EU institutions data protection regulation · Regulation (EU) 2018/1725
Article 24
Compare the available Commission, Council and Parliament texts and amendments affecting this article.
Article total: 4 parts · 3 Council drafts · 11 Parliament amendments
Source notes (1)
- The source instruction replaces paragraphs 1 and 2 with one printed paragraph 1. The printed paragraph 1 is complete; existing paragraph 2 is removed as part of that replacement.
Removed wording is struck through; added or replacement wording is highlighted.
Institutional text
European Commission proposal
All Commission’s changes to EU institutions data protection regulationThe wording proposed by the Commission at the start of this legislative file.
Full article with Commission changes
Article with proposed changes
Official consolidated text dated 23 October 2018, with all 2 Commission proposal changes affecting this article applied.
Removed by the proposal: Article 24(2).
Article 24
Automated individual decision-making, including profiling
- 1.
TheA decision which produces legal effects for a data subjectshallorhavesimilarlythesignificantlyrightaffectsnothimtoor her may besubject to a decisionbased solely on automated processing, including profiling,whichonlyproduceswherelegalthateffects concerning him or her or similarly significantly affects him or her.decision:- (a)
is necessary for entering into, or performance of, a contract between the data subject and a data controller regardless of whether the decision could be taken otherwise than by solely automated means;
- (b)
is authorised by Union law to which the controller is subject and which also lays down suitable measures to safeguard the data subject's rights and freedoms and legitimate interests; or
- (c)
is based on the data subject's explicit consent.
- (a)
- 2.
Paragraph 1 shall not apply if the decision:- (a)
is necessary for entering into, or performance of, a contract between the data subject and the controller; - (b)
is authorised by Union law, which also lays down suitable measures to safeguard the data subject’s rights and freedoms and legitimate interests; or - (c)
is based on the data subject’s explicit consent.
- (a)
- 3.
In the cases referred to in points (a) and (c) of paragraph 2, the controller shall implement suitable measures to safeguard the data subject’s rights and freedoms and legitimate interests, at least the right to obtain human intervention on the part of the controller, to express his or her point of view and to contest the decision.
- 4.
Decisions referred to in paragraph 2 of this Article shall not be based on special categories of personal data referred to in Article 10(1), unless point (a) or (g) of Article 10(2) applies and suitable measures to safeguard the data subject’s rights and freedoms and legitimate interests are in place.
No standalone Commission wording is mapped to this tracked part. A newly proposed provision may have no earlier text of its own.
Commission source wording and instructions
Article 24(1)
Commission proposal
1. A decision which produces legal effects for a data subject or similarly significantly affects him or her may be based solely on automated processing, including profiling, only where that decision: (a) is necessary for entering into, or performance of, a contract between the data subject and a data controller regardless of whether the decision could be taken otherwise than by solely automated means; (b) is authorised by Union law to which the controller is subject and which also lays down suitable measures to safeguard the data subject's rights and freedoms and legitimate interests; or (c) is based on the data subject's explicit consent.
Article 24(2)
Commission proposal
6. in Article 24 paragraphs 1 and 2 are replaced by the following: ‘1. A decision which produces legal effects for a data subject or similarly significantly affects him or her may be based solely on automated processing, including profiling, only where that decision: (a) is necessary for entering into, or performance of, a contract between the data subject and a data controller regardless of whether the decision could be taken otherwise than by solely automated means; (b) is authorised by Union law to which the controller is subject and which also lays down suitable measures to safeguard the data subject's rights and freedoms and legitimate interests; or (c) is based on the data subject's explicit consent.’
Institutional text
Council Presidency texts
Successive Presidency compromise texts. Their inclusion does not imply agreement or adoption.
No Council wording is mapped to this tracked part.
Article in June Presidency compromise · 10 June Council text
Comparison basis: Existing law (23 October 2018) compared with June Presidency compromise · 10 June (10 June 2026)
Article 24
Automated individual decision-making, including profiling
- 1.
The data subject shall have the right not to be subject to a decision based solely on automated processing, including profiling, which produces legal effects concerning him or her or similarly significantly affects him or her
., unless such processing:- (a)
is necessary for entering into, or performance of, a contract between the data subject and a data controller ;
- (b)
is authorised by Union law to which the controller is subject and which also lays down suitable measures to safeguard the data subject's rights and freedoms and legitimate interests; or
- (c)
is based on the data subject's explicit consent.
- (a)
- 2.
Paragraph 1 shall not apply if the decision:
- (a)
is necessary for entering into, or performance of, a contract between the data subject and the controller;
- (b)
is authorised by Union law, which also lays down suitable measures to safeguard the data subject’s rights and freedoms and legitimate interests; or
- (c)
is based on the data subject’s explicit consent.
- (a)
- 3.
In the cases referred to in points (a) and (c) of paragraph 2, the controller shall implement suitable measures to safeguard the data subject’s rights and freedoms and legitimate interests, at least the right to obtain human intervention on the part of the controller, to express his or her point of view and to contest the decision.
- 4.
Decisions referred to in paragraph 2 of this Article shall not be based on special categories of personal data referred to in Article 10(1), unless point (a) or (g) of Article 10(2) applies and suitable measures to safeguard the data subject’s rights and freedoms and legitimate interests are in place.
Article 24(1)
June Presidency compromise · 10 June
Council wording reconstructed for this provision from the official operation
1. The data subject shall have the right not to be subject to a decision based solely on automated processing, including profiling, which produces legal effects concerning him or her or similarly significantly affects him or her, unless such processing:
is necessary for entering into, or performance of, a contract between the data subject and a data controller ;
is authorised by Union law to which the controller is subject and which also lays down suitable measures to safeguard the data subject's rights and freedoms and legitimate interests; or (c) is based on the data subject's explicit consent.
