Texts to 22 Oct 2026

Amendment 149· Digital Omnibus proposal Recital 16

Deletion

Tabled by
David Cormand (Greens/EFA)David Cormand on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group
Committee and document
IMCO·amendments 125–328 to the draft opinion (IMCO-AM-790905, PE790.905)·16 July 2026
Source
Official text, pp. 25–26·printed header: Recital 16
Targets
Recital 16 of the Digital Omnibus proposal

Text of the amendment

As tabled

Wording it would delete

(16) In order to mitigate legal uncertainties that could discourage innovative business models, it is necessary to address the substantial compliance ambiguities and burdens associated with the provisions on smart contracts executing data sharing agreements under Article 36 of Regulation (EU) 2023/2854. The absence of harmonised standards and clear definitions for key concepts such as ‘robustness’, ‘access control’, and ‘consistency with contractual terms’, combined with the requirement for a ‘safe termination or interruption mechanism’ potentially incompatible with decentralised or public blockchain architectures built on immutable ledgers, posed challenges to innovators from a cost and opportunity perspective. Additionally, the ambiguity surrounding the performance of the conformity assessment under Article 36(2) of that Regulation risks imposing disproportionate burdens. The elimination of Article 36 of Regulation (EU) 2023/2854 would therefore promote the development and market introduction of new business models, foster innovation, and reduce barriers for emerging technologies.

Struck CommissionHighlighted amendment

Target

Wording of the targeted provisionlaw in force, Commission proposal, latest Council text

Commission proposalCOM(2025) 837

In order to mitigate legal uncertainties that could discourage innovative business models, it is necessary to address the substantial compliance ambiguities and burdens associated with the provisions on smart contracts executing data sharing agreements under Article 36 of Regulation (EU) 2023/2854. The absence of harmonised standards and clear definitions for key concepts such as ‘robustness’, ‘access control’, and ‘consistency with contractual terms’, combined with the requirement for a ‘safe termination or interruption mechanism’ potentially incompatible with decentralised or public blockchain architectures built on immutable ledgers, posed challenges to innovators from a cost and opportunity perspective. Additionally, the ambiguity surrounding the performance of the conformity assessment under Article 36(2) of that Regulation risks imposing disproportionate burdens. The elimination of Article 36 of Regulation (EU) 2023/2854 would therefore promote the development and market introduction of new business models, foster innovation, and reduce barriers for emerging technologies.

Council text of 22 October 2026ST 14756/26

In order to mitigate legal uncertainties that could discourage innovative business models, it is necessary to address the substantial compliance ambiguities and burdens associated with the provisions on smart contracts executing data sharing agreements under Article 36 of Regulation (EU) 2023/2854. The absence of harmonised standards and clear definitions for key concepts such as ‘robustness’, ‘access control’, and ‘consistency with contractual terms’, combined with the requirement for a ‘safe termination or interruption mechanism’ potentially incompatible with decentralised or public blockchain architectures built on immutable ledgers, posed challenges to innovators from a cost and opportunity perspective. Additionally, the ambiguity surrounding the performance of the conformity assessment under Article 36(2) of that Regulation risks imposing disproportionate burdens. The elimination of Article 36 of Regulation (EU) 2023/2854 would therefore promote the development and market introduction of new business models, foster innovation, and reduce barriers for emerging technologies.

Cite this amendment

Amendment 149 (David Cormand), European Parliament, Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection, amendments 125–328 to the draft opinion on COM(2025) 837 (IMCO-AM-790905, PE790.905, 16 July 2026), pp. 25–26

Link, short form and official text
Reference

Amendment 149 (David Cormand), European Parliament, Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection, amendments 125–328 to the draft opinion on COM(2025) 837 (IMCO-AM-790905, PE790.905, 16 July 2026), pp. 25–26

Short form

IMCO Amendment 149 (IMCO-AM-790905), p. 25