storing of personal data, or the gaining of access to personal data already stored, in a terminal equipment should therefore continue to be allowed only on the basis of consent and be subject to clear rules able to guarantee a high level of protection of consumers while safeguarding the functioning of the internal market. Rules governing the storing of information in terminal equipment and access to such information protect the confidentiality of communications and the integrity of user devices. These protections apply independently of whether the information accessed constitutes personal data and apply regardless of whether the information accessed constitutes personal data. With a view of providing legal clarity it is necessary to define a limitative list of purposes, strictly defined and necessary, for which the processing should be permitted without consent. These exemptions should be interpreted strictly.
Non-personalised advertising is a form of advertising that provides the highest level of consumer protection as it minimizes the collection of consumer data while still ensuring the provision of advertising on the internal market and the establishment of new businesses models in this sector. In the context of Article 88a (3) (d) (a) (new) it shall not involve the retention, storage, reuse or linking of any data generated in connection with such interaction, nor the processing, inference or use of any data relating to the consumer’s location whether precise or approximate, including where such location data is derived, inferred or processed in aggregated anonymized form. Contextual advertising as defined in Article 4 (b) (xx) and in the context of Article 88a (3) (d) (a) (new) shall not involve the retention, storage, reuse or linking of any data generated in connection with such interaction, nor the processing, inference or use of any data relating to the consumer’s location whether precise or approximate, including where such location data is derived, inferred or processed in aggregated anonymized form. If a controller invokes the exception of Article 88a (3) (d) (a) (new) , the controller will not be able to engage in any other advertising activities other than contextual advertising as defined in Article (4) (b) (xx), including, but not limited, personalised and targeted advertising activities as defined in the EDPB Guidelines 8/2020 on the targeting of social media use.
Struck CommissionHighlighted amendment
Target
Wording of the targeted provisionlaw in force, Commission proposal, latest Council text
Commission proposalCOM(2025) 837
The storing of personal data, or the gaining of access to personal data already stored, in a terminal equipment and the subsequent processing of such data should be regulated under a single legal framework, namely Regulation (EU) 2016/679, where the subscriber of the electronic communications service or the user of the terminal equipment is a natural person. The amendments presented in this Regulation continue to offer the highest levels of protection for personal data, while simplifying the experiences of data subjects in exerting their rights and expressing their choices online. The amendments concern in particular storage of information in that equipment, accessing or otherwise collecting information from that equipment that entails the processing of personal data through cookies or similar technologies to gain information from the terminal equipment. The relevant rules should also apply regardless of whether the terminal equipment is owned by the natural person or by another legal or natural person.
The storing of personal data, or the gaining of access to personal data already stored, in a terminal equipment should continue to be allowed only on the basis of consent. Similar to the approach in Directive 2002/58/EC, this requirement should not preclude storing of personal data, or gaining of access to personal data already stored, in the terminal equipment of a natural person, when that is based on Union or Member State law within the meaning of Article 6 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and if it fulfils all conditions of lawfulness laid down in that provision, and is done for the objectives laid down in Article 23(1) of Regulation (EU) 2016/679.
With a view to reducing the compliance burden and providing legal clarity to controllers, and given that certain purposes of processing pose a low risk to the rights and freedoms of data subjects or that such processing may be necessary to provide a service requested by the data subject, it is necessary to define a limitative list of purposes for which the processing should be permitted without consent. As regards storing of personal data, or the gaining of access to personal data already stored, in a terminal equipment, and subsequent processing that is necessary for those purposes, this Regulation should therefore provide that the processing is lawful. The controller, such as a media service provider, may mandate a processor, such as a market research company, to carry out the processing on its behalf.
For the subsequent processing of personal data for other purpose than those defined in the limitative list, Article 6 and, where relevant, Article 9 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 should be applied. It is the responsibility of the controller in the light of the principle of accountability to choose the appropriate legal basis for the intended processing. In order to be able to rely on legitimate interest under Article 6(1), point f, of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 as a ground for the subsequent processing of personal data, the controller must show that it pursues the controller’s or third parties’ legitimate interest, the processing is necessary in order to achieve the purpose of that legitimate interest, and the interests or fundamental rights of the data subject do not override the interests pursued by the controller. In this context, controllers should take outmost account of the following elements: whether the data subject is a child; the reasonable expectations of data subject; the impact on the individual either because of the scale of data processed or the sensitivity of the data processed; the scale of the processing at issue in the sense that the processing cannot be particularly extensive either because of their amount or the range of categories of data; the processing should be based on data limited to what is necessary and cannot be based on monitoring of large parts of the online activity of the data subjects; and other relevant factors as appropriate. The processing should not give rise to the continuous monitoring of the data subject’s private life.
Where the controller cannot rely on legitimate interest as a legal ground for the subsequent processing, the processing should be based on another ground in Article 6(1), in particular on consent in accordance with Articles 6 and 7 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679, provided that all principles of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 are met.
Council text of 22 October 2026ST 14756/26
The storing of information, or the gaining of access to information already stored, in a terminal equipment and the subsequent processing of such data should be regulated under a single legal framework, namely Directive 2002/58/EC on privacy and electronic communications, where the subscriber of the electronic communications service or the user of the terminal equipment is a natural person. The amendments to this Directive should continue to offer the highest levels of protection for personal data, while simplifying the experiences of data subjects in exerting their rights and expressing their choices online. The amendments concern in particular storage of information in that equipment, accessing or otherwise collecting information from that equipment that entails the processing of personal data through cookies or similar technologies to gain information from the terminal equipment. Privacy enhancing technologies that reduce the processing of personal data and support the effective implementation of the obligations of data minimisation and data protection by design and by default under Regulation (EU) 2016/679 can play a crucial role in maintaining citizens’ trust in online digital ecosystems and it is important to incentivise the update of such technologies.
Cite this amendment
Amendment 176 (David Cormand), European Parliament, Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection, amendments 125–328 to the draft opinion on COM(2025) 837 (IMCO-AM-790905, PE790.905, 16 July 2026), pp. 51–53
Link, short form and official text
Amendment 176 (David Cormand), European Parliament, Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection, amendments 125–328 to the draft opinion on COM(2025) 837 (IMCO-AM-790905, PE790.905, 16 July 2026), pp. 51–53
IMCO Amendment 176 (IMCO-AM-790905), p. 51