Article 24(2)
June Presidency compromise · 10 June
Exact provision wording unavailable within a wider Council operation
This provision forms part of a wider Council operation. Its wording is not available separately here; open the official source for the full passage.
Official source passage and amending instruction
in Article 24 paragraphs 1 and 2 are replaced by the following: ‘1. The data subject shall have the right not to be subject to a decision based solely on automated processing, including profiling, which produces legal effects concerning him or her or similarly significantly affects him or her, unless such processing:
is necessary for entering into, or performance of, a contract between the data subject and a data controller ;
is authorised by Union law to which the controller is subject and which also lays down suitable measures to safeguard the data subject's rights and freedoms and legitimate interests; or
is based on the data subject's explicit consent.’
Article in June Presidency compromise · 18 June Council text
Comparison basis: Existing law (23 October 2018) compared with June Presidency compromise · 18 June (18 June 2026)
Article 24
Automated individual decision-making, including profiling
- 1.
The data subject shall have the right not to be subject to a decision based solely on automated processing, including profiling, which produces legal effects concerning him or her or similarly significantly affects him or her
., unless such processing:- (a)
is necessary for entering into, or performance of, a contract between the data subject and a data controller ;
- (b)
is authorised by Union law to which the controller is subject and which also lays down suitable measures to safeguard the data subject's rights and freedoms and legitimate interests; or
- (c)
is based on the data subject's explicit consent.
- (a)
- 2.
Paragraph 1 shall not apply if the decision:- (a)
is necessary for entering into, or performance of, a contract between the data subject and the controller; - (b)
is authorised by Union law, which also lays down suitable measures to safeguard the data subject’s rights and freedoms and legitimate interests; or - (c)
is based on the data subject’s explicit consent.
- (a)
- 3.
In the cases referred to in points (a) and (c) of paragraph 2, the controller shall implement suitable measures to safeguard the data subject’s rights and freedoms and legitimate interests, at least the right to obtain human intervention on the part of the controller, to express his or her point of view and to contest the decision.
- 4.
Decisions referred to in paragraph 2 of this Article shall not be based on special categories of personal data referred to in Article 10(1), unless point (a) or (g) of Article 10(2) applies and suitable measures to safeguard the data subject’s rights and freedoms and legitimate interests are in place.
Article 24(1)
June Presidency compromise · 18 June
Council wording reconstructed for this provision from the official operation
1. The data subject shall have the right not to be subject to a decision based solely on automated processing, including profiling, which produces legal effects concerning him or her or similarly significantly affects him or her, unless such processing:
is necessary for entering into, or performance of, a contract between the data subject and a data controller ;
is authorised by Union law to which the controller is subject and which also lays down suitable measures to safeguard the data subject's rights and freedoms and legitimate interests; or
is based on the data subject's explicit consent.
Article 24(2)
June Presidency compromise · 18 June
The Council draft deletes this provision and supplies no replacement wording. Open the official source to read the instruction in context.
Official source passage and amending instruction
6. in Article 24 is replaced by the following: ‘1. The data subject shall have the right not to be subject to a decision based solely on automated processing, including profiling, which produces legal effects concerning him or her or similarly significantly affects him or her, unless such processing:
is necessary for entering into, or performance of, a contract between the data subject and a data controller ;
is authorised by Union law to which the controller is subject and which also lays down suitable measures to safeguard the data subject's rights and freedoms and legitimate interests; or
is based on the data subject's explicit consent.
In the cases referred to in points (a) and (c) of paragraph 1, the data controller shall implement suitable measures to safeguard the data subject's rights and freedoms and legitimate interests, at least the right to obtain human intervention on the part of the controller, to express his or her point of view and to contest the decision.
Decisions referred to in paragraph 1 shall not be based on special categories of personal data referred to in Article 10(1), unless point (a) or (g) of Article 10(2) applies and suitable measures to safeguard the data subject's rights and freedoms and legitimate interests are in place.’
Article in September Presidency compromise Council text
Comparison basis: Existing law (23 October 2018) compared with September Presidency compromise (3 September 2026)
Article 24
Automated individual decision-making, including profiling
- 1.
The data subject shall have the right not to be subject to a decision based solely on automated processing, including profiling, which produces legal effects concerning him or her or similarly significantly affects him or her
., unless such processing:- (a)
is necessary for entering into, or performance of, a contract between the data subject and a data controller ;
- (b)
is authorised by Union law to which the controller is subject and which also lays down suitable measures to safeguard the data subject's rights and freedoms and legitimate interests; or
- (c)
is based on the data subject's explicit consent.
- (a)
- 2.
ParagraphIn the cases referred to in points (a) and (c) of paragraph 1, the data controller shall implement suitable measures to safeguard the data subject's rights and freedoms and legitimate interests, at least the right to obtain human intervention on the part of the controller, to express his or her point of view and to contest the decision. 3. Decisions referred to in paragraph 1 shall notapplybeifbased on special categories of personal data referred to in Article 10(1), unless point (a) or (g) of Article 10(2) applies and suitable measures to safeguard thedecision:data subject's rights and freedoms and legitimate interests are in place.- (a)
is necessary for entering into, or performance of, a contract between the data subject and the controller; - (b)
is authorised by Union law, which also lays down suitable measures to safeguard the data subject’s rights and freedoms and legitimate interests; or - (c)
is based on the data subject’s explicit consent.
- (a)
- 3.
In the cases referred to in points (a) and (c) of paragraph 2, the controller shall implement suitable measures to safeguard the data subject’s rights and freedoms and legitimate interests, at least the right to obtain human intervention on the part of the controller, to express his or her point of view and to contest the decision.
- 4.
Decisions referred to in paragraph 2 of this Article shall not be based on special categories of personal data referred to in Article 10(1), unless point (a) or (g) of Article 10(2) applies and suitable measures to safeguard the data subject’s rights and freedoms and legitimate interests are in place.
Article 24(1)
September Presidency compromise
Council wording reconstructed for this provision from the official operation
1. The data subject shall have the right not to be subject to a decision based solely on automated processing, including profiling, which produces legal effects concerning him or her or similarly significantly affects him or her, unless such processing: (a) is necessary for entering into, or performance of, a contract between the data subject and a data controller ; (b) is authorised by Union law to which the controller is subject and which also lays down suitable measures to safeguard the data subject's rights and freedoms and legitimate interests; or (c) is based on the data subject's explicit consent.
Official source passage and amending instruction
6. in Article 24 is replaced by the following: ‘1. The data subject shall have the right not to be subject to a decision based solely on automated processing, including profiling, which produces legal effects concerning him or her or similarly significantly affects him or her, unless such processing: (a) is necessary for entering into, or performance of, a contract between the data subject and a data controller ; (b) is authorised by Union law to which the controller is subject and which also lays down suitable measures to safeguard the data subject's rights and freedoms and legitimate interests; or (c) is based on the data subject's explicit consent. 2. In the cases referred to in points (a) and (c) of paragraph 1, the data controller shall implement suitable measures to safeguard the data subject's rights and freedoms and legitimate interests, at least the right to obtain human intervention on the part of the controller, to express his or her point of view and to contest the decision. 3. Decisions referred to in paragraph 1 shall not be based on special categories of personal data referred to in Article 10(1), unless point (a) or (g) of Article 10(2) applies and suitable measures to safeguard the data subject's rights and freedoms and legitimate interests are in place.’
Article 24(2)
September Presidency compromise
Council wording reconstructed for this provision from the official operation
2. In the cases referred to in points (a) and (c) of paragraph 1, the data controller shall implement suitable measures to safeguard the data subject's rights and freedoms and legitimate interests, at least the right to obtain human intervention on the part of the controller, to express his or her point of view and to contest the decision. 3. Decisions referred to in paragraph 1 shall not be based on special categories of personal data referred to in Article 10(1), unless point (a) or (g) of Article 10(2) applies and suitable measures to safeguard the data subject's rights and freedoms and legitimate interests are in place.
Official source passage and amending instruction
6. in Article 24 is replaced by the following: ‘1. The data subject shall have the right not to be subject to a decision based solely on automated processing, including profiling, which produces legal effects concerning him or her or similarly significantly affects him or her, unless such processing: (a) is necessary for entering into, or performance of, a contract between the data subject and a data controller ; (b) is authorised by Union law to which the controller is subject and which also lays down suitable measures to safeguard the data subject's rights and freedoms and legitimate interests; or (c) is based on the data subject's explicit consent. 2. In the cases referred to in points (a) and (c) of paragraph 1, the data controller shall implement suitable measures to safeguard the data subject's rights and freedoms and legitimate interests, at least the right to obtain human intervention on the part of the controller, to express his or her point of view and to contest the decision. 3. Decisions referred to in paragraph 1 shall not be based on special categories of personal data referred to in Article 10(1), unless point (a) or (g) of Article 10(2) applies and suitable measures to safeguard the data subject's rights and freedoms and legitimate interests are in place.’
Article 24(1) 3 Council drafts
Article 24(1)
10 June 2026 · June Presidency compromise · 10 June
Council wording reconstructed for this provision from the official operation
1. The data subject shall have the right not to be subject to a decision based solely on automated processing, including profiling, which produces legal effects concerning him or her or similarly significantly affects him or her, unless such processing:
is necessary for entering into, or performance of, a contract between the data subject and a data controller ;
is authorised by Union law to which the controller is subject and which also lays down suitable measures to safeguard the data subject's rights and freedoms and legitimate interests; or (c) is based on the data subject's explicit consent.
Article 24(1)
18 June 2026 · June Presidency compromise · 18 June
Council wording reconstructed for this provision from the official operation
1. The data subject shall have the right not to be subject to a decision based solely on automated processing, including profiling, which produces legal effects concerning him or her or similarly significantly affects him or her, unless such processing:
is necessary for entering into, or performance of, a contract between the data subject and a data controller ;
is authorised by Union law to which the controller is subject and which also lays down suitable measures to safeguard the data subject's rights and freedoms and legitimate interests; or
is based on the data subject's explicit consent.
Article 24(1)
3 September 2026 · September Presidency compromise
Council wording reconstructed for this provision from the official operation
1. The data subject shall have the right not to be subject to a decision based solely on automated processing, including profiling, which produces legal effects concerning him or her or similarly significantly affects him or her, unless such processing: (a) is necessary for entering into, or performance of, a contract between the data subject and a data controller ; (b) is authorised by Union law to which the controller is subject and which also lays down suitable measures to safeguard the data subject's rights and freedoms and legitimate interests; or (c) is based on the data subject's explicit consent.
Official source passage and amending instruction
6. in Article 24 is replaced by the following: ‘1. The data subject shall have the right not to be subject to a decision based solely on automated processing, including profiling, which produces legal effects concerning him or her or similarly significantly affects him or her, unless such processing: (a) is necessary for entering into, or performance of, a contract between the data subject and a data controller ; (b) is authorised by Union law to which the controller is subject and which also lays down suitable measures to safeguard the data subject's rights and freedoms and legitimate interests; or (c) is based on the data subject's explicit consent. 2. In the cases referred to in points (a) and (c) of paragraph 1, the data controller shall implement suitable measures to safeguard the data subject's rights and freedoms and legitimate interests, at least the right to obtain human intervention on the part of the controller, to express his or her point of view and to contest the decision. 3. Decisions referred to in paragraph 1 shall not be based on special categories of personal data referred to in Article 10(1), unless point (a) or (g) of Article 10(2) applies and suitable measures to safeguard the data subject's rights and freedoms and legitimate interests are in place.’
Article 24(2) 3 Council drafts
Article 24(2)
10 June 2026 · June Presidency compromise · 10 June
Exact provision wording unavailable within a wider Council operation
This provision forms part of a wider Council operation. Its wording is not available separately here; open the official source for the full passage.
Official source passage and amending instruction
in Article 24 paragraphs 1 and 2 are replaced by the following: ‘1. The data subject shall have the right not to be subject to a decision based solely on automated processing, including profiling, which produces legal effects concerning him or her or similarly significantly affects him or her, unless such processing:
is necessary for entering into, or performance of, a contract between the data subject and a data controller ;
is authorised by Union law to which the controller is subject and which also lays down suitable measures to safeguard the data subject's rights and freedoms and legitimate interests; or
is based on the data subject's explicit consent.’
Article 24(2)
18 June 2026 · June Presidency compromise · 18 June
The Council draft deletes this provision and supplies no replacement wording. Open the official source to read the instruction in context.
Official source passage and amending instruction
6. in Article 24 is replaced by the following: ‘1. The data subject shall have the right not to be subject to a decision based solely on automated processing, including profiling, which produces legal effects concerning him or her or similarly significantly affects him or her, unless such processing:
is necessary for entering into, or performance of, a contract between the data subject and a data controller ;
is authorised by Union law to which the controller is subject and which also lays down suitable measures to safeguard the data subject's rights and freedoms and legitimate interests; or
is based on the data subject's explicit consent.
In the cases referred to in points (a) and (c) of paragraph 1, the data controller shall implement suitable measures to safeguard the data subject's rights and freedoms and legitimate interests, at least the right to obtain human intervention on the part of the controller, to express his or her point of view and to contest the decision.
Decisions referred to in paragraph 1 shall not be based on special categories of personal data referred to in Article 10(1), unless point (a) or (g) of Article 10(2) applies and suitable measures to safeguard the data subject's rights and freedoms and legitimate interests are in place.’
Article 24(2)
3 September 2026 · September Presidency compromise
Council wording reconstructed for this provision from the official operation
2. In the cases referred to in points (a) and (c) of paragraph 1, the data controller shall implement suitable measures to safeguard the data subject's rights and freedoms and legitimate interests, at least the right to obtain human intervention on the part of the controller, to express his or her point of view and to contest the decision. 3. Decisions referred to in paragraph 1 shall not be based on special categories of personal data referred to in Article 10(1), unless point (a) or (g) of Article 10(2) applies and suitable measures to safeguard the data subject's rights and freedoms and legitimate interests are in place.
Official source passage and amending instruction
6. in Article 24 is replaced by the following: ‘1. The data subject shall have the right not to be subject to a decision based solely on automated processing, including profiling, which produces legal effects concerning him or her or similarly significantly affects him or her, unless such processing: (a) is necessary for entering into, or performance of, a contract between the data subject and a data controller ; (b) is authorised by Union law to which the controller is subject and which also lays down suitable measures to safeguard the data subject's rights and freedoms and legitimate interests; or (c) is based on the data subject's explicit consent. 2. In the cases referred to in points (a) and (c) of paragraph 1, the data controller shall implement suitable measures to safeguard the data subject's rights and freedoms and legitimate interests, at least the right to obtain human intervention on the part of the controller, to express his or her point of view and to contest the decision. 3. Decisions referred to in paragraph 1 shall not be based on special categories of personal data referred to in Article 10(1), unless point (a) or (g) of Article 10(2) applies and suitable measures to safeguard the data subject's rights and freedoms and legitimate interests are in place.’
Competing proposals
European Parliament amendments
These are alternative tabled amendments. An amendment affecting several tracked parts appears once here, with each target identified.
More filters
Political group at the amendment date where available; otherwise the current Parliament affiliation.
Alternative wording Amendment 72 ITRE–LIBE draft report · Aura Salla and Marina Kaljurand (rapporteurs)
against:
Article 24
Automated individual decision-making, including profiling
- 1.
The data subject shall have the right not to be subject to a decision based solely on automated processing, including profiling, which produces legal effects concerning
himthem orher orthat similarly significantly affectshimthem,orunlessher.such processing:- (a)
is necessary for entering into, or performance of, a contract between the data subject and a data controller regardless of whether the decision could be taken otherwise than by solely automated means;
- (b)
is authorised by Union law to which the controller is subject and which lays down suitable measures to safeguard the data subject's rights and freedoms and legitimate interests; or
- (c)
is based on the data subject's explicit consent.
- (a)
- 2.
Paragraph 1 shall not apply if the decision:- (a)
is necessary for entering into, or performance of, a contract between the data subject and the controller; - (b)
is authorised by Union law, which also lays down suitable measures to safeguard the data subject’s rights and freedoms and legitimate interests; or - (c)
is based on the data subject’s explicit consent.
- (a)
- 3.
In the cases referred to in points (a) and (c) of paragraph 2, the controller shall implement suitable measures to safeguard the data subject’s rights and freedoms and legitimate interests, at least the right to obtain human intervention on the part of the controller, to express his or her point of view and to contest the decision.
- 4.
Decisions referred to in paragraph 2 of this Article shall not be based on special categories of personal data referred to in Article 10(1), unless point (a) or (g) of Article 10(2) applies and suitable measures to safeguard the data subject’s rights and freedoms and legitimate interests are in place.
Article 24
Automated individual decision-making, including profiling
- 1.
A decision which produces legal effects for aThe data subjectorshallsimilarlyhavesignificantlytheaffectsrighthimnotor her mayto be subject to a decision based solely on automated processing, including profiling,onlywhichwhereproduces legal effects concerning them or thatdecisionsimilarly significantly affects them, unless such processing:- (a)
is necessary for entering into, or performance of, a contract between the data subject and a data controller regardless of whether the decision could be taken otherwise than by solely automated means;
- (b)
is authorised by Union law to which the controller is subject and which also lays down suitable measures to safeguard the data subject's rights and freedoms and legitimate interests; or
- (c)
is based on the data subject's explicit consent.
- (a)
- 3.
In the cases referred to in points (a) and (c) of paragraph 2, the controller shall implement suitable measures to safeguard the data subject’s rights and freedoms and legitimate interests, at least the right to obtain human intervention on the part of the controller, to express his or her point of view and to contest the decision.
- 4.
Decisions referred to in paragraph 2 of this Article shall not be based on special categories of personal data referred to in Article 10(1), unless point (a) or (g) of Article 10(2) applies and suitable measures to safeguard the data subject’s rights and freedoms and legitimate interests are in place.
Alternative wording Amendment 73 ITRE–LIBE draft report · Aura Salla and Marina Kaljurand (rapporteurs)
against:
Article 24
Automated individual decision-making, including profiling
- 1.
The data subject shall have the right not to be subject to a decision based solely on automated processing, including profiling, which produces legal effects concerning
himthem orher orthat similarly significantly affectshimthem,orunlessher.such processing:- (a)
is necessary for entering into, or performance of, a contract between the data subject and a data controller regardless of whether the decision could be taken otherwise than by solely automated means;
- (b)
is authorised by Union law to which the controller is subject and which lays down suitable measures to safeguard the data subject's rights and freedoms and legitimate interests; or
- (c)
is based on the data subject's explicit consent.
- (a)
- 2.
Paragraph 1 shall not apply if the decision:- (a)
is necessary for entering into, or performance of, a contract between the data subject and the controller; - (b)
is authorised by Union law, which also lays down suitable measures to safeguard the data subject’s rights and freedoms and legitimate interests; or - (c)
is based on the data subject’s explicit consent.
- (a)
- 3.
In the cases referred to in points (a) and (c) of paragraph 2, the controller shall implement suitable measures to safeguard the data subject’s rights and freedoms and legitimate interests, at least the right to obtain human intervention on the part of the controller, to express his or her point of view and to contest the decision.
- 4.
Decisions referred to in paragraph 2 of this Article shall not be based on special categories of personal data referred to in Article 10(1), unless point (a) or (g) of Article 10(2) applies and suitable measures to safeguard the data subject’s rights and freedoms and legitimate interests are in place.
Article 24
Automated individual decision-making, including profiling
- 1.
A decision which produces legal effects for a data subject or similarly significantly affects him or her may be based solely on automated processing, including profiling, only where that decision:
- (a)
is necessary for entering into, or performance of, a contract between the data subject and a data controller regardless of whether the decision could be taken otherwise than by solely automated means;
- (b)
is authorised by Union law to which the controller is subject and which
alsolays down suitable measures to safeguard the data subject's rights and freedoms and legitimate interests; or - (c)
is based on the data subject's explicit consent.
- (a)
- 3.
In the cases referred to in points (a) and (c) of paragraph 2, the controller shall implement suitable measures to safeguard the data subject’s rights and freedoms and legitimate interests, at least the right to obtain human intervention on the part of the controller, to express his or her point of view and to contest the decision.
- 4.
Decisions referred to in paragraph 2 of this Article shall not be based on special categories of personal data referred to in Article 10(1), unless point (a) or (g) of Article 10(2) applies and suitable measures to safeguard the data subject’s rights and freedoms and legitimate interests are in place.
Additional proposed wording Amendment 492 · Virginie Joron IMCO
If a decision referred to in paragraph 1 is based on the outputs of a high-risk AI system within the meaning of Regulation (EU) 2024/1689, the safeguards accompanying this decision shall not affect the human oversight requirements imposed in Article 14 of this Regulation. In particular, the natural persons responsible for human oversight must be able to understand properly the system’s capabilities and limitations, to interpret correctly its outputs, to remain aware of the risk of over-reliance on these outputs, and to decide not to use the system or not to take its outputs into consideration, to override them or to invalidate them. Automated processing shall not deprive the data subject of the right to seek human intervention, express personal views and contest the decision.
against:
Article 24
Automated individual decision-making, including profiling
- 1.
A decision which produces legal effects for a data subject or similarly significantly affects him or her may be based solely on automated processing, including profiling, only where that decision:
- (a)
is necessary for entering into, or performance of, a contract between the data subject and a data controller regardless of whether the decision could be taken otherwise than by solely automated means;
- (b)
is authorised by Union law to which the controller is subject and which also lays down suitable measures to safeguard the data subject's rights and freedoms and legitimate interests; or
- (c)
is based on the data subject's explicit consent.
- (a)
- 1a.
If a decision referred to in paragraph 1 is based on the outputs of a high-risk AI system within the meaning of Regulation (EU) 2024/1689, the safeguards accompanying this decision shall not affect the human oversight requirements imposed in Article 14 of this Regulation. In particular, the natural persons responsible for human oversight must be able to understand properly the system’s capabilities and limitations, to interpret correctly its outputs, to remain aware of the risk of over-reliance on these outputs, and to decide not to use the system or not to take its outputs into consideration, to override them or to invalidate them. Automated processing shall not deprive the data subject of the right to seek human intervention, express personal views and contest the decision.
- 3.
In the cases referred to in points (a) and (c) of paragraph 2, the controller shall implement suitable measures to safeguard the data subject’s rights and freedoms and legitimate interests, at least the right to obtain human intervention on the part of the controller, to express his or her point of view and to contest the decision.
- 4.
Decisions referred to in paragraph 2 of this Article shall not be based on special categories of personal data referred to in Article 10(1), unless point (a) or (g) of Article 10(2) applies and suitable measures to safeguard the data subject’s rights and freedoms and legitimate interests are in place.
Remove proposed wording Amendment 1661 · Pernando Barrena Arza, João Oliveira ITRE · LIBE
against:
Article 24
Automated individual decision-making, including profiling
- 1.
A decision which produces legal effects for aThe data subjectorshallsimilarlyhavesignificantlytheaffectsrighthimnotor her mayto be subject to a decision based solely on automated processing, including profiling,onlywhichwhereproducesthatlegaldecision:effects concerning him or her or similarly significantly affects him or her.- (a)
is necessary for entering into, or performance of, a contract between the data subject and a data controller regardless of whether the decision could be taken otherwise than by solely automated means; - (b)
is authorised by Union law to which the controller is subject and which also lays down suitable measures to safeguard the data subject's rights and freedoms and legitimate interests; or - (c)
is based on the data subject's explicit consent.
- (a)
- 3.
In the cases referred to in points (a) and (c) of paragraph 2, the controller shall implement suitable measures to safeguard the data subject’s rights and freedoms and legitimate interests, at least the right to obtain human intervention on the part of the controller, to express his or her point of view and to contest the decision.
- 4.
Decisions referred to in paragraph 2 of this Article shall not be based on special categories of personal data referred to in Article 10(1), unless point (a) or (g) of Article 10(2) applies and suitable measures to safeguard the data subject’s rights and freedoms and legitimate interests are in place.
Alternative wording Amendment 1663 · Irena Joveva, Michael McNamara, Raquel García Hermida-Van Der Walle, Oihane Agirregoitia Martínez, Veronika Cifrová Ostrihoňová, Fabienne Keller ITRE · LIBE
against:
Article 24
Automated individual decision-making, including profiling
- 1.
A decision which produces legal effects for aThe data subjectorshallsimilarlyhavesignificantlytheaffectsrighthimnotor her mayto be subject to a decision based solely on automated processing, including profiling,onlywhichwhereproducesthatlegaldecisionaffect concerning them or similarly significantly affects them, unless such processing:- (a)
is necessary for entering into, or performance of, a contract between the data subject and a data controller regardless of whether the decision could be taken otherwise than by solely automated means;
- (b)
is authorised by Union law to which the controller is subject and which also lays down suitable measures to safeguard the data subject's rights and freedoms and legitimate interests; or
- (c)
is based on the data subject's explicit consent.
- (a)
- 3.
In the cases referred to in points (a) and (c) of paragraph 2, the controller shall implement suitable measures to safeguard the data subject’s rights and freedoms and legitimate interests, at least the right to obtain human intervention on the part of the controller, to express his or her point of view and to contest the decision.
- 4.
Decisions referred to in paragraph 2 of this Article shall not be based on special categories of personal data referred to in Article 10(1), unless point (a) or (g) of Article 10(2) applies and suitable measures to safeguard the data subject’s rights and freedoms and legitimate interests are in place.
Alternative wording Amendment 1664 · Sebastian Tynkkynen, Diego Solier ITRE · LIBE
against:
Article 24
Automated individual decision-making, including profiling
- 1.
A decision which produces legal effects for a data subject or similarly significantly affects him or her may be based solely on automated processing, including profiling, only where that decision:
- (a)
is necessary for entering into, or performance of, a contract between the data subject and a data controller regardless of whether the decision could be taken otherwise than by solely automated means, when several equally effective automated processing solutions exist, the controller should use the less intrusive one when it does not result in a significant additional administrative burden for the controller;
- (b)
is authorised by Union law to which the controller is subject and which also lays down suitable measures to safeguard the data subject's rights and freedoms and legitimate interests; or
- (c)
is based on the data subject's explicit consent.
- (a)
- 3.
In the cases referred to in points (a) and (c) of paragraph 2, the controller shall implement suitable measures to safeguard the data subject’s rights and freedoms and legitimate interests, at least the right to obtain human intervention on the part of the controller, to express his or her point of view and to contest the decision.
- 4.
Decisions referred to in paragraph 2 of this Article shall not be based on special categories of personal data referred to in Article 10(1), unless point (a) or (g) of Article 10(2) applies and suitable measures to safeguard the data subject’s rights and freedoms and legitimate interests are in place.
Alternative wording Amendment 1665 · Irena Joveva, Michael McNamara, Raquel García Hermida-Van Der Walle, Oihane Agirregoitia Martínez, Veronika Cifrová Ostrihoňová, Fabienne Keller ITRE · LIBE
against:
Article 24
Automated individual decision-making, including profiling
- 1.
A decision which produces legal effects for a data subject or similarly significantly affects him or her may be based solely on automated processing, including profiling, only where that decision:
- (a)
is necessary for entering into, or performance of, a contract between the data subject and a data controller
regardless(b)ofiswhetherauthorised by Union law to which thedecisioncontrollercouldisbesubjecttakenandotherwisewhichthanalsobylayssolelydownautomatedsuitablemeansmeasures to safeguard the data subject's rights and freedoms and legitimate interests; or - (b)
is authorised by Union law to which the controller is subject and which also lays down suitable measures to safeguard the data subject's rights and freedoms and legitimate interests; or - (c)
is based on the data subject's explicit consent.
- (a)
- 3.
In the cases referred to in points (a) and (c) of paragraph 2, the controller shall implement suitable measures to safeguard the data subject’s rights and freedoms and legitimate interests, at least the right to obtain human intervention on the part of the controller, to express his or her point of view and to contest the decision.
- 4.
Decisions referred to in paragraph 2 of this Article shall not be based on special categories of personal data referred to in Article 10(1), unless point (a) or (g) of Article 10(2) applies and suitable measures to safeguard the data subject’s rights and freedoms and legitimate interests are in place.
Alternative wording Amendment 1666 · Marina Kaljurand, Elena Sancho Murillo, Brando Benifei, Birgit Sippel, Alex Agius Saliba, Francisco Assis, Elisabeth Grossmann, Kristian Vigenin, Matjaž Nemec ITRE · LIBE
against:
Article 24
Automated individual decision-making, including profiling
- 1.
A decision which produces legal effects for a data subject or similarly significantly affects him or her may be based solely on automated processing, including profiling, only where that decision:
- (a)
is necessary for entering into, or performance of, a contract between the data subject and a data controller
regardless of whether the decision could be taken otherwise than by solely automated means; - (b)
is authorised by Union law to which the controller is subject and which also lays down suitable measures to safeguard the data subject's rights and freedoms and legitimate interests; or
- (c)
is based on the data subject's explicit consent.
- (a)
- 3.
In the cases referred to in points (a) and (c) of paragraph 2, the controller shall implement suitable measures to safeguard the data subject’s rights and freedoms and legitimate interests, at least the right to obtain human intervention on the part of the controller, to express his or her point of view and to contest the decision.
- 4.
Decisions referred to in paragraph 2 of this Article shall not be based on special categories of personal data referred to in Article 10(1), unless point (a) or (g) of Article 10(2) applies and suitable measures to safeguard the data subject’s rights and freedoms and legitimate interests are in place.
Additional proposed wording Amendment 1668 · Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pierre-Romain Thionnet, Alexandre Varaut, Fabrice Leggeri, Marion Maréchal, Christophe Bay ITRE · LIBE
1a. In Article 24, the following paragraph is inserted:
Where a decision referred to in paragraph 1 is based on the output of a high-risk AI system within the meaning of Regulation (EU) 2024/1689, the safeguards accompanying that decision shall be without prejudice to the human oversight requirements laid down in Article 14 of that Regulation. In particular, natural persons to whom human oversight is assigned shall be enabled to properly understand the capacities and limitations of the system, to correctly interpret its output, to remain aware of the risk of over-reliance on that output, and to decide not to use the system or to disregard, override or reverse its output. Automated processing shall not deprive the data subject of the right to obtain human intervention, to express his or her point of view and to contest the decision.'
against:
Article 24
Automated individual decision-making, including profiling
- 1.
A decision which produces legal effects for a data subject or similarly significantly affects him or her may be based solely on automated processing, including profiling, only where that decision:
- (a)
is necessary for entering into, or performance of, a contract between the data subject and a data controller regardless of whether the decision could be taken otherwise than by solely automated means;
- (b)
is authorised by Union law to which the controller is subject and which also lays down suitable measures to safeguard the data subject's rights and freedoms and legitimate interests; or
- (c)
is based on the data subject's explicit consent.
- (a)
- 1a.
Where a decision referred to in paragraph 1 is based on the output of a high-risk AI system within the meaning of Regulation (EU) 2024/1689, the safeguards accompanying that decision shall be without prejudice to the human oversight requirements laid down in Article 14 of that Regulation. In particular, natural persons to whom human oversight is assigned shall be enabled to properly understand the capacities and limitations of the system, to correctly interpret its output, to remain aware of the risk of over-reliance on that output, and to decide not to use the system or to disregard, override or reverse its output. Automated processing shall not deprive the data subject of the right to obtain human intervention, to express his or her point of view and to contest the decision.'
- 3.
In the cases referred to in points (a) and (c) of paragraph 2, the controller shall implement suitable measures to safeguard the data subject’s rights and freedoms and legitimate interests, at least the right to obtain human intervention on the part of the controller, to express his or her point of view and to contest the decision.
- 4.
Decisions referred to in paragraph 2 of this Article shall not be based on special categories of personal data referred to in Article 10(1), unless point (a) or (g) of Article 10(2) applies and suitable measures to safeguard the data subject’s rights and freedoms and legitimate interests are in place.
Additional proposed wording Amendment 1669 · Irena Joveva, Michael McNamara, Raquel García Hermida-Van Der Walle, Oihane Agirregoitia Martínez, Veronika Cifrová Ostrihoňová, Fabienne Keller ITRE · LIBE
1a. In Article 24, the following paragraph is inserted:
In the cases referred to in points (a), (b) and (c) of paragraph 1, the data controller shall implement suitable technical and organisational measures to safeguard the data subject's rights and freedoms and legitimate interests, at least the right to obtain genuine human intervention of the part of the controller, to express his or her point of view and to contest the decision. The human reveiwer designated to perform such intervention shall possess the necessary competance, knowledge to understand all revelant underlining data, and shall be empowered to modify or overide the decision without delay.'
against:
Article 24
Automated individual decision-making, including profiling
- 1.
A decision which produces legal effects for a data subject or similarly significantly affects him or her may be based solely on automated processing, including profiling, only where that decision:
- (a)
is necessary for entering into, or performance of, a contract between the data subject and a data controller regardless of whether the decision could be taken otherwise than by solely automated means;
- (b)
is authorised by Union law to which the controller is subject and which also lays down suitable measures to safeguard the data subject's rights and freedoms and legitimate interests; or
- (c)
is based on the data subject's explicit consent.
- (a)
- 1a.
In the cases referred to in points (a), (b) and (c) of paragraph 1, the data controller shall implement suitable technical and organisational measures to safeguard the data subject's rights and freedoms and legitimate interests, at least the right to obtain genuine human intervention of the part of the controller, to express his or her point of view and to contest the decision. The human reveiwer designated to perform such intervention shall possess the necessary competance, knowledge to understand all revelant underlining data, and shall be empowered to modify or overide the decision without delay.'
- 3.
In the cases referred to in points (a) and (c) of paragraph 2, the controller shall implement suitable measures to safeguard the data subject’s rights and freedoms and legitimate interests, at least the right to obtain human intervention on the part of the controller, to express his or her point of view and to contest the decision.
- 4.
Decisions referred to in paragraph 2 of this Article shall not be based on special categories of personal data referred to in Article 10(1), unless point (a) or (g) of Article 10(2) applies and suitable measures to safeguard the data subject’s rights and freedoms and legitimate interests are in place.
Additional proposed wording Amendment 1670 · Irena Joveva, Michael McNamara, Raquel García Hermida-Van Der Walle, Oihane Agirregoitia Martínez, Veronika Cifrová Ostrihoňová, Fabienne Keller ITRE · LIBE
1c. In Article 24, the following paragraph is inserted:
Decisions referred to in paragraph 1 shall not be based on special categories of personal data referred to in Article 9(1), unless point (a) or (g) of Article 9(2) applies and suitable technical and organisational measures to safeguard the data subject's rights and freedoms and legitimate interests are in place.'
against:
Article 24
Automated individual decision-making, including profiling
- 1.
A decision which produces legal effects for a data subject or similarly significantly affects him or her may be based solely on automated processing, including profiling, only where that decision:
- (a)
is necessary for entering into, or performance of, a contract between the data subject and a data controller regardless of whether the decision could be taken otherwise than by solely automated means;
- (b)
is authorised by Union law to which the controller is subject and which also lays down suitable measures to safeguard the data subject's rights and freedoms and legitimate interests; or
- (c)
is based on the data subject's explicit consent.
- (a)
- 1c.
Decisions referred to in paragraph 1 shall not be based on special categories of personal data referred to in Article 9(1), unless point (a) or (g) of Article 9(2) applies and suitable technical and organisational measures to safeguard the data subject's rights and freedoms and legitimate interests are in place.'
- 3.
In the cases referred to in points (a) and (c) of paragraph 2, the controller shall implement suitable measures to safeguard the data subject’s rights and freedoms and legitimate interests, at least the right to obtain human intervention on the part of the controller, to express his or her point of view and to contest the decision.
- 4.
Decisions referred to in paragraph 2 of this Article shall not be based on special categories of personal data referred to in Article 10(1), unless point (a) or (g) of Article 10(2) applies and suitable measures to safeguard the data subject’s rights and freedoms and legitimate interests are in place.
No amendments match these filters.
Selected texts
Compare wording
Choose a tracked part and a named pair of texts. Comparisons are offered only where both sides cover the same legal unit.
Select a specific tracked part above to compare wording.
No same-scope comparison is available for this tracked part. Its source wording remains available in the article text sections.
Article 24(1)
European Commission proposal → Council Presidency text · ST 10426/26
Changes in context
RemovedAdded
Both texts in full
European Commission proposal
Council Presidency text · ST 10426/26
Article 24(1)
Council Presidency text · ST 10426/26 → Council Presidency text · ST 10677/26
Changes in context
RemovedAdded
Both texts in full
Council Presidency text · ST 10426/26
Council Presidency text · ST 10677/26
Article 24(1)
Council Presidency text · ST 10677/26 → Council Presidency text · ST 12535/26
Changes in context
RemovedAdded
Both texts in full
Council Presidency text · ST 10677/26
Council Presidency text · ST 12535/26
Article 24(1)
Wording reproduced in the amendment → Amendment 1661 · ITRE–LIBE amendments 1565–1740 to the draft report: removal
Changes in context
RemovedAdded
Both texts in full
Wording reproduced in the amendment
Amendment 1661 · ITRE–LIBE amendments 1565–1740 to the draft report: removal
This wording is removed.
Article 24(1)
Wording reproduced in the amendment → Amendment 1663 · ITRE–LIBE amendments 1565–1740 to the draft report
Changes in context
RemovedAdded
Both texts in full
Wording reproduced in the amendment
Amendment 1663 · ITRE–LIBE amendments 1565–1740 to the draft report
Article 24(1)
Wording reproduced in the amendment → Amendment 1664 · ITRE–LIBE amendments 1565–1740 to the draft report
Changes in context
RemovedAdded
Both texts in full
Wording reproduced in the amendment
Amendment 1664 · ITRE–LIBE amendments 1565–1740 to the draft report
Article 24(1)
Wording reproduced in the amendment → Amendment 1665 · ITRE–LIBE amendments 1565–1740 to the draft report
Changes in context
RemovedAdded
Both texts in full
Wording reproduced in the amendment
Amendment 1665 · ITRE–LIBE amendments 1565–1740 to the draft report
Article 24(1)
Wording reproduced in the amendment → Amendment 1666 · ITRE–LIBE amendments 1565–1740 to the draft report
Changes in context
RemovedAdded
Both texts in full
Wording reproduced in the amendment
Amendment 1666 · ITRE–LIBE amendments 1565–1740 to the draft report
Article 24(1)
Wording reproduced in the amendment → Amendment 72 · ITRE–LIBE draft report · Aura Salla and Marina Kaljurand (rapporteurs)
Changes in context
RemovedAdded
Both texts in full
Wording reproduced in the amendment
Amendment 72 · ITRE–LIBE draft report · Aura Salla and Marina Kaljurand (rapporteurs)
Article 24(1)
Wording reproduced in the amendment → Amendment 73 · ITRE–LIBE draft report · Aura Salla and Marina Kaljurand (rapporteurs)
Changes in context
RemovedAdded